On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 11:06:27 -0500, John Fields did most oddly ask:
snip
BTW, what if there were no rhetorical questions?

There'd be no rhetoric?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"John Fields" wrote in message
...

Not me!

Over the last year or so I had a couple of really scary episodes
where my blood pressure went up to something like 220/150 and I
wound up in the hospital with some serious drugs needed to bring it
down to "normal". Since then we've gotten it down to around 120/60
(a near miracle, ISTM) where it sits most of the time, even when
I'm ragging on trash like Homer, but thanks for asking.

And yet mine runs 110/70 no matter what you post. You should give it up.

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:57:29 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
.. .

Then there's something you _can_ do about it? What, LOL?

**** off low grade morons like you.

You can't even keep yourself from looking like a goddam fool, here,
where trivial **** is concerned and yet you think that you're fit to
determine how the entire world should be run? Forget it. You're
nothing but a low-life piece of **** and that's all you'll ever be
so stop pretending that you're something that doesn't need to be
flushed.

Let him have Kuwait and keep gasoline at 99 cents per gallon.

So, as long as you can get gas for 99 cents a gallon you're willing
to look the other way when he kills and tortures thousands of people
for daring to disagree with him, as well as using his own people on
which to test his biological weapons and God knows what all else?

You're quite a piece of work Homer.

Right. Life is so pleasant there now - why the Iraqis keep throwing flowers
at the US troops. Not a single Iraqi was even harmed by the invasion and
occupation - so much better now.

And then there's Kuwait, saved by US troops while their own sons played in
the fleshpots of Europe.

"The one million citizens of Kuwait, where government financial assets have
topped 166 billion dollars, are to receive a grant of 200 dinars (690
dollars) each, the government has announced.
The two million foreign workers in the oil-rich emirate were not included.

The OPEC member posted a surplus in each of the past seven fiscal years,
totalling more than 50 billion dollars. Kuwait is also headed for record
revenues this year.

The government offered a similar grant in October 2004 and raised salaries
of citizens by 170 dollars monthly last year. MPs in the outspoken
parliament have been pressing for a new hike.

The Gulf Arab state provides a cradle-to-grave welfare system to its
citizens who receive most public services at heavily subsidized prices and
pay no income tax.

Some 92 percent of Kuwait's 300,000-strong workforce are employed in
government jobs, with high wages and minimal work pressure."

Hmmm, and what has happened to the servicemen injured saving Kuwait? The
ones who are in wheel chairs or blind living in run down trailers? Any money
for them?

---
Nope. That wasn't part of the deal.
---

You don't get to be President of the United States of America if
you're illiterate, dumbass, and the only reason he wouldn't be able
to understand what you wrote would be because of the stupid,
nonsensical **** you spew.

I still can't see how a doped up idiot and C student like little George
could even get into Harvard let alone earn an MBA. Something is wrong there.

---
Nope, it's just that _you_ can't see how it happened. I'm sure
there's a lot of stuff you can't quite figure out. Like how to tie
your shoelaces, maybe?
---


As far as the rest of it goes, you're just afraid to do it because
you know damned well that you've got nothing to say that the
administration hasn't heard already and rejected as utter crap.
With good reason, BTW.

None of them has a ****ing clue.

---
I doubt that. I think it's more like _you_ don't have a ****ing
clue. Everything you think you know something about you get from
the media. Do you get regular communiques from the White House
apprising you of what's going on and asking for your opinion? No.

Do you have any idea of what's going on besides what you read in the
paper and see on TV? No. ****ing clueless and you don't even know
it, sadder still.
---

You're the spokesturd for Coprofaggots Anonymous and you don't feel
uncomfortable with that, do you?

No, that's your 'honor for life'.

---
Oh, how clever and devastating...
---

Interesting how you always resort to ad hominem arguments instead of posting facts.

---
That wasn't an ad hominem argument, dumbass, it was an ad hominem
attack.

Learn what the "big words" mean before you use them and you'll save
yourself a world of grief, y'know...


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:53:19 -0500, John Fields did most oddly state:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:57:29 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote:
"John Fields" wrote...

