Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"T N Nurse" bravely wrote to "All" (25 Sep 04 14:35:33)
--- on the heady topic of "Transformer question" TNN From: T N Nurse TNN Subject: Transformer question TNN Organization: Malathion Church of Holy Redemption TNN Xref: aeinews sci.electronics.repair:39778 sci.electronics.misc:18316 TNN I have a 50 watt valve amp which seems to have blown its TNN output transformer. A new one is on order, but I was puzzled TNN by some of the reading I got off it and wondered if someone TNN could give an explanation. All the measurements were made TNN with the transformer *_completely out of circuit_*, both primary TNN and secondary. TNN The transformer is from a push-pull standard guitar amp (Trace TNN Elliot 50 watt combo, 2 EL34s) and one of the valves was glowing TNN red hot before the fuse popped. Checking the bias voltages, I TNN had around -46v on the grid of each of the El34s, so that was TNN a reasonable figure. I then removed the output transformer TNN and did some resistance measurements on it. When measure from TNN the centre tap to either of the primary outer connections, the TNN reading was 69 ohms for each. But when I measured across the TNN primary outer connections, instead of the expected 138 ohms, TNN I got an open circuit. I rechecked it numerous times but with TNN the same result. I even removed the cables from their connector TNN and measure across the bare wires, but still the same result, TNN 69 ohms from the centre tap to the outers, but open circuit TNN between the outers. TNN On the basis of these bizarre reading, I assumed the transformer TNN is faulty and ordered a new one, but can anyone offer an TNN explanation as to why I got such resistance readings? I have a TNN vague recollection of similar results on a small 15 watt amp I TNN repaired many years ago and replacing the transformer fixed it TNN and it went on to give good service, but I would like to know TNN what is actually going on. Anyone? The only thing I can think of is that (burnt) oxidized metal to metal contacts can form a rudimentary semiconductor and will not allow current to flow in reverse just like a diode. Try swapping your ohmmeter wires. A*s*i*m*o*v .... Are part-time band-leaders semi-conductors? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Having an open resistance reading on the primary in indicative there
has been failure within the transformer, be it an open thermal protect device or actually a break within the actual primary wires. At that point it is not necessary to determine the condition of the secondary unless you have a specific reason for doing so, such as, determining what the shorted output valve may have damages along with the transformer. Specifically overheated or damaged resistors, capacitors, etc in that particular circuit. You may be able to compare the values with those on the other-side of the push-pull circuit to ascertain if indeed there is additional damages. FYIW the bias voltages sound normal for the operational characteristics of those particular valves. I would be interented also in the cathode current and plate voltages on eachof the devices. May be best to replace both of them since one obviously has failed, trying to get a matched pair, if available an reasonable cost. Cheers: Good luck in rectifying the initial failure and remedies. "T N Nurse" wrote in message ... I have a 50 watt valve amp which seems to have blown its output transformer. A new one is on order, but I was puzzled by some of the reading I got off it and wondered if someone could give an explanation. All the measurements were made with the transformer *_completely out of circuit_*, both primary and secondary. The transformer is from a push-pull standard guitar amp (Trace Elliot 50 watt combo, 2 EL34s) and one of the valves was glowing red hot before the fuse popped. Checking the bias voltages, I had around -46v on the grid of each of the El34s, so that was a reasonable figure. I then removed the output transformer and did some resistance measurements on it. When measure from the centre tap to either of the primary outer connections, the reading was 69 ohms for each. But when I measured across the primary outer connections, instead of the expected 138 ohms, I got an open circuit. I rechecked it numerous times but with the same result. I even removed the cables from their connector and measure across the bare wires, but still the same result, 69 ohms from the centre tap to the outers, but open circuit between the outers. On the basis of these bizarre reading, I assumed the transformer is faulty and ordered a new one, but can anyone offer an explanation as to why I got such resistance readings? I have a vague recollection of similar results on a small 15 watt amp I repaired many years ago and replacing the transformer fixed it and it went on to give good service, but I would like to know what is actually going on. Anyone? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:03:32 -0400, "Art"
wrote: Having an open resistance reading on the primary in indicative there has been failure within the transformer, be it an open thermal protect device or actually a break within the actual primary wires. --- You obviously missed the point, which was that a finite resistance could be measured from the center tap to either end of the primary but that the end-to-end resistance was infinite. -- John Fields |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Fields writes:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:03:32 -0400, "Art" wrote: Having an open resistance reading on the primary in indicative there has been failure within the transformer, be it an open thermal protect device or actually a break within the actual primary wires. --- You obviously missed the point, which was that a finite resistance could be measured from the center tap to either end of the primary but that the end-to-end resistance was infinite. I liked the two separate windings with two wires not making contact for the centertap. Has the OP retested or checked for this possibility? --- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Mirror: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/ Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/ +Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/lasersam.htm | Mirror Sites: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_mirror.html Note: These links are hopefully temporary until we can sort out the excessive traffic on Repairfaq.org. Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header is ignored. To contact me, please use the feedback form on the S.E.R FAQ Web sites. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
its most likely your digital meter.
my fluke i use at work will not properly read a field winding above a 100 ohms due to inductive reactions. it just sits there blinking now and then giving me an OL reading. try putting it on DIODE mode. John Fields wrote: On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:03:32 -0400, "Art" wrote: Having an open resistance reading on the primary in indicative there has been failure within the transformer, be it an open thermal protect device or actually a break within the actual primary wires. --- You obviously missed the point, which was that a finite resistance could be measured from the center tap to either end of the primary but that the end-to-end resistance was infinite. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Fields wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:03:32 -0400, "Art" wrote: Having an open resistance reading on the primary in indicative there has been failure within the transformer, be it an open thermal protect device or actually a break within the actual primary wires. --- You obviously missed the point, which was that a finite resistance could be measured from the center tap to either end of the primary but that the end-to-end resistance was infinite. Any chance there's more in there than a transformer? Like a couple of protective diodes (perhaps as snubbers) that are back-to-back when viewed from end-to-end? It would be odd, but not completely out of the question. -- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form . |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
this ought to get everybody fired up.... | Woodworking | |||
transformer question | Electronics | |||
30-0-30 Transformer, home brew or buy | Electronics Repair |