flipper wrote:

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:45:01 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:23:02 -0800, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

Bush is a far cry from the kind of president Jefferson was.


I haven't seen a real statesman since Kennedy.

Read this:

http://www.amazon.com/Dark-Side-Came...38389&sr= 1-3

JFK was a charismatic, diseased, sex-addicted bungler who almost got
the world incinerated.

And that's why those who shared that opinion had him taken out, right?

That preoccupation with sex makes me think Oliver Stone was on to
something when he portrayed the right winger plot to assassinate JFK as
being infiltrated by homosexuals.

Oliver Stone might have been 'on' something because his movie JFK is
in the finest Alice Through the Looking Glass tradition.

"Charismatic" seems to be enough to impress some people.

In the long run, history may be kinder to W than to JFK.

JFK didn't actually get more that 3000 people killed. Bush was perceived
as weak, which encouraged al Qaida.

Amazing how Al Qaeda knew Bush would be elected when they plotted the
9-11 attacks and put their operatives in place during the Clinton
Administration.

And they planned and organized their first WTC attack during George HW
Bush's administration.

The Cole attack was, no doubt, a premature election celebration.

Perhaps only possible due to the administration's attention being
engaged by the GOP's fascination with Bill's sex life.

The only real data point we have for the perceived strength of a US
president discouraging terrorists is Iran's return of the US hostages
when Reagan was elected.


--
Paul Hovnanian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Procrastinators: The leaders for tomorrow.

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:38:39 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:45:01 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:23:02 -0800, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

Bush is a far cry from the kind of president Jefferson was.


I haven't seen a real statesman since Kennedy.

Read this:

http://www.amazon.com/Dark-Side-Came...38389&sr= 1-3

JFK was a charismatic, diseased, sex-addicted bungler who almost got
the world incinerated.

And that's why those who shared that opinion had him taken out, right?

That preoccupation with sex makes me think Oliver Stone was on to
something when he portrayed the right winger plot to assassinate JFK as
being infiltrated by homosexuals.

"Charismatic" seems to be enough to impress some people.

In the long run, history may be kinder to W than to JFK.

JFK didn't actually get more that 3000 people killed. Bush was perceived
as weak, which encouraged al Qaida.


Democrats may have no brains, but they certainly have an imaginative
streak for conspiracy theories ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Gosh, W caused the *first* WTC bombing in 1993?

John

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:40:32 +0000, William Hayes wrote:

If Democrats Had Any Brains...

They'd read the Constitution of the United States, Article II, Paragraph
one, wherein the sex of the President is clearly 'defined'.

When that was written, women had the legal status of children. Although
the Nineteenth Amendment specifies only voting rights, it has been held
to include qualification for elected office, so there have been no
challenges to female candidates for Congress based on the masculine
pronouns in Article I. Any attempt to challenge Hillary's elegibility
based on Article II would be as silly as the attempt to paint Obama as a
crypto-Muslim, and would probably result in the quickest Supreme Court
ruling in US history.

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:24:40 -0800, StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt
wrote:

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:51:09 -0800, John Larkin
wrote:


Gosh, W caused the *first* WTC bombing in 1993?

John


Bull****.

Your fascination with things fecal remains impressive.

John

flipper wrote:

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:10:44 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

flipper wrote:

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:45:01 -0800, "Paul Hovnanian P.E."
wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:23:02 -0800, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

Bush is a far cry from the kind of president Jefferson was.


I haven't seen a real statesman since Kennedy.

Read this:

http://www.amazon.com/Dark-Side-Came...38389&sr= 1-3

JFK was a charismatic, diseased, sex-addicted bungler who almost got
the world incinerated.

And that's why those who shared that opinion had him taken out, right?

That preoccupation with sex makes me think Oliver Stone was on to
something when he portrayed the right winger plot to assassinate JFK as
being infiltrated by homosexuals.

Oliver Stone might have been 'on' something because his movie JFK is
in the finest Alice Through the Looking Glass tradition.

"Charismatic" seems to be enough to impress some people.

