On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 06:29:02 -0700, DeserTBob's Futile Efforts
wrote:

http://search.ebay snipping to trash link

Yes, it's that "king of all eBay spammers" Charlie Nudo of Drums, PA
once more, trying a "stealth" spamming run of only a few posts in
off-topic/no-spam newsgroups to see if he can get away with it...which
he obviously hasn't. It's either stupidity at work, or his
self-destructive mental state which keeps him bashing in his own head,
over and over again.

"Noodles" has recently had even more of his Google Groups spamming
accounts shut down and now is only down to one. Also, his ISP,
Frontier.net, is levying fines against email and Usenet spammers,
probably which has helped keep "Noodles" somewhat under control. But,
now it's time to rack up more of those successful spam complaints to
get this account shut down, as well. The last campaign got all the
remaining active spam accounts shut down by Google in short order.

Please take a moment to forward his spam post, along with complete
headers and adding "SPAM from 216.222.224.175" in the subject line,
to:






Hopefully, in short order, yet another Charlie Nudo eBay junk spam
account will bite the dust. For those unaware of this spamming
psychotic megatroll, see:

http://blogspot.nudowatch.com

DeserTBoB wrote:

snip


Please take a moment to forward his spam post, along with complete
headers and adding "SPAM from 216.222.224.snip" in the subject line,
to:

snip

Please consider a bit more research before complaining about abuse
from a particular IP address; often there are many users behind
NAT these days, operating in an entirely unrelated manner to each
other, with a single visible public IP address. It is not fair
to them to make a blanket condemnation. Dedicated spammers can
redirect their trash from many IP sources as well, including
public terminals, hotspots, and infected PCs. An effective
anti-spam campaign really needs to address the issue of zombies
first.

IMHO Usenet would be well served by a conversion to auto-moderation
of technical newsgroups that are plagued by spam. In addition it
would help to improve the terribly poor signal to noise ratio
in some groups (in recent years) caused by the bad behavior of
some participants.

Regards,

Michael

On Aug 18, 11:31 am, msg wrote:
DeserTBoB wrote:

snip



Please take a moment to forward his spam post, along with complete
headers and adding "SPAM from 216.222.224.snip" in the subject line,
to:

snip

Please consider a bit more research before complaining about abuse
from a particular IP address; often there are many users behind
NAT these days, operating in an entirely unrelated manner to each
other, with a single visible public IP address. It is not fair
to them to make a blanket condemnation. Dedicated spammers can
redirect their trash from many IP sources as well, including
public terminals, hotspots, and infected PCs. An effective
anti-spam campaign really needs to address the issue of zombies
first.

IMHO Usenet would be well served by a conversion to auto-moderation
of technical newsgroups that are plagued by spam. In addition it
would help to improve the terribly poor signal to noise ratio
in some groups (in recent years) caused by the bad behavior of
some participants.

Regards,

Michael

gotta admit though, that is a pretty cool looking record player

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

msg wrote:

DeserTBoB wrote:

snip


Please take a moment to forward his spam post, along with complete
headers and adding "SPAM from 216.222.224.snip" in the subject line,
to:

snip

Please consider a bit more research before complaining about abuse
from a particular IP address; often there are many users behind
NAT these days, operating in an entirely unrelated manner to each
other, with a single visible public IP address. It is not fair
to them to make a blanket condemnation. Dedicated spammers can
redirect their trash from many IP sources as well, including
public terminals, hotspots, and infected PCs. An effective
anti-spam campaign really needs to address the issue of zombies
first.

IMHO Usenet would be well served by a conversion to auto-moderation
of technical newsgroups that are plagued by spam. In addition it
would help to improve the terribly poor signal to noise ratio
in some groups (in recent years) caused by the bad behavior of
some participants.

Regards,

Michael


That spammer has been pouring his crap into rec.antiques.radio+phono
for years. His ISP is either spinless, or blind with greed.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:
DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

On Aug 19, 3:32 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:
On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

You Could be grateful that for the first time in over a month you
weren't ignored completely. Twit.

On Aug 19, 4:49 pm, Steven wrote:
On Aug 19, 3:32 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

You Could be grateful that for the first time in over a month you
weren't ignored completely. Twit.