Then there's something you _can_ do about it? What, LOL?

**** off low grade morons like you.

You can't even keep yourself from looking like a goddam fool, here,
where trivial **** is concerned and yet you think that you're fit to
determine how the entire world should be run? Forget it. You're
nothing but a low-life piece of **** and that's all you'll ever be so
stop pretending that you're something that doesn't need to be flushed.

Let him have Kuwait and keep gasoline at 99 cents per gallon.

So, as long as you can get gas for 99 cents a gallon you're willing to
look the other way when he kills and tortures thousands of people for
daring to disagree with him, as well as using his own people on which
to test his biological weapons and God knows what all else?

You're quite a piece of work Homer.

Right. Life is so pleasant there now - why the Iraqis keep throwing
flowers at the US troops. Not a single Iraqi was even harmed by the
invasion and occupation - so much better now.

And then there's Kuwait, saved by US troops while their own sons played
in the fleshpots of Europe.

"The one million citizens of Kuwait, where government financial assets
have topped 166 billion dollars, are to receive a grant of 200 dinars
(690 dollars) each, the government has announced. The two million foreign
workers in the oil-rich emirate were not included.

The OPEC member posted a surplus in each of the past seven fiscal years,
totalling more than 50 billion dollars. Kuwait is also headed for record
revenues this year.

The government offered a similar grant in October 2004 and raised
salaries of citizens by 170 dollars monthly last year. MPs in the
outspoken parliament have been pressing for a new hike.

The Gulf Arab state provides a cradle-to-grave welfare system to its
citizens who receive most public services at heavily subsidized prices
and pay no income tax.

Some 92 percent of Kuwait's 300,000-strong workforce are employed in
government jobs, with high wages and minimal work pressure."

Hmmm, and what has happened to the servicemen injured saving Kuwait? The
ones who are in wheel chairs or blind living in run down trailers? Any
money for them?

---
Nope. That wasn't part of the deal.

Gee, why am _I_ not surprised? Of course, who cares what happens to a
bunch of worthless, lowlife grunts who were lucky enough to visit the
Middle East on the taxpayer's dime? They were just lower-income types
anyway, right? Not useful people, like the rich. Not anyone who
_matters_. Well, aside from the rich people who volunteered, but they
were silly. Leave the actual fighting to the little people, the cannon
fodder -- it's what they're for.

Right?

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"John Fields" wrote in message
...

Hmmm, and what has happened to the servicemen injured saving Kuwait? The
ones who are in wheel chairs or blind living in run down trailers? Any
money
for them?

---
Nope. That wasn't part of the deal.

Right. Use the Yanks when you must and ignore them the rest of the time.

I still can't see how a doped up idiot and C student like little George
could even get into Harvard let alone earn an MBA. Something is wrong
there.

---
Nope, it's just that _you_ can't see how it happened. I'm sure
there's a lot of stuff you can't quite figure out. Like how to tie
your shoelaces, maybe?

I'm not the only one who wonders how someone with a degree in history
doesn't have a clue about history and with a degree in business
administration doesn't have a clue how to manage anything.

None of them has a ****ing clue.

---
I doubt that. I think it's more like _you_ don't have a ****ing
clue. Everything you think you know something about you get from
the media. Do you get regular communiques from the White House
apprising you of what's going on and asking for your opinion? No.

Do you have any idea of what's going on besides what you read in the
paper and see on TV? No. ****ing clueless and you don't even know
it, sadder still.

And yet I am SO much better informed than you.

You're the spokesturd for Coprofaggots Anonymous and you don't feel
uncomfortable with that, do you?

No, that's your 'honor for life'.

---
Oh, how clever and devastating...
---

Interesting how you always resort to ad hominem arguments instead of
posting facts.

---
That wasn't an ad hominem argument, dumbass, it was an ad hominem
attack.

Learn what the "big words" mean before you use them and you'll save
yourself a world of grief, y'know...

ad hominem argument, ad hominem attack. Tomato - tomato.

