Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
|
#2
Posted to alt.home.repair,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
Cyprus haircut (was: OT Never in America?)
harry wrote:
Government to take 10% of everyone's money. (Cyprus deposit confiscation) Yea, I've been following that on zerohedge since sunday morning. I reconfigured some forex positions before the pre-market open in Asia on Sunday afternoon, and by sunday evening had made a few thousand dollars. You can be assured that 99% of Americans have no idea what happened in Syprus - let alone even knowing where it is on a map. Lots of Russian mafia money tied up in Cyprus - along with civillian money from UK and Germany. Yea - something like that is probably going to happen in the US about a year from now. |
#3
Posted to alt.home.repair,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
Cyprus haircut (was: OT Never in America?)
In Home Guy wrote:
Yea - something like that is probably going to happen in the US about a year from now. Well, why not? What's the real difference between the government seizing a chunk of your savings and seizing a chunk of your income? The various governments have long claimed first dibs on your money and property, if not outright ownership. [Followups set to something vaguely appropriate] -- St. Paul, MN |
#4
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On 3/18/2013 11:04 AM, harry wrote:
Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...92G03I20130317 One of the reasons the founding fathers gave us the 2nd amendment |
#5
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:52:35 -0400, Frank
wrote: On 3/18/2013 11:04 AM, harry wrote: Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...92G03I20130317 One of the reasons the founding fathers gave us the 2nd amendment Good one Frank! They now have a European Union sponsored bank robbery...got the government they voted for. |
#6
Posted to alt.home.repair,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
Cyprus haircut
On 3/18/2013 11:19 AM, Home Guy wrote:
harry wrote: Government to take 10% of everyone's money. (Cyprus deposit confiscation) Yea, I've been following that on zerohedge since sunday morning. I reconfigured some forex positions before the pre-market open in Asia on Sunday afternoon, and by sunday evening had made a few thousand dollars. You can be assured that 99% of Americans have no idea what happened in Syprus - let alone even knowing where it is on a map. Lots of Russian mafia money tied up in Cyprus - along with civillian money from UK and Germany. Yea - something like that is probably going to happen in the US about a year from now. They already have been doing that for decades every April. -- Bill In Hamptonburg, NY In the Original Orange County (est. 1683) To Email, remove the double zeros after @ |
#7
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cyprus haircut (was: OT Never in America?)
On Monday, March 18, 2013 8:19:09 AM UTC-7, Home Guy wrote:
harry wrote: Government to take 10% of everyone's money. (Cyprus deposit confiscation) Yea, I've been following that on zerohedge since sunday morning. I reconfigured some forex positions before the pre-market open in Asia on Sunday afternoon, and by sunday evening had made a few thousand dollars. How did you do when Bernanke planned on driving US interest rates to zero? Prove it. Even PIMCO got that one wrong. You can be assured that 99% of Americans have no idea what happened in Syprus - Syrup? Citrus? Old Spice? Sy-ops? Snaggle Puss? Cypress? let alone even knowing where it is on a map. Lots of Russian mafia money tied up in Cyprus - along with civillian money from UK and Germany. Cypress is just another example of why the Euro was a bad idea. Countries adopted the Euro mostly because they were fiscally irresponsible in the first place and didn't want to clamp down on wasteful spending and inflation because of the risks to incumbent politicians. So by switching their currencies to the Euro they essentially handed over their economies to Germany. |
#8
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Monday 18 March 2013 18:02 Oren wrote in alt.home.repair:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:52:35 -0400, Frank wrote: On 3/18/2013 11:04 AM, harry wrote: Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...us-parliament- idUSBRE92G03I20130317 One of the reasons the founding fathers gave us the 2nd amendment Good one Frank! They now have a European Union sponsored bank robbery...got the government they voted for. "They" might have, assuming you mean Cyprus. We (UK) did not get a sodding vote. We had a vote on the EEC in 1975 which was nothing like the EU - and few punters imagined the EU in its present form: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_... erendum,_1975 Archbishop Makarios III will be spinning in his grave - still, I suppose they could strap some magnets on him and have an energy export to rival Russian gas. -- Tim Watts Personal Blog: http://squiddy.blog.dionic.net/ http://www.sensorly.com/ Crowd mapping of 2G/3G/4G mobile signal coverage |
