Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
An ER doc had a photo on his site a few years ago of a left hand that
got hit by a slab of wood that ended up with fusing of the joints of a couple of the fingers, one wearing a ring. It is taped to the front of my saw near the switch. What was your hand doing in the way of a kickback, in the line of fire so to speak? |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had a scary moment with my wedding ring on the back deck a few weeks
ago. I was working with MDF and I knew I was wearing the expensive, titanium wedding ring when I started. Then 6 hours later, I wasn't married anymore! I don't have shop yet and so I work on the back deck. I swept every dustpile carefully, I crawled underneath the deck in the mud, and an hour later it was lost. I am still a newlywed and my wife was none too pleased. The MDF dust acted like talc and off slipped the ring. The great thing is I found it 2 days later when I went out at night with a good flashlight and searched the herb garden next to the end of the deck. There it shone, ready to wear. I don't do that anymore, needless to say. Geoff Collins "Upscale" wrote in message .cable.rogers.com... Why did you not just snip or cut one section of the ring and widen it to get it off? I can't remember why it happened, but I remember crushing my ring one day. Used a pair of tin snips to cut the thin part, spread it and had it off easily. It was fairly cheap (e.g. $15) to have it repaired at the jewellers. |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Geoff) writes:
I had a scary moment with my wedding ring on the back deck a few weeks ago. I was working with MDF and I knew I was wearing the expensive, titanium wedding ring when I started. Then 6 hours later, I wasn't That's the second time i hear that titanium wedding rings are extra expensive. Why? The material cannot be the reason, you get it (at 90% purity) for 37 CHF per Kg.... -- Dr. Juergen Hannappel http://lisa2.physik.uni-bonn.de/~hannappe Phone: +49 228 73 2447 FAX ... 7869 Physikalisches Institut der Uni Bonn Nussallee 12, D-53115 Bonn, Germany CERN: Phone: +412276 76461 Fax: ..77930 Bat. 892-R-A13 CH-1211 Geneve 23 |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's the second time i hear that titanium wedding rings are extra
expensive. Why? The material cannot be the reason, you get it (at 90% purity) for 37 CHF per Kg.... Because people will pay for them? Might be a business for you to get into. I know I paid more than the price of gold for my wife's engagement ring... -- gabriel |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
... I've heard all the arguments that your finger shouldn't be
near the blades / drills etc., but the consequences of a minor mishap are too high - rings can rip a finger off. Exactly. Actually, the ring can create a problem even without any power-tool or electricity involved. I know a person who is missing a finger. He was lifting a heavy object from the ground to his shoulder behind a mini-van that has its rear door raised open. Unfortunately, his ring got caught with the door hinger, and he ripped his finger off. That didn't involve any power tool or any welding equipment. The only things involved was the force that he applied to himself and a tiny metal object that was sticking out. No, I don't wear a ring when I work in my workshop or when I move anything. Jay Chan |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:47:24 +0100, Juergen Hannappel
wrote: That's the second time i hear that titanium wedding rings are extra expensive. Why? FASHION! Titanium is cheaper than gold. In fact, you can get a 3 POUND bicycle frame, made of 100% Ti, for less than many people pay for a 2 oz. ring. Barry |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And just try to get that titanium off if it's ever crushed onto your finger.
The doctors and EMTs don't like trying to cut them off at all. Tom On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:47:24 +0100, Juergen Hannappel wrote: That's the second time i hear that titanium wedding rings are extra expensive. Why? Someday, it'll all be over.... |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Titanium is cheaper than gold. In fact, you can get a 3 POUND bicycle
frame, made of 100% Ti, for less than many people pay for a 2 oz. ring. Actually, the titanium in bicycles is alloyed with vanadium and aluminum. Tom Someday, it'll all be over.... |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK, it's not too bad. $149 for it and I must say it's very nice.