Seems it is you who constantly display ignorance. You should cut down on the
stupid pills.

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 21:10:20 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
.. .

Not me!

Over the last year or so I had a couple of really scary episodes
where my blood pressure went up to something like 220/150 and I
wound up in the hospital with some serious drugs needed to bring it
down to "normal". Since then we've gotten it down to around 120/60
(a near miracle, ISTM) where it sits most of the time, even when
I'm ragging on trash like Homer, but thanks for asking.

And yet mine runs 110/70 no matter what you post. You should give it up.

---
I'm not posting to try to raise your blood pressure, I just like
bashing the bashers.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

"John Fields" wrote in message
...

And yet mine runs 110/70 no matter what you post. You should give it up.

I'm not posting to try to raise your blood pressure, I just like
bashing the bashers.

No, you like trolling. I like catching trolls, dragging them into the boat,
whacking them on the head with a 2 by 4, and tossing them back for shark
bait.

Thanks!

Homer J Simpson wrote:
"John Fields" wrote in message
...

And yet mine runs 110/70 no matter what you post. You should give
it up.

I'm not posting to try to raise your blood pressure, I just like
bashing the bashers.

No, you like trolling. I like catching trolls, dragging them into the
boat, whacking them on the head with a 2 by 4, and tossing them back
for shark bait.

Do you plan to do that soon?

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:07:33 GMT, The God of Odd Statements
wrote:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:53:19 -0500, John Fields did most oddly state:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:57:29 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote:

Hmmm, and what has happened to the servicemen injured saving Kuwait? The
ones who are in wheel chairs or blind living in run down trailers? Any
money for them?

---
Nope. That wasn't part of the deal.

Gee, why am _I_ not surprised? Of course, who cares what happens to a
bunch of worthless, lowlife grunts who were lucky enough to visit the
Middle East on the taxpayer's dime?

---
Their families and friends do, and their country does.
---

They were just lower-income types
anyway, right? Not useful people, like the rich. Not anyone who
_matters_. Well, aside from the rich people who volunteered, but they
were silly. Leave the actual fighting to the little people, the cannon
fodder -- it's what they're for.

Right?

---
Kinda. When you join the service as enlisted, (just for example,
let's say the Army Infantry) the presumption is that if you have to
go to war you're going to be a grunt, you're going to be put in
harm's way, and you're the one who's going to have to do the dirty
work. There's no mystery about that, and it's just the way it
works.

Certainly there's no presumption that a grateful foreign nation
which you helped will repay you in monetary terms, since that's not
part of the deal.

Simple.



--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

John Fields wrote in
:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:07:33 GMT, The God of Odd Statements
wrote:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:53:19 -0500, John Fields did most oddly state:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:57:29 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote:

Hmmm, and what has happened to the servicemen injured saving Kuwait?
The ones who are in wheel chairs or blind living in run down
trailers? Any money for them?

---
Nope. That wasn't part of the deal.

Gee, why am _I_ not surprised? Of course, who cares what happens to a
bunch of worthless, lowlife grunts who were lucky enough to visit the
Middle East on the taxpayer's dime?

---
Their families and friends do, and their country does.


No it doesn't. That wasn't part of the deal, as you said yourself and now
appear to contradict. The sooner people take some personal responsibility
instead of displacing and enshrining it in some kind of veneer of
patriotism, the sooner people will stop dying stupidly for nothing.

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:14:02 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
.. .

Hmmm, and what has happened to the servicemen injured saving Kuwait? The
ones who are in wheel chairs or blind living in run down trailers? Any
money
for them?

---
Nope. That wasn't part of the deal.

Right. Use the Yanks when you must and ignore them the rest of the time.

---
So now you'd have the countries we've helped making payments to
individual servicemen/women for the services they performed? That
would be OK, except that we don't run a mercenary Army.
---

I still can't see how a doped up idiot and C student like little George
could even get into Harvard let alone earn an MBA. Something is wrong
there.

---
Nope, it's just that _you_ can't see how it happened. I'm sure
there's a lot of stuff you can't quite figure out. Like how to tie
your shoelaces, maybe?