In the long run, history may be kinder to W than to JFK.

JFK didn't actually get more that 3000 people killed. Bush was perceived
as weak, which encouraged al Qaida.

Amazing how Al Qaeda knew Bush would be elected when they plotted the
9-11 attacks and put their operatives in place during the Clinton
Administration.

And they planned and organized their first WTC attack during George HW
Bush's administration.

Which is even further back than G.W.'s administration.

What it is with liberals and nonsensical fantasies? I mean, do you all
actually have to 'work' at it or do they just come naturally?

Rational thought just doesn't seem to be liberal's strong suit and the
fact of the matter is Al Qaeda considered the U.S. 'weak' (not the
first to do so) because, until 2001, Presidents of both parties had a
tendency to behave a lot like what 'liberals' claim they want: a boat
loads of talk followed up by talk, and if that fails then some talk,
with little, preferably no, 'action'. And what little action that was
taken liberals opposed so the last people who should be casting
'appearance of weakness' stones is the left wing.

I could also point out that during GHW's administration it was "Bin
who?" because he hadn't attacked us yet so unless you're making a case
that the U.S. should go around assassinating anyone they suspect
'might' become a nut case one day then you have no point. But that's
probably being too rational.

The Cole attack was, no doubt, a premature election celebration.

Perhaps only possible due to the administration's attention being
engaged by the GOP's fascination with Bill's sex life.

Not according to Billy Boy. He TRIED and TRIED and TRIED his damndest
wag angry finger to kill the S.O.B.

And how could he have legitimately done that without a Congressional
declaration of war? Congress (guess who was running that show at the
time) was too upset over heterosexual behavior.


A few missile attacks proved to be useless, but that wasn't Clinton's
fault. There's only so much you can do at long distances against mobile
targets.


And he wouldn't lie. Oh wait, that's what the impeachment was about.

The only real data point we have for the perceived strength of a US
president discouraging terrorists is Iran's return of the US hostages
when Reagan was elected.

Expecting to 'discourage' someone who's determined to kill themselves
'for the cause' is an exercise in futility.

The Iranians weren't trying to kill themselves. Fortunately, they
weren't trying to kill the hostages either. A point that the neo-cons
seem to have overlooked when lumping them in with other factions in the
area.

We've killed far more Iranian civilians than they have Americans.


--
Paul Hovnanian
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Procrastinators: The leaders for tomorrow.

John Larkin wrote:

Your fascination with things fecal remains impressive.


He proves that old saying: "Turds of a feather, are stuck together!"
;-)


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:39:53 -0800, ChairmanOfTheBored
wrote:

On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:27:55 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

Your fascination with things fecal remains impressive.


He proves that old saying: "Turds of a feather, are stuck together!"
;-)

It appears to me that it is you that are obsessed with it. I just
happen to reference it in some of the things I say.

For certain values of "some." Like 99.6% or so.

But hey, whatever turns you on.

John

SJR On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:40:32 +0000, William Hayes wrote:

If Democrats Had Any Brains...

They'd read the Constitution of the United States, Article II,
Paragraph one, wherein the sex of the President is clearly
'defined'.

SJR When that was written, women had the legal status of
SJR children. Although the Nineteenth Amendment specifies
SJR only voting rights, it has been held to include qualification
SJR for elected office, so there have been no challenges to
SJR female candidates for Congress based on the masculine
SJR pronouns in Article I. Any attempt to challenge Hillary's
SJR elegibility based on Article II would be as silly as the
SJR attempt to paint Obama as a crypto-Muslim, and
SJR would probably result in the quickest Supreme
SJR Court ruling in US history.

Supreme Court probabilites not withstanding, Amendment
20 states for the record, "if the president elect shall have failed to
qualify..."
Congress will get to pick their President of their Choice.
How does Hillary's running mate sound for President ?
What's his name ?? William Jefferson Clinton ??

SJR On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:40:32 +0000, William Hayes wrote:

If Democrats Had Any Brains...