#10
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On 3/18/2013 10:04 AM, harry wrote:
Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...92G03I20130317 In America, we do it in the form of taxpayer subsidies. Per Bloomberg: .. . . what if we told you that, by our calculations, the largest U.S. banks aren’t really profitable at all? What if the billions of dollars they allegedly earn for their shareholders were almost entirely a gift from U.S. taxpayers? .. . . To put the figure in perspective, it’s tantamount to the government giving the banks about 3 cents of every tax dollar collected. Full article at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...n-a-year-.html |
#11
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On 03/18/13 02:35 pm, Tim Watts wrote:
They now have a European Union sponsored bank robbery...got the government they voted for. "They" might have, assuming you mean Cyprus. We (UK) did not get a sodding vote. We had a vote on the EEC in 1975 which was nothing like the EU - and few punters imagined the EU in its present form: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_... erendum,_1975 My late parents -- and I wonder how many more Brits beside -- were totally opposed to the Common Market but could not bring themselves to vote for the party that opposed UK membership in the Common Market and kept voting for the party that was in favor of the UK joining. They then kept complaining about Brussels this and Brussels that. Perce |
#12
Posted to alt.home.repair,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
Cyprus haircut
willshak wrote:
Yea - something like that is probably going to happen in the US about a year from now. They already have been doing that for decades every April. Nah, that's not it. Every Friday is "Bank Closing Day" in the US. That's when several black SUV's with tinted windows roll up to a bank on a friday afternoon, and a dozen men in black suits and sunglasses come out, carrying briefcases, and rush into the bank and kick all the customers out. The last guy locks the doors and puts out the "bank closed" sign. The bank may or may not open the following Monday - under a different name. Accounts over $100k (or is it $250k?) are screwed. And when the FDIC goes bankrupt, you will experience banking - Cyprus Style. |
#13
Posted to alt.home.repair,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
Cyprus haircut (was: OT Never in America?)
|
#14
Posted to alt.home.repair,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
Cyprus haircut (was: OT Never in America?)
Han used improper usenet message-composition style by unnecessarily
full-quoting: Cyprus seems to be an even more special case because it is (it seems) a haven for dubious moneys to get laundered lily-white. Mostly Russian, The analogy that I've heard goes as follows: Americans would be ****ed if their tax dollars were used to bail out a Texas bank (and by extension the account holders of the bank) that held significant deposits sourced from Mexican drug cartels. Why were the Cypriot banks going bankrupt? They seemed to be heavily invested in Greek bonds. |
#15
Posted to misc.consumers,alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cyprus haircut (was: OT Never in America?)
Bert wrote:
Yea - something like that is probably going to happen in the US about a year from now. Well, why not? What's the real difference between the government seizing a chunk of your savings and seizing a chunk of your income? That's called a wealth tax. The last time the US gov't tried that was when they confiscated all public gold. The various governments have long claimed first dibs on your money and property, if not outright ownership. When you vote for the same monkey twice, the one who likes to start expensive wars that ends up destroying your economy, then yea- you have to pay for it one way or another. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The Cypriot parliament is going to vote tomorrow on whether or not to make this money grab "legal". I hope they don't allow it, but if they do, then it shakes the foundation of banking to it's core.