Only to have Dummiass respond to your posts.

On Aug 19, 6:07 pm, Radiola wrote:
On Aug 19, 4:49 pm, Steven wrote:





On Aug 19, 3:32 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

You Could be grateful that for the first time in over a month you
weren't ignored completely. Twit.

Only to have Dummiass respond to your posts.

You're lucky. I wouldn't be as nice to you as him.

On Aug 19, 5:49 pm, Steven wrote:
On Aug 19, 3:32 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

You Could be grateful that for the first time in over a month you
weren't ignored completely. Twit.

August 19th and you have almost 1700 posts for the month. Good grief,
get a life and move out of your mothers basement.

On Aug 19, 8:51 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:
On Aug 19, 5:49 pm, Steven wrote:





On Aug 19, 3:32 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

You Could be grateful that for the first time in over a month you
weren't ignored completely. Twit.

August 19th and you have almost 1700 posts for the month. Good grief,
get a life and move out of your mothers basement.

Mom doesn't have a basement, Nudo. You live in a doghouse however.

I've lived nearly 40 miles away since 1983.

On Aug 19, 8:51 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:
On Aug 19, 5:49 pm, Steven wrote:





On Aug 19, 3:32 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

You Could be grateful that for the first time in over a month you
weren't ignored completely. Twit.

August 19th and you have almost 1700 posts for the month. Good grief,
get a life and move out of your mothers basement.

Oh, yeah, one thing. Why are you so jealous? All of yours are world-
class garbage. Trip on that Mr. Fail and Tear it Apart.

On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 10:31:23 -0500, msg wrote:

DeserTBoB wrote:

snip


Please take a moment to forward his spam post, along with complete
headers and adding "SPAM from 216.222.224.snip" in the subject line,
to:

snip

Please consider a bit more research before complaining about abuse
from a particular IP address snip

I've been hammering away at this megatoad for years, and have
recently been having some success. The IPs are real; his IP is
frontier.net, which recently bought out epix.net of Dallas, PA.

This idiot's too stupid to know anything about spoofing IPs or
anything remotely resembling a spambot. He pecks away on his thrift
store PII, one message at a time, in "goo goo groopz", hoping to sell
some of the trash he scooped out of the dumpster in front of his run
down "resort" in the toxic coal mining region of NE Pennsylvania.
However, his output of these annoying spamgrams hit 30 and up to 60 a
day at times, but my technique has gotten 26 of his Google accounts
banned for spamming, and now Frontier.net is up his ass for the same
offense.

Do some research on this toad Charlie Nudo...you'll find him
laughable.

http://nudowatch.blogspot.com

On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 17:14:38 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

That spammer has been pouring his crap into rec.antiques.radio+phono
for years. His ISP is either spinless, or blind with greed. snip

Mike, FYI:

Noodles' ISP, Epix, was bought out by Frontier of Rochester, NY
earlier in the year. Frontier assessed both email and Usenet spammers
a minimum $200 "labor charge" for disciplining them for Terms of
Service violations, and has no problem cutting off Noodles' service
entirely should he start up with the Google spamming again.

Google's finally responding now, as well, as Noodles has had 26
accounts shut down for spamming, harassment, etc. etc. etc.

Frontier's abuse mail:



They like having the IP of the spamgram in the subject line...for
whatever reason.

In rec.antiques.radio+phono DeserTBoB wrote:
I've been hammering away at this megatoad for years, and have
recently been having some success. The IPs are real; his IP is
frontier.net, which recently bought out epix.net of Dallas, PA.

Hammering by using the same obnoxious spamming methods. Two wrongs never
make a right.

On Aug 19, 10:55 pm, Steven wrote:
On Aug 19, 8:51 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:





On Aug 19, 5:49 pm, Steven wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:32 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

You Could be grateful that for the first time in over a month you
weren't ignored completely. Twit.

August 19th and you have almost 1700 posts for the month. Good grief,
get a life and move out of your mothers basement.

Mom doesn't have a basement, Nudo. You live in a doghouse however.

I've lived nearly 40 miles away since 1983.- Hide quoted text -


Oh, you really got me on that one, however, moving from your mothers
and into public housing was a lateral move at best.