They'd read the Constitution of the United States, Article II,
Paragraph one, wherein the sex of the President is clearly
'defined'.

SJR When that was written, women had the legal status of
SJR children. Although the Nineteenth Amendment specifies
SJR only voting rights, it has been held to include qualification
SJR for elected office, so there have been no challenges to
SJR female candidates for Congress based on the masculine
SJR pronouns in Article I. Any attempt to challenge Hillary's
SJR elegibility based on Article II would be as silly as the
SJR attempt to paint Obama as a crypto-Muslim, and
SJR would probably result in the quickest Supreme
SJR Court ruling in US history.

Supreme Court probabilites not withstanding, Amendment
20 states for the record, "if the president elect shall have failed to
qualify..."
Congress will get to pick their President of their Choice.
How does Hillary's running mate sound for President ?
What's his name ?? William Jefferson Clinton ??

f On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 21:28:08 GMT, "William Hayes"
f wrote:

SJR On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:40:32 +0000, William Hayes wrote:

If Democrats Had Any Brains...

They'd read the Constitution of the United States, Article II,
Paragraph one, wherein the sex of the President is clearly
'defined'.

SJR When that was written, women had the legal status of
SJR children. Although the Nineteenth Amendment specifies
SJR only voting rights, it has been held to include qualification
SJR for elected office, so there have been no challenges to
SJR female candidates for Congress based on the masculine
SJR pronouns in Article I. Any attempt to challenge Hillary's
SJR elegibility based on Article II would be as silly as the
SJR attempt to paint Obama as a crypto-Muslim, and
SJR would probably result in the quickest Supreme
SJR Court ruling in US history.

Supreme Court probabilites not withstanding, Amendment
20 states for the record, "if the president elect shall have failed to
qualify..."
Congress will get to pick their President of their Choice.

f Actually, "for the record," the 20'th states "then the Vice President
f elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified."

How does Hillary's running mate sound for President ?
What's his name ?? William Jefferson Clinton ??

f Since he is not running and, therefore, unlikely to have accrued
f enough elector votes to be among the top 3, he would not be in the
f list of choices Congress could chose from.

Which part did you fail to understand ?
Hillary's running mate is Bill Clinton ... or the part where you jump to
conclusions.
Either case, Article II, 19th amendment and 20th amendment are going to
make your day.
The Democrats have something up their sleeve and you're trying to ignore it.
You are Funny Stuff.

f On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:28:35 -0600, "William Hayes"
f wrote:


How does Hillary's running mate sound for President ?
What's his name ?? William Jefferson Clinton ??
f Since he is not running and, therefore, unlikely to have accrued
f enough elector votes to be among the top 3, he would not be in the
f list of choices Congress could chose from.
Which part did you fail to understand ?
f None, thank you for asking.

You are welcome.

Hillary's running mate is Bill Clinton
f He's her husband 'mate'. Not a 'running mate'.

Egh, 'mate', What part of the Constitution forbids husbands as running mates
?
Take your time, took the Clintons five years to find the answer to that one.

f A "running mate" is a person running for a subordinate position on a
f joint ticket. As in, this case, "Vice President." the choice of which
f hasn't been made since the primary office choice hasn't been made,
f yet, either.

You are striving to understand.

... or the part where you jump to conclusions.
f Then write clearly.

Define 'clearly'.

You are Funny Stuff.
f Is your tin foil hat on straight?

Can't afford tin foil, had to settle on the cheaper alternative, secretary
uvula.

f On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:09:04 -0600, "William Hayes"
f wrote:

f On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:28:35 -0600, "William Hayes"
f wrote:


Egh, 'mate', What part of the Constitution forbids husbands as running
mates ?
Take your time, took the Clintons five years to find the answer to that
one.

f Why would I waste my time on an irrelevancy?

Is it ?

f Your statement was false, as I "clearly" explained..

Thats akin to saying the whole dozen eggs is bad becuase one egg is rotton.
You are still funny.

Can't afford tin foil, had to settle on the cheaper alternative,
secretary
uvula.

fIt isn't working.

