Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Does anyone happen to know the official speed of a Dictabelt? It seems
to be around 6 inches per second or 30 belt revolutions per minute, but there must be a proper specification somewhere. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Adrian Tuddenham wrote in message
lid.invalid... Does anyone happen to know the official speed of a Dictabelt? It seems to be around 6 inches per second or 30 belt revolutions per minute, but there must be a proper specification somewhere. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk If the Zapruder / Kennedy assassination recording is out there , is there any repeated scratch/molding clicks to take timings off ? Try posting to r.a.r.p ? |
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Adrian Tuddenham wrote in message
lid.invalid... Does anyone happen to know the official speed of a Dictabelt? It seems to be around 6 inches per second or 30 belt revolutions per minute, but there must be a proper specification somewhere. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk Do you get involved with non-contact vinyl/wax reading via CD laser/tracking/servo technology |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
On 9/29/2011 10:22 AM, N_Cook wrote:
Try posting to r.a.r.p ? That would be rec.antiques,radio+phono or is that a different group you had in mind? Jeff -- "Everything from Crackers to Coffins" |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Jeffrey Angus wrote in message
... On 9/29/2011 10:22 AM, N_Cook wrote: Try posting to r.a.r.p ? That would be rec.antiques,radio+phono or is that a different group you had in mind? Jeff -- "Everything from Crackers to Coffins" yep To OP, would that use shaded pole motor and then fixed gearing? |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
N_Cook wrote:
Jeffrey Angus wrote in message ... On 9/29/2011 10:22 AM, N_Cook wrote: Try posting to r.a.r.p ? That would be rec.antiques,radio+phono or is that a different group you had in mind? Jeff -- "Everything from Crackers to Coffins" yep To OP, would that use shaded pole motor and then fixed gearing? Capacitor start/run motor with rubber idlerprimary drive; then pulleys and a flat belt to the final drive roller shaft - so there's plenty of slippage to give measurement errors. Also, the machines I have seen in the UK have 60 c/s motors adapted for 50 c/s, which have very low torque and a high slip frequency on load. (The only fixed gearing is between the drive roller and the leadscrew.) -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
N_Cook wrote:
Adrian Tuddenham wrote in message lid.invalid... Does anyone happen to know the official speed of a Dictabelt? It seems to be around 6 inches per second or 30 belt revolutions per minute, but there must be a proper specification somewhere. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk Do you get involved with non-contact vinyl/wax reading via CD laser/tracking/servo technology I recorded the wax test cylinders for Southampton University's optical reading project; but I don't do any optical playback myself. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#9
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:07:40 +0100, lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: Does anyone happen to know the official speed of a Dictabelt? Which maker and what model? They followed the same speeds at record platters. ips time 15 15 min 7 1/2 30 min 3 3/4 60 min 1 7/8 120 min I think you have misunderstood the type of machine I am enquiring about. [...] It seems to be around 6 inches per second or 30 belt revolutions per minute, but there must be a proper specification somewhere. 30 rev/min = 0.5 rev/sec. At 12" per revolution, that's: 0.5 rev/sec * 12 in/rev = 6 in/sec. Close enough to 7.5 ips. It issignificantly below 7.5 ips. I need to know the manufacturer's specifications as I am developing a playback machine for archival work, where comparison between the actual speed and the 'official' speed can yield useful historical information. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#10
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Interesting dilemma you got there. I searched the web but then it
would be unreasonable to think you hadn't. I found something called a memobelt which was supposedly the same or similar. However in thinking about it, being a scribing machine of sorts, and given the time frame I would think two things, well one..... It is unlikely that the unit used a capstan. Crushing the media would not be desirable. As such that means the media speed would vary as it accumulates on the reel, which we really cannot call a takeup reel because of the lack of a capstan and pinch roller. I guess it would be called a drive reel then. I don't imagine alot of problems with this, because some things can just be figured out. Now I have gone into wiki and as you probably know the JFK assassination is recorded on this medium. The article I read also states that there are references due to police calls which do denote the time one way or another, but that data are better used in fine tuning, it seems that you need more of a ballpark figure right now. As such I would