I'm not the only one who wonders how someone with a degree in history
doesn't have a clue about history and with a degree in business
administration doesn't have a clue how to manage anything.

None of them has a ****ing clue.

---
I doubt that. I think it's more like _you_ don't have a ****ing
clue. Everything you think you know something about you get from
the media. Do you get regular communiques from the White House
apprising you of what's going on and asking for your opinion? No.

Do you have any idea of what's going on besides what you read in the
paper and see on TV? No. ****ing clueless and you don't even know
it, sadder still.

And yet I am SO much better informed than you.

---
Filling your head with **** doesn't mean you're better informed, it
just means you're thinking what somebody else wants you to.
---


You're the spokesturd for Coprofaggots Anonymous and you don't feel
uncomfortable with that, do you?

No, that's your 'honor for life'.

---
Oh, how clever and devastating...
---

Interesting how you always resort to ad hominem arguments instead of
posting facts.

---
That wasn't an ad hominem argument, dumbass, it was an ad hominem
attack.

Learn what the "big words" mean before you use them and you'll save
yourself a world of grief, y'know...

ad hominem argument, ad hominem attack. Tomato - tomato.

---
Hmmm... seems you need to look up the little words, too.
---


Seems it is you who constantly display ignorance. You should cut down on the
stupid pills.

---
Speaking of ignorance, that 'display' is a plural verb. It should
be the singular, 'displays' in order to agree numerically with the
singular noun, 'you'.

But, as far as the stupid pills goes, you're right.

I should cut down, but every time I post something for you I have to
take one so I can dull my wits and write at a level you can
comprehend.



--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:51:15 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
.. .

And yet mine runs 110/70 no matter what you post. You should give it up.

I'm not posting to try to raise your blood pressure, I just like
bashing the bashers.

No, you like trolling. I like catching trolls, dragging them into the boat,
whacking them on the head with a 2 by 4, and tossing them back for shark
bait.

---
That may be what you _like_, but right now _you're_ the one with
the hook in his mouth.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:14:33 -0500, John Fields did most oddly state:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:07:33 GMT, The God of Odd Statements wrote:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:53:19 -0500, John Fields did most oddly state:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:57:29 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote:

Hmmm, and what has happened to the servicemen injured saving Kuwait?
The ones who are in wheel chairs or blind living in run down trailers?
Any money for them?

---
Nope. That wasn't part of the deal.

Gee, why am _I_ not surprised? Of course, who cares what happens to a
bunch of worthless, lowlife grunts who were lucky enough to visit the
Middle East on the taxpayer's dime?

---
Their families and friends do, and their country does. ---

No, their country doesn't -- not meaningfully. There may be lots of
verbiage to that effect, but it's all hot air. I don't mean individual
citizens (who aren't in a position to do anything significant), I mean
your government and military.

They were just lower-income types
anyway, right? Not useful people, like the rich. Not anyone who
_matters_. Well, aside from the rich people who volunteered, but they
were silly. Leave the actual fighting to the little people, the cannon
fodder -- it's what they're for.

Right?

---
Kinda. When you join the service as enlisted, (just for example, let's
say the Army Infantry) the presumption is that if you have to go to war
you're going to be a grunt, you're going to be put in harm's way, and
you're the one who's going to have to do the dirty work. There's no
mystery about that, and it's just the way it works.

And then get dumped on the sidewalk, with a "So long, sucker!"

Certainly there's no presumption that a grateful foreign nation which you
helped will repay you in monetary terms, since that's not part of the
deal.

Considering how your government and military tend to prefer that someone
else look after vets with Gulf War Syndrome, I don't see why not. I
support the individual troops, you see, not merely the idea of them, as
the wingnuts do.

Simple-

minded, yes.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

John Fields wrote in
:

So now you'd have the countries we've helped making payments to
individual servicemen/women for the services they performed? That
would be OK, except that we don't run a mercenary Army.


I don't think the point was about services performed, but about
compensation for loss. If one soldier or marine gets luckier than another,
they're more likely to do well for themselves later as it's a hell of a
thing to put on the CV for those who value such things.