It's very light on my finger, I don't worry about it bending and its quite comfortable. SWMBO got all the diamonds and gold, I'm happy with Titanium. DY (Tom) wrote in message ... Titanium is cheaper than gold. In fact, you can get a 3 POUND bicycle frame, made of 100% Ti, for less than many people pay for a 2 oz. ring. Actually, the titanium in bicycles is alloyed with vanadium and aluminum. Tom Someday, it'll all be over.... |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy wrote:
Not all of them. There have been quite a few CP frames about (although mine is 6/4). CP meaning "commercially pure"? Sorry, but none come to mind. What frame maker is going that route? Tom Someday, it'll all be over.... |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:35:59 GMT, "Upscale" wrote:
Why did you not just snip or cut one section of the ring and widen it to get it off? I can't remember why it happened, but I remember crushing my ring one day. Used a pair of tin snips to cut the thin part, spread it and had it off easily. It was fairly cheap (e.g. $15) to have it repaired at the jewellers. Gotta tell you all about our Shipping supervisor's encounter with ring removal: The fellow said he was replacing his wedding ring, which was too small, after being mounted on his finger for 22 years. Couldn't twist, pry, soap or grease it off, so he decided to cut it away. He jams a pencil underneath the ring to stand it off his finger....and reaches for his Dremel with one of those abrasive wheels mounted on it. Me: "What about the heat....?" Him: "Wait. I'm getting to that." So he proceeds to slice through the ring, and given gold's excellent conduction of heat, breaks through at the same instant the heat really begins to burn his finger. This generates a reaction in which he places his hand in his mouth to assist in cooling. Of course, saliva and moist skin are relatively poor heat conductors, and the poor fellow burns the tip of his tongue and lower lip. Made some interesting marks on his face, I can assure you, however, there was more. As the ring was cut, internal stresses in the metal caused the band to contrict tightly around his finger, still in the "very GD hot" stage. He suffered 2nd degree burns on the root of his ring finger, which looked pretty ugly a week afterwards. This is one of those things that tickle your funny bone before moving on to the sympathy zone. My boss once said "You can find sympathy in the dictionary between sh*t and syphillis." Tom Flyer |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:37:36 GMT, "Mark Jerde"
wrote: g Sorry, my practical experience is different. The extension cords on the ceiling reduce a tripping hazard that existed when I ran them on the floor Ideally, of course, I'd have outlets wherever needed. But the panel and subpanel are maxed out. When I rewire the house I have to get a bigger cable from the power company. Mark - You're making my point very well :-) We all do things that might not be textbook-perfect from time to time. You've just given an example of where you've done something that improves your safety situation, even though you are doing something which is still technically a no-no. Even though it improves your situation and is perfectly safe in this case, there are a whole raft of passages in the NEC that make what you are doing not quite kosher. But again, I'm not saying there's anything really wrong with your cords on the ceiling, they are certainly safer there than on the floor - but dedicated outlets would be neater and safer. Personally, I think that if you're close enough to a tablesaw blade that the ring matters, you'll soon have no fingers left, ring or no ring. And I'm sorry, but the kickback scenario where the ring got smashed just seems extremely unlikely - if you set yourself up for that kind of kickback, you could just as easily be killed by a board through the throat or something. On the other hand (couldn't resist :-)) I can imagine cases where wearing a ring in the shop would be dangerous. My brother was a welder and maintenance supervisor at International Harvester. Nobody wore rings in his department. This may be a myth, but they were told that there had been an instance of a guy falling off of a steel I-beam, catching his ring on the edge as he tried to grab the beam to save himself, and having the skin completely ripped off of his ring finger as his entire body weight hung from the ring caught on the beam. Nobody was quite sure if this was true, but they all chose to not wear rings, because it seemed like something that could actually happen to even a reasonably careful person. This is very unlike the ring-around-the-tablesaw question, which requires several concurrent stupid decisions in order for an accident to occur. Tim Carver |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Second that. In my case it was a young man shinning down a Lightning Mk6
