Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
X-ray danger whilst working on TV?
When I was recently into the back of my Sony KV-27EXR15 set, I saw
some warnings about X-ray radiation exposure. Is there significant exposure hazard while working on the set from the back? Since the enclosure is entirely plastic, I would think that you'd be exposed to x-rays no matter where you were located in relationship to the set, not just when you opened the back to have a look. Any comments? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Properly operating the risk is minimal, there are protect circuts within the
set which protect from over voltage and over current which, in design, shut down the set. "Darmok" wrote in message ... When I was recently into the back of my Sony KV-27EXR15 set, I saw some warnings about X-ray radiation exposure. Is there significant exposure hazard while working on the set from the back? Since the enclosure is entirely plastic, I would think that you'd be exposed to x-rays no matter where you were located in relationship to the set, not just when you opened the back to have a look. Any comments? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Art" writes:
Properly operating the risk is minimal, there are protect circuts within the set which protect from over voltage and over current which, in design, shut down the set. Also keep in mind that the same warnings are on 1/2 inch camcorder viewfinder CRTs. And, as noted, the plastic won't block the X-rays so it's not much different than with the back on. --- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Mirror: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/ Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/ +Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/lasersam.htm | Mirror Sites: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_mirror.html Note: These links are hopefully temporary until we can sort out the excessive traffic on Repairfaq.org. Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header above is ignored unless my full name is included in the subject line. Or, you can contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Just a quick FYI. The KV sets the energy level of the x-ray and the
current sets the quantity of x-rays produced. 25KV is right at the threshold for x-ray generation capability of any significant level. Hence the critical nature of the x-ray protect circuits. The energy level would indicate how thick of an xray stopping material would be required to protect you. At 25KV the lead in the glass is enough to stop virtually all errant x-rays produced. The mA is the amount of electrons flowing and the greater the electrons hitting the surface, the greater the quantity of x-rays. The dosimeters only measure the exposure to the quantity of x-rays, but not the energy level. The higher the energy level the greater the chance of causing a DNA mutation. The higher the dose over time, the greater the chance of causing a DNA mutation. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
It certainly used to be a real problem in the old days, when a PD500 shunt
regulator valve ( tube ) was used in the EHT supply. When working with the deflection stage cage open, a lead glass shield had to be placed over this device. X Rays are easily created by accelerating a stream of electrons, and slamming them into some kind of anode, and the 25 kV used in a CTV is plenty enough to generate an electron beam with enough energy to do just this. However, the electron beam should not actually ever touch the anode inside the picture tube - otherwise no electrons would ever reach the faceplate to light up the phosphor. The electrons do, however, dissipate large amounts of their energy, when they collide with the slotmask inside the CRT. As far as I know, this manifests as heat, but possibly, some soft x rays may be generated. You are right that any generated to the rear or sides would probably escape through the plastic cabinet, but the inside of this, or even the plastic itself, may be treated to prevent EM radiation of all wavelengths, as there is paranoia these days about such things. I don't think that there is any significant danger from x rays any more from CTVs. I would guess that as there is high voltage present, and high energy electron beams present, the manufacturers err on the side of caution and warn of the possibility of random x ray generation. As an addition, no x rays would escape from the picture tube faceplate, as this is made from lead doped glass to be sufficiently conductive to form the return path for the spent electrons. Geoff "Darmok" wrote in message ... When I was recently into the back of my Sony KV-27EXR15 set, I saw some warnings about X-ray radiation exposure. Is there significant exposure hazard while working on the set from the back? Since the enclosure is entirely plastic, I would think that you'd be exposed to x-rays no matter where you were located in relationship to the set, not just when you opened the back to have a look. Any comments? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 06:18:13 -0400, Darmok
wrote: When I was recently into the back of my Sony KV-27EXR15 set, I saw some warnings about X-ray radiation exposure. Is there significant exposure hazard while working on the set from the back? Since the enclosure is entirely plastic, I would think that you'd be exposed to x-rays no matter where you were located in relationship to the set, not just when you opened the back to have a look. Most television sets are designed to be watched from the frontside. And in case someone forgets, there is that warning on the back. But in practice: if you work on a life color-tv, X-ray radiation is probably the least of your worries. -- Kind regards, Gerard Bok |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Darmok" wrote in message ... When I was recently into the back of my Sony KV-27EXR15 set, I saw some warnings about X-ray radiation exposure. Is there significant exposure hazard while working on the set from the back? Since the enclosure is entirely plastic, I would think that you'd be exposed to x-rays no matter where you were located in relationship to the set, not just when you opened the back to have a look. There is a slight danger from X-Rays. There is also a slight danger from repairing the set while in a swimming pool. Tobacco smoking is a REAL danger. N |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for all the input. I guess, for the person who only looks into