On Aug 19, 10:57 pm, Steven wrote:
On Aug 19, 8:51 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:





On Aug 19, 5:49 pm, Steven wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:32 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

You Could be grateful that for the first time in over a month you
weren't ignored completely. Twit.

August 19th and you have almost 1700 posts for the month. Good grief,
get a life and move out of your mothers basement.

Oh, yeah, one thing. Why are you so jealous? All of yours are world-
class garbage. Trip on that Mr. Fail and Tear it Apart.- Hide quoted text -

Your net detective skills are as limp as your driving skills.

On 20 Aug 2007 10:09:21 GMT, wrote:

In rec.antiques.radio+phono DeserTBoB wrote:
I've been hammering away at this megatoad for years, and have
recently been having some success. The IPs are real; his IP is
frontier.net, which recently bought out epix.net of Dallas, PA.

Hammering by using the same obnoxious spamming methods. snip

Wrong (again,) Dutch Boy. "Spam" defined is unwanted, unsolicited
email or Usenet articles which are designed to sell items or schemes
for a commercial purpose. What my responses are is called "spam
copping." Get a clue.

F*%^ DB...he hasn't put nearly 20 of these "MI5 vignettes" up on this
and dozens of groups worldwide in a few hours time.

Time to flood this 'Toronto Free-net' with abuse then get back to
castrating Bob the Boar. Google doesn't even filter or remove the
accounts they ban.

The fact it starts with Italian groups suggests the usual suspect
k00ks.

On Aug 20, 7:54 am, Delfin Black
wrote:
On Aug 19, 10:55 pm, Steven wrote:





On Aug 19, 8:51 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 19, 5:49 pm, Steven wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:32 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

You Could be grateful that for the first time in over a month you
weren't ignored completely. Twit.

August 19th and you have almost 1700 posts for the month. Good grief,
get a life and move out of your mothers basement.

Mom doesn't have a basement, Nudo. You live in a doghouse however.

I've lived nearly 40 miles away since 1983.- Hide quoted text -

Oh, you really got me on that one, however, moving from your mothers
and into public housing was a lateral move at best.

I don't live in public housing, I rent a common house from a landord.
You don't know anything about anything but your little world of
Usenet. You aren't even Nudo. You're the same useless syphilic gay
crush of happines that always can't wait to bug other thinking it
means something and might make me magically go away.

Quit wasting my time, Smashmouth. I have a shipment to make.

On Aug 20, 7:55 am, Delfin Black
wrote:
On Aug 19, 10:57 pm, Steven wrote:





On Aug 19, 8:51 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 19, 5:49 pm, Steven wrote:

On Aug 19, 3:32 pm, Delfin Black
wrote:

On Aug 18, 2:20 pm, Steven wrote:

DB was banned from Google groups a LONG time ago if you'd look at the
profile, and that means the posting is done from Usenet.

Anti spam measures my butt. The peanut gallery members will please
refrain? The rest of us just normally ignore both ot them/

Bull****. You post everytime they do.

Don't you have some neighbors to run over?

You Could be grateful that for the first time in over a month you
weren't ignored completely. Twit.

August 19th and you have almost 1700 posts for the month. Good grief,
get a life and move out of your mothers basement.

Oh, yeah, one thing. Why are you so jealous? All of yours are world-
class garbage. Trip on that Mr. Fail and Tear it Apart.- Hide quoted text -

Your net detective skills are as limp as your driving skills.

I don't drive and I don't care, Viagra Nation.

same asshole as usual, same group

Curb your dog, kids.

In rec.antiques.radio+phono DeserTBoB wrote:
On 20 Aug 2007 10:09:21 GMT, wrote:
Hammering by using the same obnoxious spamming methods. snip
Wrong (again,) Dutch Boy. "Spam" defined is unwanted, unsolicited
email or Usenet articles which are designed to sell items or schemes
for a commercial purpose. What my responses are is called "spam
copping." Get a clue.

No need for big words when you can't back them up. Spam has, per
definition, nothing to do with commercial intent or purpose. Only
with the flooding of unwanted or unsolicited articles, messages or
other misuse of communication. Which may or may not be commercial.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam

Be sure to check out the Monty Python part as well, as this is the
origin of the word spam in this context.

--
Met vriendelijke groet,

Maarten Bakker.