She likes it.

"ChairmanOfTheBored" wrote in message
...

Egh, 'mate', What part of the Constitution forbids husbands as running
mates ?
Take your time, took the Clintons five years to find the answer to that
one.

f Why would I waste my time on an irrelevancy?

Is it ?

f Your statement was false, as I "clearly" explained..

Thats akin to saying the whole dozen eggs is bad becuase one egg is
rotton.
You are still funny.

Can't afford tin foil, had to settle on the cheaper alternative,
secretary
uvula.

fIt isn't working.

She likes it.

Your little f character in front of the quote designator character
negates the quote designator, I am a ****ing Usenet retard!

You really shouldn't talk about yourself that way.

"flipper" wrote in message
...

f Your statement was false, as I "clearly" explained..
Thats akin to saying the whole dozen eggs is bad becuase one egg is
rotton.
A false statement is a false statement and yours was false.

Maybe. Maybe Not.
The primary isn't over until the fat lady sings.

"ChairmanOfTheBored" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:54:27 GMT, "William Hayes"
wrote:

You really shouldn't talk about yourself that way.

I'm a goddamned Usenet retard.

Ok, if you insist. Go ahead, talk about yourself that way.

"flipper" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:55:50 GMT, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"flipper" wrote in message
. ..

f Your statement was false, as I "clearly" explained..
Thats akin to saying the whole dozen eggs is bad becuase one egg is
rotton.
A false statement is a false statement and yours was false.

Maybe. Maybe Not.
The primary isn't over until the fat lady sings.

There is no 'maybe' to it and what 'might' happen in the future is
irrelevant as you made a present tense false statement.

If Obama wins;
If Obama doesn't win, the present tense false statement is going to make
you feel ... bohica.
I don't care, I'm not voting for them, but against them.

"ChairmanOfTheBored" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:13:28 GMT, "William Hayes"
wrote:
"ChairmanOfTheBored" wrote in message
. ..
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:54:27 GMT, "William Hayes"
wrote:
You really shouldn't talk about yourself that way.
I'm a goddamned Usenet retard.
Ok, if you insist. Go ahead, talk about yourself that way.
My mentality is that of a three year old, I am a retarded ****, and no,
you did not change the original post, so You know where the Usenet
stupidity rests. Squarely in My immature, retarded lap, I'm a little boy.

Ok, whatever you say.

"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
...
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
...
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:08 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
. ..
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

You are still a stalking, post edit retard, I see.

How does a 56 year old retard like you justify acting like a ****ing
poorly raised eight year old? Your mother and father should have been
drawn and quartered for not flushing your retarded ass the moment you
exited your mother's anus.

Guess we need to figure out the syntax for dumping all your aliases,
by using NNTP-Posting-Host ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:02:22 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:08 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
...
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

You are still a stalking, post edit retard, I see.

How does a 56 year old retard like you justify acting like a ****ing
poorly raised eight year old? Your mother and father should have been
drawn and quartered for not flushing your retarded ass the moment you
exited your mother's anus.

Guess we need to figure out the syntax for dumping all your aliases,
by using NNTP-Posting-Host ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Just kill based on keywords. Every one of his posts contains anal or
fecal references. He has a real thing for butts.

John

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:30:10 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:21:25 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:02:22 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:08 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
om...
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

You are still a stalking, post edit retard, I see.

How does a 56 year old retard like you justify acting like a ****ing
poorly raised eight year old? Your mother and father should have been
drawn and quartered for not flushing your retarded ass the moment you
exited your mother's anus.

Guess we need to figure out the syntax for dumping all your aliases,
by using NNTP-Posting-Host ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Just kill based on keywords. Every one of his posts contains anal or
fecal references. He has a real thing for butts.


You're an idiot, Larkin. You can't even operate a degreaser properly.

I don't operate a degreaser; that's what employees are for. But I do
get the money from selling the cleaned boards. Does that make me an
idiot?

That is really sad. Even more so when one hears that you actually think
you are using it correctly.