Is there an insurance against loss of limbs or other faculties in war? As
far as I know there isn't, everyone from the government right down to the
smallest private insurance companies expressly exclude such losses on the
grounds that war is hell, basically.

"John Fields" wrote in message
...

So now you'd have the countries we've helped making payments to
individual servicemen/women for the services they performed? That
would be OK, except that we don't run a mercenary Army.

Explain the "campaign contributions" from the oil companies then.

And yet I am SO much better informed than you.

Filling your head with **** doesn't mean you're better informed, it
just means you're thinking what somebody else wants you to.

I know you are but what am I?

I should cut down, but every time I post something for you I have to
take one so I can dull my wits and write at a level you can
comprehend.

Odd. I have to have a four year old translate for me because you write so
far below my level.

"John Fields" wrote in message
news
That may be what you _like_, but right now _you're_ the one with
the hook in his mouth.

Not on this planet. What color is the sky on your world?

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 23:27:32 GMT, Lostgallifreyan
wrote:

John Fields wrote in
:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:07:33 GMT, The God of Odd Statements
wrote:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:53:19 -0500, John Fields did most oddly state:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 20:57:29 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote:

Hmmm, and what has happened to the servicemen injured saving Kuwait?
The ones who are in wheel chairs or blind living in run down
trailers? Any money for them?

---
Nope. That wasn't part of the deal.

Gee, why am _I_ not surprised? Of course, who cares what happens to a
bunch of worthless, lowlife grunts who were lucky enough to visit the
Middle East on the taxpayer's dime?

---
Their families and friends do, and their country does.


No it doesn't. That wasn't part of the deal, as you said yourself and now
appear to contradict. The sooner people take some personal responsibility
instead of displacing and enshrining it in some kind of veneer of
patriotism, the sooner people will stop dying stupidly for nothing.

---
That's not what I said.

The question was: "Who cares what happens to a bunch of worthless,
lowlife grunts who were lucky enough to visit the Middle East on the
taxpayer's dime?"

I think it's pretty clear that their families and friends will care
about what happens to them, don't you?

As far as the country is concerned, (or let's say the government,
instead) the care there will be financial. A soldier who comes back
unhurt won't have to use the VA's medical facilities or cause the
government to spend anything else (with some exceptions) once the
soldier goes back to civilian life.

I agree with the taking personal responsibility part, BTW.
Unfortunately, not everyone is capable of taking responsibility for
themselves, and I suppose that's where cannon fodder comes from.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:45:31 -0500, John Fields did most oddly state:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:14:02 GMT, "Homer J Simpson" wrote:
"John Fields" wrote...

Hmmm, and what has happened to the servicemen injured saving Kuwait?
The ones who are in wheel chairs or blind living in run down trailers?
Any money
for them?

---
Nope. That wasn't part of the deal.

Right. Use the Yanks when you must and ignore them the rest of the time.

---
So now you'd have the countries we've helped making payments to individual
servicemen/women for the services they performed? That would be OK,
except that we don't run a mercenary Army. ---

No, you(r leaders) run an Imperial Army/Navy/Air Force/etc., though they
have yet to admit it, after more than a century of doing so.

snip spelling/typo lames

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:49:43 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:32:38 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
"John Fields" wrote in message

Consider the blind - who listen to Usenet. They have to wade through a
mountain of crap to hear one line - or sometimes none.

So we should all carry white canes?

You're an American. I don't expect you to give a damn about your fellow
citizens - or anyone else on earth.

It's not a question of any of that, it's a question of not forcing
the many to conform to the needs of the unfortunate few.

True, but doesn't that go hand-in-hand with not forcing the few to
conform to the limitations of the many?

Thanks,
Rich

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 00:04:59 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
.. .

So now you'd have the countries we've helped making payments to
individual servicemen/women for the services they performed? That
would be OK, except that we don't run a mercenary Army.

Explain the "campaign contributions" from the oil companies then.

And yet I am SO much better informed than you.

