Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
|
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
On 7/28/12 1:23 PM, Leon wrote:
http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...4-70e58b73187a There's an underground coal mine fire in New Straitsville, OH which has been burning for 120 years. -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
-MIKE- wrote in
: On 7/28/12 1:23 PM, Leon wrote: http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...-over-40-years -30115437.html?pb_list=23dce613-c500-43f0-9134-70e58b73187a There's an underground coal mine fire in New Straitsville, OH which has been burning for 120 years. And Centralia, PA ... -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
On 7/28/2012 2:56 PM, Han wrote:
-MIKE- wrote in : On 7/28/12 1:23 PM, Leon wrote: http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...-over-40-years -30115437.html?pb_list=23dce613-c500-43f0-9134-70e58b73187a There's an underground coal mine fire in New Straitsville, OH which has been burning for 120 years. And Centralia, PA ... And one that has been burning in NJ I believe Jersey City for 30 or 40 years |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:23:04 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...4-70e58b73187a The "REAL" reason for global warming is the French. European French, Quebec French, take your pick. |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
On 7/28/2012 1:01 PM, Dave wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:23:04 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...4-70e58b73187a The "REAL" reason for global warming is the French. European French, Quebec French, take your pick. Nah, it's all the hot air and flatulence Congress puts out. |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
On 7/28/2012 7:21 PM, Just Wondering wrote:
On 7/28/2012 1:01 PM, Dave wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:23:04 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...4-70e58b73187a The "REAL" reason for global warming is the French. European French, Quebec French, take your pick. Nah, it's all the hot air and flatulence Congress puts out. I think it is caused by the flatulence from the trillions of animals on earth. |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
Leon wrote:
http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...4-70e58b73187a Nonsense. Global Warming is caused, or at least started, by the "AIDS Quilt" project. |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in
: http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...over-40-years- 30115437.html?pb_list=23dce613-c500-43f0-9134-70e58b73187a http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/op...-of-a-climate- change-skeptic.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all and for another commentary: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...l-koch-funded- study-finds-global-warming-is-real-on-the-high-end-and-essentially-all-due- to-carbon-pollution/ -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
On 29 Jul 2012 01:04:52 GMT, Han wrote:
Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in : http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...over-40-years- 30115437.html?pb_list=23dce613-c500-43f0-9134-70e58b73187a http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/op...-of-a-climate- change-skeptic.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all and for another commentary: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...l-koch-funded- study-finds-global-warming-is-real-on-the-high-end-and-essentially-all-due- to-carbon-pollution/ Jeeze, is it April 1st again already? -- It takes as much energy to wish as to plan. --Eleanor Roosevelt |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
Larry Jaques wrote in
: On 29 Jul 2012 01:04:52 GMT, Han wrote: Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in : http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...r-over-40-year s- 30115437.html?pb_list=23dce613-c500-43f0-9134-70e58b73187a http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/op...-of-a-climate- change-skeptic.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all and for another commentary: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...hell-koch-fund ed- study-finds-global-warming-is-real-on-the-high-end-and-essentially-all- due- to-carbon-pollution/ Jeeze, is it April 1st again already? Sorry, Larry. This is an early birthday present for you. The latest Koch brothers-financed study to definitively demonstrate that global warming is a hoax has found exactly the opposite of what they wanted: Global warming is real, and at least 70% if not all is caused by man. At least that is what I gather from all the buzz about this indeed definitive study by reputable scientists (AFAIKT). -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
On 7/29/2012 7:04 AM, Han wrote:
Larry Jaques wrote in : On 29 Jul 2012 01:04:52 GMT, Han wrote: Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in : http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...r-over-40-year s- 30115437.html?pb_list=23dce613-c500-43f0-9134-70e58b73187a http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/op...-of-a-climate- change-skeptic.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all and for another commentary: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...hell-koch-fund ed- study-finds-global-warming-is-real-on-the-high-end-and-essentially-all- due- to-carbon-pollution/ Jeeze, is it April 1st again already? Sorry, Larry. This is an early birthday present for you. The latest Koch brothers-financed study to definitively demonstrate that global warming is a hoax has found exactly the opposite of what they wanted: Global warming is real, and at least 70% if not all is caused by man. At least that is what I gather from all the buzz about this indeed definitive study by reputable scientists (AFAIKT). I can assure you 99.999999999999999999999999% of global warming is caused by the sun. Take away the sun and see how much of the heat we have now remains. |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
"Leon" wrote in message
... On 7/29/2012 7:04 AM, Han wrote: Larry Jaques wrote in : On 29 Jul 2012 01:04:52 GMT, Han wrote: Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in : http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...r-over-40-year s- 30115437.html?pb_list=23dce613-c500-43f0-9134-70e58b73187a http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/op...-of-a-climate- change-skeptic.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all and for another commentary: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...hell-koch-fund ed- study-finds-global-warming-is-real-on-the-high-end-and-essentially-all- due- to-carbon-pollution/ Jeeze, is it April 1st again already? Sorry, Larry. This is an early birthday present for you. The latest Koch brothers-financed study to definitively demonstrate that global warming is a hoax has found exactly the opposite of what they wanted: Global warming is real, and at least 70% if not all is caused by man. At least that is what I gather from all the buzz about this indeed definitive study by reputable scientists (AFAIKT). I can assure you 99.999999999999999999999999% of global warming is caused by the sun. Take away the sun and see how much of the heat we have now remains. When a boy scout uses a magnifying glass to start a fire "I can assure you 99.999999999999999999999999% of the heat needed to ignite the fuel is caused by the sun." I doubt some dumb magnifying glass plays ANY role. Dave in Texas |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
On 29 Jul 2012 12:04:22 GMT, Han wrote:
Larry Jaques wrote in : On 29 Jul 2012 01:04:52 GMT, Han wrote: Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in : http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...r-over-40-year s- 30115437.html?pb_list=23dce613-c500-43f0-9134-70e58b73187a http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/op...-of-a-climate- change-skeptic.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all and for another commentary: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...hell-koch-fund ed- study-finds-global-warming-is-real-on-the-high-end-and-essentially-all- due- to-carbon-pollution/ Jeeze, is it April 1st again already? Sorry, Larry. This is an early birthday present for you. Gee, thanks. g It's next week, BTW. (59) The latest Koch brothers-financed study to definitively demonstrate that global warming is a hoax has found exactly the opposite of what they wanted: Global warming is real, and at least 70% if not all is caused by man. At least that is what I gather from all the buzz about this indeed definitive study by reputable scientists (AFAIKT). The ThinkProgress site is suspect: liberals twisting facts once again. The hockey stick graph is a real good clue to that without research. Their "study" indicating that "NRA Members Agree: More Gun Regulation Makes Sense" is such bull**** I can't stand it. I wonder how long it took them to find that many liberals with guns who were NRA members- in-name-only. Or did they just have liberals buy memberships to support that "study"? And if AGWK is at the high end of predictions, why has each IPCC study since the first shown -less- warming than first reported? They stairstep down. My guess is that the computer models are being updated as they find new data to make them more, or at least _somewhat_, reliable. Have you read the Koch report on their server or Muller's report, or just this completely cooked-up page at TP? (Fitting initials. I think of toilet paper when reading their dung.) I'm off to find the real reports now. It's no wonder that TP didn't link it, and I'm surprised that they linked Muller's. -- It takes as much energy to wish as to plan. --Eleanor Roosevelt |
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
Larry Jaques wrote in
