Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronic Schematics (alt.binaries.schematics.electronic) A place to show and share your electronics schematic drawings. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
Joerg wrote:
wrote: and here we have a fine group i shall dub "the mu men" or "the mu-see-ums" ;-)) solid, easy to get along with and sensible, no foolishness with p-layer punch thru or bonding failures! and tubes may actually be repaired too, nothing like those flimsy silicon flakes! :-)) Tubes are for real men. When they fail, they often do so in a rather spectacular manner. Molten glass splattering about and all that. And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.Â*Â* --Schiller |
#42
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Joerg wrote: Tubes are for real men. When they fail, they often do so in a rather spectacular manner. Molten glass splattering about and all that. Real men used tubes made with Beryllium Oxide Ceramic, instead of wimpy glass. Forced air cooling ruled! Arrh! Arrh! Arrh! Somewhere in my stuff i still have a pair of 4CX600Js. Someday i will want sockets and "chimneys" for them. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.Â*Â* --Schiller |
#43
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
joseph2k wrote:
And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. I've seen horizontal output tubes where the glass melted when the drive failed. It also destroyed the flyback transformer. A few of the melted tubes had a hole in the glass, while others just softened and shrank till they were touching the plates. Maybe a half dozen melted tubes in 30 years. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#44
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
joseph2k wrote:
Joerg wrote: wrote: and here we have a fine group i shall dub "the mu men" or "the mu-see-ums" ;-)) solid, easy to get along with and sensible, no foolishness with p-layer punch thru or bonding failures! and tubes may actually be repaired too, nothing like those flimsy silicon flakes! :-)) Tubes are for real men. When they fail, they often do so in a rather spectacular manner. Molten glass splattering about and all that. And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. PL509. Those are European color TV tubes used to drive the flyback transformer. Similar to the 6KD6, probably. Just taller. There used to be an odd rule for ham operator that had the highest license class in Germany. This rule didn't limit max RF out but it placed a cap of 150W on plate or collector dissipation as per data sheet. The PL509 was rated 30W so you were allowed to have up to five in there. Of course, everyone knew that 30W was conservative and they were rated for continuous duty. In SSB you could easily peak to 80W or more. How much more? That was the white knuckle question. So, in the heat of the game there was the occasional tube melt-down. Plates creaking, getting red, then bright red, followed by orange, a wee spot of whitish glow ... KAPOOF! I have seen PL509 tubes where the glass barely held on but was deformed, basically sucked snugly onto the plate. They looked like a dog's chew toy. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com |
#45
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
joseph2k wrote: And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. I've seen horizontal output tubes where the glass melted when the drive failed. It also destroyed the flyback transformer. A few of the melted tubes had a hole in the glass, while others just softened and shrank till they were touching the plates. Maybe a half dozen melted tubes in 30 years. Hmmmph. Failed protective circuits or hardware. Fuses should have blown and circuit breakers tripped before that that happened. They weren't a Muntz brand were they? -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.Â*Â* --Schiller |
#46
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
Joerg wrote:
joseph2k wrote: Joerg wrote: wrote: and here we have a fine group i shall dub "the mu men" or "the mu-see-ums" ;-)) solid, easy to get along with and sensible, no foolishness with p-layer punch thru or bonding failures! and tubes may actually be repaired too, nothing like those flimsy silicon flakes! :-)) Tubes are for real men. When they fail, they often do so in a rather spectacular manner. Molten glass splattering about and all that. And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. PL509. Those are European color TV tubes used to drive the flyback transformer. Similar to the 6KD6, probably. Just taller. There used to be an odd rule for ham operator that had the highest license class in Germany. This rule didn't limit max RF out but it placed a cap of 150W on plate or collector dissipation as per data sheet. The PL509 was rated 30W so you were allowed to have up to five in there. Of course, everyone knew that 30W was conservative and they were rated for continuous duty. In SSB you could easily peak to 80W or more. How much more? That was the white knuckle question. So, in the heat of the game there was the occasional tube melt-down. Plates creaking, getting red, then bright red, followed by orange, a wee spot of whitish glow ... KAPOOF! I have seen PL509 tubes where the glass barely held on but was deformed, basically sucked snugly onto the plate. They looked like a dog's chew toy. OK, but even the text of post shows that that the tubes were being intentionally operated well beyond their ratings. My dad talked about pushing 6L6s like that, but never seemed to have a meltdown. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.Â*Â* --Schiller |