attempt to take a picture of a section of this belt media. In fact I would do it at the beginneing of a reel as well as at the end. Since the information is scribed, like a phonograph record groove, you should be able to figure out the speed by the length of the modulation in the "groove". It is logical to assume that they used the minimum speed possible for intelligibility, therefore figuring the minimum bandwidth for speech what do we have ? I would think that 600 - 4,000 Hz would be enough. Looking at the groove should then give you an idea. The high frequency limit is the key,. And remember they didn't have high compliance Shibata stylii when this thing was invented. You may need quite a length of it, run it through something for film or whatever, and use magnification. Find the shortest "wavelength" undulations in the groove you can, and assume it's a couple of Khz. Then you can figure the IPS from there. I wonder how you intend to pick this up really. Optically or with a stylus ? I mean would you somehow fit a magnetic phono cartridge to this whatchamacallit or let some type of LED and optical sensor array do it ? This intrigues me just because it is different, and the fact that I am stil a Beta dood. I even have a one inch vodeotape hiding in the basement, still waiting for a machine that can play it. I used to own a Cartovision !, but I did buy it used..... Data preservation and restoration is a real field of endevor, I mean people do devote their carreer to it. I myself would pay money to have what I have recorded on Beta for example in the old days. In fact I even worked on one of those Technicolor VCRs. Actually eight millimeter but not the Sony type that was standardized about a decade or so later...... Aaaa, the good old days. J |
#11
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
In article
d.invalid, lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:07:40 +0100, lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: Does anyone happen to know the official speed of a Dictabelt? Which maker and what model? They followed the same speeds at record platters. ips time 15 15 min 7 1/2 30 min 3 3/4 60 min 1 7/8 120 min I think you have misunderstood the type of machine I am enquiring about. [...] It seems to be around 6 inches per second or 30 belt revolutions per minute, but there must be a proper specification somewhere. 30 rev/min = 0.5 rev/sec. At 12" per revolution, that's: 0.5 rev/sec * 12 in/rev = 6 in/sec. Close enough to 7.5 ips. It issignificantly below 7.5 ips. I need to know the manufacturer's specifications as I am developing a playback machine for archival work, where comparison between the actual speed and the 'official' speed can yield useful historical information. Any chance of there being any power-line hum in the recording? If there is, that's your calibration. If not the fundamental, then maybe harmonics ... Isaac |
#12
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:08:55 +0100,
lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:07:40 +0100, lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: Does anyone happen to know the official speed of a Dictabelt? Which maker and what model? They followed the same speeds at record platters. ips time 15 15 min 7 1/2 30 min 3 3/4 60 min 1 7/8 120 min I think you have misunderstood the type of machine I am enquiring about. Maybe. As I see above, it's called a Dictabelt. I used to fix those in the early 1960's. I may still have a functional blue belt Dictaphone, hand mike, and foot switch, somewhere in my mess. As I understand it, the machine is something like this: http://www.videointerchange.com/images/Dictabelt3.jpg http://www.gumtree.com/p/for-sale/dictaphone-timemaster-dictabelt-recorder-electronica/86424428 http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/other/Dictabelts/dictabelts.htm http://www.dpph.nl/content/radio_tv_audio/recorders/dictaphone/dictaphone0711.html If this is not the machine, it might be helpful if you would kindly disclose some additional clues such as the maker and model numbers. It issignificantly below 7.5 ips. I need to know the manufacturer's specifications as I am developing a playback machine for archival work, where comparison between the actual speed and the 'official' speed can yield useful historical information. Ok, I need to know the manufacturer, model number, and color of the belt (blue or red). Please forgive me for not being able to guess that information from your description. To the best of my limited knowledge from 45 years ago, the nominal speed of these devices used record speeds per the chart above. The speed was settable and adjustable, but always followed the chart as nominal speeds. If you have physical posession of a machine, you should be able to measure it. If you have a clue as to the runtime of the belt, you should be able to calculate it. The belt speed should not have a huge effect on your playback device. If the belt contains voice, you should be able to simply listen to the belt, and adjust the drive speed until the speech is clear. You'll need to do that anyway because many such dictation machines offer multiple speeds, any of which might have been used for the recording. Good luck. -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831-336-2558 # http://802.11junk.com # http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS |
#13
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:08:55 +0100, lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: [...] As I understand it, the machine is something like this: http://www.videointerchange.com/images/Dictabelt3.jpg http://www.gumtree.com/p/for-sale/di...belt-recorder- electronica/86424428 http://www.dpph.nl/content/radio_tv_...rs/dictaphone/ dictaphone0711.html Yes http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/other/Dictabelts/dictabelts.htm This was my set-up which I am now having to replace. [...] Ok, I need to know the manufacturer,... Dictaphone model number, ... Any Dictabelt model and color of the belt (blue or red). Any belt I am constructing a playback machine for archival work, which needs to be able to cope with any Dictabelt. There was a standard speed which applied to all the normal models and all belts, so as to allow interchangeability of the belts world-wide. The basic machine was designed for 60 c/s mains, but there were adaptations to allow the machines to run at the correct belt speeds on 50 c/s. Some special machines were also designed to run at half speed for logging purposes . I have already encountered some belts which were recorded on unadapted half-speed 60 c/s machines working from 50 c/s supplies - and, no doubt, there will be others which were recorded at different non-standard speeds for various reasons. What I need to know is the manufacturer's specification for the standard belt speed which was supposed to allow interchangeability between all the machines. I can then calibrate the speed control on my machine to show the %age speed variation from the norm, so as to deduce information about the circumstances under which each belt was recorded. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#14
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Jeff Urban wrote:
Interesting dilemma you got there. I searched the web but then it would be unreasonable to think you hadn't. I found something called a memobelt which was supposedly the same or similar. However in thinking about it, being a scribing machine of sorts, and given the time frame I would think two things, well one..... It is unlikely that the unit used a capstan. This is a belt recording system, it was driven by being tensioned around a pair of parallel rollers. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#15
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
isw wrote:
In article d.invalid, lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:07:40 +0100, lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: Does anyone happen to know the official speed of a Dictabelt? Which maker and what model? They followed the same speeds at record platters. ips time 15 15 min 7 1/2 30 min 3 3/4 60 min 1 7/8 120 min I think you have misunderstood the type of machine I am enquiring about. [...] It seems to be around 6 inches per second or 30 belt revolutions per minute, but there must be a proper specification somewhere. 30 rev/min = 0.5 rev/sec. At 12" per revolution, that's: 0.5 rev/sec * 12 in/rev = 6 in/sec. Close enough to 7.5 ips. It issignificantly below 7.5 ips. I need to know the manufacturer's specifications as I am developing a playback machine for archival work, where comparison between the actual speed and the 'official' speed can yield useful historical information. Any chance of there being any power-line hum in the recording? If there is, that's your calibration. If not the fundamental, then maybe harmonics ... That sometimes occurs and is very helpful as long as the machine was running from stabilised mains supplies. Some Dictabelt machines were battery-powered and some 'in the field' would have been run from inverters or vibrator packs. I need to know the manufacturer's standard speed in order to measure the variations of individual belts from the norm. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#16
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Adrian Tuddenham wrote in message valid.invalid... N_Cook wrote: Jeffrey Angus wrote in message ... On 9/29/2011 10:22 AM, N_Cook wrote: Try posting to r.a.r.p ? That would be rec.antiques,radio+phono or is that a different group you had in mind? Jeff -- "Everything from Crackers to Coffins" yep To OP, would that use shaded pole motor and then fixed gearing? Capacitor start/run motor with rubber idlerprimary drive; then pulleys and a flat belt to the final drive roller shaft - so there's plenty of slippage to give measurement errors. Also, the machines I have seen in the UK have 60 c/s motors adapted for 50 c/s, which have very low torque and a high slip frequency on load. (The only fixed gearing is between the drive roller and the leadscrew.) -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk For the Kennedy material someone melded the dictaphone audio to the 24? fps of film so if any repeat noise/clicks on the belt would then be synced to the film and a forensically accurate timing to determine the number of shots or echoes |
#17
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Adrian Tuddenham wrote in message