: On 29 Jul 2012 12:04:22 GMT, Han wrote: Larry Jaques wrote in m: On 29 Jul 2012 01:04:52 GMT, Han wrote: Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in : http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...for-over-40-ye ar s- 30115437.html?pb_list=23dce613-c500-43f0-9134-70e58b73187a http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/op...on-of-a-climat e- change-skeptic.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all and for another commentary: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...bshell-koch-fu nd ed- study-finds-global-warming-is-real-on-the-high-end-and-essentially-al l- due- to-carbon-pollution/ Jeeze, is it April 1st again already? Sorry, Larry. This is an early birthday present for you. Gee, thanks. g It's next week, BTW. (59) I know. Somehow my FB tells me it is soon. Btw, you're too young to be so curmudgeonly grin. The latest Koch brothers-financed study to definitively demonstrate that global warming is a hoax has found exactly the opposite of what they wanted: Global warming is real, and at least 70% if not all is caused by man. At least that is what I gather from all the buzz about this indeed definitive study by reputable scientists (AFAIKT). The ThinkProgress site is suspect: liberals twisting facts once again. The hockey stick graph is a real good clue to that without research. Their "study" indicating that "NRA Members Agree: More Gun Regulation Makes Sense" is such bull**** I can't stand it. I wonder how long it took them to find that many liberals with guns who were NRA members- in-name-only. Or did they just have liberals buy memberships to support that "study"? While I am for gun control, I think that the NRA has driven too many people to buy guns, so that I am almost feeling forced to go and get some too. I'll let you all know when I do, so you can get body armor ... grin And if AGWK is at the high end of predictions, why has each IPCC study since the first shown -less- warming than first reported? They stairstep down. My guess is that the computer models are being updated as they find new data to make them more, or at least _somewhat_, reliable. Have you read the Koch report on their server or Muller's report, or just this completely cooked-up page at TP? (Fitting initials. I think of toilet paper when reading their dung.) I'm off to find the real reports now. It's no wonder that TP didn't link it, and I'm surprised that they linked Muller's. Let me know when you find reliable reports denying the Muller paper. -- It takes as much energy to wish as to plan. --Eleanor Roosevelt Sometimes it is better to plan and act on your suspicions, than to just sit and wait. -- Han Broekman -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT The real reason for "global warming" Ba ha ha
"Larry Jaques" wrote in message
... On 29 Jul 2012 12:04:22 GMT, Han wrote: Larry Jaques wrote in : On 29 Jul 2012 01:04:52 GMT, Han wrote: Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote in : http://screen.yahoo.com/quot-door-to...r-over-40-year s- 30115437.html?pb_list=23dce613-c500-43f0-9134-70e58b73187a http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/op...-of-a-climate- change-skeptic.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all and for another commentary: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/201...hell-koch-fund ed- study-finds-global-warming-is-real-on-the-high-end-and-essentially-all- due- to-carbon-pollution/ Jeeze, is it April 1st again already? Sorry, Larry. This is an early birthday present for you. Gee, thanks. g It's next week, BTW. (59) The latest Koch brothers-financed study to definitively demonstrate that global warming is a hoax has found exactly the opposite of what they wanted: Global warming is real, and at least 70% if not all is caused by man. At least that is what I gather from all the buzz about this indeed definitive study by reputable scientists (AFAIKT). The ThinkProgress site is suspect: liberals twisting facts once again. The hockey stick graph is a real good clue to that without research. Their "study" indicating that "NRA Members Agree: More Gun Regulation Makes Sense" is such bull**** I can't stand it. I wonder how long it took them to find that many liberals with guns who were NRA members- in-name-only. Or did they just have liberals buy memberships to support that "study"? And if AGWK is at the high end of predictions, why has each IPCC study since the first shown -less- warming than first reported? They stairstep down. My guess is that the computer models are being updated as they find new data to make them more, or at least _somewhat_, reliable. Have you read the Koch report on their server or Muller's report, or just this completely cooked-up page at TP? (Fitting initials. I think of toilet paper when reading their dung.) I'm off to find the real reports now. It's no wonder that TP didn't link it, and I'm surprised that they linked Muller's. To wit: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/op...c.html?_r=1&hp |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|