Filling your head with **** doesn't mean you're better informed, it
just means you're thinking what somebody else wants you to.

I know you are but what am I?

I should cut down, but every time I post something for you I have to
take one so I can dull my wits and write at a level you can
comprehend.

Odd. I have to have a four year old translate for me because you write so
far below my level.

---
Excellent! It's working!


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

"Richard The Dreaded Libertarian" wrote in message
news
It's not a question of any of that, it's a question of not forcing
the many to conform to the needs of the unfortunate few.

True, but doesn't that go hand-in-hand with not forcing the few to
conform to the limitations of the many?

I just watched a show on Portugal. I saw outside a famous museum an
obviously new and added ramp for wheelchairs. It made me happy to see that
in Portugal they recognize basic fairness.

It's much harder to add these ramps than to trim Usenet posts but people in
many countries do the first. What is the problem with the second?

"John Fields" wrote in message
...

Odd. I have to have a four year old translate for me because you write so
far below my level.

Excellent! It's working!

Yes. I can sometimes follow your demented ramblings.

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 00:05:00 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news
That may be what you _like_, but right now _you're_ the one with
the hook in his mouth.

Not on this planet.

---
Really? Disengage, then.
---

What color is the sky on your world?

---
Depends...


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 00:29:38 +0000, Homer J Simpson did most oddly state:
"Richard The Dreaded Libertarian" wrote...

It's not a question of any of that, it's a question of not forcing the
many to conform to the needs of the unfortunate few.

True, but doesn't that go hand-in-hand with not forcing the few to
conform to the limitations of the many?

I just watched a show on Portugal. I saw outside a famous museum an
obviously new and added ramp for wheelchairs. It made me happy to see that
in Portugal they recognize basic fairness.

It's much harder to add these ramps than to trim Usenet posts but people
in many countries do the first. What is the problem with the second?

Nothing. See? I trimmed. If you require more trimming than that, you'll
have to wait until I feel like it.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

Homer The Homo!
Understand that?





On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 00:04:59 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
.. .

So now you'd have the countries we've helped making payments to
individual servicemen/women for the services they performed? That
would be OK, except that we don't run a mercenary Army.

Explain the "campaign contributions" from the oil companies then.

And yet I am SO much better informed than you.

Filling your head with **** doesn't mean you're better informed, it
just means you're thinking what somebody else wants you to.

I know you are but what am I?

I should cut down, but every time I post something for you I have to
take one so I can dull my wits and write at a level you can
comprehend.

Odd. I have to have a four year old translate for me because you write so
far below my level.

"Bart" wrote in message
...

Homer The Homo!
Understand that?

Bart the Fart. Understand that?

Point?

BTW, Homer shows more than a little interest in Marge so we must wonder
about YOUR homosexual fixations. You should talk to the 'Reverend' Phelps.

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:03:10 +0000, Bart did most oddly state:

Homer The Homo!
Understand that?

You mean you're a top-poasting gay-lamer? I suppose I can understand
it...

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

The God of Odd Statements wrote in
news
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:03:10 +0000, Bart did most oddly state:

Homer The Homo!
Understand that?

You mean you're a top-poasting gay-lamer? I suppose I can understand
it...

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt



Are you really that concerned with usenet etiquette, P's and Q's and such?
Pretty funny given the size of that sig...

Lostgallifreyan wrote:

Are you really that concerned with usenet etiquette, P's and Q's and such?
Pretty funny given the size of that sig...


Look at some of the newsgroups you are replying to. alt.usenet.kooks
is not a place to reply to. I deleted it from my reply.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 04:14:44 +0000, Lostgallifreyan did most oddly state:
The God of Odd Statements wrote:
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:03:10 +0000, Bart did most oddly state:

Homer The Homo!
Understand that?

You mean you're a top-poasting gay-lamer? I suppose I can understand
it...

Are you really that concerned with usenet etiquette, P's and Q's and such?
Pretty funny given the size of that sig...