#47
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:29:51 +0000, joseph2k wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote: joseph2k wrote: And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. I've seen horizontal output tubes where the glass melted when the drive failed. It also destroyed the flyback transformer. A few of the melted tubes had a hole in the glass, while others just softened and shrank till they were touching the plates. Maybe a half dozen melted tubes in 30 years. Hmmmph. Failed protective circuits or hardware. Fuses should have blown and circuit breakers tripped before that that happened. They weren't a Muntz brand were they? Actually, fuses and circuit breakers aren't intended primarily to protect the equipment itself - they're to keep the overcurrent from burning down the house (or factory, or whatever). Cheers! Rich |
#48
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
joseph2k wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote: joseph2k wrote: And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. I've seen horizontal output tubes where the glass melted when the drive failed. It also destroyed the flyback transformer. A few of the melted tubes had a hole in the glass, while others just softened and shrank till they were touching the plates. Maybe a half dozen melted tubes in 30 years. Hmmmph. Failed protective circuits or hardware. Fuses should have blown and circuit breakers tripped before that that happened. They weren't a Muntz brand were they? No, they were RCa, GE, Zenith, Motorola, Philco, Sylvania, Magnavox, and a lot of other brands. No one has EVER claimed that the TVs were well designed. Take the early sold state sets. The horizontal drive would fail, and put a large DC bias on the deflection yoke, breaking the the neck of the CRT. The company that made the so called "Safety capacitor" filed bankruptcy, leaving a number of manufacturers scrambling to find someone to make a replacement part, and take responsibility for any damage if their design failed. The "Safety capacitors went from three leads to four, to improve the chances that the "Safety capacitor" would open if there was a failure in the horizontal deflection circuit. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#49
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
Rich Grise wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 19:29:51 +0000, joseph2k wrote: Michael A. Terrell wrote: joseph2k wrote: And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. I've seen horizontal output tubes where the glass melted when the drive failed. It also destroyed the flyback transformer. A few of the melted tubes had a hole in the glass, while others just softened and shrank till they were touching the plates. Maybe a half dozen melted tubes in 30 years. Hmmmph. Failed protective circuits or hardware. Fuses should have blown and circuit breakers tripped before that that happened. They weren't a Muntz brand were they? Actually, fuses and circuit breakers aren't intended primarily to protect the equipment itself - they're to keep the overcurrent from burning down the house (or factory, or whatever). Cheers! Rich Goodness the breaker panel / fuse panel stuff is for that, i was talking about the fuses / breakers that are (supposed to be) part of the equipment itself. It usually has much lower trip / blow ratings. The power to do that to something like a 6DK6 is quite a lot. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.Â*Â* --Schiller |
#50
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
joseph2k wrote: Michael A. Terrell wrote: joseph2k wrote: And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. I've seen horizontal output tubes where the glass melted when the drive failed. It also destroyed the flyback transformer. A few of the melted tubes had a hole in the glass, while others just softened and shrank till they were touching the plates. Maybe a half dozen melted tubes in 30 years. Hmmmph. Failed protective circuits or hardware. Fuses should have blown and circuit breakers tripped before that that happened. They weren't a Muntz brand were they? No, they were RCa, GE, Zenith, Motorola, Philco, Sylvania, Magnavox, and a lot of other brands. News to me. But then again "Madman Muntz" _was_ unique. Extreme corner cutting seems to be the norm today. No one has EVER claimed that the TVs were well designed. Well, properly (safety) designed consumer products are an exception. Take the early sold state sets. The horizontal drive would fail, and put a large DC bias on the deflection yoke, breaking the the neck of the CRT. Never saw an instance of that either. Maybe it was a good thing that i got out of the TV repair business as a teen. The company that made the so called "Safety capacitor" filed bankruptcy, leaving a number of manufacturers scrambling to find someone to make a replacement part, and take responsibility for any damage if their design failed. The "Safety capacitors went from three leads to four, to improve the chances that the "Safety capacitor" would open if there was a failure in the horizontal deflection circuit. I vaguely remember hearing about that. Live and learn. -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.Â*Â* --Schiller |
#51
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
