Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Electronics Repair (sci.electronics.repair) Discussion of repairing electronic equipment. Topics include requests for assistance, where to obtain servicing information and parts, techniques for diagnosis and repair, and annecdotes about success, failures and problems. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output
devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. Each of the 4 insulating pads had shrunk about 5mm at the tops (hottest) compared to bottoms , ruffling the original outer edges, heat damage ?. I replaced all 4 with mica and thin films of thermal grease. Before doing so I powered up the amp with 400 Hz cointinuous sine giving 20 watts in a dummy load. No fan cooling for this amp, just convection/radiation. Laid a brass barrel protected thermometer on the heatsink and took measurements. Stabilised at 33 deg C over ambient after 50 minutes. Replaced with mica and redid the load test. For same ambient , same testing position/attitude, power in load etc it now took 30 minutes to stabilise at plus 32 deg C over ambient. More graphically , but less scientific, - the finger test. After half an hour of heating with the mica setup I could hold a fingertip on each tranny for about 5 seconds before finding it uncomfortable. Previously half a second of fingertip touch was enough. Any comments ? -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#2
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
N Cook wrote:
I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. Each of the 4 insulating pads had shrunk about 5mm at the tops (hottest) compared to bottoms , ruffling the original outer edges, heat damage ?. I replaced all 4 with mica and thin films of thermal grease. Before doing so I powered up the amp with 400 Hz cointinuous sine giving 20 watts in a dummy load. No fan cooling for this amp, just convection/radiation. Laid a brass barrel protected thermometer on the heatsink and took measurements. Stabilised at 33 deg C over ambient after 50 minutes. Replaced with mica and redid the load test. For same ambient , same testing position/attitude, power in load etc it now took 30 minutes to stabilise at plus 32 deg C over ambient. More graphically , but less scientific, - the finger test. After half an hour of heating with the mica setup I could hold a fingertip on each tranny for about 5 seconds before finding it uncomfortable. Previously half a second of fingertip touch was enough. Any comments ? yes you have too much time on your hands only joking honest Ron |
#3
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
N Cook wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. Each of the 4 insulating pads had shrunk about 5mm at the tops (hottest) compared to bottoms , ruffling the original outer edges, heat damage ?. I replaced all 4 with mica and thin films of thermal grease. Before doing so I powered up the amp with 400 Hz cointinuous sine giving 20 watts in a dummy load. No fan cooling for this amp, just convection/radiation. Laid a brass barrel protected thermometer on the heatsink and took measurements. Stabilised at 33 deg C over ambient after 50 minutes. Replaced with mica and redid the load test. For same ambient , same testing position/attitude, power in load etc it now took 30 minutes to stabilise at plus 32 deg C over ambient. More graphically , but less scientific, - the finger test. After half an hour of heating with the mica setup I could hold a fingertip on each tranny for about 5 seconds before finding it uncomfortable. Previously half a second of fingertip touch was enough. Any comments ? The *heatsink* temperature won't be affected by the choice of insulator one tiny bit. You actually need to measure the *device* temperature to determine how effective the heat transfer washers are. I don't know how well calibrated your fingertips are ! Graham |
#4
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
On Sep 11, 10:29 am, "N Cook" wrote:
I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. Each of the 4 insulating pads had shrunk about 5mm at the tops (hottest) compared to bottoms , ruffling the original outer edges, heat damage ?. I replaced all 4 with mica and thin films of thermal grease. Before doing so I powered up the amp with 400 Hz cointinuous sine giving 20 watts in a dummy load. No fan cooling for this amp, just convection/radiation. Laid a brass barrel protected thermometer on the heatsink and took measurements. Stabilised at 33 deg C over ambient after 50 minutes. Replaced with mica and redid the load test. For same ambient , same testing position/attitude, power in load etc it now took 30 minutes to stabilise at plus 32 deg C over ambient. More graphically , but less scientific, - the finger test. After half an hour of heating with the mica setup I could hold a fingertip on each tranny for about 5 seconds before finding it uncomfortable. Previously half a second of fingertip touch was enough. Any comments ? Your fingertip response change is very steep in the area 32-33 C. -- John |
#5
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:29:38 +0100, "N Cook"
wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. Each of the 4 insulating pads had shrunk about 5mm at the tops (hottest) compared to bottoms , ruffling the original outer edges, heat damage ?. I replaced all 4 with mica and thin films of thermal grease. Before doing so I powered up the amp with 400 Hz cointinuous sine giving 20 watts in a dummy load. No fan cooling for this amp, just convection/radiation. Laid a brass barrel protected thermometer on the heatsink and took measurements. Stabilised at 33 deg C over ambient after 50 minutes. Replaced with mica and redid the load test. For same ambient , same testing position/attitude, power in load etc it now took 30 minutes to stabilise at plus 32 deg C over ambient. More graphically , but less scientific, - the finger test. After half an hour of heating with the mica setup I could hold a fingertip on each tranny for about 5 seconds before finding it uncomfortable. Previously half a second of fingertip touch was enough. Any comments ? Silicone pads are terrible thermally. My finger is pretty well calibrated from 50 to 60C. I can stand 50C forever, 60C for about one second, and interpolate between. John |
#6
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
John Larkin wrote: Silicone pads are terrible thermally. The cheap silicone pads are terrible. There are however some very good silicone pads too. The white ones that the OP mentioned he had in another post are normally higher performance than mica+grease. Graham |
#7
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:01:53 -0700, John Larkin
wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:29:38 +0100, "N Cook" wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. Each of the 4 insulating pads had shrunk about 5mm at the tops (hottest) compared to bottoms , ruffling the original outer edges, heat damage ?. I replaced all 4 with mica and thin films of thermal grease. Before doing so I powered up the amp with 400 Hz cointinuous sine giving 20 watts in a dummy load. No fan cooling for this amp, just convection/radiation. Laid a brass barrel protected thermometer on the heatsink and took measurements. Stabilised at 33 deg C over ambient after 50 minutes. Replaced with mica and redid the load test. For same ambient , same testing position/attitude, power in load etc it now took 30 minutes to stabilise at plus 32 deg C over ambient. More graphically , but less scientific, - the finger test. After half an hour of heating with the mica setup I could hold a fingertip on each tranny for about 5 seconds before finding it uncomfortable. Previously half a second of fingertip touch was enough. Any comments ? Silicone pads are terrible thermally. My finger is pretty well calibrated from 50 to 60C. I can stand 50C forever, 60C for about one second, and interpolate between. John My favorite coffee temperature D from BC |
#8
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
Eeyore wrote in message
... John Larkin wrote: Silicone pads are terrible thermally. The cheap silicone pads are terrible. There are however some very good silicone pads too. The white ones that the OP mentioned he had in another post are normally higher performance than mica+grease. Graham Yes white ones I'm wondering if they can chemically change over time and/or excessive temperature , downgrading to be more of a thermal insuilator. They are not discoloured or hardened or anything different in the ex-compressed area by sight or flexing, just permanetly deformed , the ruffling is permanent. -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#9
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
N Cook wrote: Eeyore wrote John Larkin wrote: Silicone pads are terrible thermally. The cheap silicone pads are terrible. There are however some very good silicone pads too. The white ones that the OP mentioned he had in another post are normally higher performance than mica+grease. Yes white ones I'm wondering if they can chemically change over time and/or excessive temperature , downgrading to be more of a thermal insuilator. They are not discoloured or hardened or anything different in the ex-compressed area by sight or flexing, just permanetly deformed , the ruffling is permanent. Sounds normal to me. Because they're quite soft, these silicone washers will flow slightly under pressure and conform to the heatsink and device surfaces very well. This aids the thermal transfer. It also explains the ruffled edges. Graham |
#10
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
N Cook wrote:
Eeyore wrote in message ... John Larkin wrote: Silicone pads are terrible thermally. The cheap silicone pads are terrible. There are however some very good silicone pads too. The white ones that the OP mentioned he had in another post are normally higher performance than mica+grease. Graham Yes white ones I'm wondering if they can chemically change over time and/or excessive temperature , downgrading to be more of a thermal insuilator. They are not discoloured or hardened or anything different in the ex-compressed area by sight or flexing, just permanetly deformed , the ruffling is permanent. Is it possible that it's been caused by some kind of attack by a chemical substance, silicon grease? Maybe some clown has sprayed something like WD40 all over the inside. People really do that you know! Ron(UK) |
#11
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
In article , "N Cook" wrote:
I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. Each of the 4 insulating pads had shrunk about 5mm at the tops (hottest) compared to bottoms , ruffling the original outer edges, heat damage ?. I replaced all 4 with mica and thin films of thermal grease. Before doing so I powered up the amp with 400 Hz cointinuous sine giving 20 watts in a dummy load. No fan cooling for this amp, just convection/radiation. Laid a brass barrel protected thermometer on the heatsink and took measurements. Stabilised at 33 deg C over ambient after 50 minutes. Replaced with mica and redid the load test. For same ambient , same testing position/attitude, power in load etc it now took 30 minutes to stabilise at plus 32 deg C over ambient. More graphically , but less scientific, - the finger test. After half an hour of heating with the mica setup I could hold a fingertip on each tranny for about 5 seconds before finding it uncomfortable. Previously half a second of fingertip touch was enough. Any comments ? I didn't quite follow your entire post, but I would have used a IR thermometer pointed on the devices, then the heatsink, then the room. I never thought silicone was better than mica, except in the case of a poor fit, or warped pieces. I have also tried to sand down surfaces that were not flush, and even remove the oxide on aluminum, to optimize transfer. grge |
