Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Home Repair (alt.home.repair) For all homeowners and DIYers with many experienced tradesmen. Solve your toughest home fix-it problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-03-16, Harry K wrote:
The trick to nailing two (or more) 2X members together so you have a straight member is to eyeball them and then lay them so the curve is opposite. Start nailing at one end and keep pulling the opposite ends to make the area being nailed match each other as you proceed. A helper is nice but not really needed. It will be easy at the start but grows harder the nearer you approach the opposite end. The last nail or two may require a clamp to make the members match. Interesting, when I've been in this situation I've always aligned the ends and nailed those off, then aligned the midpoints and nailed that, and then the quarter points, etc. At a certain point it becomes very difficult to eliminate the slight difference remaining, so I give up on the straightening. This gives me something that is on average straight, but with perhaps small amounts of curvature between each nailing point. So that raises the question of whether one of these ways is better than the other. I don't know, any thoughts? Cheers, Wayne |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 11:04*am, Wayne Whitney wrote:
On 2008-03-16, Harry K wrote: The trick to nailing two (or more) 2X members together so you have a straight member is to eyeball them and then lay them so the curve is opposite. *Start nailing at one end and keep pulling the opposite ends to make the area being nailed match each other as you proceed. A helper is nice but not really needed. *It will be easy at the start but grows harder the nearer you approach the opposite end. The last nail or two may require a clamp to make the members match. Interesting, when I've been in this situation I've always aligned the ends and nailed those off, then aligned the midpoints and nailed that, and then the quarter points, etc. *At a certain point it becomes very difficult to eliminate the slight difference remaining, so I give up on the straightening. *This gives me something that is on average straight, but with perhaps small amounts of curvature between each nailing point. So that raises the question of whether one of these ways is better than the other. *I don't know, any thoughts? Cheers, Wayne You need to be a lot more picky about your lumber. It shouldn't be necessary to go through all that fuss to get a good result. When you sort through the junque lumber at the box store, look at the endgrains and then check for excessive knots, warping, cupping, twist and whatever. There is a relationship between the endgrain pattern and quality of the wood straightness. Doesn't take too much inspection to see the differences and pick out the better pieces. If that stack is hopeless, go to the other box store or maybe a real lumberyard. Some species are better than others, too, so it pays to know if is aspen, pondersosa pine, spruce (not likely), larch, or hemlock (ugh). Yellow pine is neat stuff but a bear to work with unless you must have its special properties. HTH Joe |
#3
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 6:41*pm, Joe wrote:
On Mar 16, 11:04*am, Wayne Whitney wrote: On 2008-03-16, Harry K wrote: The trick to nailing two (or more) 2X members together so you have a straight member is to eyeball them and then lay them so the curve is opposite. *Start nailing at one end and keep pulling the opposite ends to make the area being nailed match each other as you proceed. A helper is nice but not really needed. *It will be easy at the start but grows harder the nearer you approach the opposite end. The last nail or two may require a clamp to make the members match. Interesting, when I've been in this situation I've always aligned the ends and nailed those off, then aligned the midpoints and nailed that, and then the quarter points, etc. *At a certain point it becomes very difficult to eliminate the slight difference remaining, so I give up on the straightening. *This gives me something that is on average straight, but with perhaps small amounts of curvature between each nailing point. So that raises the question of whether one of these ways is better than the other. *I don't know, any thoughts? Cheers, Wayne You need to be a lot more picky about your lumber. It shouldn't be necessary to go through all that fuss to get a good result. When you sort through the junque lumber at the box store, look at the endgrains and then check for excessive knots, warping, cupping, twist and whatever. There is a relationship between the endgrain pattern and quality of the wood straightness. Doesn't take too much inspection to see the differences and pick out the better pieces. If that stack is hopeless, go to the other box store *or maybe a real lumberyard. Some species are better than others, too, so it pays to know if is aspen, pondersosa pine, spruce (not likely), larch, or hemlock (ugh). *Yellow pine is neat stuff but a bear to work with unless you must have its special properties. HTH Joe- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - It is all but impossible to find perfectly straight 8ft or more lumber of any dimension and has been so since I was a pup way back in the 40s. Harry K |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 9:04*am, Wayne Whitney wrote:
On 2008-03-16, Harry K wrote: The trick to nailing two (or more) 2X members together so you have a straight member is to eyeball them and then lay them so the curve is opposite. *Start nailing at one end and keep pulling the opposite ends to make the area being nailed match each other as you proceed. A helper is nice but not really needed. *It will be easy at the start but grows harder the nearer you approach the opposite end. The last nail or two may require a clamp to make the members match. Interesting, when I've been in this situation I've always aligned the ends and nailed those off, then aligned the midpoints and nailed that, and then the quarter points, etc. *At a certain point it becomes very difficult to eliminate the slight difference remaining, so I give up on the straightening. *This gives me something that is on average straight, but with perhaps small amounts of curvature between each nailing point. So that raises the question of whether one of these ways is better than the other. *I don't know, any thoughts? Cheers, Wayne Hmmm...never heard of doing ti that way. Looks more difficult than what I described. The method I use is what I learned in a carpentry course back in the 70s. Biggest member and length I helped with was a triple member 2x10x30ft for a basement support. Even 2x10 can be forced straight that way although the last foot or so definitely needs clamps. Harry K |
#5
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2008-03-17, Harry K wrote:
Hmmm...never heard of doing it that way. Looks more difficult than what I described. Well, I skip the clamps, and I give up when I can't readily do it by hand. So I have a bunch of little deviations along the length of the two members. With the linear method, you accumulate all the deviations at the free end, so you have to keep going till the end, using more and more force as necessary. Cheers, Wayne |
#6
![]()
Posted to alt.home.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 17, 12:06 pm, Wayne Whitney wrote:
On 2008-03-17, Harry K wrote: Hmmm...never heard of doing it that way. Looks more difficult than what I described. Well, I skip the clamps, and I give up when I can't readily do it by hand. So I have a bunch of little deviations along the length of the two members. With the linear method, you accumulate all the deviations at the free end, so you have to keep going till the end, using more and more force as necessary. It's a lot easier to align each end and then pull the center into alignment. http://www.ont-woodlot-assoc.org/ima...s-bow-kink.jpg You can straighten bowed lumber by opposing two warped boards boards and nailing them together. You can't straighten cupped lumber. You can straighten crooked lumber by driving nails in a corner of the bowed board at a 45 degree angle into the other board - that will beat up an edge, but it will straighten most crooks. Wish it was that easy in politics. ![]() R |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OK to air-nail 2x4s together on their flat faces? | Home Repair | |||
Key Faces - Do it yourself video | UK diy | |||
Wooden Fence 2x4s | Woodworking | |||
Festool DOMINO - doubling mortises in 2x4s | Woodworking | |||
concrete nails/coil nail/roofing nail/umbrella nail | Home Repair |