ladder dirung a scramble start (Cold War days, guys) who slipped, caught his ring in a step tread and managed to peel most of his ring finger like taking a condom off. The other big nono about wearing rings was the skinny dipstick whose ring didn't fit and managed to drop it in the starboard equipment compartment of the same aircraft type. We spent most of that night stripping the bloody thing to find it before the aircraft could fly again. I accept that it's slightly different when you're wearing a ring in your own woodworking shop, but as far as I'm concerned, it's just another thing in the way, so I don't wear one. I don't wear a wris****ch either. YMMV Frank "Groggy" wrote in message s.com... I agree with Andy on this. For mechanical binding and (potentially) electrical reasons, I'd recommend against wearing rings around machinery or anywhere it is likely to catch and cause damage. I have personally seen a finger torn off by catching on a latch in an aircraft (C130) doorway when the individual jumped to the ground - not pretty. Whilst not directly relevant to the shop, mechanical binding has shown (to me) that the weakest point is the finger, not the ring. Some production shops have these as rules. In some countries they are legislation. In all instances they are for a reason. If you read this Doug, "no rings" is the wrong lesson to learn from the given instance, but that does not mean the policy is a bad one in conjunction with the other safeguards you mentioned. regards, Greg "Andy Dingley" wrote in message ... On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:31:38 GMT, (Doug Miller) wrote: Ahh, I see. Still IMO "no rings" is the wrong lesson to learn from this. I have no idea what "the right question" is. But the right answer is don't wear rings in a workshop. -- Do whales have krillfiles ? |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:51:05 GMT, Tim Carver
wrote: On the other hand (couldn't resist :-)) I can imagine cases where wearing a ring in the shop would be dangerous. My brother was a welder and maintenance supervisor at International Harvester. Nobody wore rings in his department. This may be a myth, but they were told that there had been an instance of a guy falling off of a steel I-beam, catching his ring on the edge as he tried to grab the beam to save himself, and having the skin completely ripped off of his ring finger as his entire body weight hung from the ring caught on the beam. Nobody was quite sure if this was true, but they all chose to not wear rings, because it seemed like something that could actually happen to even a reasonably careful person. This is very unlike the ring-around-the-tablesaw question, which requires several concurrent stupid decisions in order for an accident to occur. Essentially that same thing happened to a friend of mine in college. He was climbing in (or maybe out) of a second-floor dorm room window, when he slipped and grabbed at the window ledge. He caught his wedding ring on the aluminum track of the sliding window and pretty much skinned his finger to the bone. It was a very ugly mess and I'm not sure he ever regained full use of that finger. Frankly, the danger of a ring around power equipment is probably pretty slight, if you are close enough to catch it all you might be doing is increasing the severity of the injury. Sort of like wearing gloves when using the TS. I do on rough lumber, but never on smooth stuff. You just need to understand the risks and take steps to minimize them. Tim Douglass http://www.DouglassClan.com |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:30:11 -0800, Tim Douglass
wrote: Essentially that same thing happened to a friend of mine in college. He was climbing in (or maybe out) of a second-floor dorm room window, when he slipped and grabbed at the window ledge. He caught his wedding ring on the aluminum track of the sliding window and pretty much skinned his finger to the bone. It was a very ugly mess and I'm not sure he ever regained full use of that finger. You have a friend who was a married man, injured while climbing thru a dorm room window while he was in college? Sorry about his finger, but I'm certain that it would be pertinent to the safety discussion for us to know a little more about how this came about :-) Tim Carver |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tim Carver wrote: On the other hand (couldn't resist :-)) I can imagine cases where wearing a ring in the shop would be dangerous. My brother was a welder and maintenance supervisor at International Harvester. Nobody wore rings in his department. This may be a myth, but they were told that there had been an instance of a guy falling off of a steel I-beam, catching his ring on the edge as he tried to grab the beam to save himself, and having the skin completely ripped off of his ring finger as his entire body weight hung from the ring caught on the beam. Nobody was quite sure if this was true, but they all chose to not wear rings, because it seemed like something that could actually happen to even a reasonably careful person. This is very unlike the ring-around-the-tablesaw question, which requires several concurrent stupid decisions in order for an accident to occur. I'm a mechanic. I went to Vocational school, I've worked on Uncle Sugars Nuclear Missiles, and earned my A&P. The machinery I've worked on is used on earth, sea, sky and outer space. Compared to some equipment I've worked on, the nastiest