#12
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
Meat Plow wrote: I prefer silicon pads in high power amps both RF and audio as do quite a few manufacturers. When building stuff in the west, the reduction in labour with 'grease-free' assembly is a not inconsiderable cost saving. It should pay for the extra cost of a decent performance silicone pad. Graham |
#13
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
On Sep 11, 8:29 am, "N Cook" wrote:
I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. The previous post, that said it was the transistor temperature that would be variable, was correct; remember, the whole heat output is dumped into the heatsink, and that isn't affected by the thermal resistance of your mica. Heatsink-to-air temperature difference is whatever it takes to drain that heat. It is possible to fit a second heatsink onto the TOP of the transistor, if you really need better thermal transfer (using both bottom and top surfaces of the metal plate). |
#14
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
N Cook wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices What the heck *WAS* TOP66 ? I'd have thought that was a plastic TO-66 size device. I'm sure those devices are in some other package.such as TO247, TO264 (TO-3P) whatever Graham |
#15
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:09:33 GMT, D from BC
wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:01:53 -0700, John Larkin wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:29:38 +0100, "N Cook" wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. Each of the 4 insulating pads had shrunk about 5mm at the tops (hottest) compared to bottoms , ruffling the original outer edges, heat damage ?. I replaced all 4 with mica and thin films of thermal grease. Before doing so I powered up the amp with 400 Hz cointinuous sine giving 20 watts in a dummy load. No fan cooling for this amp, just convection/radiation. Laid a brass barrel protected thermometer on the heatsink and took measurements. Stabilised at 33 deg C over ambient after 50 minutes. Replaced with mica and redid the load test. For same ambient , same testing position/attitude, power in load etc it now took 30 minutes to stabilise at plus 32 deg C over ambient. More graphically , but less scientific, - the finger test. After half an hour of heating with the mica setup I could hold a fingertip on each tranny for about 5 seconds before finding it uncomfortable. Previously half a second of fingertip touch was enough. Any comments ? Silicone pads are terrible thermally. My finger is pretty well calibrated from 50 to 60C. I can stand 50C forever, 60C for about one second, and interpolate between. John My favorite coffee temperature D from BC It's interesting that the tongue is the most temperature-sensitive part of the human body, and the most resistant to temperature damage. John |
#16
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:29:38 +0100, N Cook wrote:
Any comments ? Most people have known for decades that mica and good goop beats those stupid silicone things hands down. Cheers! Rich |
#17
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:57:23 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:09:33 GMT, D from BC On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:01:53 -0700, John Larkin .... My finger is pretty well calibrated from 50 to 60C. I can stand 50C forever, 60C for about one second, and interpolate between. My favorite coffee temperature It's interesting that the tongue is the most temperature-sensitive part of the human body, and the most resistant to temperature damage. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ That's only because it's the wettest part that ever sees the outside. ;-) I heard some standup comic talking about hot food - "It's too hot to pick up with my hands, so I'm going to put it into my mouth?" ;-) Ever blistered your palate with hot pizza? ;-) Cheers! Rich |
#18
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:30:33 +0000, GregS wrote:
.... pieces. I have also tried to sand down surfaces that were not flush, and even remove the oxide on aluminum, to optimize transfer. Unless you're under oil or something, you _can't_ remove the oxide on aluminum, because it so aggressively sucks up oxygen. But, fortunately, aluminum oxide (especially in the thicknesses that it spontaneously forms in air) is practically as good a heat conductor as pure aluminum. :-) And it's a much better electrical insulator. ;-D I've heard that if you get the surface flat enough, and type III anodize it, that you don't even need the mica. Cheers! Rich |
#19
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:38:08 +0100, Eeyore wrote:
N Cook wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices What the heck *WAS* TOP66 ? I'd have thought that was a plastic TO-66 size device. I'm sure those devices are in some other package.such as TO247, TO264 (TO-3P) whatever The way I had been taught, if you cut of the "C" lead of a TO-220, and bend the "E" and "B" leads 90 degrees at the right point, it drops right into a TO-66 spot, and a TO-247, with the same treatment, will drop into a TO-3 spot. Hope This Helps! Rich |