valid.invalid... Jeff Urban wrote: Interesting dilemma you got there. I searched the web but then it would be unreasonable to think you hadn't. I found something called a memobelt which was supposedly the same or similar. However in thinking about it, being a scribing machine of sorts, and given the time frame I would think two things, well one..... It is unlikely that the unit used a capstan. This is a belt recording system, it was driven by being tensioned around a pair of parallel rollers. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk Patent number and then Is the original patent tech info available? |
#18
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:31:54 -0700, Jeff Liebermann
wrote: If this is not the machine, it might be helpful if you would kindly disclose some additional clues such as the maker and model numbers. Perhaps Adrian should have said that he has been working on these for some time:- e.g:- http://cadensa.bl.uk/uhtbin/cgisirsi...12&library=ALL http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/other/...dictabelts.htm |
#19
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
N_Cook wrote:
Adrian Tuddenham wrote in message valid.invalid... Jeff Urban wrote: Interesting dilemma you got there. I searched the web but then it would be unreasonable to think you hadn't. I found something called a memobelt which was supposedly the same or similar. However in thinking about it, being a scribing machine of sorts, and given the time frame I would think two things, well one..... It is unlikely that the unit used a capstan. This is a belt recording system, it was driven by being tensioned around a pair of parallel rollers. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk Patent number and then Is the original patent tech info available? Loads of patents, but I don't suppose any of them would include the meanufacturer's designated belt speed. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#20
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
N_Cook wrote:
Adrian Tuddenham wrote in message valid.invalid... N_Cook wrote: Jeffrey Angus wrote in message ... On 9/29/2011 10:22 AM, N_Cook wrote: Try posting to r.a.r.p ? That would be rec.antiques,radio+phono or is that a different group you had in mind? Jeff -- "Everything from Crackers to Coffins" yep To OP, would that use shaded pole motor and then fixed gearing? Capacitor start/run motor with rubber idlerprimary drive; then pulleys and a flat belt to the final drive roller shaft - so there's plenty of slippage to give measurement errors. Also, the machines I have seen in the UK have 60 c/s motors adapted for 50 c/s, which have very low torque and a high slip frequency on load. (The only fixed gearing is between the drive roller and the leadscrew.) -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk For the Kennedy material someone melded the dictaphone audio to the 24? fps of film so if any repeat noise/clicks on the belt would then be synced to the film and a forensically accurate timing to determine the number of shots or echoes It is better to try to find the original specification, rather than to deduce it from recordings which may have been altered or may not have followed the standard in the first place. As you can see above, it is not easy to be certain what the standard was supposed to be, even when an actual machine is available. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
#21
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:10:01 +0100,
lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: Any Dictabelt model I just tore apart many boxes of junk that I haven't seen for 20 years, but didn't find my Dictaphone or belts. Sorry. I think asking in the rec.antiques.radio+phono newsgroup might be more productive in finding someone with a working Dictaphone machine. I am constructing a playback machine for archival work, which needs to be able to cope with any Dictabelt. There was a standard speed which applied to all the normal models and all belts, so as to allow interchangeability of the belts world-wide. The basic machine was designed for 60 c/s mains, but there were adaptations to allow the machines to run at the correct belt speeds on 50 c/s. Some special machines were also designed to run at half speed for logging purposes . I have already encountered some belts which were recorded on unadapted half-speed 60 c/s machines working from 50 c/s supplies - and, no doubt, there will be others which were recorded at different non-standard speeds for various reasons. That explains the strange errors in apparent belt speed. I would have expected South Africa to use the same standards as UK (230V 50Hz). What I need to know is the manufacturer's specification for the standard belt speed which was supposed to allow interchangeability between all the machines. I can then calibrate the speed control on my machine to show the %age speed variation from the norm, so as to deduce information about the circumstances under which each belt was recorded. If that's the situation, you may need to handle a fairly wide range of belt speeds. I suspect that it might be easier to setup a servo controlled motor, external belt tensioner, and stylus attached to a linear actuator. In effect, a belt recorder implimented mostly in software. That should give you control over speed and head position, which should also solve the track skipping problem. It would also allow you to run at some high speed (i.e. 15 ips) and slow down the playback in software. Good luck. Sounds like an interesting project. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#22