Not a single check has bounced. That machine has cleaned about $50
million worth of boards so far.

But congrats for making a "clean" post.

John

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:30:10 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:21:25 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:02:22 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:08 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
om...
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

You are still a stalking, post edit retard, I see.

How does a 56 year old retard like you justify acting like a ****ing
poorly raised eight year old? Your mother and father should have been
drawn and quartered for not flushing your retarded ass the moment you
exited your mother's anus.

Guess we need to figure out the syntax for dumping all your aliases,
by using NNTP-Posting-Host ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Just kill based on keywords. Every one of his posts contains anal or
fecal references. He has a real thing for butts.


You're an idiot, Larkin. You can't even operate a degreaser properly.

I don't operate a degreaser; that's what employees are for. But I do
get the money from selling the cleaned boards. Does that make me an
idiot?

That is really sad. Even more so when one hears that you actually think
you are using it correctly.

Not a single check has bounced. That machine has cleaned about $50
million worth of boards so far.

But congrats for making a "clean" post.

John

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:39:11 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:30:10 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:21:25 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:02:22 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:08 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
news:t7ntt31233lgvorhlv2sftn3q9sh7ev22o@4ax. com...
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

You are still a stalking, post edit retard, I see.

How does a 56 year old retard like you justify acting like a ****ing
poorly raised eight year old? Your mother and father should have been
drawn and quartered for not flushing your retarded ass the moment you
exited your mother's anus.

Guess we need to figure out the syntax for dumping all your aliases,
by using NNTP-Posting-Host ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Just kill based on keywords. Every one of his posts contains anal or
fecal references. He has a real thing for butts.


You're an idiot, Larkin. You can't even operate a degreaser properly.

I don't operate a degreaser; that's what employees are for. But I do
get the money from selling the cleaned boards. Does that make me an
idiot?

That is really sad. Even more so when one hears that you actually think
you are using it correctly.

Not a single check has bounced. That machine has cleaned about $50
million worth of boards so far.

But congrats for making a "clean" post.

John

Maybe run "UltimatePatriot" through the degreaser ?:-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:39:11 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:30:10 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:21:25 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:02:22 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:08 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
news:t7ntt31233lgvorhlv2sftn3q9sh7ev22o@4ax. com...
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

You are still a stalking, post edit retard, I see.

How does a 56 year old retard like you justify acting like a ****ing
poorly raised eight year old? Your mother and father should have been
drawn and quartered for not flushing your retarded ass the moment you
exited your mother's anus.

Guess we need to figure out the syntax for dumping all your aliases,
by using NNTP-Posting-Host ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Just kill based on keywords. Every one of his posts contains anal or
fecal references. He has a real thing for butts.


You're an idiot, Larkin. You can't even operate a degreaser properly.

I don't operate a degreaser; that's what employees are for. But I do
get the money from selling the cleaned boards. Does that make me an
idiot?

That is really sad. Even more so when one hears that you actually think
you are using it correctly.

Not a single check has bounced. That machine has cleaned about $50
million worth of boards so far.

But congrats for making a "clean" post.

John

Maybe run "UltimatePatriot" through the degreaser ?:-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:54:39 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:39:11 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:30:10 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:21:25 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:02:22 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:08 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
news:t7ntt31233lgvorhlv2sftn3q9sh7ev22o@4ax .com...
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

You are still a stalking, post edit retard, I see.

How does a 56 year old retard like you justify acting like a ****ing
poorly raised eight year old? Your mother and father should have been
drawn and quartered for not flushing your retarded ass the moment you
exited your mother's anus.

Guess we need to figure out the syntax for dumping all your aliases,
by using NNTP-Posting-Host ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Just kill based on keywords. Every one of his posts contains anal or
fecal references. He has a real thing for butts.


You're an idiot, Larkin. You can't even operate a degreaser properly.

I don't operate a degreaser; that's what employees are for. But I do
get the money from selling the cleaned boards. Does that make me an
idiot?

That is really sad. Even more so when one hears that you actually think
you are using it correctly.