#20
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:29:02 GMT, Rich Grise wrote:
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:29:38 +0100, N Cook wrote: Any comments ? Most people have known for decades that mica and good goop beats those stupid silicone things hands down. Cheers! Rich Yup; the silicone is too thick. And the vendors measure theta with insane clamping forces applied, then lie by another 2:1 for good measure. John |
#21
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
"whit3rd" wrote in message
ups.com... On Sep 11, 8:29 am, "N Cook" wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. The previous post, that said it was the transistor temperature that would be variable, was correct; remember, the whole heat output is dumped into the heatsink, and that isn't affected by the thermal resistance of your mica. Heatsink-to-air temperature difference is whatever it takes to drain that heat. It is possible to fit a second heatsink onto the TOP of the transistor, if you really need better thermal transfer (using both bottom and top surfaces of the metal plate). The interface between the device and the heatsink is probably the most critical piece in the puzzle, and is the piece that a builder/repairer has most control over. The device temperature is what you're trying to control. You have no control over the internal thermal impedances of the device... they are determined by the manufacturing process and materials. Given a heatsink has adequate capacity for dissipating the heat (heatsink to air thermal impedance), then that only leaves the device to heatsink interface to manipulate. In comparison between greased mica and silpad insulators, the mica/grease combination has the better thermal characteristics. Mica can be problematic though, mainly because there seems to be no quality control on the manufacturing process. The thickness of a mica slab can vary from 0.010 to 0.050 or more. Mica can withstand about 1000 volts per mil, so it really doesn't need to be so thick. You can usually split a mica slab several times and still be safe in using it. The thermal impedance goes down somewhat with thinner slabs, too. Overall, mica/grease can exhibit almost half the thermal impedance of a silpad. Given the same device power dissipation, lower thermal impedances mean lower device temperature. -- Dave M MasonDG44 at comcast dot net (Just substitute the appropriate characters in the address) "In theory, there isn't any difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." - Yogi Berra |
#22
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
DaveM wrote: Overall, mica/grease can exhibit almost half the thermal impedance of a silpad. Given the same device power dissipation, lower thermal impedances mean lower device temperature. And this beats mica+grease hands down. http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...jsp?sku=681120 0.2C/W Graham |
#23
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
"Eeysore Gullible Fool" And this beats mica+grease hands down. http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...jsp?sku=681120 0.2C/W ** The 0.2 figure is meaningless until you read how the maker derived it. 1. It applies to a special test rig with 1 square inch area. 2. The pressure used is a massive 200 psi. As a TO3P pack has a metal tab area of only 0.36 sq inch and the mounting pressure is more like 50 psi in practice, the 0.2 figure has to be de-rated by about 6 times. So it is really 1.2 C/W, at best. Which thin mica and thermal grease will easily better. Yaaaaaawnnn...... ......... Phil |
#24
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
"John Larkin" wrote in message ... On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:09:33 GMT, D from BC wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:01:53 -0700, John Larkin wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:29:38 +0100, "N Cook" wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. Each of the 4 insulating pads had shrunk about 5mm at the tops (hottest) compared to bottoms , ruffling the original outer edges, heat damage ?. I replaced all 4 with mica and thin films of thermal grease. Before doing so I powered up the amp with 400 Hz cointinuous sine giving 20 watts in a dummy load. No fan cooling for this amp, just convection/radiation. Laid a brass barrel protected thermometer on the heatsink and took measurements. Stabilised at 33 deg C over ambient after 50 minutes. Replaced with mica and redid the load test. For same ambient , same testing position/attitude, power in load etc it now took 30 minutes to stabilise at plus 32 deg C over ambient. More graphically , but less scientific, - the finger test. After half an hour of heating with the mica setup I could hold a fingertip on each tranny for about 5 seconds before finding it uncomfortable. Previously half a second of fingertip touch was enough. Any comments ? Silicone pads are terrible thermally. My finger is pretty well calibrated from 50 to 60C. I can stand 50C forever, 60C for about one second, and interpolate between. John My favorite coffee temperature D from BC It's interesting that the tongue is the most temperature-sensitive part of the human body, and the most resistant to temperature damage. John That being the case, why is it so easy to burn your tongue on a hot drink or hot food ? Arfa |
#25
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