the back of an operating TV once or twice a year, the hazard is minimal. However, if my job were to be looking into the back end of operating color TVs all day long, day after day, year after year, that might be a different story. I wonder if there are any full-time TV servicemen (women) who follow this NG who could give their input? Cheers |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
I've been in the business 27 yrs, back in the old days of tube sets,
and early solid state there was no safety protection. Anybody remember the old Zenith 20Y1C50 type set with a bad VDR? The HV would run 35-40KV all day, people happily watching their TV didn't know or care the HV was too high and never hurt a thing, or the old Zenith 25EC chassis with the bad safety capacitor that would let the high voltage climb so high it would cut the neck off the picture tube? Never hurt anyone that I know of. Sure never worried me then or now. Darmok wrote: Thanks for all the input. I guess, for the person who only looks into the back of an operating TV once or twice a year, the hazard is minimal. However, if my job were to be looking into the back end of operating color TVs all day long, day after day, year after year, that might be a different story. I wonder if there are any full-time TV servicemen (women) who follow this NG who could give their input? Cheers |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On 15 Jun 2005 20:31:42 -0700, "RonKZ650" wrote:
I've been in the business 27 yrs, back in the old days of tube sets, and early solid state there was no safety protection. Anybody remember the old Zenith 20Y1C50 type set with a bad VDR? The HV would run 35-40KV all day, people happily watching their TV didn't know or care the HV was too high and never hurt a thing, or the old Zenith 25EC chassis with the bad safety capacitor that would let the high voltage climb so high it would cut the neck off the picture tube? Never hurt anyone that I know of. Sure never worried me then or now. Thanks for your input! Darmok wrote: Thanks for all the input. I guess, for the person who only looks into the back of an operating TV once or twice a year, the hazard is minimal. However, if my job were to be looking into the back end of operating color TVs all day long, day after day, year after year, that might be a different story. I wonder if there are any full-time TV servicemen (women) who follow this NG who could give their input? Cheers |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"RonKZ650" writes:
I've been in the business 27 yrs, back in the old days of tube sets, and early solid state there was no safety protection. Anybody remember the old Zenith 20Y1C50 type set with a bad VDR? The HV would run 35-40KV all day, people happily watching their TV didn't know or care the HV was too high and never hurt a thing, or the old Zenith 25EC chassis with the bad safety capacitor that would let the high voltage climb so high it would cut the neck off the picture tube? Never hurt anyone that I know of. Sure never worried me then or now. How exactly would you know if it hurt anyone? It's not like you would glow in the dark. Cancers can appear decades later.... --- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Mirror: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/ Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/ +Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/lasersam.htm | Mirror Sites: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_mirror.html Note: These links are hopefully temporary until we can sort out the excessive traffic on Repairfaq.org. Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header above is ignored unless my full name is included in the subject line. Or, you can contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Ditto: same question.
You do not know if xrays injured you, unless it was prolonged exposure of minutes or hours to an extremely high dose where you will have xray burns. Cancer and DNA damage may not show up for years later. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Sam Goldwasser" wrote in message ... How exactly would you know if it hurt anyone? It's not like you would glow in the dark. Cancers can appear decades later.... You're not supposed to glow in the dark? Oh crap! N |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
NSM wrote: "Sam Goldwasser" wrote in message ... How exactly would you know if it hurt anyone? It's not like you would glow in the dark. Cancers can appear decades later.... You're not supposed to glow in the dark? Oh crap! N Send your application to Jeff Probst for the next Survivor. Outwit, outplay, outglow Ken |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Darmok" wrote in message ... When I was recently into the back of my Sony KV-27EXR15 set, I saw some warnings about X-ray radiation exposure. Is there significant exposure hazard while working on the set from the back? Since the enclosure is entirely plastic, I would think that you'd be exposed to x-rays no matter where you were located in relationship to the set, not just when you opened the back to have a look. Any comments? On a modern TV, zero risk, I've seen people *try* to make Xrays with a TV CRT and have very little success, there's just too much lead in the glass. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"James Sweet" wrote in message news:mHqse.15960$L65.7495@trnddc05... On a modern TV, zero risk, I've seen people *try* to make Xrays with a TV CRT and have very little success, there's just too much lead in the glass. Better to look at "The Amateur Scientist" in "Scientific American". I'm sure they have had a do it yourself X-Ray generator. N |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"NSM" writes:
"James Sweet" wrote in message news:mHqse.15960$L65.7495@trnddc05... On a modern TV, zero risk, I've seen people *try* to make Xrays with a TV CRT and have very little success, there's just too much lead in the glass. Better to look at "The Amateur Scientist" in "Scientific American". I'm sure they have had a do it yourself X-Ray generator. Typically they use an old high voltage rectifier tube. Never heard of using a CRT. --- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Mirror: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/ Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/ +Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/lasersam.htm | Mirror Sites: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_mirror.html Note: These links are hopefully temporary until we can sort out the excessive traffic on Repairfaq.org. Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header above is ignored unless my full name is included in the subject line. Or, you can contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Sam Goldwasser" wrote in message ... "NSM" writes: Typically they use an old high voltage rectifier tube. Never heard of using a CRT. That's my recollection too. N |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
"Sam Goldwasser" wrote in message ... "NSM" writes: "James Sweet" wrote in message news:mHqse.15960$L65.7495@trnddc05... On a modern TV, zero risk, I've seen people *try* to make Xrays with a TV CRT and have very little success, there's just too much lead in the glass. Better to look at "The Amateur Scientist" in "Scientific American". I'm sure they have had a do it yourself X-Ray generator. Typically they use an old high voltage rectifier tube. Never heard of using a CRT. It was more of an experiment just to see if Xrays could be produced with a CRT, as I recall about all it did was melt a big hole in the shadow mask. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 01:27:01 GMT, "James Sweet"
wrote: "Sam Goldwasser" wrote in message ... "NSM" writes: "James Sweet" wrote in message news:mHqse.15960$L65.7495@trnddc05... On a modern TV, zero risk, I've seen people *try* to make Xrays with a TV CRT and have very little success, there's just too much lead in the glass. Better to look at "The Amateur Scientist" in "Scientific American". I'm sure they have had a do it yourself X-Ray generator. Typically they use an old high voltage rectifier tube. Never heard of using a CRT. It was more of an experiment just to see if Xrays could be produced with a CRT, as I recall about all it did was melt a big hole in the shadow mask. Okay, so I can see that the majority are clearly of a mind that xrays cannot pass through the heavily leaded front of the picture tube. What about the thin, transparent neck in the back of the tube? Nothing much offering protection there, is there? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Just some comments for the history of the problem
The original X-Ray problem was found in some GE color tube sets that used a triode as a high voltage shunt regulator. As long as the shunt was working properly there was no significant X-Ray production and the triode was designed to contain the very low KV (soft) X-Rays it did produce. It was found that there was a failure mode that allowed the HV to rise and the increased voltage was enough to generate a stronger (harder) X-Ray that could exit the shunt tube. As I recall the most intense area was directed down through the bottom of the case. One of the comments about it's danger was that the most likely person to receive significant exposure was the bar tender standing under a wall mounted set. I was part of a radiation safety team that inspected a GE plant in Illinois that produced this chassie in the middle 1960s. As I recall there was no recommendations for any changes to the production line at the plant to reduce the exposure levels as there was not a level of radiation present that required it. A set was badly misadjusted for us to make some measurements that confirmed the exposure levels. Hugh retired Nuke Safety Geek ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Goldwasser" Newsgroups: sci.electronics.repair Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 7:02 AM Subject: X-ray danger whilst working on TV? "NSM" writes: "James Sweet" wrote in message news:mHqse.15960$L65.7495@trnddc05... On a modern TV, zero risk, I've seen people *try* to make Xrays with a TV CRT and have very little success, there's just too much lead in the glass. Better to look at "The Amateur Scientist" in "Scientific American". I'm sure they have had a do it yourself X-Ray generator. Typically they use an old high voltage rectifier tube. Never heard of using a CRT. --- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Mirror: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/ Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/ +Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/lasersam.htm | Mirror Sites: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_mirror.html Note: These links are hopefully temporary until we can sort out the excessive traffic on Repairfaq.org. Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header above is ignored unless my full name is included in the subject line. Or, you can contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs. "Sam Goldwasser" wrote in message ... "NSM" writes: "James Sweet" wrote in message news:mHqse.15960$L65.7495@trnddc05... On a modern TV, zero risk, I've seen people *try* to make Xrays with a TV CRT and have very little success, there's just too much lead in the glass. Better to look at "The Amateur Scientist" in "Scientific American". I'm sure they have had a do it yourself X-Ray generator. Typically they use an old high voltage rectifier tube. Never heard of using a CRT. --- sam | Sci.Electronics.Repair FAQ Mirror: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/ Repair | Main Table of Contents: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/ +Lasers | Sam's Laser FAQ: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/sam/lasersam.htm | Mirror Sites: http://repairfaq.ece.drexel.edu/REPAIR/F_mirror.html Note: These links are hopefully temporary until we can sort out the excessive traffic on Repairfaq.org. Important: Anything sent to the email address in the message header above is ignored unless my full name is included in the subject line. Or, you can contact me via the Feedback Form in the FAQs. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Combi boiler thermostat not working properly | UK diy | |||
central heating not working | UK diy | |||
RCD trips while working on dead circuit | UK diy | |||
Making a ruin into something habitable. | UK diy | |||
Gas Weedeater not working when tank is on bottom (correct cutting position) | Home Repair |