That's because the only reason why we don't all get up early tomorrow morning and go to our banks to get our money out is because we've got confidence that they'll give it back any time we want it. That's because the whole idea behind a bank is that it's a safer place to keep your money than under your mattress or stuffed into a mouse hole in your wall. But, banks don't keep your money in a safe. Most of the deposits a bank has are invested in long term investments like mortgages and loans. So, everyone wanting their money back at the same time would force any bank into immediate bankruptcy. It's really the trust that our banks will give us our money back if and when we want it that keeps the whole system afloat. Without that trust, the whole system collapses, and we can have a global collapse of the world's banking system tomorrow if everyone wanted their money back tomorrow. And, this Cypriot money grab is exactly the kind of thing that can destory that trust that keeps the banking system afloat. IF, after tomorrow, anyone ever hears rumour of a similar "Tax on Savings" to be implemented in Greece or Italy or Ireland to finance another bail out for those governments, then every European outside of Germany will be lining up to get their money out of their bank. And, that will cause a run on the European banks, and the near economic collapse of 2008 will be repeated, only this time starting in Europe and spreading to North America instead. North American banks hold bonds issued by other banks, including large European banks like ING and the Royal Bank of Scotland. So if those European banks go bankrupt, their bonds become nearly worthless, and that causes the asset value of North American banks to collapse. That's the way the economic collapse spreads. I think this Cypriot money grab goes way too far in that it shakes people's confidence in keeping their money "safe", by keeping it in the bank, and breaking that trust is playing with fire. I just hope the Cypriot parliament will realize that when they vote tomorrow. Last edited by nestork : March 19th 13 at 06:09 AM |
#17
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Mar 18, 6:02*pm, Oren wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:52:35 -0400, Frank wrote: On 3/18/2013 11:04 AM, harry wrote: Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...liament-idUSBR.... One of the reasons the founding fathers gave us the 2nd amendment Good one Frank! They now have a European Union sponsored bank robbery...got the government they voted for. The government they DIDN'T vote for. |
#18
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Mar 19, 5:58*am, nestork wrote:
The Cypriot parliament is going to vote tomorrow on whether or not to make this money grab "legal". *I hope they don't allow it, but if they do, then it shakes the foundation of banking to it's core. That's because the only reason why we don't all get up early tomorrow morning and go to our banks to get our money out is because we've got confidence that they'll give it back any time we want it. *That's because the whole idea behind a bank is that it's a safer place to keep your money than under your mattress or stuffed into a mouse hole in your wall. But, banks don't keep your money in a safe. *Most of the deposits a bank has are invested in long term investments like mortgages and loans. *So, everyone wanting their money back at the same time would force any bank into immediate bankruptcy. *It's really the trust that our banks will give us our money back if and when we want it that keeps the whole system afloat. *Without that trust, the whole system collapses, and we can have a global collapse of the world's banking system tomorrow if everyone wanted their money back tomorrow. *And, this Cypriot money grab is exactly the kind of thing that can destory that trust that keeps the banking system afloat. IF, after tomorrow, anyone ever hears rumour of a similar "Tax on Savings" to be implemented in Greece or Italy or Ireland to finance another bail out for those governments, then every European outside of Germany will be lining up to get their money out of their bank. *And, that will cause a run on the European banks, and the near economic collapse of 2008 will be repeated, only this time starting in Europe and spreading to North America instead. *North American banks hold bonds issued by other banks, including large European banks like ING and the Royal Bank of Scotland. *So if those European banks go bankrupt, their bonds become nearly worthless, and that causes the asset value of North American banks to collapse. *That's the way the economic collapse spreads. I think this Cypriot money grab goes way too far in that it shakes people's confidence in keeping their money "safe", by keeping it in the bank, and breaking that trust is playing with fire. *I just hope the Cypriot parliament will realize that when they vote tomorrow. -- nestork Heh Heh. That already happened here in the UK. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Rock The Cypriot Banks are all closed 'til Thursday to stop a run on them. Cash machines there were emptied in the first hour after people heard about it. |
#19
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Tuesday, March 19, 2013 1:58:16 AM UTC-4, nestork wrote:
The Cypriot parliament is going to vote tomorrow on whether or not to make this money grab "legal". I hope they don't allow it, but if they do, then it shakes the foundation of banking to it's core. That's because the only reason why we don't all get up early tomorrow morning and go to our banks to get our money out is because we've got confidence that they'll give it back any time we want it. That's because the whole idea behind a bank is that it's a safer place to keep your money than under your mattress or stuffed into a mouse hole in your wall. But, banks don't keep your money in a safe. Most of the deposits a bank has are invested in long term investments like mortgages and loans. So, everyone wanting their money back at the same time would force any bank into immediate bankruptcy. It's really the trust that our banks will give us our money back if and when we want it that keeps the whole system afloat. Without that trust, the whole system collapses, and we can have a global collapse of the world's banking system tomorrow if everyone wanted their money back tomorrow. And, this Cypriot money grab is exactly the kind of thing that can destory that trust that keeps the banking system afloat. IF, after tomorrow, anyone ever hears rumour of a similar "Tax on Savings" to be implemented in Greece or Italy or Ireland to finance another bail out for those governments, then every European outside of Germany will be lining up to get their money out of their bank. And, that will cause a run on the European banks, and the near economic collapse of 2008 will be repeated, only this time starting in Europe and spreading to North America instead. North American banks hold bonds issued by other banks, including large European banks like ING and the Royal Bank of Scotland. So if those European banks go bankrupt, their bonds become nearly worthless, and that causes the asset value of North American banks to collapse. That's the way the economic collapse spreads. I think this Cypriot money grab goes way too far in that it shakes people's confidence in keeping their money "safe", by keeping it in the bank, and breaking that trust is playing with fire. I just hope the Cypriot parliament will realize that when they vote tomorrow. -- nestork God is a piece of ****. Bring the war home to destroy the goddamned government. |
#20
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
In article ,
nestork wrote: I think this Cypriot money grab goes way too far in that it shakes people's confidence in keeping their money "safe", by keeping it in the bank, and breaking that trust is playing with fire. I just hope the Cypriot parliament will realize that when they vote tomorrow. Also indicates how far out of touch with reality the honchoes are becoming. I mean, who thought that the best way to help preserve a banking system was to cause a run on that banking system. And this is hardly the first time. (Prior to Lehman's collapse, we had muddled through by patching together good and bad banks and keeping the baseline of too big to fail unknown. When Lehman's was allowed to collapse, we knew and it wasn't all that high. Thus, literally overnight, nobody could trust anybody else and the rest is history. Not an economist so I don't know if this is anything other than fantasy, but it would have been interesting to see. -- America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the *******s."-- Claire Wolfe |
#21
Posted to alt.home.repair,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
Cypriot haircut (was this poor subject line: OT Never in America?)
harry used improper usenet message composition style by unnecessarily
full-quoting: The Cypriot Banks are all closed 'til Thursday to stop a run on them. Cash machines there were emptied in the first hour after people heard about it. If you can withdraw all (or a good portion) of your account savings from an ATM in a single transaction, then you don't have enough wealth in said account to worry about losing 5 or 10% of it. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I'm sure that the ATM machines in Cyprus limit the amount you can withdraw from your account to a few hundred dollars per day. Otherwise a stolen ATM card could result in some people's entire life savings being lost to thieves.
Still, your point is well taken. Even if the ATM machines remained fully stocked with cash, the most someone here in Canada could take out each day is $400, or $2800 over the course of a week. That would save them $280 on this money grab if they had over $100,000 in the bank. But, that's still small potatos compared to the $10,000+ the government would seize. Cyprus is going to be an interesting place for economists to watch in future since people there will be reluctant to trust banks with their savings. I expect you're going to see a lot more people putting their money in glass jars and burying those jars in gardens and flower beds and such to prevent the same thing from happening again in future. |
#23
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 15:48 nestork wrote in alt.home.repair:
I'm sure that the ATM machines in Cyprus limit the amount you can withdraw from your account to a few hundred dollars per day. Otherwise a stolen ATM card could result in some people's entire life savings being lost to thieves. Still, your point is well taken. Even if the ATM machines remained fully stocked with cash, the most someone here in Canada could take out each day is $400, or $2800 over the course of a week. That would save them $280 on this money grab if they had over $100,000 in the bank. But, that's still small potatos compared to the $10,000+ the government would seize. Cyprus is going to be an interesting place for economists to watch in future since people there will be reluctant to trust banks with their savings. I expect you're going to see a lot more people putting their money in glass jars and burying those jars in gardens and flower beds and such to prevent the same thing from happening again in future. And in gold, platnium, silver or palladium if they have sense... -- Tim Watts Personal Blog: http://squiddy.blog.dionic.net/ http://www.sensorly.com/ Crowd mapping of 2G/3G/4G mobile signal coverage |
#24
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:30:58 +0000, Tim Watts
wrote: Cyprus is going to be an interesting place for economists to watch in future since people there will be reluctant to trust banks with their savings. I expect you're going to see a lot more people putting their money in glass jars and burying those jars in gardens and flower beds and such to prevent the same thing from happening again in future. And in gold, platnium, silver or palladium if they have sense... ....guns and bullets |
#25
Posted to alt.home.repair,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
Oren wrote:
Cyprus is going to be an interesting place for economists to watch in future since people there will be reluctant to trust banks with their savings. I expect you're going to see a lot more people putting their money in glass jars and burying those jars in gardens and flower beds and such to prevent the same thing from happening again in future. And in gold, platnium, silver or palladium if they have sense... ...guns and bullets Again, it's no end of funny to see you Americans keep thinking that your guns will protect your wealth (what little of it you have). Your guns can do nothing for you to protect your liberty, anonymity, mobility, financial security, or (in general) what you used to call the "American Way of Life". |
#26
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Mar 19, 3:48*pm, nestork wrote:
I'm sure that the ATM machines in Cyprus limit the amount you can withdraw from your account to a few hundred dollars per day. *Otherwise a stolen ATM card could result in some people's entire life savings being lost to thieves. Still, your point is well taken. *Even if the ATM machines remained fully stocked with cash, the most someone here in Canada could take out each day is $400, or $2800 over the course of a week. *That would save them $280 on this money grab if they had over $100,000 in the bank. But, that's still small potatos compared to the $10,000+ the government would seize. Cyprus is going to be an interesting place for economists to watch in future since people there will be reluctant to trust banks with their savings. *I expect you're going to see a lot more people putting their money in glass jars and burying those jars in gardens and flower beds and such to prevent the same thing from happening again in future. -- nestork When the banks open,there will be a run on them, whatever the outcome of gov,deliberations. And prob elsewhere in the world. Everyone is very twitchy. |
#27
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Monday, March 18, 2013 11:04:38 AM UTC-4, harry wrote:
Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...92G03I20130317 The news reports I heard were that the idea was rejected with prejudice. Just news of it caused a run on the banks. Will it happen here? Not a chance. Even just hinting at it will cause a total economic meltdown as people run on the banks to take out all their money. I can't believe people like Rush are dumb enough to believe that it is even a possibility in the USA. There is not one American politician who would vote for such a ridiculous proposal, because they'd be giving up their money too. |
#28
Posted to alt.home.repair,misc.consumers
|
|||
|
|||
Cypriot haircut (was: OT Never in America?)
harry full-quoted:
When the banks open,there will be a run on them, whatever the outcome of gov,deliberations. And prob elsewhere in the world. Everyone is very twitchy. Americans don't have that problem. Most of them don't have 2 cents to rub together - living paycheck to paycheck (or disability payment to disability payment). It's estimated that 25% of american adults don't even have bank accounts. Those of them that actually have a job and get paid by check use pay-day check-cashing services to convert their checks to cash-money. |
#29
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Mar 20, 8:53*am, wrote:
On Monday, March 18, 2013 11:04:38 AM UTC-4, harry wrote: Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...liament-idUSBR... The news reports I heard were that the idea was rejected with prejudice. Just news of it caused a run on the banks. Will it happen here? Not a chance. Even just hinting at it will cause a total economic meltdown as people run on the banks to take out all their money. I can't believe people like Rush are dumb enough to believe that it is even a possibility in the USA. There is not one American politician who would vote for such a ridiculous proposal, because they'd be giving up their money too. WARNING! I just looked at this thread for the first time and clicked on the reuters link. Norton blocked it and came back saying it blocked an attack by Malicious Rootkit Website 33 |
#30
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cypriot haircut (was: OT Never in America?)