joseph2k wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote: joseph2k wrote: Michael A. Terrell wrote: joseph2k wrote: And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. I've seen horizontal output tubes where the glass melted when the drive failed. It also destroyed the flyback transformer. A few of the melted tubes had a hole in the glass, while others just softened and shrank till they were touching the plates. Maybe a half dozen melted tubes in 30 years. Hmmmph. Failed protective circuits or hardware. Fuses should have blown and circuit breakers tripped before that that happened. They weren't a Muntz brand were they? No, they were RCa, GE, Zenith, Motorola, Philco, Sylvania, Magnavox, and a lot of other brands. News to me. But then again "Madman Muntz" _was_ unique. Extreme corner cutting seems to be the norm today. No one has EVER claimed that the TVs were well designed. Well, properly (safety) designed consumer products are an exception. Take the early sold state sets. The horizontal drive would fail, and put a large DC bias on the deflection yoke, breaking the the neck of the CRT. Never saw an instance of that either. Maybe it was a good thing that i got out of the TV repair business as a teen. The company that made the so called "Safety capacitor" filed bankruptcy, leaving a number of manufacturers scrambling to find someone to make a replacement part, and take responsibility for any damage if their design failed. The "Safety capacitors went from three leads to four, to improve the chances that the "Safety capacitor" would open if there was a failure in the horizontal deflection circuit. I vaguely remember hearing about that. Live and learn. It nearly put Zenith out of business. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#52
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
joseph2k wrote: the neck of the CRT. Never saw an instance of that either. Maybe it was a good thing that i got out of the TV repair business as a teen. The company that made the so called "Safety capacitor" filed bankruptcy, leaving a number of manufacturers scrambling to find someone to make a replacement part, and take responsibility for any damage if their design failed. The "Safety capacitors went from three leads to four, to improve the chances that the "Safety capacitor" would open if there was a failure in the horizontal deflection circuit. I vaguely remember hearing about that. Live and learn. It nearly put Zenith out of business. Zenith is in the TV business? -Chuck |
#53
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:33:47 -0400, Chuck Harris wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote: joseph2k wrote: the neck of the CRT. Never saw an instance of that either. Maybe it was a good thing that i got out of the TV repair business as a teen. The company that made the so called "Safety capacitor" filed bankruptcy, leaving a number of manufacturers scrambling to find someone to make a replacement part, and take responsibility for any damage if their design failed. The "Safety capacitors went from three leads to four, to improve the chances that the "Safety capacitor" would open if there was a failure in the horizontal deflection circuit. I vaguely remember hearing about that. Live and learn. It nearly put Zenith out of business. Zenith is in the TV business? Apparently: http://www.zenith.com/index.asp?flash=false Cheers! Rich |
#54
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
Chuck Harris wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote: joseph2k wrote: the neck of the CRT. Never saw an instance of that either. Maybe it was a good thing that i got out of the TV repair business as a teen. The company that made the so called "Safety capacitor" filed bankruptcy, leaving a number of manufacturers scrambling to find someone to make a replacement part, and take responsibility for any damage if their design failed. The "Safety capacitors went from three leads to four, to improve the chances that the "Safety capacitor" would open if there was a failure in the horizontal deflection circuit. I vaguely remember hearing about that. Live and learn. It nearly put Zenith out of business. Zenith is in the TV business? -Chuck It was, at the time that the safety capacitor problem cropped up. It was a US corporation, making most of its electronics in the US, as well. That was 25 or 30 years ago on the "E" and "F" series of color TV chassis. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
#55
Posted to alt.binaries.schematics.electronic
|
|||
|
|||
Oh my! Nostalgia!
and the mains lines even began warming the ckt breaker boxes too! ahhhh,
memories! "joseph2k" wrote in message t... Michael A. Terrell wrote: joseph2k wrote: And just what tubes were those? Of the about about 1000 failed tubes that i have seen well over 95% were just filament / heater failures; and not one broken envelope except for two mechanical shock victims. I've seen horizontal output tubes where the glass melted when the drive failed. It also destroyed the flyback transformer. A few of the melted tubes had a hole in the glass, while others just softened and shrank till they were touching the plates. Maybe a half dozen melted tubes in 30 years. Hmmmph. Failed protective circuits or hardware. Fuses should have blown and circuit breakers tripped before that that happened. They weren't a Muntz brand were they? -- JosephKK Gegen dummheit kampfen die Gotter Selbst, vergebens.  --Schiller |