Build a Chicken House Quickly
With These Techniques
http://123probiz.com/building-a-chickencoop

Enri Patuly
Marketing
http://tinyurl.com/7hou5t

On 10/15/2010 1:23 AM, 3ndy wrote:
Build a Chicken House Quickly
With These Techniques

Ahhhhh ... finally, something I know about!

Don't do that! It will ruin your tools, your custom furniture "eye", and
the very next cabinet you build will look like a chicken coop and smell
like a tubafour.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 4/15/2010
KarlC@ (the obvious)

On Oct 15, 8:11*am, Swingman wrote:
On 10/15/2010 1:23 AM, 3ndy wrote:

Build a Chicken House Quickly
With These Techniques

Ahhhhh ... finally, something I know about!

Don't do that! It will ruin your tools, your custom furniture "eye", and
the very next cabinet you build will look like a chicken coop and smell
like a tubafour.

--www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 4/15/2010
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Tinyurl people seem to know a thing or two about spam. Link is dead.

Besides, I liked your design better, Swing.

"Swingman" wrote in message
...
On 10/15/2010 1:23 AM, 3ndy wrote:
Build a Chicken House Quickly
With These Techniques

Ahhhhh ... finally, something I know about!

Don't do that! It will ruin your tools, your custom furniture "eye", and
the very next cabinet you build will look like a chicken coop and smell
like a tubafour.

AND, have a serious impact on your ability to read increments smaller than
sixteenth's of an inch. ;~)

On 10/15/2010 9:40 AM, Leon wrote:
wrote in message
...
On 10/15/2010 1:23 AM, 3ndy wrote:
Build a Chicken House Quickly
With These Techniques

Ahhhhh ... finally, something I know about!

Don't do that! It will ruin your tools, your custom furniture "eye", and
the very next cabinet you build will look like a chicken coop and smell
like a tubafour.

AND, have a serious impact on your ability to read increments smaller than
sixteenth's of an inch. ;~)

??? Wot?

There is really no need whatsoever for anything smaller.

It's called "interpolation", and I'll have you know it is a valid
scientific procedure for past 3000 years or so.

A "sixteenth and a half", or a "sixteenth and quarter" is sooooooo much
more elegant. AND, it frees your synapses for much more important issues
.... like where to go for lunch.



--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 4/15/2010
KarlC@ (the obvious)

"Swingman" wrote in message
...
On 10/15/2010 9:40 AM, Leon wrote:


??? Wot?

There is really no need whatsoever for anything smaller.

It's called "interpolation", and I'll have you know it is a valid
scientific procedure for past 3000 years or so.

A "sixteenth and a half", or a "sixteenth and quarter" is sooooooo much
more elegant. AND, it frees your synapses for much more important issues
... like where to go for lunch.



A sixteenth and a quarter... hummmmmmm, 5/64, LOL

OK where does the fifth come into this?


Oh yeah! Duh! That's when you are making an amendment.


"Leon" wrote in message
...
A sixteenth and a quarter... hummmmmmm, 5/64, LOL


"Swingman" wrote in message
...
??? Wot?

There is really no need whatsoever for anything smaller.

It's called "interpolation", and I'll have you know it is a valid
scientific procedure for past 3000 years or so.

A "sixteenth and a half", or a "sixteenth and quarter" is sooooooo much
more elegant. AND, it frees your synapses for much more important issues
... like where to go for lunch.