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:06:57 -0400, Home Guy wrote in
Re Cypriot haircut (was: OT Never in America?): harry full-quoted: When the banks open,there will be a run on them, whatever the outcome of gov,deliberations. And prob elsewhere in the world. Everyone is very twitchy. Americans don't have that problem. Most of them don't have 2 cents to rub together - living paycheck to paycheck (or disability payment to disability payment). It's estimated that 25% of american adults don't even have bank accounts. Those of them that actually have a job and get paid by check use pay-day check-cashing services to convert their checks to cash-money. Welcome to Amerika. |
#31
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 05:53:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote
in Re OT Never in America?: On Monday, March 18, 2013 11:04:38 AM UTC-4, harry wrote: Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...92G03I20130317 The news reports I heard were that the idea was rejected with prejudice. Just news of it caused a run on the banks. Will it happen here? Not a chance. Even just hinting at it will cause a total economic meltdown as people run on the banks to take out all their money. In a police state anything is possible. All it takes is waking up one morning to an "emergency" decree from the President. Remember the wage/price freeze of the early 1970s? I can't believe people like Rush are dumb enough to believe that it is even a possibility in the USA. There is not one American politician who would vote for such a ridiculous proposal, because they'd be giving up their money too. The politicos will quietly exempt themselves, just like they do with other onerous legislation, e.g. social security. Federal, state and local taxes consume more that 55% of the GDP http://taxfoundation.org/tax-topics/tax-burdens and there is no end in sight. Welcome to Amerika. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
But, if they'd gone ahead with it, I'd have said that would be the 2nd extremely dangerous precedent that a government has set in my lifetime. The first woulda been George Bush's "Let's build a coalition of the willing to attack Iraq before they attack us" plan. That, effectively set a precedent saying that you could justify starting a war with another country on the grounds that their intentions toward you are hostile. Unfortunately, I don't have enough fingers and toes to count off all the hostile relationships that have existed for years on this Good Earth... Argentina vs. Britain over the Falklands, Israel vs. everyone else over the Palestinians, China vs. Tibet, India vs. Pakistan over the Kashmir, Venezuela vs. Columbia, Turkey vs. Greece over Cyprus, Russia vs. Chechnya over who knows what, China vs. Japan over those rocks sticking out of the Sea of Japan, Malaysia vs. East Timor over independance, India vs. Sri Lanka over independance, Canada vs. Denmark over Hans Island, which isn't large enough to even play a game of soccer on, the USA vs. Cuba over the right to be communist, North Korea vs. South Korea over ideology, etc. Last edited by nestork : March 20th 13 at 04:10 PM |
#33
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Mar 18, 6:02*pm, Oren wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:52:35 -0400, Frank wrote: On 3/18/2013 11:04 AM, harry wrote: Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...liament-idUSBR.... One of the reasons the founding fathers gave us the 2nd amendment Good one Frank! They now have a European Union sponsored bank robbery...got the government they voted for. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFlKJmE4gVE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2hM8e-r-eUA |
#34
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Mar 20, 12:53*pm, wrote:
On Monday, March 18, 2013 11:04:38 AM UTC-4, harry wrote: Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...liament-idUSBR... The news reports I heard were that the idea was rejected with prejudice. Just news of it caused a run on the banks. Will it happen here? Not a chance. Even just hinting at it will cause a total economic meltdown as people run on the banks to take out all their money. I can't believe people like Rush are dumb enough to believe that it is even a possibility in the USA. There is not one American politician who would vote for such a ridiculous proposal, because they'd be giving up their money too. They would move their money abroad, being forwarned, |
#35
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cyprus haircut (was: OT Never in America?)
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:05:46 +0000 (UTC), Bert
wrote: In Home Guy wrote: Yea - something like that is probably going to happen in the US about a year from now. Well, why not? If you don't know "why not", you're as dumb as HomoGay. Look at what's happening in Cyprus (and about to spread across Europe) if you're that far from reality. What's the real difference between the government seizing a chunk of your savings and seizing a chunk of your income? Destruction of the entire monetary system. That's all. The various governments have long claimed first dibs on your money and property, if not outright ownership. [Followups set to something vaguely appropriate] Set back to where the discussion is taking place. |
#36
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:37:50 -0700, Oren wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:30:58 +0000, Tim Watts wrote: Cyprus is going to be an interesting place for economists to watch in future since people there will be reluctant to trust banks with their savings. I expect you're going to see a lot more people putting their money in glass jars and burying those jars in gardens and flower beds and such to prevent the same thing from happening again in future. And in gold, platnium, silver or palladium if they have sense... ...guns and bullets And folks, now you know why the Democrats are trying to grab guns. |
#37