Actually, I'm more concerned with oafish stupidity and k0oKy behaviour,
such as that exhibited by "Bart". My .sig is appropriately-sized for Teh
Empire, TYVM.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!
"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:

"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

On 2006-10-02, Homer J Simpson wrote:

I just watched a show on Portugal. I saw outside a famous museum an
obviously new and added ramp for wheelchairs. It made me happy to see that
in Portugal they recognize basic fairness.

It's much harder to add these ramps than to trim Usenet posts but people in
many countries do the first. What is the problem with the second?

I've got to wonder how may blind people follow the electronics newsgroups;
but anyway, most decent newsreaders can hide the quoted text fairly easily.

eg: if I type "T" slrn hides all but one line of the quotes.

still usenet posts are written once and read hundereds of times. greatest
efficinecy is had when the messages are optimised for reading.

--

Bye.
Jasen

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 00:17:04 GMT, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
wrote:

On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 18:49:43 -0500, John Fields wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 02:32:38 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
"John Fields" wrote in message

Consider the blind - who listen to Usenet. They have to wade through a
mountain of crap to hear one line - or sometimes none.

So we should all carry white canes?

You're an American. I don't expect you to give a damn about your fellow
citizens - or anyone else on earth.

It's not a question of any of that, it's a question of not forcing
the many to conform to the needs of the unfortunate few.

True, but doesn't that go hand-in-hand with not forcing the few to
conform to the limitations of the many?

---
What did you have in mind, specifically?


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 00:29:39 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
.. .

Odd. I have to have a four year old translate for me because you write so
far below my level.

Excellent! It's working!

Yes. I can sometimes follow your demented ramblings.

---
So, even the four-year-old has to dumb it down for you?


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:22:59 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"Bart" wrote in message
.. .

Homer The Homo!
Understand that?

Bart the Fart. Understand that?

Point?

BTW, Homer shows more than a little interest in Marge so we must wonder
about YOUR homosexual fixations. You should talk to the 'Reverend' Phelps.

---
And your identification with a dysfunctional cartoon character is
healthy? You should talk to a shrink if you can find one who can
keep from laughing in your face.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

"John Fields" wrote in message
news
So, even the four-year-old has to dumb it down for you?

Other way around. I need him to translate your demented babblings into
something approaching human speech.

"John Fields" wrote in message
...

BTW, Homer shows more than a little interest in Marge so we must wonder
about YOUR homosexual fixations. You should talk to the 'Reverend' Phelps.

And your identification with a dysfunctional cartoon character is
healthy? You should talk to a shrink if you can find one who can
keep from laughing in your face.

He is a summation of the US male.

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:30:19 +0000, Homer J Simpson attempted to confuse
the issue further by squeaking:
"John Fields" wrote...

BTW, Homer shows more than a little interest in Marge so we must wonder
about YOUR homosexual fixations. You should talk to the 'Reverend'
Phelps.

Errr, "Pastor" Phelps...

And your identification with a dysfunctional cartoon character is
healthy? You should talk to a shrink if you can find one who can keep
from laughing in your face.

He is a summation of the US male.

The animated answer to Al Bundy.

--
__________________________________________________ ______________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pig****er In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so ****ing scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pig****er in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: . com

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:

"Demon Lord of Confusion" wrote in message
news
The animated answer to Al Bundy.

Peg Bundy: "All men are idiots. I married their king".

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:30:19 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
news
So, even the four-year-old has to dumb it down for you?

Other way around. I need him to translate your demented babblings into
something approaching human speech.

---
If it's for _your_ consumption, why bother? A few barks and a bowl
of Alpo ought to keep you happy enough...


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:30:19 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
wrote:


"John Fields" wrote in message
.. .

BTW, Homer shows more than a little interest in Marge so we must wonder
about YOUR homosexual fixations. You should talk to the 'Reverend' Phelps.

And your identification with a dysfunctional cartoon character is
healthy? You should talk to a shrink if you can find one who can
keep from laughing in your face.

He is a summation of the US male.

---
Well, imitation _is_ the sincerest form of flattery, I suppose, even
if you're forced to aspire to the dregs because that's the best you
can do.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer