Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/17/2020 8:20 PM, J. Clarke wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:46:21 -0800 (PST), Michael wrote: On Monday, February 17, 2020 at 6:37:09 PM UTC-6, Robbie Brusso wrote: I had planned on using box joints to build the frame of a hanging cabinet (top, bottom, sides). However, I'm starting to wonder about the weight bearing ability of the bottom frame member. The tapers of a dovetail would make me feel a little better but with a box joint I wonder about the load bearing ability of the bottom member. Thoughts? Well made box joints will easily hold up the weight and then some. If it's the bottom, you're loading a glue line in shear. If you are using a glue that absolutely positively does not creep (which lets out just about any PVA glue) you might be OK. But that's what dado joints are made for. The cabinet will be suspended by what? The top, as in a French cleat or will there be some sort of support from the sides? Will the weight of the contents be supported by the sides or will everything be sitting in the bottom? All of that matters a lot. Personally, I don't screw around and use dovetails all-round as my preferred method of support is via French cleat which applies much of its force to the top (and a little to the back and sides but that eventually gets applied to the top too). Not the most inspiring piece ever but this is my first try at a wall-hung display case. It uses half-blind dovetails to join top/bottom to sides: http://johnmcgaw.com/ww/furniture24.html -- Bodger's Dictum: Artifical intelligence can never overcome natural stupidity. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 12:53:56 -0500, John McGaw
wrote: On 2/17/2020 8:20 PM, J. Clarke wrote: On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:46:21 -0800 (PST), Michael wrote: On Monday, February 17, 2020 at 6:37:09 PM UTC-6, Robbie Brusso wrote: I had planned on using box joints to build the frame of a hanging cabinet (top, bottom, sides). However, I'm starting to wonder about the weight bearing ability of the bottom frame member. The tapers of a dovetail would make me feel a little better but with a box joint I wonder about the load bearing ability of the bottom member. Thoughts? Well made box joints will easily hold up the weight and then some. If it's the bottom, you're loading a glue line in shear. If you are using a glue that absolutely positively does not creep (which lets out just about any PVA glue) you might be OK. But that's what dado joints are made for. The cabinet will be suspended by what? The top, as in a French cleat or will there be some sort of support from the sides? Will the weight of the contents be supported by the sides or will everything be sitting in the bottom? All of that matters a lot. Personally, I don't screw around and use dovetails all-round as my preferred method of support is via French cleat which applies much of its force to the top (and a little to the back and sides but that eventually gets applied to the top too). Not the most inspiring piece ever but this is my first try at a wall-hung display case. It uses half-blind dovetails to join top/bottom to sides: http://johnmcgaw.com/ww/furniture24.html Yours made me think of a way OP could still use his box joints - attach a second bottom or moulding to make it look like it's trimmed on 3 edges but actually screwed up into the sides for a little extra strength ? .. might make the box joints look odd though ... out-of-place .. John T. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The french cleat idea is a great one (and one I'll likely use instead of my idea of a nailer inside the cabinet). Would it be considered sacrilege to put a brad into the box joints? Would it risk splitting?
|
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/18/2020 1:06 PM, Robbie Brusso wrote:
...Would it be considered sacrilege to put a brad into the box joints? ... Only 'til the glue dries. -- |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/18/2020 1:06 PM, Robbie Brusso wrote:
The french cleat idea is a great one (and one I'll likely use instead of my idea of a nailer inside the cabinet). Would it be considered sacrilege to put a brad into the box joints? Would it risk splitting? Keep in mind that a French cleat, to be the safest install, still needs a screw or two to hold it into position. The cabinet could be pulled out from the wall and fall if not permanently fastened. That said the French cleat is still a good way for one person to hang a cabinet. This is not furniture so screws, brads, etc are acceptable. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/18/2020 4:21 PM, Leon wrote:
On 2/18/2020 1:06 PM, Robbie Brusso wrote: The french cleat idea is a great one (and one I'll likely use instead of my idea of a nailer inside the cabinet). Would it be considered sacrilege to put a brad into the box joints? Would it risk splitting? Keep in mind that a French cleat, to be the safest install, still needs a screw or two to hold it into position.Â* The cabinet could be pulled out from the wall and fall if not permanently fastened.Â* That said the French cleat is still a good way for one person to hang a cabinet.Â* This is not furniture so screws, brads, etc are acceptable. I don't see why you couldn't use a brad or a nail or a screw in the box joint. I've done it with pegs in both box and dovetail joints in drawers when I was concerned about wear over years of use. There are so many ways to join wood in an application like this and so many variations that could be applied to each that one could spend a lifetime trying them all out (if you work as slowly as I do, anyway). Here is an old-school way of doing pegged box joints although using rectangular ebony pegs is kind of out there if you are looking for simple: https://www.finewoodworking.com/read...1/18/tool-tote Done properly is is very pretty, you must admit. -- Bodger's Dictum: Artifical intelligence can never overcome natural stupidity. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John McGaw writes:
On 2/18/2020 4:21 PM, Leon wrote: On 2/18/2020 1:06 PM, Robbie Brusso wrote: The french cleat idea is a great one (and one I'll likely use instead of my idea of a nailer inside the cabinet). Would it be considered sacrilege to put a brad into the box joints? Would it risk splitting? Keep in mind that a French cleat, to be the safest install, still needs a screw or two to hold it into position.Â* The cabinet could be pulled out from the wall and fall if not permanently fastened.Â* That said the French cleat is still a good way for one person to hang a cabinet.Â* This is not furniture so screws, brads, etc are acceptable. I don't see why you couldn't use a brad or a nail or a screw in the box joint. A tightly fitting, correctly glued box joint should be stronger than the wood around it. I don't see the necessity of additional reinforcement. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/19/2020 12:20 PM, Scott Lurndal wrote:
John McGaw writes: On 2/18/2020 4:21 PM, Leon wrote: On 2/18/2020 1:06 PM, Robbie Brusso wrote: The french cleat idea is a great one (and one I'll likely use instead of my idea of a nailer inside the cabinet). Would it be considered sacrilege to put a brad into the box joints? Would it risk splitting? Keep in mind that a French cleat, to be the safest install, still needs a screw or two to hold it into position.ÂÂ* The cabinet could be pulled out from the wall and fall if not permanently fastened.ÂÂ* That said the French cleat is still a good way for one person to hang a cabinet.ÂÂ* This is not furniture so screws, brads, etc are acceptable. I don't see why you couldn't use a brad or a nail or a screw in the box joint. A tightly fitting, correctly glued box joint should be stronger than the wood around it. I don't see the necessity of additional reinforcement. Assuming that the joint is fitted well and the glue involved is guaranteed to never creep under constant load then reinforcement is not needed. I don't see the necessity of security blankets but if it makes the OP feel better about it, what is the harm? I back my computers up to three different destinations and keep copies of my data in a bank vault. Necessary? Maybe not but it lets me sleep better at night. -- Bodger's Dictum: Artifical intelligence can never overcome natural stupidity. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/18/2020 6:21 PM, John McGaw wrote:
On 2/18/2020 4:21 PM, Leon wrote: On 2/18/2020 1:06 PM, Robbie Brusso wrote: The french cleat idea is a great one (and one I'll likely use instead of my idea of a nailer inside the cabinet). Would it be considered sacrilege to put a brad into the box joints? Would it risk splitting? Keep in mind that a French cleat, to be the safest install, still needs a screw or two to hold it into position.Â* The cabinet could be pulled out from the wall and fall if not permanently fastened.Â* That said the French cleat is still a good way for one person to hang a cabinet.Â* This is not furniture so screws, brads, etc are acceptable. I don't see why you couldn't use a brad or a nail or a screw in the box joint. I've done it with pegs in both box and dovetail joints in drawers when I was concerned about wear over years of use. There are so many ways to join wood in an application like this and so many variations that could be applied to each that one could spend a lifetime trying them all out (if you work as slowly as I do, anyway). Here is an old-school way of doing pegged box joints although using rectangular ebony pegs is kind of out there if you are looking for simple: https://www.finewoodworking.com/read...1/18/tool-tote Done properly is is very pretty, you must admit. I think pegging of the joint is best described in your last sentence. I think for any other reason may be overkill. There is a LOT of glue surface in a box joint, triple, IIRC. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 1:06:09 PM UTC-6, Robbie Brusso wrote:
The french cleat idea is a great one (and one I'll likely use instead of my idea of a nailer inside the cabinet). Would it be considered sacrilege to put a brad into the box joints? Would it risk splitting? Maybe drill a 1/8 hole and drive in a 1/8 dowel. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 1:06:09 PM UTC-6, Robbie Brusso wrote:
The french cleat idea is a great one (and one I'll likely use instead of my idea of a nailer inside the cabinet). Would it be considered sacrilege to put a brad into the box joints? Would it risk splitting? Here's Norm making a medicine cabinet using box joints. You'll need the required belt sander and brad nailer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2FEthi8X64 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cabinet, Furniture Design Software, Autodesk QuickCAD v8.0, Punch Software Home Design Architectural Series 18 v6.0, SOLID V3.5 - CABINET VISION, Cabinet Design Centre v7.0 - Cubit, 20-20 Kitchen Design V6.1,Cabinet Vision Solid, Planit Millennium II | Woodturning | |||
Cabinet, Furniture Design Software, Autodesk QuickCAD v8.0, Punch Software Home Design Architectural Series 18 v6.0, SOLID V3.5 - CABINET VISION, Cabinet Design Centre v7.0 - Cubit, 20-20 Kitchen Design V6.1,Cabinet Vision Solid, Planit Millennium II | Home Repair | |||
Cabinet, Furniture Design Software, Autodesk QuickCAD v8.0, Punch Software Home Design Architectural Series 18 v6.0, SOLID V3.5 - CABINET VISION, Cabinet Design Centre v7.0 - Cubit, 20-20 Kitchen Design V6.1,Cabinet Vision Solid, Planit Millennium II | Home Ownership | |||
Cabinet, Furniture Design Software, Autodesk QuickCAD v8.0, Punch Software Home Design Architectural Series 18 v6.0, SOLID V3.5 - CABINET VISION, Cabinet Design Centre v7.0 - Cubit, 20-20 Kitchen Design V6.1,Cabinet Vision Solid, Planit Millennium II | UK diy | |||
Cabinet, Furniture Design Software, Autodesk QuickCAD v8.0, Punch Software Home Design Architectural Series 18 v6.0, SOLID V3.5 - CABINET VISION, Cabinet Design Centre v7.0 - Cubit, 20-20 Kitchen Design V6.1,Cabinet Vision Solid, Planit Millennium II | Woodworking |