Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
However the is more time at the bandsaw and sander or planer but it (IMO)
makes for a more reliable lamination. Your suggestion still makes sense. You can control the work within the bandsaw/planer/sander work; once it goes in the steaming box, you are at the mercy of the clock, and how the lignin reacts to the steam. So I would always think that anything you do to keep the process under your control is better. I designed and built a music stand using curly redwood. I used bent laminations, not steam bent techniques (I can't imagine trying to steam bend such a wood), but did have one problem (two if you count the vacuum pump failing): you have to make sure you have enough of the wood you are using when some of the bends fail (I had just enough, and I couldn't replace any wood lost). However, I assume the orginal poster wanted the look of the solid bent look with no laminations; what I questioned was the idea of doing all of them at the same time. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wood Steaming And Drying Question | Woodworking |