Phil Allison wrote: "Eeysore Gullible Fool" And this beats mica+grease hands down. http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...jsp?sku=681120 0.2C/W ** The 0.2 figure is meaningless until you read how the maker derived it. 1. It applies to a special test rig with 1 square inch area. 2. The pressure used is a massive 200 psi. As a TO3P pack has a metal tab area of only 0.36 sq inch and the mounting pressure is more like 50 psi in practice, the 0.2 figure has to be de-rated by about 6 times. So it is really 1.2 C/W, at best. Which thin mica and thermal grease will easily better. Hey Phil, I have used similar high-performance washers in some of my amplifier designs although I prefer to avoid washers ideally using 'live' heatsinks fwiw. I can assure you that they absolutely do not have 1.2C/W thermal resistance in practice. It's trivially simple to do the measurements. In one design that comes to mind using the 'rust' coloured washers from Warth, the thermal resistance was measured at ~ 0.3C/W. Graham |
#26
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
"Eeysore MORONIC BLOODY Fool" And this beats mica+grease hands down. http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...jsp?sku=681120 0.2C/W ** The 0.2 figure is meaningless until you read how the maker derived it. 1. It applies to a special test rig with 1 square inch area. 2. The pressure used is a massive 200 psi. As a TO3P pack has a metal tab area of only 0.36 sq inch and the mounting pressure is more like 50 psi in practice, the 0.2 figure has to be de-rated by about 6 times. So it is really 1.2 C/W, at best. Which thin mica and thermal grease will easily better. Hey Phil, ** Drop dead you PITA ****. Anyone else can go read the damn Bergquist data sheet !!! ........ Phil |
#27
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
Phil Allison (the snipping twit) wrote: "Eeysore MORONIC BLOODY Fool" And this beats mica+grease hands down. http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...jsp?sku=681120 0.2C/W ** The 0.2 figure is meaningless until you read how the maker derived it. 1. It applies to a special test rig with 1 square inch area. 2. The pressure used is a massive 200 psi. As a TO3P pack has a metal tab area of only 0.36 sq inch and the mounting pressure is more like 50 psi in practice, the 0.2 figure has to be de-rated by about 6 times. So it is really 1.2 C/W, at best. Which thin mica and thermal grease will easily better. Hey Phil, ** Drop dead you PITA ****. Drop DEAD you snipping MORON " I have used similar high-performance washers in some of my amplifier designs although I prefer to avoid washers ideally using 'live' heatsinks fwiw. I can assure you that they absolutely do not have 1.2C/W thermal resistance in practice. It's trivially simple to do the measurements. In one design that comes to mind using the 'rust' coloured washers from Warth, the thermal resistance was measured at ~ 0.3C/W. " Anyone else can go read the damn Bergquist data sheet !!! I said I was using WARTH pads. And the figures I obtained were with normal device torquing. " Thermal impedance range from 0.13 - 0.6°C-in/watt at 50 psi " http://www.lairdtech.com/pages/produ...e-Overview.asp " Thermal impedance of 0.13 range °C-in/watt at 20 psi clip force " http://www.lairdtech.com/pages/products/T-gard-K52.asp Graham |
#28
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
DaveM wrote in message
. .. "whit3rd" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 11, 8:29 am, "N Cook" wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. The previous post, that said it was the transistor temperature that would be variable, was correct; remember, the whole heat output is dumped into the heatsink, and that isn't affected by the thermal resistance of your mica. Heatsink-to-air temperature difference is whatever it takes to drain that heat. It is possible to fit a second heatsink onto the TOP of the transistor, if you really need better thermal transfer (using both bottom and top surfaces of the metal plate). The interface between the device and the heatsink is probably the most critical piece in the puzzle, and is the piece that a builder/repairer has most control over. The device temperature is what you're trying to control. You have no control over the internal thermal impedances of the device... they are determined by the manufacturing process and materials. Given a heatsink has adequate capacity for dissipating the heat (heatsink to air thermal impedance), then that only leaves the device to heatsink interface to manipulate. In comparison between greased mica and silpad insulators, the mica/grease combination has the better thermal characteristics. Mica can be problematic though, mainly because there seems to be no quality control on the manufacturing process. The thickness of a mica slab can vary from 0.010 to 0.050 or more. Mica can withstand about 1000 volts per mil, so it really doesn't need to be so thick. You can usually split a mica slab several times and still be safe in using it. The thermal impedance goes down somewhat with thinner slabs, too. Overall, mica/grease can exhibit almost half the thermal impedance of a silpad. Given the same device power dissipation, lower thermal impedances mean lower device temperature. -- Dave M MasonDG44 at comcast dot net (Just substitute the appropriate characters in the address) "In theory, there isn't any difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." - Yogi Berra I think I will rely on the evidence of my own observations and not performance tables produced by the manufacturer's with an obvious vested interest. I've no reason to believe the original silpads had aged, been affected by WD40 or anything. I will assume they are , all manufacturers, all generically bad until a similar personally conducted experiment, in a real situation, proves to me to be otherwise. -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#29
