Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cross for 2SA49
I have a suspect transistor in the MPX circuit of an HK330A receiver
that is not decoding stereo. The one in question, 2SA49, crosses on the NTE site to an NTE126. I provide the specs for the 2SA49 and the NTE126. Is this a good substitution? Might there be a less espensive option (NTE126 is $4.86 or so). 2SA49 (PNP Ge) Vcbo=-18V Vebo=-12V Vceo(sat)=? Ic=-5mA Pc=60mW fT=? hfe=30-200 (From the Japanese Transistor Manual http://www.datasheetarchive.com/search.php?q=2SA49) NTE126 (PNP Ge) Vcbo=15V Vebo=2.5V Vceo=15V Ic=100uA Pc=150mW fT=300Mhz hfe=40 http://www.nteinc.com/specs/100to199/pdf/nte126.pdf From what I have learned so far, the important parameters for this application are Ic, fT, Vceo. Do I have enough information to select a sub? Also, what is the significance of the negative values indicated on the 2SA49 spec sheet, does this impact how I would install the replacement? |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cross for 2SA49
wrote in message oups.com... I have a suspect transistor in the MPX circuit of an HK330A receiver that is not decoding stereo. The one in question, 2SA49, crosses on the NTE site to an NTE126. I provide the specs for the 2SA49 and the NTE126. Is this a good substitution? Might there be a less espensive option (NTE126 is $4.86 or so). 2SA49 (PNP Ge) Vcbo=-18V Vebo=-12V Vceo(sat)=? Ic=-5mA Pc=60mW fT=? hfe=30-200 (From the Japanese Transistor Manual http://www.datasheetarchive.com/search.php?q=2SA49) NTE126 (PNP Ge) Vcbo=15V Vebo=2.5V Vceo=15V Ic=100uA Pc=150mW fT=300Mhz hfe=40 http://www.nteinc.com/specs/100to199/pdf/nte126.pdf From what I have learned so far, the important parameters for this application are Ic, fT, Vceo. Do I have enough information to select a sub? Also, what is the significance of the negative values indicated on the 2SA49 spec sheet, does this impact how I would install the replacement? The Ic looks low on the replacement you have. It will depend on how the device is used as to how important the paremeters are. In non critical circuits the Vc, Ic, and having more hfe are important. Ft is important if the device is used in high frequency (RF ) applications. The negative values are usually put in for PNP devices in the spec sheets to denote the collector is usually connected to the negative of the supply voltage. It can be leftout by whoever prints the spec sheets. Just as if you ask the price of something in the dollars price range and a guy says 25. You usually think of dollars in the US and not 25 pennys or 25 dimes or 25 quarters. but he may say 25 dollars. |
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cross for 2SA49
The 1996 Transistor Substitution manual lists 2SA1015 as a substitute for
the 2SA49. wrote in message oups.com... I have a suspect transistor in the MPX circuit of an HK330A receiver that is not decoding stereo. The one in question, 2SA49, crosses on the NTE site to an NTE126. I provide the specs for the 2SA49 and the NTE126. Is this a good substitution? Might there be a less espensive option (NTE126 is $4.86 or so). 2SA49 (PNP Ge) Vcbo=-18V Vebo=-12V Vceo(sat)=? Ic=-5mA Pc=60mW fT=? hfe=30-200 (From the Japanese Transistor Manual http://www.datasheetarchive.com/search.php?q=2SA49) NTE126 (PNP Ge) Vcbo=15V Vebo=2.5V Vceo=15V Ic=100uA Pc=150mW fT=300Mhz hfe=40 http://www.nteinc.com/specs/100to199/pdf/nte126.pdf From what I have learned so far, the important parameters for this application are Ic, fT, Vceo. Do I have enough information to select a sub? Also, what is the significance of the negative values indicated on the 2SA49 spec sheet, does this impact how I would install the replacement? |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cross for 2SA49
AF124 (NTE160) looks to be a much better match.
|
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cross for 2SA49
I found a Sams cross reference manual at the library, and it too was
showing NTE126 as a sub for 2SA49, but NTE160 certainly looks better. By the way, the Ic of 100uA for the NTE126 is incorrect, this information is not on the datasheet, that is the value of the C-E cutoff current, the Ic is not given in the datasheet, can it be calculated? This stuff is all new to me, one would think NTE database would cross to the on-the-face-of-it better choice of NTE160. |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cross for 2SA49
Backspace past "pdf" to get at the folders - change the "200to299 in similar
format to navigate....... http://www.nteinc.com/specs/200to299/ Use DAP to queue downloads as many at once as you like. http://www.download3k.com/Download-A...-dap8.exe.html wrote in message oups.com... I have a suspect transistor in the MPX circuit of an HK330A receiver that is not decoding stereo. The one in question, 2SA49, crosses on the NTE site to an NTE126. I provide the specs for the 2SA49 and the NTE126. Is this a good substitution? Might there be a less espensive option (NTE126 is $4.86 or so). 2SA49 (PNP Ge) Vcbo=-18V Vebo=-12V Vceo(sat)=? Ic=-5mA Pc=60mW fT=? hfe=30-200 (From the Japanese Transistor Manual http://www.datasheetarchive.com/search.php?q=2SA49) NTE126 (PNP Ge) Vcbo=15V Vebo=2.5V Vceo=15V Ic=100uA Pc=150mW fT=300Mhz hfe=40 http://www.nteinc.com/specs/100to199/pdf/nte126.pdf From what I have learned so far, the important parameters for this application are Ic, fT, Vceo. Do I have enough information to select a sub? Also, what is the significance of the negative values indicated on the 2SA49 spec sheet, does this impact how I would install the replacement? |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Cross for 2SA49
"CLARENCE CLAY" wrote in message news:Yj8dg.8302$qn2.129@trnddc04... The 1996 Transistor Substitution manual lists 2SA1015 as a substitute for the 2SA49. It might work - but the 1015 looks like a Si type, if the original is part of a matched pair or duplicated in another channel it might cause an imbalance! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
has anyone converted a cross slide screw to metric. | Metalworking | |||
warner swazey screw machine 1ab or 1ac cross slides problems | Metalworking | |||
Making a table from a cross section, how can I stop it splitting? | Woodworking | |||
OT Cross Posted Messages | Home Repair | |||
this ought to get everybody fired up.... | Woodworking |