Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Latest Project, and my thoughts on furniture design
I finished up the web site details on my latest project: a slightly
embelished, Mission-Style Entertainment Center/Curio Cabinet. Here it is if you are interested: http://www.the-wildings.com/shop/current/ One of my complaintes about woodworking, or I guess woodworkers specifically, is that too many people are way too dependent on plans. Don't interpret this the wrong way. I think plans are a great learning tool in woodworking. I have built several things from plans in the past and I often study plans intently to get design and construction ideas, and then apply these to different projects. I also sell plans. However, there are certain times when you need to build something that has dimensions or a layout that plans just don't exist for. Unfortunately, I think getting too dependent on plans tends to stifle ones creativity. I have decided to try to help people by putting more details on the design of our projects on my website. I started this a few years back with a detailed description of the rocking chair we designed (http://the-wildings.com/shop/furniture/rocker/), but haven't provided much detail since. I am going to try to put more effort into this as I develop new projects going forward. On this current project, I discuss some of the contraints and the thought process we went through during the design phase. I also show some of the jigs we developed to do the automated carvings. I haven't spent too much time discussing routine stuff, like edging plywood, etc. If people find this more basic stuff useful, I can focus more on that in the future as well. So, if you are a relatively new woodworker that tends to work mostly from plans, I challenge you to try your hand at design. It is not all that difficult, and for me at least, it is kind of fun. The satisfaction you get when the piece is complete is even more as well.And if you have tried it and things didn't turn out quite as well as you like, then keep trying. Design ability, like all things in woodworking, gets better with practice. I'd be interested in other people's thoughts. Also feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the project, or want any further details. Joe in Denver My Woodworking Website: www.the-wildings.com/shop/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Beauty of a project.
I guess I am fairly new to woodworking (At least I am definitely new to "fine" woodworking). I just finished my first really nice nightstand and I am working on a second one to match. Here are my thoughts on plans verses design. I am doing bedroom furniture based on plans from a woodsmith book. I followed the plan closely on the first one and got into some trouble as not all cuts are exactly perfect every time. So on the second one I have followed the plan loosely and followed the actual project dimensions very closely. This seems to work much better. I am also in the process of helping a friend build a winerack/sideboard. This design is completely from my head to paper. I am really glad that I have done the woodsmith based projects as they introduced me to techniques and design ideas that I really needed to know in order to make a good and stable design for my friend. So... I think that every woodworker should spend time looking at plans. Even if they don't build the thing. I think plans are a very effective medium to share and learn ideas about design and style. I also think that for inexperienced (I came from a background of a lot of "not-fine" woodworking) woodworker plans help to solidify techniques, hone skills and understand common mistakes in a somewhat sheltered environment. At least this was true of the fine and very detailed plans from woodsmith (in my mind the best beginner-intermediate woodworking mag). This in mind I think that eventually a hobby woodworker will become bored with the reproduction of someone else's work. We hobbyist woodwork because we like doing it, something that I think is rooted in creativity not expressed at our "real" jobs. Thus eventually it must come from us. W |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Joe Wilding" wrote in message news:1110204506.cb0f84eaf5c48f04220cad9e9801df9a@t eranews... I finished up the web site details on my latest project: a slightly embelished, Mission-Style Entertainment Center/Curio Cabinet. Here it is if you are interested: http://www.the-wildings.com/shop/current/ Nice site. I really like how you show pieces from which the design elements were inspired. One of my complaintes about woodworking, or I guess woodworkers specifically, is that too many people are way too dependent on plans. Don't interpret this the wrong way. I think plans are a great learning tool in woodworking. I have built several things from plans in the past and I often study plans intently to get design and construction ideas, and then apply these to different projects. I also sell plans. However, there are certain times when you need to build something that has dimensions or a layout that plans just don't exist for. Unfortunately, I think getting too dependent on plans tends to stifle ones creativity. I'm with you 100%. I have never built anything from a published plan. But that does not mean that published plans are not a very appropriate way of communicating how a project goes together. Just as you gathered inspiration from other pieces, a plan can be an effective way to communicate a design technique. On the other hand, I think some people just want to build and either don't get, or can't get the design/creativity aspect of woodworking. If that makes them happy, well good for them. -s |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005 07:08:20 -0700, "Joe Wilding"
wrote: I finished up the web site details on my latest project: a slightly embelished, Mission-Style Entertainment Center/Curio Cabinet. Here it is if you are interested: http://www.the-wildings.com/shop/current/ Interesting looking piece. One of my complaintes about woodworking, or I guess woodworkers specifically, is that too many people are way too dependent on plans. Don't interpret this the wrong way. I think plans are a great learning tool in woodworking. I have built several things from plans in the past and I often study plans intently to get design and construction ideas, and then apply these to different projects. I also sell plans. However, there are certain times when you need to build something that has dimensions or a layout that plans just don't exist for. Unfortunately, I think getting too dependent on plans tends to stifle ones creativity. I have decided to try to help people by putting more details on the design of our projects on my website. I started this a few years back with a detailed description of the rocking chair we designed (http://the-wildings.com/shop/furniture/rocker/), but haven't provided much detail since. I am going to try to put more effort into this as I develop new projects going forward. On this current project, I discuss some of the contraints and the thought process we went through during the design phase. I also show some of the jigs we developed to do the automated carvings. I haven't spent too much time discussing routine stuff, like edging plywood, etc. If people find this more basic stuff useful, I can focus more on that in the future as well. So, if you are a relatively new woodworker that tends to work mostly from plans, I challenge you to try your hand at design. It is not all that difficult, and for me at least, it