Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ollie" Olivili at Hot Mail dot com wrote in message news ![]() "Morris Dovey" wrote in message ... You might find it helpful to DAGS on 'router chip load' - which is one of the relevant tool factors (others are feed rate, spindle speed, and cutter geometry) - and, of course, the material being cut has considerations of its own. Morris, thanks for the good info. I am still new in this business and the reference to DAGS was strange to me? What is that? My question about the reasons for dado cuts was a short hand to ask "What are the arguments to do the dado cuts with cutter head and what are the arguments to do the dado cuts with router bits". Your answer indicated, that there are very few (perhaps none) reasons to use the cutter head if there is a router bit that can do the job. Answer's still the same. Smaller the diameter of the bit, the more you need the router's speed. Larger the diameter or more frequent the cut - the shaper. If either tool is capable of doing the job, the shaper is favored for volume work. It's got thicker cutters, an induction motor, and is easily adapted for power feeding. |