Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps the sensible approach to this is extend the rubber feet by half an
inch as this is a known cure. There is no obvious place to put a secoind fan at the air outlet. -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#2
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() N_Cook wrote: Perhaps the sensible approach to this is extend the rubber feet by half an inch as this is a known cure. A simple solution at least. There is no obvious place to put a secoind fan at the air outlet. You CAN 'gang' 2 fans in series to increase the air pressure but I've never needed to do it. Also, fitting a 'thicker' fan will increase the air pressure. You may find 12, 19 and 25mm versions of certain axial fans. The thicker they get, the more pressure they generate and that helps achieve good airflow. The CFM figures are largely just a guidline since there are with zero pressure gradient. Graham |
#3
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Meat Plow wrote in message
... On Wed, 28 May 2008 18:31:00 +0100, N_Cook wrote: Perhaps the sensible approach to this is extend the rubber feet by half an inch as this is a known cure. There is no obvious place to put a secoind fan at the air outlet. So every XR 886 overheats? Not to the extent of tripping any of the thermal switches but enough to concern the owner into trying to improve airflow - admirable thinking for a non-techie. Just giving greater clearance to the airflow under an amp should not normally affect the amp temperature though. I would suggest that it is due to forcing the air to follow a tortuous path so a generic design flaw. I've heated up the fan motor, etc and there seems nothing wrong with this fan as well as no change of fan noise reported by the owner. -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#4
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
N_Cook wrote:
Meat Plow wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 May 2008 18:31:00 +0100, N_Cook wrote: Perhaps the sensible approach to this is extend the rubber feet by half an inch as this is a known cure. There is no obvious place to put a secoind fan at the air outlet. So every XR 886 overheats? Not to the extent of tripping any of the thermal switches but enough to concern the owner into trying to improve airflow - admirable thinking for a non-techie. Just giving greater clearance to the airflow under an amp should not normally affect the amp temperature though. I would suggest that it is due to forcing the air to follow a tortuous path so a generic design flaw. I've heated up the fan motor, etc and there seems nothing wrong with this fan as well as no change of fan noise reported by the owner. What say if an amplifier was designed in such a way that the thermal protection was intended to operate at some given device temperature, say the safe working temp of the output transistors, and the cooling arrangments designed accordingly? Output transistors get hot, heatsink gets hot, thermal devices trip, amplifier shuts down or whatever it`s designed to do. But, by increasing the airflow from the fan[1] or improving the cooling to the heatsink in some other way, results in the heatsink remaining cooler when the actual output devices themselves are still running at a high temperature. Bearing in mind that the temp sensors may not be directly monitoring the devices temp, but some other area on the heatsink, that might lead to the thermal protection failing to operate. By changing the design of the cooling, you could be blowing cool air over the temp sensors and not the output devices. Result = a trip to silicon heaven. I have seen Peavey mixer amps shut down in hot weather when placed in direct sunlight and driven hard, that`s the protection doing what it`s designed to do tho. Generally speaking, if a decent quality amplifier is overheating, it`s operator error, not a design fault. (IMO) Ron(UK) [1] This is hypothetical of course, I realise you havent changed the fan or it`s cooling path in this instance, but I think it`s something to be aware of. Maybe someone with experience in 'designing' power amplifiers could comment? |
#5
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron(UK) wrote in message
... N_Cook wrote: Meat Plow wrote in message ... On Wed, 28 May 2008 18:31:00 +0100, N_Cook wrote: Perhaps the sensible approach to this is extend the rubber feet by half an inch as this is a known cure. There is no obvious place to put a secoind fan at the air outlet. So every XR 886 overheats? Not to the extent of tripping any of the thermal switches but enough to concern the owner into trying to improve airflow - admirable thinking for a non-techie. Just giving greater clearance to the airflow under an amp should not normally affect the amp temperature though. I would suggest that it is due to forcing the air to follow a tortuous path so a generic design flaw. I've heated up the fan motor, etc and there seems nothing wrong with this fan as well as no change of fan noise reported by the owner. What say if an amplifier was designed in such a way that the thermal protection was intended to operate at some given device temperature, say the safe working temp of the output transistors, and the cooling arrangments designed accordingly? Output transistors get hot, heatsink gets hot, thermal devices trip, amplifier shuts down or whatever it`s designed to do. But, by increasing the airflow from the fan[1] or improving the cooling to the heatsink in some other way, results in the heatsink remaining cooler when the actual output devices themselves are still running at a high