machine in your home shop is pretty pussy. Woodworking is a past time for me but the safety rules still hold: No adornment of any type while working. No rings, chains or watches. From my point of view it's funny as hell to read dumbasses justifications for wearing jewelry around machinery. Bottom line is, if you wear a ring in the shop your a Pollyanna. Everyone has brain farts. It's been three days since my right eye's been right. Seems I got a piece of metal stuck in it from grinding. I was installing outlets in the ceiling for my shop lights. I needed to move one but I had ring shanked it to the truss and the easiest way to get it off was with my die grinder. I put on the safety glasses and ear muffs. I ground off the heads making sure the sparks didn't go near anything valuable, especially myself. Later, while washing up in the shower, I get this pain in my right eye. I figured it was soap. The next day it was a bit scratchy but I couldn't see anything in the eye. WTF??? It was a bit of dark gray grinding bur in my cornea. Somehow this ball got lodged in my eye *after* I was done using the grinder. I think it got washed there in the shower. (hospital story omitted) Went to the opthamologist. Real freaky listening to a needle twang while their picking at your eyeball. I submit this story to illustrate how one can follow safety procedures and still get bit. So go ahead, wear your rings, work safely and if you get bit tell us why it shouldn't have happened. -- Mark N.E. Ohio Never argue with a fool, a bystander can't tell you apart. (S. Clemens, A.K.A. Mark Twain) When in doubt hit the throttle. It may not help but it sure ends the suspense. (Gaz, r.moto) |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
--={Flyer}=-- wrote:
reaches for his Dremel with one of those abrasive wheels mounted on it. Gack! I had to cut Dad's ring off because it was causing him pain. I used an Xacto razor saw to get most of it, then cut through with tin snips. Worked fine. Tell your boss to try my way next time. ![]() -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
--={Flyer}=-- wrote in message . ..
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:35:59 GMT, "Upscale" wrote: Why did you not just snip or cut one section of the ring and widen it to get it off? I can't remember why it happened, but I remember crushing my ring one day. Used a pair of tin snips to cut the thin part, spread it and had it off easily. It was fairly cheap (e.g. $15) to have it repaired at the jewellers. Gotta tell you all about our Shipping supervisor's encounter with ring removal: Here's another one: never wear rings if you work around high current DC supplies. Apparently some of the early IBM mainframes had multi-hundred amp 5V supplies where the terminals were closely spaced which lead non-zero numbers of tech's with ring fingers that were blown off when the ring closed the circuit. In this case no ring was left to be removed. There are still some systems used in various particle and nuclear physics experiments that have a similar feature 300A @ 5V supplies with the terminals spaced about 1cm apart -- scary. It's easier to take the ring off for WW before the accident than after. That act, however, does not recuse one from being careful. hex -30- |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I still have the nick in my wedding ring that almost lost me a finger. Got
it while surfing (actually, while "trying" to surf) wthout a leash on the board. Had a wipeout, grabbed for the board, and a fin caught my ring. Since theboard & I were going in opposite directions with a few tons of seawater pushing, it was quite painful. "Tim Carver" wrote in message ... On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:37:36 GMT, "Mark Jerde" wrote: g Sorry, my practical experience is different. The extension cords on the ceiling reduce a tripping hazard that existed when I ran them on the floor Ideally, of course, I'd have outlets wherever needed. But the panel and subpanel are maxed out. When I rewire the house I have to get a bigger cable from the power company. Mark - You're making my point very well :-) We all do things that might not be textbook-perfect from time to time. You've just given an example of where you've done something that improves your safety situation, even though you are doing something which is still technically a no-no. Even though it improves your situation and is perfectly safe in this case, there are a whole raft of passages in the NEC that make what you are doing not quite kosher. But again, I'm not saying there's anything really wrong with your cords on the ceiling, they are certainly safer there than on the floor - but dedicated outlets would be neater and safer. Personally, I think that if you're close enough to a tablesaw blade that the ring matters, you'll soon have no fingers left, ring or no ring. And I'm sorry, but the kickback scenario where the ring got smashed just seems extremely unlikely - if you set yourself up for that kind of kickback, you could just as easily be killed by a board through the throat or something. On the other hand (couldn't resist :-)) I can imagine cases where wearing a ring