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
N Cook wrote:
I think I will rely on the evidence of my own observations and not performance tables produced by the manufacturer's with an obvious vested interest. I've no reason to believe the original silpads had aged, been affected by WD40 or anything. I will assume they are , all manufacturers, all generically bad until a similar personally conducted experiment, in a real situation, proves to me to be otherwise. Exactly what is the item of equipment in question? Ron(UK) |
#30
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Eeysore = ASININE, MORONIC BLOODY IDIOT
"Eeysore = ASININE, MORONIC BLOODY IDIOT And this beats mica+grease hands down. http://uk.farnell.com/jsp/Semiconduc...jsp?sku=681120 0.2C/W ** The 0.2 figure is meaningless until you read how the maker derived it. 1. It applies to a special test rig with 1 square inch area. 2. The pressure used is a massive 200 psi. As a TO3P pack has a metal tab area of only 0.36 sq inch and the mounting pressure is more like 50 psi in practice, the 0.2 figure has to be de-rated by about 6 times. So it is really 1.2 C/W, at best. Which thin mica and thermal grease will easily better. Hey Phil, ** Drop dead you PITA evil ****. Anyone else can go read the damn Bergquist data sheet !!! I said I was using WARTH pads. ** The Farnell link above that ** YOU ****ING POSTED ** is for BERGQUIST !!! YOU STINKING ASININE CRIMINAL MORON ........ Phil |
#31
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
"N Cook" wrote in message ... DaveM wrote in message . .. "whit3rd" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 11, 8:29 am, "N Cook" wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. The previous post, that said it was the transistor temperature that would be variable, was correct; remember, the whole heat output is dumped into the heatsink, and that isn't affected by the thermal resistance of your mica. Heatsink-to-air temperature difference is whatever it takes to drain that heat. It is possible to fit a second heatsink onto the TOP of the transistor, if you really need better thermal transfer (using both bottom and top surfaces of the metal plate). The interface between the device and the heatsink is probably the most critical piece in the puzzle, and is the piece that a builder/repairer has most control over. The device temperature is what you're trying to control. You have no control over the internal thermal impedances of the device... they are determined by the manufacturing process and materials. Given a heatsink has adequate capacity for dissipating the heat (heatsink to air thermal impedance), then that only leaves the device to heatsink interface to manipulate. In comparison between greased mica and silpad insulators, the mica/grease combination has the better thermal characteristics. Mica can be problematic though, mainly because there seems to be no quality control on the manufacturing process. The thickness of a mica slab can vary from 0.010 to 0.050 or more. Mica can withstand about 1000 volts per mil, so it really doesn't need to be so thick. You can usually split a mica slab several times and still be safe in using it. The thermal impedance goes down somewhat with thinner slabs, too. Overall, mica/grease can exhibit almost half the thermal impedance of a silpad. Given the same device power dissipation, lower thermal impedances mean lower device temperature. -- Dave M MasonDG44 at comcast dot net (Just substitute the appropriate characters in the address) "In theory, there isn't any difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." - Yogi Berra I think I will rely on the evidence of my own observations and not performance tables produced by the manufacturer's with an obvious vested interest. I've no reason to believe the original silpads had aged, been affected by WD40 or anything. I will assume they are , all manufacturers, all generically bad until a similar personally conducted experiment, in a real situation, proves to me to be otherwise. -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ Surely a degree of faith in what manufacturers say, has to be assumed, otherwise we would all go around our whole lives with our heads up our collective arses ! Do you for instance do a complete analysis of every piece of processed food you eat to see if the manufacturer is lying about how much salt it contains or how much calorific value it has ? Do you check your bottles of beer to see if the ABV that the manufacturer quotes is true ? Do you run a complete set of tests on a resistor type before stocking it as a spare to see if what the manufacturer says about its tolerance stability is correct ? No? Neither do I. I can understand scepticism about 'waved in the air' figures that appear to have little or no foundation in reality, but figures for these washers that quote specifics on the applied pressure to get the results that are published, don't seem to fall into that category to me. I can also understand manufacturers of some products getting into 'mine's bigger than yours' specmanship contests, but silicone heatsink pads ? Do you really believe that these are such a big part of the manufacturer's total output of products, that he needs to engage in the sort of behaviour that involves lying, or at least distorting, the 'true' facts about the product, just to sell a few more than the other guy ? As it happens, I cannot remember seeing pads distorted in the way that you describe, so maybe they were from a bad batch or something. Maybe, the amp manufacturer torqued them up too much, and the heat did the rest. Maybe the amp was used on midsummer's day in Ibiza at full volume with a blanket over it, and a fault ... I agree that many amps have output devices that appear to run hotter than we might like, and that the thermal transfer across the insulators seems less than ideal, but if that's the way the manufacturer made it and is happy with, and the item is not on my bench with failed output transistors, then I tend to just note the fact with interest, and work on using the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" principle. And to Graham, I HATE amps that have live heatsinks. Just a few days ago, I had a big AV amp on the bench that nearly threw me off my chair when I laid the edge of my hand across the two heatsinks ready to take some measurements with the meter probe in the other hand. This thing had rails of about +/- 80v, so it dumped 160v across my hand. Basstud thing ... Arfa |
