Well, okay they let the turd resign. The good news is, Bush hires Al
Gore to replace him!

..
..
..
..
..

Yeah, sure. You libs would love that.

"G Henslee" wrote in message
...
Well, okay they let the turd resign. The good news is, Bush hires Al Gore
to replace him!

.
.
.
.
.

Yeah, sure. You libs would love that.

Al Bundee could do a better job than Brown.

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:45:23 +0000, FDR wrote:

Yeah, sure. You libs would love that.

Al Bundee could do a better job than Brown.

You must mean "Al Bundy". Spelling counts.

Yes, he is much more electable than any candidate the Libs have fielded
for several years now, and/or are likely to put forth in the next few
years. The only real possibility you Libs have is Obama, who won't be
ready until around 2012.

--
All posts that originate from Google Groups are ignored.
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951

Dan C wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 21:45:23 +0000, FDR wrote:

Yeah, sure. You libs would love that.

Al Bundee could do a better job than Brown.

You must mean "Al Bundy". Spelling counts.

Yes, he is much more electable than any candidate the Libs have fielded
for several years now, and/or are likely to put forth in the next few
years. The only real possibility you Libs have is Obama, who won't be
ready until around 2012.

--
All posts that originate from Google Groups are ignored.

Excellent. Saves me the trouble of plonking you.

R