in the shop would be dangerous. My brother was a welder and maintenance supervisor at International Harvester. Nobody wore rings in his department. This may be a myth, but they were told that there had been an instance of a guy falling off of a steel I-beam, catching his ring on the edge as he tried to grab the beam to save himself, and having the skin completely ripped off of his ring finger as his entire body weight hung from the ring caught on the beam. Nobody was quite sure if this was true, but they all chose to not wear rings, because it seemed like something that could actually happen to even a reasonably careful person. This is very unlike the ring-around-the-tablesaw question, which requires several concurrent stupid decisions in order for an accident to occur. Tim Carver |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
I submit this story to illustrate how one can follow safety procedures and still get bit. Safety glasses still let stuff get in your eyes, in my experience. I caught a rock in the eye while weed eating. Went right up at just the right angle to slip under the glasses and wing me in the eye. Scratched my cornea. There was nothing inappropriate about the glasses I was wearing, and the opthamologist didn't bless me out for poor safety practices. It's just that they don't really work that well. Goggles are much better at keeping stuff out, but they fog so bad you might as well just put on blinders, and stuff can still make it through the little holes. Along with my lathe, I got one of those $11 full face shield thingies. I LOVE it. Why have I been wearing safey glasses all these years? Safety glasses SUCK. Sure, stuff could still get under this too, but it's a lot less likely. I've got two so far. One for me, one for one of the kids. I want to pick up two more, so I can have one dedicated for weed eating, and one for the other rug rat. They're awesome, and quite reasonably priced IMHO. I was convinced of this the first time a piece came apart and bounced harmlessly off of the piece of clear plastic in front of my mouth full of expensive-to-replace teeth. ![]() -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(hex) writes:
[...] left to be removed. There are still some systems used in various particle and nuclear physics experiments that have a similar feature 300A @ 5V supplies with the terminals spaced about 1cm apart -- scary. but not *so* easy to touch, and at least here at CERN you are supposed to add a wrning sign "Danger, extra low voltage". But if you consider the dangers of an ordinary power cable: If you touch a loose end with your bare finger you will get a small burn (maybe) and jerk it away, but the ring might cause the short-circuit current to flow, which can easily reach a few thousand amps before the breaker kicks in. It's easier to take the ring off for WW before the accident than after. That act, however, does not recuse one from being careful. Much better not to wear any rings or oher jewelry at all, since danger lurks everywhere and bites often when least expected, and the jewelry never helps you: If you are beautiful by yourself it only distracts, if not it only makes you attractive to thieves... -- Dr. Juergen Hannappel http://lisa2.physik.uni-bonn.de/~hannappe Phone: +49 228 73 2447 FAX ... 7869 Physikalisches Institut der Uni Bonn Nussallee 12, D-53115 Bonn, Germany CERN: Phone: +412276 76461 Fax: ..77930 Bat. 892-R-A13 CH-1211 Geneve 23 |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:52:57 GMT, Tim Carver
wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:30:11 -0800, Tim Douglass wrote: Essentially that same thing happened to a friend of mine in college. He was climbing in (or maybe out) of a second-floor dorm room window, when he slipped and grabbed at the window ledge. He caught his wedding ring on the aluminum track of the sliding window and pretty much skinned his finger to the bone. It was a very ugly mess and I'm not sure he ever regained full use of that finger. You have a friend who was a married man, injured while climbing thru a dorm room window while he was in college? Sorry about his finger, but I'm certain that it would be pertinent to the safety discussion for us to know a little more about how this came about :-) We attended college in Spokane, WA. His wife attended college in Denver, CO (IIRC). Guys lived on the ground floor, girls on the second floor. Beyond all that I really don't have any idea what was going on... ;-) Tim Douglass http://www.DouglassClan.com |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Silvan,
That is why my glasses (to see) have polycarbonate lenses just in case. My son (rug rat) also has polycarbonate lenses in his glasses. Adds very little to the cost of the glasses, but worth it. Andy On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 02:27:26 -0500, Silvan wrote: Along with my lathe, I got one of those $11 full face shield thingies. I LOVE it. Why have I been wearing safey glasses all these years? Safety glasses SUCK. Sure, stuff could still get under this too, but it's a lot less likely. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Phones, hearing aids and loop aerials | UK diy |