#32
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
" Chairman of the CRIMINAL ****WITS " ** Go eat dog **** - you muther****ing nut case. ....... Phil |
#33
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Phil can't read
Phil Allison wrote: "Eeysore = AMAZING GENIUS I said I was using WARTH pads. ** The Farnell link above that ** YOU ****ING POSTED ** is for BERGQUIST !!! Those Bergquist pads are white like the OP's were. I have not used that variety myself. YOU STINKING ASININE CRIMINAL MORON I said that I have used WARTH PADS (rusty red in colour) and in TO-3 size they measured 0.3C/W. They also DO NOT require a high pressure interface. Graham |
#34
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
N Cook wrote: I think I will rely on the evidence of my own observations and not performance tables produced by the manufacturer's with an obvious vested interest. Considering that you don't know how to measure thermal ressitance I will rely on my own measurements which say that top-quality high performance 'sil-pads' can outperform grease and mica. Graham |
#35
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
Arfa Daily wrote in message
... "N Cook" wrote in message ... DaveM wrote in message . .. "whit3rd" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 11, 8:29 am, "N Cook" wrote: I was not convinced that for an existing used amp with 4x TOP66 power output devices that the silicone pads were better than mica. The previous post, that said it was the transistor temperature that would be variable, was correct; remember, the whole heat output is dumped into the heatsink, and that isn't affected by the thermal resistance of your mica. Heatsink-to-air temperature difference is whatever it takes to drain that heat. It is possible to fit a second heatsink onto the TOP of the transistor, if you really need better thermal transfer (using both bottom and top surfaces of the metal plate). The interface between the device and the heatsink is probably the most critical piece in the puzzle, and is the piece that a builder/repairer has most control over. The device temperature is what you're trying to control. You have no control over the internal thermal impedances of the device... they are determined by the manufacturing process and materials. Given a heatsink has adequate capacity for dissipating the heat (heatsink to air thermal impedance), then that only leaves the device to heatsink interface to manipulate. In comparison between greased mica and silpad insulators, the mica/grease combination has the better thermal characteristics. Mica can be problematic though, mainly because there seems to be no quality control on the manufacturing process. The thickness of a mica slab can vary from 0.010 to 0.050 or more. Mica can withstand about 1000 volts per mil, so it really doesn't need to be so thick. You can usually split a mica slab several times and still be safe in using it. The thermal impedance goes down somewhat with thinner slabs, too. Overall, mica/grease can exhibit almost half the thermal impedance of a silpad. Given the same device power dissipation, lower thermal impedances mean lower device temperature. -- Dave M MasonDG44 at comcast dot net (Just substitute the appropriate characters in the address) "In theory, there isn't any difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is." - Yogi Berra I think I will rely on the evidence of my own observations and not performance tables produced by the manufacturer's with an obvious vested interest. I've no reason to believe the original silpads had aged, been affected by WD40 or anything. I will assume they are , all manufacturers, all generically bad until a similar personally conducted experiment, in a real situation, proves to me to be otherwise. -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ Surely a degree of faith in what manufacturers say, has to be assumed, otherwise we would all go around our whole lives with our heads up our collective arses ! Do you for instance do a complete analysis of every piece of processed food you eat to see if the manufacturer is lying about how much salt it contains or how much calorific value it has ? Do you check your bottles of beer to see if the ABV that the manufacturer quotes is true ? Do you run a complete set of tests on a resistor type before stocking it as a spare to see if what the manufacturer says about its tolerance stability is correct ? No? Neither do I. I can understand scepticism about 'waved in the air' figures that appear to have little or no foundation in reality, but figures for these washers that quote specifics on the applied pressure to get the results that are published, don't seem to fall into that category to me. I can also understand manufacturers of some products getting into 'mine's bigger than yours' specmanship contests, but silicone heatsink pads ? Do you really