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 05:53:33 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Monday, March 18, 2013 11:04:38 AM UTC-4, harry wrote: Government to take 10% of everyone's money. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...92G03I20130317 The news reports I heard were that the idea was rejected with prejudice. Just news of it caused a run on the banks. Will it happen here? Not a chance. Even just hinting at it will cause a total economic meltdown as people run on the banks to take out all their money. I can't believe people like Rush are dumb enough to believe that it is even a possibility in the USA. There is not one American politician who would vote for such a ridiculous proposal, because they'd be giving up their money too. What a naive little lefty. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
You already paid income tax on the money that you have in the bank. The Cypriot government now seizing a chunk of your savings is no different than being taxed twice on the same income. Imagine if, to raise more money, the Cypriot government ALSO levied a tax on all withdrawls from Cypriot bank accounts so that you end up paying tax three times on the same income? That would definitely force people living in Cyprus to keep their money in cash buried in jars in the flower beds around their homes, and that would spell the end for Cypriot banks, and the jobs of the people that work in those banks. This whole European Union is turning into an economic train wreck in slow motion. Half the countries in Europe were unofficially bankrupt and cooking their books to make them more palatable in order to gain entry into the European Union. Now, all of that is coming out in the open. Greece, for example, borrowed huge amounts of money to host the 2004 summer Olympics, and that's a big part of the reason they're an economic disaster now. And, as long as Europe's finances are out of order, the economy in North America will be slow because we export much of what we produce to Europe, and we want to be confident that they can pay for what they buy. Untill the Europeans get their ducks in order, businesses over hear are going to be reluctant to spend money building new factories or hiring new employees for them cuz they don't know if things over there are going to improve or collapse entirely. Last edited by nestork : March 21st 13 at 04:15 PM |
#39
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:03:09 +0000, nestork
wrote in Re OT Never in America?: Well, by now everyone has heard that the Cypriot parliament has rejected that idea and is now looking for another way to finance their bail out plans. But, if they'd gone ahead with it, I'd have said that would be the 2nd extremely dangerous precedent that a government has set in my lifetime. The first woulda been George Bush's "Let's build a coalition of the willing to attack Iraq before they attack us" plan. That, effectively set a precedent saying that you could justify starting a war with another country on the grounds that their intentions toward you are hostile. No, that strategy is as old as war itself. It's most infamous use in the last centrury was Hitler's attack on Poland and Russia. |
#40
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
OT Never in America?
On Mar 20, 12:03*pm, nestork wrote:
[_2_ Wrote: ;3032750'] WARNING! I just looked at this thread for the first time and clicked on the reuters link. Norton blocked it and came back saying it blocked an attack by Malicious Rootkit Website 33 Well, by now everyone has heard that the Cypriot parliament has rejected that idea and is now looking for another way to finance their bail out plans. But, if they'd gone ahead with it, I'd have said that would be the 2nd extremely dangerous precedent that a government has set in my lifetime. The first woulda been George Bush's "Let's build a coalition of the willing to attack Iraq before they attack us" plan. *That, effectively set a precedent saying that you could justify starting a war with another country on the grounds that their intentions toward you are hostile. That indeed is enough justification for starting a war. But it sure was not the justification for going to war with Iraq. Iraq invaded Kuwait with no provocation whatever. A whole coalition of countries went to war to drive Iraq out. One very important part of the agreement that ended that war was Iraq agreeing to full cooperation with UN weapons inspectors. Iraq agreed to account for all their WMDs which they had at time. They agreed to open access for the UN inspectors and to destroy all their WMDs and WMD programs. Iraq never complied with that agreement. Even on the eve of the war, with 400,000 troops ready to attack, in his last report to the UN, Hans Blix said they still were not cooperating. They were given every opportunity to do so and refused. More than enough justification for military action. *Unfortunately, I don't have enough fingers and toes to count off all the hostile relationships that have existed for years on this Good Earth... Argentina vs. Britain over the Falklands, Israel vs. everyone else over the Palestinians, China vs. Tibet, India vs. Pakistan over the Kashmir, Venezuela vs. Columbia, Turkey vs. Greece over Cyprus, Russia vs. Chechnya over who knows what, China vs. Japan over those rocks sticking out of the Sea of Japan, Malaysia vs. East Timor over independance, India vs. Sri Lanka over independance, Canada vs. Denmark over Hans Island, which isn't large enough to even play a game of soccer on, the USA vs. Cuba over the right to be communist, North Korea vs. South Korea over ideology, etc. -- nestork One essential difference is that now we have countries run by unstable, total nut jobs that are rapidly developing WMDs that will be able to directly hit major cities in the USA. Some of those nut case ideologies, driven by religous fanaticism, have demonstrated over and over that they are very willing to die as long as they take as many innocents with them as possible. You may be OK living with that threat, but most of us are not. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Only in America? | UK diy | |||
OT Could almost be America.... | Home Repair | |||
OT America and oil | Home Repair | |||
OT - Come to America! | Metalworking | |||
Nancy Loves George: The Elites-Driven 'White Trashing of America' to Degrade, Demoralize & Replace White America | Home Repair |