Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:

Just saying...that there's voter fraud and then there's collusion:
Why hasn't husted been charged with violations of voters rights,
which just in Ohio could have eliminated more voters than all the
"illegal" voters anyone could find in the whole US

Because the courts have long recognized that voting is, in the main, a
POLITICAL matter, not a CONSTITUTIONAL one. The court tries, sometimes
without success, to avoid meddling in political disputes.

For example, the Indiana case before the Supreme Court on the state
requiring a photo ID, ignored any "undue burden" argument, which would have
made the case a constitutional one. In essence, the court said a state may
impose almost any requirement on voters that it deems proper (i.e.,
requiring voters to wear some sort of red-colored clothing, approach the
polling place on unicycles, or whatever).