believe that these are such a big part of the manufacturer's total output of products, that he needs to engage in the sort of behaviour that involves lying, or at least distorting, the 'true' facts about the product, just to sell a few more than the other guy ? As it happens, I cannot remember seeing pads distorted in the way that you describe, so maybe they were from a bad batch or something. Maybe, the amp manufacturer torqued them up too much, and the heat did the rest. Maybe the amp was used on midsummer's day in Ibiza at full volume with a blanket over it, and a fault ... I agree that many amps have output devices that appear to run hotter than we might like, and that the thermal transfer across the insulators seems less than ideal, but if that's the way the manufacturer made it and is happy with, and the item is not on my bench with failed output transistors, then I tend to just note the fact with interest, and work on using the "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" principle. And to Graham, I HATE amps that have live heatsinks. Just a few days ago, I had a big AV amp on the bench that nearly threw me off my chair when I laid the edge of my hand across the two heatsinks ready to take some measurements with the meter probe in the other hand. This thing had rails of about +/- 80v, so it dumped 160v across my hand. Basstud thing ... Arfa Unless big G has a defendable patent on mica then why do I not see like-for-like , in real situations, comparison tables of BigCorp GeeWizz SiilyPad versus mica in the performance figures. "Live" heatsink amps would be ok if the damn things were labelled with big fluorescent stickes stating such. But of course such amps should only be serviced by their own service agents is what they would say. -- Diverse Devices, Southampton, England electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on http://home.graffiti.net/diverse:graffiti.net/ |
#36
Posted to sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
Arfa Daily wrote:
And to Graham, I HATE amps that have live heatsinks. Just a few days ago, I had a big AV amp on the bench that nearly threw me off my chair when I laid the edge of my hand across the two heatsinks ready to take some measurements with the meter probe in the other hand. This thing had rails of about +/- 80v, so it dumped 160v across my hand. Basstud thing ... Arfa A bit of a zap now and then is sposed to be very good for your heart - if it don't stop it that is I`m with you on the live heatsink thing, but it does make mounting devices a lot simpler (and cheaper for the manufacturer no doubt). Has anyone any thoughts on using nylon machine screws to mount devices, instead of the usual tophat spacer and normal nut n bolt? Ron(UK) |
#37
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
Arfa Daily wrote: And to Graham, I HATE amps that have live heatsinks. Just a few days ago, I had a big AV amp on the bench that nearly threw me off my chair when I laid the edge of my hand across the two heatsinks ready to take some measurements with the meter probe in the other hand. This thing had rails of about +/- 80v, so it dumped 160v across my hand. Basstud thing ... You're not supposed to rest your hand inside live equipment ! I hope you take more care with LOPTs etc. Graham |
#38
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Graham Stevenson = PSYCHOTIC MANIAC
" Graham Stevenson = totally schizo psychopath. " ** The Farnell link above that ** YOU ****ING POSTED ** is for BERGQUIST !!! Those Bergquist pads are white like the OP's were. ** You are totally and completely INSANE - Stevenson !!! Someone needs to shoot you * right in the ****ing head* . Then apply for a Queen's awards for great favours to humanity. You deserve to die in the most vile agony. ....... Phil |
#39
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
Eeyore wrote:
Arfa Daily wrote: And to Graham, I HATE amps that have live heatsinks. Just a few days ago, I had a big AV amp on the bench that nearly threw me off my chair when I laid the edge of my hand across the two heatsinks ready to take some measurements with the meter probe in the other hand. This thing had rails of about +/- 80v, so it dumped 160v across my hand. Basstud thing ... You're not supposed to rest your hand inside live equipment ! I hope you take more care with LOPTs etc. Graham You're not a proper TV repair man till you lose all the hairs off the back of your hand! Ron(UK) |
#40
Posted to sci.electronics.repair,sci.electronics.design
|
|||
|
|||
Mica versus Silicone pad insulators
"Eeyore" wrote in message ... Arfa Daily wrote: And to Graham, I HATE amps that have live heatsinks. Just a few days ago, I had a big AV amp on the bench that nearly threw me off my chair when I laid the edge of my hand across the two heatsinks ready to take some measurements with the meter probe in the other hand. This thing had rails of about +/- 80v, so it dumped 160v across my hand. Basstud thing ... You're not supposed to rest your hand inside live equipment ! I hope you take more care with LOPTs etc. Graham Easy to say, but when you've been doing it for 30 odd years, and are used to heatsinks being grounded, it's hard to change. And as for LOPTxs, I try to avoid even getting the backs off TV sets and monitors these days, unless it's for a mate ... Arfa |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
White rubbery power tranny insulators | Electronics Repair | |||
Sanitary silicone sealant versus General purpose | UK diy | |||
porcelain, composite insulators | Home Ownership | |||
Even with electrical plate insulators, cold air is leaking thru... | Home Repair | |||
mica capacitor substitutes | Electronics Repair |