temperature. Bearing in mind that the temp sensors may not be directly monitoring the devices temp, but some other area on the heatsink, that might lead to the thermal protection failing to operate. By changing the design of the cooling, you could be blowing cool air over the temp sensors and not the output devices. Result = a trip to silicon heaven. I have seen Peavey mixer amps shut down in hot weather when placed in direct sunlight and driven hard, that`s the protection doing what it`s designed to do tho. Generally speaking, if a decent quality amplifier is overheating, it`s operator error, not a design fault. (IMO) Ron(UK) [1] This is hypothetical of course, I realise you havent changed the fan or it`s cooling path in this instance, but I think it`s something to be aware of. Maybe someone with experience in 'designing' power amplifiers could comment? s.e.d added All very true but you seem to be missing the point. An amp that works perfectly all right should not suddenly run noticeably cooler doing exactly the same job in the same gig but just placing fag packets, lighters etc , whatever was at hand, under each of the feet on the base. 2 th sw on 2 of the o/p TO3 and one on the heatsink in this case and yes the air blows over the those 2 th sw as much as the cans of the TO3, in fact they are directly in the ducted flow of air probably reducing the passing volume/area by a 1/3 at each end of one of the heatsink ducts, compared to no th sw in the path. -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#6
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
![]() N_Cook wrote: An amp that works perfectly all right should not suddenly run noticeably cooler doing exactly the same job in the same gig but just placing fag packets, lighters etc , whatever was at hand, under each of the feet on the base. You don't understand equipment cooling adequately. It's PERFECTLY obvious to me. It's all to do with the effect of back pressure on air flow. Adding more space underneath the unit reduces the back pressure. It's a truly cruddy design that they did it that way though. Graham |
#7
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron(UK)" wrote: Maybe someone with experience in 'designing' power amplifiers could comment? I have done ! There's something worth adding though. To optmise air flow you need a high 'static pressure'. There's a huge variation in this characteristic. The best examples I've found are NMB (formerly Boxer) and Panasonic's Panaflow fans. Be careful to order the high pressure version. They make versions with various motors speeds. In the case of NMB, the 'best' ones used to have 'B50' as part of the part number. I forget Panasonic's method of marking. DO NOT use cheap 'off brand' fans for applications like this. I see Farnell have NMB but only as a special US import. You didn't say what size it is but the popular 80mm size would be for example .... http://uk.farnell.com/8235414/electr...kl-05w-b50-e00 Read the data sheet here http://www.eminebea.com/content/pdf/...3/I/3112kl.pdf to see just how radically. the airflow varies with the Bxx model number. Graham |
#8
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() N_Cook wrote: Just giving greater clearance to the airflow under an amp should not normally affect the amp temperature though. Yes it will by reducing the back pressure. Graham |
#9
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() N_Cook wrote: I would suggest that it is due to forcing the air to follow a tortuous path so a generic design flaw. That's what causes the high back pressure (and hence low air flow). For good cooling the airflow path should be in a striaght line with air vents in and out as large as possible (consistent with safety regs) and there are some other cute aspects which are even less well known too. Graham |
#10
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eeyore wrote in message
... N_Cook wrote: I would suggest that it is due to forcing the air to follow a tortuous path so a generic design flaw. That's what causes the high back pressure (and hence low air flow). For good cooling the airflow path should be in a striaght line with air vents in and out as large as possible (consistent with safety regs) and there are some other cute aspects which are even less well known too. Graham Agreed , I'll take a photo later to show how tortuous this path is. Even more dramatic was an Ashdown amp I had to repair recently for another fault. Supposedly fan assisted cooling but the fan "design" location was just circulating air inside the casing as no baffles etc to guide air in and out the single "vent" port. Owner much appreciated the amp running much cooler and being able to feel air coming out of the vent. s.e.r added as design issue -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#11
![]()
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Meat Plow wrote: N_Cook wrote: Perhaps the sensible approach to this is extend the rubber feet by half an inch as this is a known cure. There is no obvious place to put a secoind fan at the air outlet. So every XR 886 overheats? Would depend how they're operated, load impedance and the style of music (especially so). I have researched this area extensively and the variations are enormous.Stnadardised tests such as 1/8 or 1/3 power noise are especially useless. Graham |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
peavey valeking amp | Electronics Repair | |||
Peavey Schems ... | Electronics Repair | |||
1997 Phillips Magnavox | Electronics Repair | |||
Peavey DPC 750 Amp | Electronics Repair | |||
Peavey XR 700-800 schematics? | Electronics Repair |