Not a single check has bounced. That machine has cleaned about $50
million worth of boards so far.

But congrats for making a "clean" post.

John

Maybe run "UltimatePatriot" through the degreaser ?:-)

...Jim Thompson

And contaminate all our boards?

John

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:54:39 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:39:11 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:30:10 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:21:25 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:02:22 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:08 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
news:t7ntt31233lgvorhlv2sftn3q9sh7ev22o@4ax .com...
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

You are still a stalking, post edit retard, I see.

How does a 56 year old retard like you justify acting like a ****ing
poorly raised eight year old? Your mother and father should have been
drawn and quartered for not flushing your retarded ass the moment you
exited your mother's anus.

Guess we need to figure out the syntax for dumping all your aliases,
by using NNTP-Posting-Host ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Just kill based on keywords. Every one of his posts contains anal or
fecal references. He has a real thing for butts.


You're an idiot, Larkin. You can't even operate a degreaser properly.

I don't operate a degreaser; that's what employees are for. But I do
get the money from selling the cleaned boards. Does that make me an
idiot?

That is really sad. Even more so when one hears that you actually think
you are using it correctly.

Not a single check has bounced. That machine has cleaned about $50
million worth of boards so far.

But congrats for making a "clean" post.

John

Maybe run "UltimatePatriot" through the degreaser ?:-)

...Jim Thompson

And contaminate all our boards?

John

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:00:58 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:54:39 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:39:11 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:30:10 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:21:25 -0700, John Larkin
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:02:22 -0700, Jim Thompson
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:08 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
news:t7ntt31233lgvorhlv2sftn3q9sh7ev22o@4a x.com...
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

You are still a stalking, post edit retard, I see.

How does a 56 year old retard like you justify acting like a ****ing
poorly raised eight year old? Your mother and father should have been
drawn and quartered for not flushing your retarded ass the moment you
exited your mother's anus.

Guess we need to figure out the syntax for dumping all your aliases,
by using NNTP-Posting-Host ;-)

...Jim Thompson


Just kill based on keywords. Every one of his posts contains anal or
fecal references. He has a real thing for butts.


You're an idiot, Larkin. You can't even operate a degreaser properly.

I don't operate a degreaser; that's what employees are for. But I do
get the money from selling the cleaned boards. Does that make me an
idiot?

That is really sad. Even more so when one hears that you actually think
you are using it correctly.

Not a single check has bounced. That machine has cleaned about $50
million worth of boards so far.

But congrats for making a "clean" post.

John

Maybe run "UltimatePatriot" through the degreaser ?:-)

...Jim Thompson

And contaminate all our boards?

John

Ah, yes, It would render the pig wouldn't it ?:-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

I just changed your nfilter flag to "TURD".

I thought it more appropriate to your mental level ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:47:01 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

[snip]

Flagged as "TURD" by nfilter.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

America: Land of the Free, Because of the Brave

Jim Thompson wrote:

Maybe run "UltimatePatriot" through the degreaser ?:-)


The EPA would never issue a permit to dispose of 'that' much
contaminated cleaner.


--
aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists

Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file
* drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic.

http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:54:27 -0700, UltimatePatriot
wrote:

I just changed your nfilter flag to "TURD".

I thought it more appropriate to your mental level ;-)


That's an insult to turds, Jim. he's what's left when they prep you
for a colonoscopy and a whole day on laxatives didn't flush him out.


--
aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists

Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file
* drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic.

http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:08 -0500, "William Hayes"
wrote:


"UltimatePatriot" wrote in message
. ..
Perhaps one day, I will make a post that isn't 100% totally retarded.

I sincerely doubt it.

I am still a stalking, post edit retard, You see.

I see.

How does a 56 year old retard like me justify acting like a ****ing
poorly raised eight year old?

I dunno. How do you manage it ?

My mother and father should have been drawn and quartered
for not flushing my retarded ass the moment I
exited my mother's anus.

Obviously first rate toilet paper; like Charmin.