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Dictabelt speed
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:10:01 +0100, lid (Adrian Tuddenham) wrote: Any Dictabelt model I just tore apart many boxes of junk that I haven't seen for 20 years, but didn't find my Dictaphone or belts. Sorry. I think asking in the rec.antiques.radio+phono newsgroup might be more productive in finding someone with a working Dictaphone machine. I have a working Dictablet machine (in addition to the one I have cannibalised to make the archival player). That is how I know the approximate speeds. What I do not know is the manufacturer's specified speed. For a number of reasons, the speed I have measured on my machine may not be the same as the specified speed. What I really need is the manufacturer's written specification (which might be found in either an internal works document or a decent workshop manual). Somebody somewhere must have worked on those machines and will know what the speed was supposed to be. I am constructing a playback machine for archival work, which needs to be able to cope with any Dictabelt. There was a standard speed which applied to all the normal models and all belts, so as to allow interchangeability of the belts world-wide. The basic machine was designed for 60 c/s mains, but there were adaptations to allow the machines to run at the correct belt speeds on 50 c/s. Some special machines were also designed to run at half speed for logging purposes . I have already encountered some belts which were recorded on unadapted half-speed 60 c/s machines working from 50 c/s supplies - and, no doubt, there will be others which were recorded at different non-standard speeds for various reasons. That explains the strange errors in apparent belt speed. I would have expected South Africa to use the same standards as UK (230V 50Hz). It did, but they were using a machine which had been adapted to run at half speed on 60 c/s - and were running it on 50 c/s. The speed was 17% below half speed. What I need to know is the manufacturer's specification for the standard belt speed which was supposed to allow interchangeability between all the machines. I can then calibrate the speed control on my machine to show the %age speed variation from the norm, so as to deduce information about the circumstances under which each belt was recorded. If that's the situation, you may need to handle a fairly wide range of belt speeds. I suspect that it might be easier to setup a servo controlled motor, external belt tensioner, and stylus attached to a linear actuator. In effect, a belt recorder implimented mostly in software. That should give you control over speed and head position, which should also solve the track skipping problem. It would also allow you to run at some high speed (i.e. 15 ips) and slow down the playback in software. My experience suggests that it is better to allow the stylus to follow the grooves, rather than being rigidly fixed where the groove ought to be. That way, belts which wander across the faces of the rollers don't cause the stylus to skip. The leadscrew of the machine drives the playback head carriage, but the head swivels freely to adjust itself + or - 1/8" from the central position set by the carriage. At present I am using the machine's existing motor with the two sets of stator coils driven in quadrature from a pair of high voltage amplifiers by signals from a 4-phase oscillator. As well as providing variable frequency, the system has to control the current through the motor windings so as to gives adequate mechanical torque but not saturate the iron and give rise to excessive hum harmonics in the playback head. The motor will work over a speed range from 20 to 70 c/s if the phasing and currents can be correctly maintained. It may be possible to put a toothed wheel and magnetic sensor on the drive roller shaft, which would be used to control the motor drive frequency so as to compensate for slippage in the rubber idler and drive belt and the motor slip frequency. That way, the drive roller speed would be accurately controlled and the only discrepancies would come from the very slight slippage of the recorded belt on the roller. Another way of specifying the speed would be to count the drive roller revolutions. Off-load, it seems to be spot-on 120 rpm, so perhaps that is how the manufacturers laid down their standard. Good luck. Sounds like an interesting project. It is. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dewalt DW423 - Bypass Speed Control - Convert to Single Speed | Woodworking | |||
HF single speed -or- variable speed multi-tool? | Home Repair | |||
HF single speed -or- variable speed multi-tool? | Home Repair | |||
Drill Press: variable speed vs. multi-speed | Woodworking | |||
Grizzly 1022 arbor speed vs blade speed | Woodworking |