Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Dave Balderstone
 
Posts: n/a
Default alt.woodworking

In article , tm
wrote:

FYI, someone calling themself Charles Sheller has sent csmgs for
alt.woodworking, alt.woodworking.marketplace and alt.woodworking.plans.

Nothing about all-ages, tho.


The neighborhood kook is continuing its attack.
  #2   Report Post  
Rob Stokes
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You got one too huh?

Rob

--


http://www.robswoodworking.com

"Dave Balderstone" wrote in message
tone.ca...
In article , tm
wrote:

FYI, someone calling themself Charles Sheller has sent csmgs for
alt.woodworking, alt.woodworking.marketplace and alt.woodworking.plans.

Nothing about all-ages, tho.


The neighborhood kook is continuing its attack.



  #3   Report Post  
Woodchuck Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default

tm wrote in
:

FYI, someone calling themself Charles Sheller has sent csmgs for
alt.woodworking, alt.woodworking.marketplace and
alt.woodworking.plans.

Nothing about all-ages, tho.


Thanks for the heads up. They appear to have been legitimately created by
the admin of a small NSP..probably someone following the discussion who
wanted to beat Susan and Vito to the punch, and shoot down their chances
for proposing a reorganization of rec.woodworking. I don't see any
connection to the soft wreck proponents. The charters are too loose, and
there is no mention of "decency" or foul language. The alt.* hierarchy does
not require a vote, unlike the Big-8.

From the control messages..


CHARTER: alt.woodworking

This is a general woodworking forum. Woodworking discussion of any type
is encouraged, with the exception of any promotional material for sale,
auction or trade. No advertising of any kind is permitted. Binary
postings other than digital signatures are not permitted.


CHARTER: alt.woodworking.marketplace

This forum is a marketplace for items related to woodworking. You are
permitted to list items for sale [FS], trade [FT], or want-to-buy [WTB].
Pointers to web auctions [FA] for products of interest to woodworkers
may also be posted here. These postings must be restricted to the
private sale, trade, or auction of personally owned items. Commercial
entities or dealers may not list items, services, or promotional
material of any kind to this newsgroup. Binary postings other than
digital signatures are not permitted.


CHARTER: alt.woodworking.plans

This forum was created for woodworkers to post, archive, and discuss
free woodworking plans and ideas for projects. No advertising or
promotional material of any kind is permitted. You may not sell or
solicit plans for money here. Binary postings other than digital
signatures are not permitted.

--
Bill
  #4   Report Post  
Woodchuck Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave Balderstone wrote in
tone.ca:

FYI, someone calling themself Charles Sheller has sent csmgs for
alt.woodworking, alt.woodworking.marketplace and alt.woodworking.plans.

Nothing about all-ages, tho.


The neighborhood kook is continuing its attack.


They appear to be legit. This can be a good thing. If Susan and Vito ever
really submit a multiple group reorganization, the rebuttle from NAN would
be "There's already an alt.* group like that". If the soft wreck proponents
were behind these three new groups, the charters would probably be much
more restrictive and preachy. If the kook(s) was/were behind them, there
would probably be a more ridiculous/crude element to the charters.

Not to worry. Propagation of alt.* groups is poor, compared to Big-8
groups.

--
Bill
  #5   Report Post  
Dave Balderstone
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Woodchuck Bill
wrote:

They appear to be legit. This can be a good thing. If Susan and Vito ever
really submit a multiple group reorganization, the rebuttle from NAN would
be "There's already an alt.* group like that". If the soft wreck proponents
were behind these three new groups, the charters would probably be much
more restrictive and preachy. If the kook(s) was/were behind them, there
would probably be a more ridiculous/crude element to the charters.


There's a "Charles Sheller" listing in the vote result for
soc.religion.satanism and rec.woodworking.all-ages. Voted yes on both.


  #6   Report Post  
Woodchuck Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave Balderstone wrote in
tone.ca:

They appear to be legit. This can be a good thing. If Susan and Vito
ever really submit a multiple group reorganization, the rebuttle from
NAN would be "There's already an alt.* group like that". If the soft
wreck proponents were behind these three new groups, the charters
would probably be much more restrictive and preachy. If the kook(s)
was/were behind them, there would probably be a more ridiculous/crude
element to the charters.


There's a "Charles Sheller" listing in the vote result for
soc.religion.satanism and rec.woodworking.all-ages. Voted yes on both.


Like I said..someone following the discussion. He appears to favor the
creation of new groups :-) I still think if it was meant to be a troll
attack, there would have at least been some kind of an announcement to get
a rise. Let it play out for a while before slamming the guy. The alt.*
hierarchy is unmanaged; anyone with proper access and skill may create new
groups.

If the news.groups kook was able to send out control messages, he probably
would have put them in rec.* instead of alt.*.

--
Bill
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"