is kind of fun. The satisfaction you get when the piece is complete is even more as well.And if you have tried it and things didn't turn out quite as well as you like, then keep trying. Design ability, like all things in woodworking, gets better with practice. I'd be interested in other people's thoughts. Also feel free to contact me if you have any questions about the project, or want any further details. Joe in Denver My Woodworking Website: www.the-wildings.com/shop/ Design threads die like a dog on the Wreck. It's a damned shame. Your point about the dependence on plans is well taken. So is the one about their usefulness when one is starting out. In any artistic area, when one begins to practice in it, it is useful to copy, as much can be learned from those that have gone before. Once a person builds a few items and gets the basics of general technique down; it may be time for them to go to graduate school. I've learned most of the small amount that I know from working from the plans of good designers, working with antique furniture, seeing furniture in galleries and museums, and trying to incorporate what I've experienced into what I build. To me, the design process has become more interesting than the actual building of the piece. After you've built enough stuff, the execution, while not diminished in importance, is simply expected. The fundamental underpinnings of good design can be absorbed in a number of ways. For proportion and a sense of scale, I always refer people to Palladio, and The Four Books On Architecture. In particular, the study of the classical proportions of the five columns is worthwhile. A column can be analogized to a room, with the area of the plinth standing for the base detail; the shaft of the column being the wall, or the vertical portion of the cabinet between the horizontal elements; and the cornice being analogous to the crown. I've stolen classical entablatures for the cornice work of built in cabinets and it has worked out very well. But, the sense of proportion within the piece is directly related to the scale of the piece within the environment that it will reside in. For my money, there is no substitute for drawing the whole room, or at least the wall that the piece will sit against, to get a read on the scale and proportion of the piece in its space. Graduate school is when you start drawing your own plans. Designing involves you in all four of the Aristotelian modes of causality; the Material, the Formal, the Efficient, and the Final. In few areas of our lives can we be involved to such a degree in causing something to exist. Creativity, in this sense, is one of life's great pleasures, and it would be sad if someone were to satisfy themselves with a subset of the four - when all are within their grasp. In a less esoteric expression of the above: "I thought this up, I made it - and it kicks ass." Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email) http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Tom Watson wrote in
news snip In a less esoteric expression of the above: "I thought this up, I made it - and it kicks ass." Amen, brother. Except my drawing skills are rather rudimentary, and I work much better in building prototypes, mockups, and final pieces that 'grew as they went along'. Not that I'm in their class, but what I read from and about such luminaries as James Krenov and Gary Knox Bennett is that their 'plans' are far closer to sketches than working, scaled drawings. Lonnie Bird and Phillip Lowe, to name some current authors/craftspeople, are far more likely to create full-scale engineering drawings, detailed, and measured to great accuracy. Their apparent focus, seen from the FWW articles, is reproducing a style of an earlier time. And David Marks, at least viewed from his television show, cuts MDF templates before ever working in natural wood. I think part of the cause goes to basic training, and perhaps motivation. Marks expects, as part of making a living, to make multiples. Bird and Lowe make accurate replicas. Bennett and Krenov (who, by the way, seem to have little love for one another), are, in the most basic sense, sculptors who happen to work mostly with wood, capable of multiples, but not really interested in making another "just like the first". My training was in ceramics and sculpture, (and calculus and chemistry and economics), all areas in which one waves their arms, and says "Something like that. You get the idea." It is a real chore for me to do more than two of anything of the same pattern. Even the Shaker wall clocks I made were of different woods. The pair of nightstands I made in maple and cherry were a single project, from the start. I think I could only run a woodworking business if I had trusted apprentices. It was the only way I could run any of the other repetitive aspects of the businesses I had. "Do it like this. Holler if you have a question." The problem solving, the art, the nice people, the respect - those are what makes for the rewards. Patriarch |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Tom Watson" wrote in message
To me, the design process has become more interesting than the actual building of the piece. After you've built enough stuff, the execution, while not diminished in importance, is simply expected. Agreed ... except for me it is the most frustrating part of woodworking. I rarely work from plans, and thusly have been handicapped in having to go it alone for much of my woodworking existence. If there is one area I know that I consistently fail in, it is +design+. And if I do succeed, it is entirely accidental ... despite spending many more hours in research and drawing up of a plan, then in executing it. I have been making a conscious effort these past couple of years to write down what I feel are design shortcomings in my projects in hopes that the "lessons learned" will sink in ... but I am beginning to believe that, like art, design ability, while something that can be taught, is often better left to the truly talented. Hell, the way my "inspirations" always end up looking like a Velvet Elvis, you'd think I was Jerry Springer watching, poor white, trailer trash. (Could those pink plastic flamingos in my front yard have something to do with it?) -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 11/06/04 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Swingman" wrote in
: snip I rarely work from plans, and thusly have been handicapped in having to go it alone for much of my woodworking existence. If there is one area I know that I consistently fail in, it is +design+. And if I do succeed, it is entirely accidental ... despite spending many more hours in research and drawing up of a plan, then in executing it. I have been making a conscious effort these past couple of years to write down what I feel are design shortcomings in my projects in hopes that the "lessons learned" will sink in ... but I am beginning to believe that, like art, design ability, while something that can be taught, is often better left to the truly talented. Somebody I read lately said that the secret is in knowing what the rules are, so you can selectively break them, at the right times. It is being guided by principles and judgement, rather than slavish adherence to structure. Kind of like coloring cherry. (g,d & r) Patriarch |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Latest Project Pics | Woodworking | |||
Latest project: Civil War Cannon carriage | Woodworking | |||
How Do You Stay On Track During A Project (to McQualude) | Woodworking |