| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
English is a little trouble for me .so ,there are maybe some errors in
my writting. so I hope someone who is kind help me check the syntax error (grammar mistakes) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Different microstructures and mechanical properties can be developed in a variety of annealing temperature. An investigation was undertaken to examine effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and mechanical of dual phase steel under simulated hot-dipped galvanizing. The steel (of composition 0.15wt%C 0.1wt%Si 1.7wt%Mn) was obtained at three different heating temperatures (790$B!n(B, 820$B!n(B, 850$B!n(B) by continuous annealing experiment thermal simulator. The microstructures were observed by the optical microscope and transmission electron microscopy, and the mechanical properties were tested. Under hot-dip galvanizing condition, the effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and the relationship of microstructure and mechanical properties have been investigated. Increasing the annealing temperature, martensite volume fraction increases, and intergranular carbide reduces and ferrite intragranular carbide becomes small. When the annealing temperature is 790$B!n(B, most of martensite distributes intergranular region. Increasing the annealing temperature, intragranular island martensite increases. When the annealing temperature reaches 820$B!n!$(Btwin martensite appears in the room temperature microstructure. The influence of annealing temperature on the flow curve is significant. When the annealing temperature is 790$B!n(B, there is obvious yield point elongation. When the annealing temperature is 820$B!n(B, yield point elongation disappears. At the same time, tensile strength fluctuates with the annealing temperature changes. |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
I have corrected the document foor you.
Here it is in proper English ------------------ When it comes to purchasing products with the label "Made in China", Caveat Emptor--let the buyer beware. Generally, consumers equate these three words with cheap and shoddy products. Now, $B!H(BMade In China$B!I(B also spells $B!H(BDanger$B!I(B. The list of defective Chinese goods is long, from pet food containing melamine to toothpaste tainted with antifreeze, Five types of imported seafood were found to be laced with chemicals and, although no fatalities or illnesses have been reported in the U.S. yet, Chinese counterfeit glycerin found in cough syrup has been linked to more than 100 deaths in Panama. In the wake of the US stepping up testing of Chinese products, the Chinese government reports that it closed 180 food plants and discovered 23,000 safety violations. Most disturbing is the amount of defective Chinese goods that have slipped through US investigators$B!G(B safety nets. The Regulators In 2003, leaders in China formed the State Food and Drug Administration but the agency was riddled with problems, from weak investigative procedures to corrupt officials. First director Zheng Xiaoyu was convicted of taking bribes from domestic pharmaceutical companies to approve untested medicine and was later executed. The FDA in the United States also has its problems. Lack of funding and competition with 11 other federal regulatory agencies make it almost impossible to police our food supply. Food China has recently risen to be one of the world$B!G(Bs top agricultural exporters: in just four years, from 2002 to 2006, FDA-regulated foods imported from China more than doubled and experts predict the number to triple by the end of 2007. Chinese foods are pervasive in most American kitchens; from additives such as xanthum gum (used as a thickener in dairy products, salad dressings and most frozen foods including ice cream) to preservatives such as ascorbic acid (Vitamin C). Most breakfast cereals are made in China. Companies such as Kellog and General Mills are just now beginning to test additives such as wheat in their products. (Menu Foods pet recall found melamine in wheat gluten?a discovery that sounded the alarm bells to potential dangers in human food supply.) Recently, Veggie Booty was recalled after an outbreak of salmonella was traced back to the snack food. According to the US maker, salmonella was found in a spice imported from China that was used to season the snack food. Toys China produces 80 percent of the world$B!G(Bs toys, some of which contain lead paint. Soon after Target recalled about 200,000 Kool Toyz action figures because of sharp edges and lead contamination, Toys $B!H(BR$B!I(B Us discovered that the same Chinese company that manufactured those toys also made the Elite Operations figures in its stores. More recently, Mattel Inc., the world$B!G(Bs largest toymaker, recalled 1.5 million China-made Sesame Street, Dora the Explorer and other children$B!G(Bs products as they might contain $B!H(Bexcessive levels$B!I(B of lead. Eighty-one other types of Fisher-Price branded toys sold in US stores since May 2007 are included in the massive recall. And lead paint isn$B!G(Bt restricted to toys: The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission recalled children$B!G(Bs jewelry from China that potentially could cause lead poisoning. Tires In June 2007, the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration ordered a recall of 450,000 defective radial tires for pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles and vans. A New Jersey importer notified officials that its Chinese manufacturer had stopped including gum strips, a safety feature that holds the tire together and prevents it from separating. (Tread separation led to the recall of millions of Firestone tires in 2000; this particular tire failure was linked to an increased risk of rollover of light trucks and SUV's.) The faulty tires are believed to have caused a car accident in Pennsylvania in August of 2006 that killed two people. A lawsuit filed by the families alleges the accident happened because the tire lacked the gum strip. The lawsuit alleges the Chinese company removed the critical gum strip after the initial test tires were manufactured. Consumer advocates said this case exposes significant loopholes in the system that regulates products in the United States. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has called for a full investigation into the importation of the defective tires. The New Jersey tire importer sued the manufacturer of the tires, Hangzhou Zhongce Rubber, in a New Jersey court. The Hague Convention is a policy which allows foreign corporations to be sued in different countries. Tire manufacturer Hangzhou Zhongce Rubber has been served under the Hague convention. Other Lawsuits As well, a number of lawsuits have been filed against importers of Chinese products. Menu Foods, the Ontario pet food maker whose Chinese-sourced product contained melamine, faces more than 100 class action lawsuits. A proposed class action has been filed against the distributor of various Thomas & Friends? wooden railway toys. As long as companies continue to import Chinese goods, it is inevitable that more class actions will be filed. Chinese Defective Products Articles China Recall: Kids II Play Blocks with Excessive Lead Paint It is a well known fact that kids will put things in their mouths - that's what kids do. And to think that our kids are putting defective products into their mouths, and toys containing lead paint, is cause for certain alarm. Once again, news that toys made in China are being recalled for a lead paint hazard. This time, Kids II is recalling Baby Einstein Color Blocks due to excessive levels of lead paint. China Recall: KB Toys with Excessive Lead Paint In spite of efforts by Chinese authorities, and importers of Chinese products to keep a watchful eye for the presence of defective products, the parade of defective products just keeps on coming. Today$B!G(Bs Recall from China: The Kolcraft Play Yard The Runaway Recall Train Pulls in from China Yet Again: More Recalled Toys Tainted Toys for Tots: It$B!G(Bs All About Cutting Corners Defective Tires: We must send a message to China Chinese Defective Products: Deadly Consequences both in the US and China Chinese Defective Products in the News AUG-30-07: The CPSC, in cooperation with Toys "R" Us Inc., announced a voluntary recall of about 27,000 Imaginarium Wooden Coloring Cases. The printed ink on the outer packaging of the wood case contains lead. Also, some of the black watercolor paint contains excessive levels of lead, which violates the federal lead paint standard. The recall involves the Imaginarium brand 213 Piece Wooden Coloring Case which includes crayons, pastels, colored pencils, fiber pens, paintbrush, pencil, water colors, palette, white paint, ruler and pencil sharpener in a light tan wooden carrying case. They were sold by Toys "R" Us stores nationwide and toysrus.com from October 2006 through August 2007. [CPSC: TOYS R US LEAD] AUG-21-07: Wal-Mart Stores Inc. quietly stopped selling two brands of dog treats in July, after customers voiced concerns that the Chinese products may have caused their pets to fall ill, but no recall has been announced. The world's largest retailer started pulling Chicken Jerky Strips from Import-Pingyang Pet Product Co. and Chicken Jerky from Shanghai Bestro Trading on July 26. Wal-Mart also placed a computerized block on all cash registers to prevent workers from selling the products. Wal-Mart's action follows a massive pet food recall in March, when retailers began pulling products made in China that included the chemical melamine ? a contaminant that's a byproduct of several pesticides. Philadelphia television station WPVI reported last week that a woman claimed her 2-year-old Chihuahua died after eating Bestro Chicken Jerky Strips. The station reported that an autopsy found the dog died of an infection caused by toxic bacteria. [FOX NEWS: WALMART DOG TREATS] AUG-19-07: Chinese-made products including toothpaste, seafood and pet food have caused controversy about how safe they are. [COURIER-JOURNAL: CHINESE DEFECTIVE PRODUCT] |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Dec 13, 2:05 pm, "Stupendous Man" wrote:
I have corrected the document foor you. Here it is in proper English ------------------ When it comes to purchasing products with the label "Made in China", Caveat Emptor--let the buyer beware. Generally, consumers equate these three words with cheap and shoddy products. Now, "Made In China" also spells "Danger". Much copy and paste verbage deleted. Here is someone who obviously is trying to learn and improve their English, and all you do is dredge up some stuff that is irrelavant. My opinion of you is less than Stupendous. Dan |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Dec 13, 10:11 am, " wrote:
Here is someone who obviously is trying to learn and improve their (sic) English, and all you do is dredge up some stuff that is irrelavant. (sic) My opinion of you is less than Stupendous. Likewise. |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Dec 13, 10:05 pm, "Stupendous Man" wrote:
I have corrected the document foor you. Here it is in proper English ------------------ When it comes to purchasing products with the label "Made in China", Caveat Emptor--let the buyer beware. Generally, consumers equate these three words with cheap and shoddy products. Now, "Made In China" also spells "Danger". as a man on the earth, I'm sorry for some misfortunes caused by some "Made in China". every consumer including me abhors shoddy products. so what we can do is that never consume shoddy proucts whether it "Made in China" or "Made in Moon" AS a man in the street, I'm glad to know various comments about China which come from the rest of world. Let me know what they are thinking about China. as a chinese ,I'm working hard to change : what i can change. At last i hope China bring chance and benefit instead of harm to you, to me, to the world. by the way, Merry Christmas to everyone be carefule when you consume whether it "Made in China" or "Made in Moon" |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Dec 13, 10:05 pm, "Stupendous Man" wrote:
I have corrected the document foor you. Here it is in proper English ------------------ When it comes to purchasing products with the label "Made in China", Caveat Emptor--let the buyer beware. Generally, consumers equate these three words with cheap and shoddy products. Now, "Made In China" also spells "Danger". as a man on the earth, I'm sorry for some misfortunes caused by some "Made in China". every consumer including me abhors shoddy products. so what we can do is that never consume shoddy proucts whether it "Made in China" or "Made in Moon" AS a man in the street, I'm glad to know various comments about China which come from the rest of world. Let me know what they are thinking about China. as a chinese ,I'm working hard to change : what i can change. At last i hope China bring chance and benefit instead of harm to you, to me, to the world. by the way, Merry Christmas to everyone be carefule when you consume whether it "Made in China" or "Made in Moon" |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
wrote AS a man in the street, I'm glad to know various comments about China which come from the rest of world. Let me know what they are thinking about China. As another "man on the street" (actually a dirt road in the forest), I apologise for my flippant response. Many other discussion groups that I frequent have been hit hard recently by spammers from China, and I assumed that you were one of them. I am the kind of guy who goes 35 miles into town to try to find suitable parts for projects that i am doing, and am often dismayed to find that all hardware stores carry exactly the same, poorly made product, usually from China. I end up making my own, or buying it online from a quality supplier at a higher price. I do hope that Chiunes products increase in quality. Perhaps I will then willingly buy Chinese goods. as a chinese ,I'm working hard to change : what i can change. That's the measure of a man. -- Stupendous Man, Defender of Freedom, Advocate of Liberty |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:46:59 -0800 (PST), wrote:
On Dec 13, 10:05 pm, "Stupendous Man" wrote: I have corrected the document foor you. Here it is in proper English ------------------ When it comes to purchasing products with the label "Made in China", Caveat Emptor--let the buyer beware. Generally, consumers equate these three words with cheap and shoddy products. Now, "Made In China" also spells "Danger". as a man on the earth, I'm sorry for some misfortunes caused by some "Made in China". every consumer including me abhors shoddy products. Oh, bull****. http://www.productrecallwatch.com/ enter "China" into the search box. Your country has put poison in our drugs, our toothpaste, our cosmetics, our pet food, and our childrens toys. Lead paint seems to be a large part of your gross national product. And a month ago, you sold me a toy which metabolizes into a coma-inducing drug (Aqua-dots), because the adhesive that does so was a few pennies per batch cheaper than the one that was specified. Once, is an accident. Twice, coincidence. 38 times a month, is enemy action. I urge everyone to talk to their congressmen and tell them to revoke China's "most favored trade nation" status. Friends like China, we don't need. so what we can do is that never consume shoddy proucts whether it "Made in China" or "Made in Moon" The moon's manufacturers (what drugs are YOU on?) haven't tried to poison my kids or my pets so far. China has, repeatedly. AS a man in the street, I'm glad to know various comments about China which come from the rest of world. Let me know what they are thinking about China. as a chinese ,I'm working hard to change : what i can change. Yeah right. by the way, Merry Christmas to everyone Oh, **** off, you lying hypocrite. be carefule when you consume whether it "Made in China" or "Made in Moon" No. Obey the ****ing laws in the country you're selling stuff to. And yes, I know I'm answering either a troll or an idiot. |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
Dave Hinz wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:46:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 13, 10:05 pm, "Stupendous Man" wrote: I have corrected the document foor you. Here it is in proper English ------------------ When it comes to purchasing products with the label "Made in China", Caveat Emptor--let the buyer beware. Generally, consumers equate these three words with cheap and shoddy products. Now, "Made In China" also spells "Danger". as a man on the earth, I'm sorry for some misfortunes caused by some "Made in China". every consumer including me abhors shoddy products. Oh, bull****. http://www.productrecallwatch.com/ enter "China" into the search box. Your country has put poison in our drugs, our toothpaste, our cosmetics, our pet food, and our childrens toys. Lead paint seems to be a large part of your gross national product. And a month ago, you sold me a toy which metabolizes into a coma-inducing drug (Aqua-dots), because the adhesive that does so was a few pennies per batch cheaper than the one that was specified. Once, is an accident. Twice, coincidence. 38 times a month, is enemy action. I urge everyone to talk to their congressmen and tell them to revoke China's "most favored trade nation" status. Friends like China, we don't need. so what we can do is that never consume shoddy proucts whether it "Made in China" or "Made in Moon" The moon's manufacturers (what drugs are YOU on?) haven't tried to poison my kids or my pets so far. China has, repeatedly. AS a man in the street, I'm glad to know various comments about China which come from the rest of world. Let me know what they are thinking about China. as a chinese ,I'm working hard to change : what i can change. Yeah right. by the way, Merry Christmas to everyone Oh, **** off, you lying hypocrite. be carefule when you consume whether it "Made in China" or "Made in Moon" No. Obey the ****ing laws in the country you're selling stuff to. And yes, I know I'm answering either a troll or an idiot. It would appear that so am I. -- Tanus This is not really a sig. http://www.home.mycybernet.net/~waugh/shop/ |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 07:33:37 -0500, Tanus wrote:
Dave Hinz wrote: Once, is an accident. Twice, coincidence. 38 times a month, is enemy action. I urge everyone to talk to their congressmen and tell them to revoke China's "most favored trade nation" status. Friends like China, we don't need. And yes, I know I'm answering either a troll or an idiot. It would appear that so am I. Really? Which of my specific points do you feel I am either wrong, or insincere about? |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
Dave Hinz wrote:
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:46:59 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Dec 13, 10:05 pm, "Stupendous Man" wrote: I have corrected the document foor you. Here it is in proper English ------------------ I'm responding to a later post with this one. In it you asked "Really? Which of my specific points do you feel I am either wrong, or insincere about?" I don't feel you were insincere in anything you said. But what irked me was some of the comments you made painted with a wide brush. When it comes to purchasing products with the label "Made in China", Caveat Emptor--let the buyer beware. Generally, consumers equate these three words with cheap and shoddy products. Now, "Made In China" also spells "Danger". as a man on the earth, I'm sorry for some misfortunes caused by some "Made in China". every consumer including me abhors shoddy products. Oh, bull****. http://www.productrecallwatch.com/ enter "China" into the search box. Your country has put poison in our drugs, our toothpaste, our cosmetics, our pet food, and our childrens toys. And your country has been responsible for contracting those offshore manufacturers. Your country's retailers are supposedly responsible for QC, and dropped the ball. China's manufacturing industry may be putting out lousy products, but who's buying them? Lead paint seems to be a large part of your gross national product. And a month ago, you sold me He sold you nothing. China sold you nothing. You bought that in your country from one of your own retailers. Those are the guys mentioned above with the QC issues. a toy which metabolizes into a coma-inducing drug (Aqua-dots), because the adhesive that does so was a few pennies per batch cheaper than the one that was specified. Once, is an accident. Twice, coincidence. 38 times a month, is enemy action. If that's truly the case, then identify the enemy. Hint: it's not China. I urge everyone to talk to their congressmen and tell them to revoke China's "most favored trade nation" status. Friends like China, we don't need. so what we can do is that never consume shoddy proucts whether it "Made in China" or "Made in Moon" The moon's manufacturers (what drugs are YOU on?) haven't tried to poison my kids or my pets so far. China has, repeatedly. AS a man in the street, I'm glad to know various comments about China which come from the rest of world. Let me know what they are thinking about China. as a chinese ,I'm working hard to change : what i can change. Yeah right. by the way, Merry Christmas to everyone Oh, **** off, you lying hypocrite. My original post responded to you saying that "And yes, I know I'm answering either a troll or an idiot." I said it looked like I was too. The above comment about telling him to **** off and calling him a hypocrite pretty well drives it home. be carefule when you consume whether it "Made in China" or "Made in Moon" No. Obey the ****ing laws in the country you're selling stuff to. And yes, I know I'm answering either a troll or an idiot. Have a nice Christmas. -- Tanus This is not really a sig. http://www.home.mycybernet.net/~waugh/shop/ |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:44:39 -0500, Tanus wrote:
Dave Hinz wrote: Oh, bull****. http://www.productrecallwatch.com/ enter "China" into the search box. Your country has put poison in our drugs, our toothpaste, our cosmetics, our pet food, and our childrens toys. And your country has been responsible for contracting those offshore manufacturers. Yes. We give you specs, and you substitute lead paint where it's not specified, lead paint where it's not specified, and toxins in the pet food to boost the apparent protein count in the wheat gluten - except that it kills the pets. Oh, and the antifreeze in the toothpaste, that was a nice touch. Your country's retailers are supposedly responsible for QC, and dropped the ball. Bull****. That crap isn't supposed to be in the products in the first place. And yet China-apologists like you will deflect the blame from anyone but the ones making the intentional decision to put substances in the products which are known to be harmful and illegal. Lead paint seems to be a large part of your gross national product. And a month ago, you sold me He sold you nothing. China sold you nothing. You bought that in your country from one of your own retailers. Those are the guys mentioned above with the QC issues. A Chinese manufacturer deviated from the spec given to them. YES, hell yes, I think the importer should be held liable for the toxic products. If you had gone to productrecallwatch.com and read any of the commentary I've written there, you'd find that blisteringly clear. BUT, if China wasn't putting the crap into the products in the first place, we wouldn't have this problem, would we. They share blame, but the only ones we can directly do anything about are the importers. a toy which metabolizes into a coma-inducing drug (Aqua-dots), because the adhesive that does so was a few pennies per batch cheaper than the one that was specified. Once, is an accident. Twice, coincidence. 38 times a month, is enemy action. If that's truly the case, then identify the enemy. Hint: it's not China. And who do you pretend it is? Every retailer that sells it? No. The corner store should not be burdoned with testing products. The importers? Somewhat. They bring it in to the country, and should be responsible to make sure it works and is safe. The manufacturers? Absolutely. I urge everyone to talk to their congressmen and tell them to revoke China's "most favored trade nation" status. Friends like China, we don't need. My original post responded to you saying that "And yes, I know I'm answering either a troll or an idiot." I said it looked like I was too. The above comment about telling him to **** off and calling him a hypocrite pretty well drives it home. Oh, disagreement and disrespect of someone who is defending a country who is actively trying to kill my kids and pets is somehow trolling or idiocy now? I see. You have a unique perspective. Have a nice Christmas. I intend to. What does that have to do with toxic Chinese imports, exactly? |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
Dave Hinz wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:44:39 -0500, Tanus wrote: Dave Hinz wrote: Oh, bull****. http://www.productrecallwatch.com/ enter "China" into the search box. Your country has put poison in our drugs, our toothpaste, our cosmetics, our pet food, and our childrens toys. And your country has been responsible for contracting those offshore manufacturers. Yes. We give you specs, and you substitute lead paint where it's not specified, lead paint where it's not specified, and toxins in the pet food to boost the apparent protein count in the wheat gluten - except that it kills the pets. Oh, and the antifreeze in the toothpaste, that was a nice touch. You gave me nothing. I don't manufacture the stuff, and I don't import it. Take me out of this equation. Your country's retailers are supposedly responsible for QC, and dropped the ball. Bull****. That crap isn't supposed to be in the products in the first place. And yet China-apologists like you will deflect the blame from anyone but the ones making the intentional decision to put substances in the products which are known to be harmful and illegal. I don't know where you get the idea that I'm a China-apologist. I haven't taken them off the hook whatsoever. What I have said is own up to your responsibility. Retailers like Mattel knew damned well they were using manufacturing companies that would cut corners if they could. And they did. Lead paint seems to be a large part of your gross national product. And a month ago, you sold me He sold you nothing. China sold you nothing. You bought that in your country from one of your own retailers. Those are the guys mentioned above with the QC issues. A Chinese manufacturer deviated from the spec given to them. YES, hell yes, I think the importer should be held liable for the toxic products. If you had gone to productrecallwatch.com and read any of the commentary I've written there, you'd find that blisteringly clear. BUT, if China wasn't putting the crap into the products in the first place, we wouldn't have this problem, would we. They share blame, but the only ones we can directly do anything about are the importers. So can the retailers, but I agree. It belongs more in the lap of the importers. a toy which metabolizes into a coma-inducing drug (Aqua-dots), because the adhesive that does so was a few pennies per batch cheaper than the one that was specified. Once, is an accident. Twice, coincidence. 38 times a month, is enemy action. If that's truly the case, then identify the enemy. Hint: it's not China. And who do you pretend it is? Every retailer that sells it? No. The corner store should not be burdoned with testing products. Now you're just being petty. You know as well as I do I'm not talking about corner stores. The importers? Somewhat. They bring it in to the country, and should be responsible to make sure it works and is safe. The manufacturers? Absolutely. I urge everyone to talk to their congressmen and tell them to revoke China's "most favored trade nation" status. Friends like China, we don't need. My original post responded to you saying that "And yes, I know I'm answering either a troll or an idiot." I said it looked like I was too. The above comment about telling him to **** off and calling him a hypocrite pretty well drives it home. Oh, disagreement and disrespect of someone who is defending a country who is actively trying to kill my kids and pets is somehow trolling or idiocy now? I see. You have a unique perspective. No, my perspective is just different from yours. My suspicion is that anyone who has that has a "unique" perspective to you Have a nice Christmas. I intend to. What does that have to do with toxic Chinese imports, exactly? One trick pony, aren't you? -- Tanus This is not really a sig. http://www.home.mycybernet.net/~waugh/shop/ |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:46:42 -0500, Tanus wrote:
Dave Hinz wrote: Yes. We give you specs, and you substitute lead paint where it's not specified, lead paint where it's not specified, and toxins in the pet food to boost the apparent protein count in the wheat gluten - except that it kills the pets. Oh, and the antifreeze in the toothpaste, that was a nice touch. You gave me nothing. I don't manufacture the stuff, and I don't import it. Take me out of this equation. And yet, you inject yourself INTO the equation as an apologist for the criminals in question. Your choice, not mine. You want to defend them, you take the criticism of them. Bull****. That crap isn't supposed to be in the products in the first place. And yet China-apologists like you will deflect the blame from anyone but the ones making the intentional decision to put substances in the products which are known to be harmful and illegal. I don't know where you get the idea that I'm a China-apologist. I haven't taken them off the hook whatsoever. What I have said is own up to your responsibility. They're given a spec. They arbitrarily decide to deviate from the spec and use something cheaper and toxic. And then YOU defend them. Retailers like Mattel knew damned well they were using manufacturing companies that would cut corners if they could. And they did. Prove it. And prosecute Mattel. A Chinese manufacturer deviated from the spec given to them. YES, hell yes, I think the importer should be held liable for the toxic products. If you had gone to productrecallwatch.com and read any of the commentary I've written there, you'd find that blisteringly clear. BUT, if China wasn't putting the crap into the products in the first place, we wouldn't have this problem, would we. They share blame, but the only ones we can directly do anything about are the importers. So can the retailers, but I agree. It belongs more in the lap of the importers. And yet you defend those who substitute safe chemicals for poison. Interseting. And who do you pretend it is? Every retailer that sells it? No. The corner store should not be burdoned with testing products. Now you're just being petty. You know as well as I do I'm not talking about corner stores. Do I? Let's be specific. The manufacturer is ultimately responsible. But, they're in a different country with a suspect (to say the least) legal and political system. So in the US, our only realistic recourse is to punish the importers. This doesn't change the fact that China continues to exploit the ill-advised "most favored trade nation" status. Lets revoke that until they earn our trust. The importers? Somewhat. They bring it in to the country, and should be responsible to make sure it works and is safe. The manufacturers? Absolutely. No, my perspective is just different from yours. My suspicion is that anyone who has that has a "unique" perspective to you Lets see. So you want to defend China for shipping toxic products to us. Why, exactly, have you chosen this specific cause as yours? I intend to. What does that have to do with toxic Chinese imports, exactly? One trick pony, aren't you? It's called "sticking to the topic of the post". You should try it. Answer the question. |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
snip
Lets see. So you want to defend China for shipping toxic products to us. Why, exactly, have you chosen this specific cause as yours? I intend to. What does that have to do with toxic Chinese imports, exactly? One trick pony, aren't you? It's called "sticking to the topic of the post". You should try it. Answer the question. Usenet has quite a few users who twist and turn people's words, and never back down. You're one of them. I'm not one to argue repeatedly about what I didn't say. I state it once, and if the accusation comes back to me, I just move on. Which is what I"m doing now. See ya. However, something to consider is that you don't win an argument by re-hashing drivel. You just **** other people off who might otherwise have given you credence. -- Tanus This is not really a sig. http://www.home.mycybernet.net/~waugh/shop/ |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 20:22:20 -0500, Tanus wrote:
snip (I wrote, but Tanus doesn't have the ability to quote me properly saying:) Lets see. So you want to defend China for shipping toxic products to us. Why, exactly, have you chosen this specific cause as yours? It's called "sticking to the topic of the post". You should try it. Answer the question. Usenet has quite a few users who twist and turn people's words, and never back down. You're one of them. I'm not one to argue repeatedly about what I didn't say. I state it once, and if the accusation comes back to me, I just move on. Which is what I"m doing now. See ya. Backpedal noted. You pretend to defend chinese imported toxins until confronted with facts. Thanks for verifying that. However, something to consider is that you don't win an argument by re-hashing drivel. You just **** other people off who might otherwise have given you credence. OK, so tell me specifically which recalls on productrecallwatch.com aren't accurate. Because, if they're wrong, it's not the fault of the messenger (me) but, the fault of the reporting entities (various). Show your work. Or just admit that you got nothing, which anyone who keeps current on the facts will know. If only your point of view had ANY validity. And yet it doesn't. And yet you defend it. Why do you try to help people trying to kill me, my kids, and my pets? |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On 16 Dec 2007 00:28:31 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 18:46:42 -0500, Tanus wrote: Dave Hinz wrote: Yes. We give you specs, and you substitute lead paint where it's not specified, lead paint where it's not specified, and toxins in the pet food to boost the apparent protein count in the wheat gluten - except that it kills the pets. Oh, and the antifreeze in the toothpaste, that was a nice touch. Not to start a war but you state that "we give you specs" how did you determine the exact specs that the Chinese were given? Is this information available on the Web? I ask this because my experience in dealing with the Chinese is that they do meet the specs - right to the letter. If your spec is "paint it red" then they paint it red with the cheapest paint that they can locate. If you say "it must pass a protein check using the XYZ test" then it will. But if you say "paint it red" using a paint with the following constituents - AND NOT CONTAINING ANY OF THE SUBSTANCES ON THE ATTACHED HAZARDOUS CONTENTS LIST" then that is exactly what you will get, but it may very well cost you more money. Since this is a metal working group let me give you another example: All over Asia are machine shops (what we used to call job shops) and every one is equipped with Chinese machines. Lathes, milling machines, grinders, you name it. And every one of these machines is equal in quality to the American made machinery that I ran for many years, but you don't see this machinery in the U.S. because nobody wants to buy it - it costs too much. What everyone wants is the cheap Chinese junk from Harbor Freight. So that is what is what the Chinese sell to Harbor Freight - cheap junk that you can't find in most Asian countries because no professional shop here will buy it. In short, "you want cheap - we got cheap" Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On 2007-12-16, Bruce in Bangkok wrote:
Since this is a metal working group let me give you another example: All over Asia are machine shops (what we used to call job shops) and every one is equipped with Chinese machines. Lathes, milling machines, grinders, you name it. And every one of these machines is equal in quality to the American made machinery that I ran for many years, but you don't see this machinery in the U.S. because nobody wants to buy it - it costs too much. What everyone wants is the cheap Chinese junk from Harbor Freight. So that is what is what the Chinese sell to Harbor Freight - cheap junk that you can't find in most Asian countries because no professional shop here will buy it. Bruce, you said something very interesting and something that makes sense to me. What I do want to know is, how come those quality chinese goods are not seen in the US, as much as they deserve to be seen. I mean, if I could buy a quality new machine for, say, 60% of what a new US made machine costs, I personally would do it. (assuming that support, etc is also available). i |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
Ignoramus8988 wrote:
On 2007-12-16, Bruce in Bangkok wrote: Since this is a metal working group let me give you another example: All over Asia are machine shops (what we used to call job shops) and every one is equipped with Chinese machines. Lathes, milling machines, grinders, you name it. And every one of these machines is equal in quality to the American made machinery that I ran for many years, but you don't see this machinery in the U.S. because nobody wants to buy it - it costs too much. What everyone wants is the cheap Chinese junk from Harbor Freight. So that is what is what the Chinese sell to Harbor Freight - cheap junk that you can't find in most Asian countries because no professional shop here will buy it. Bruce, you said something very interesting and something that makes sense to me. What I do want to know is, how come those quality chinese goods are not seen in the US, as much as they deserve to be seen. I mean, if I could buy a quality new machine for, say, 60% of what a new US made machine costs, I personally would do it. (assuming that support, etc is also available). i I believe he already answered that, Ig. Very well too. Richard |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On 16 Dec 2007 00:28:31 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote:
I don't know where you get the idea that I'm a China-apologist. I haven't taken them off the hook whatsoever. What I have said is own up to your responsibility. They're given a spec. They arbitrarily decide to deviate from the spec and use something cheaper and toxic. And then YOU defend them. Im fascinated by the fact the buffoon thinks that the end user or retailer is supposed to act as the QA department of a manufacturer 3500 miles away, and with 3 degrees of separation. Thats idiocy. Gunner |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 23:53:23 -0600, Ignoramus8988
wrote: On 2007-12-16, Bruce in Bangkok wrote: Since this is a metal working group let me give you another example: All over Asia are machine shops (what we used to call job shops) and every one is equipped with Chinese machines. Lathes, milling machines, grinders, you name it. And every one of these machines is equal in quality to the American made machinery that I ran for many years, but you don't see this machinery in the U.S. because nobody wants to buy it - it costs too much. What everyone wants is the cheap Chinese junk from Harbor Freight. So that is what is what the Chinese sell to Harbor Freight - cheap junk that you can't find in most Asian countries because no professional shop here will buy it. Bruce, you said something very interesting and something that makes sense to me. What I do want to know is, how come those quality chinese goods are not seen in the US, as much as they deserve to be seen. I mean, if I could buy a quality new machine for, say, 60% of what a new US made machine costs, I personally would do it. (assuming that support, etc is also available). i Frankly I don't know, but I can say that after perusing the pages of Harbor Freight I've seen none of these types of machines offered for sale here. The multi function mini machines are available but rare. I believe they are of European manufacture. Do a search on Alibaba and see what is available, I think you will find it enlightening. Regarding support I can't comment on what is available in the U.S. I suspect that it is a factor of who is the agent/supplier, but In Asia all machinery comes with guarantees and at least parts support. Bruce-in-Bangkok (Note:remove underscores from address for reply) |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:48:06 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok wrote:
On 16 Dec 2007 00:28:31 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote: Yes. We give you specs, and you substitute lead paint where it's not specified, lead paint where it's not specified, and toxins in the pet food to boost the apparent protein count in the wheat gluten - except that it kills the pets. Oh, and the antifreeze in the toothpaste, that was a nice touch. Not to start a war but you state that "we give you specs" how did you determine the exact specs that the Chinese were given? Is this information available on the Web? Of course. The specific chemicals spec'd for aqua-dots, for instance, and the chemical substituted, have been widely published. And each of the toy manufacturers has _claimed_ that lead paint was substituted for the specified paint, even to the point where the initial batches were made to spec, passed QA, and then the cheaper lead paint was substituted for later production. Want links? I ask this because my experience in dealing with the Chinese is that they do meet the specs - right to the letter. If your spec is "paint it red" then they paint it red with the cheapest paint that they can locate. If you say "it must pass a protein check using the XYZ test" then it will. Eve if they have to put phenols in a food product, which will kill whatever eats it? But if you say "paint it red" using a paint with the following constituents - AND NOT CONTAINING ANY OF THE SUBSTANCES ON THE ATTACHED HAZARDOUS CONTENTS LIST" then that is exactly what you will get, but it may very well cost you more money. Yes, in theory, but in the case of this example, the spec was not followed. I'm kind of surprised that people who haven't followed the issue are springing to the defense of China on this one because, it's really not a supportable point of view. Since this is a metal working group let me give you another example: All over Asia are machine shops (what we used to call job shops) and every one is equipped with Chinese machines. Lathes, milling machines, grinders, you name it. And every one of these machines is equal in quality to the American made machinery that I ran for many years, but you don't see this machinery in the U.S. because nobody wants to buy it - it costs too much. What everyone wants is the cheap Chinese junk from Harbor Freight. So that is what is what the Chinese sell to Harbor Freight - cheap junk that you can't find in most Asian countries because no professional shop here will buy it. In short, "you want cheap - we got cheap" Cheap is fine, if that's the spec. If the spec is "Use this polymer which doesn't metabolize into a drug that will induce coma if eaten", and they use one that does, because it's cheaper (yes I can provide cites), then THAT is a problem. And that's what they did in this case. And continue to do at every opportunity. THAT, is the problem. |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Dec 16, 2:19 am, Gunner wrote:
Im fascinated by the fact the buffoon thinks that the end user or retailer is supposed to act as the QA department of a manufacturer 3500 miles away, and with 3 degrees of separation. Thats idiocy. As a former QC tech for a US factory, one of my tasks was to inspect incoming shipments using random samples to determine if they did indeed meet specifications. The shipments came from more than 3500 miles away, with many degrees of separation. One of the things we checked was chemical content of the paint. (More specifically, we checked for certain banned compounds and elements.) That's not idiocy. It's responsible standard operating procedure. Or at least it was, fifteen years ago. Are you telling me that factories today aren't inspecting their parts any more? |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
|
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
|
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Dec 16, 12:06 pm, Dave Hinz wrote:
We're not importing toy parts, we're importing toys, packaged and ready for the store shelf. As has been pointed out, the distributors should be inspecting those toys even if they're "ready for the store shelf" You can blame the Chinese factories all you want. They deserve it. But unless I misunderstand you, it seems you want to place no blame at all on the parent companies who are taking them, without any inspection, and placing them on the store shelves. In my factory, we shipped out many things "Ready for the shelves" and we sometimes got shipments returned because of something somebody found in an inspection. Sometimes it was our fault, sometimes it was a mistake. My point is that those toys should have had a better final inspection from the people that bought them. Part of the blame goes to the customer. Not all, but dammit, our people got sloppy too. You're supposed to keep better tabs on your suppliers than that. |
The requested Grammar/syntax review: please check syntax error(grammar mistakes) for me
Metalworking is not my first skill, and many of the questionable
sections of your article are probably technical in nature, not grammatical. Also, the lack of paragraphing in your text makes it more difficult to read. I'll go through it sentence by sentence and tell you where I think it's rough. (Many of the "rough spots" are the sort of thing I used to find in my classmate's papers, by the way. They aren't really indicative that English is the second language of the writer.) First is the original sentence, then my version of syntax and grammar. This is a rough draft, requiring further review. Paragraphing can be discussed later. :-) Also note this was done as an excuse to delay going outside to shovel snow. Which I am now about to go and do. -------------------------------------- Different microstructures and mechanical properties can be developed in a variety of annealing temperature. ---Possibly change "in" to "at": Different microstructures and mechanical properties can be developed at a variety of annealing temperatures. An investigation was undertaken to examine effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and mechanical of dual phase steel under simulated hot-dipped galvanizing. ------ An investigation was undertaken to examine the effects of annealing temperature on microstructure and mechanical properties of dual phase steel, under simulated hot-dipped galvanizing conditions. The steel (of composition 0.15wt%C 0.1wt%Si 1.7wt%Mn) was obtained at three different heating temperatures (790?, 820?, 850?) by continuous annealing experiment thermal simulator. ---- here, I fall down. I'm okay with this part: The steel (of composition 0.15wt%C 0.1wt%Si 1.7wt%Mn) was obtained at three different heating temperatures (790?, 820?, 850?) ----- but when I get here, I'm a little confused. by continuous annealing experiment thermal simulator. ----Do we mean, we used a "continuous annealing experiment thermal simulator"? -- or did we use continuous annealing in a thermal simulator as an experiment? --- a little more explanation is in order, I think. The microstructures were observed by the optical microscope and transmission electron microscopy, and the mechanical properties were tested. The microstructures were observed using an optical microscope and transmission electron microscopy, and the mechanical properties were tested. Under hot-dip galvanizing condition, the effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and the relationship of microstructure and mechanical properties have been investigated. Under hot-dip galvanizing conditions, the effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and the relationship of microstructure to mechanical properties were investigated. Increasing the annealing temperature, martensite volume fraction increases, and intergranular carbide reduces and ferrite intragranular carbide becomes small. ------ Again, I'm not sure. I think this is what it means: When the annealing temperature is increased, martensite volume fraction increases, intergranular carbide reduces, and ferrite intragranular carbide becomes small. When the annealing temperature is 790?, most of martensite distributes intergranular region. --- a little problem with the degree symbol. Mac, Windows, and Unix -- often disagree about it. I am also stumped about what's happening -- with the martensite. I know it's a displacive rather than diffusive -- crystaline structure but don't know if it's being transformed -- or whether it's redistributing itself, or whether it's doing something -- to the intergranular region. When the annealing temperature is 790 degrees, most of the martensite distributes to the intergranular region. --- Increasing the annealing temperature, intragranular island martensite increases. --- I think this is correct. Increasing the annealing temperature causes the intragranular martensite island to increase. When the annealing temperature reaches 820?,twin martensite appears in the room temperature microstructure. --- This is the meaning I take from that, but I don't' know if it's correct: When the annealing temperature reaches 820 degrees,twin martensite areas appear in the room temperature microstructure. -- No problem found. :-) The influence of annealing temperature on the flow curve is significant. When the annealing temperature is 790?, there is obvious yield point elongation. When the annealing temperature is 820?, yield point elongation disappears. At the same time, tensile strength fluctuates with the annealing temperature changes. On Dec 12, 9:10 pm, wrote: English is a little trouble for me .so ,there are maybe some errors in my writting. so I hope someone who is kind help me check the syntax error (grammar mistakes) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Different microstructures and mechanical properties can be developed in a variety of annealing temperature. An investigation was undertaken to examine effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and mechanical of dual phase steel under simulated hot-dipped galvanizing. The steel (of composition 0.15wt%C 0.1wt%Si 1.7wt%Mn) was obtained at three different heating temperatures (790$B!n(B, 820$B!n(B, 850$B!n(B) by continuous annealing experiment thermal simulator. The microstructures were observed by the optical microscope and transmission electron microscopy, and the mechanical properties were tested. Under hot-dip galvanizing condition, the effect of annealing temperature on microstructure and the relationship of microstructure and mechanical properties have been investigated. Increasing the annealing temperature, martensite volume fraction increases, and intergranular carbide reduces and ferrite intragranular carbide becomes small. When the annealing temperature is 790$B!n(B, most of martensite distributes intergranular region. Increasing the annealing temperature, intragranular island martensite increases. When the annealing temperature reaches 820$B!n!$(Btwin martensite appears in the room temperature microstructure. The influence of annealing temperature on the flow curve is significant. When the annealing temperature is 790$B!n(B, there is obvious yield point elongation. When the annealing temperature is 820$B!n(B, yield point elongation disappears. At the same time, tensile strength fluctuates with the annealing temperature changes. |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
|
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Dec 16, 12:33 pm, Dave Hinz wrote:
Mistakes are also your fault. Whose else would you pretend they are? Seems to me, the culture is "profit at any cost to the customers, and apologize if we get caught". That is disgusting, but dozens of items a week? It is hard to come to any other conclusion. By "mistake", I meant that the inspector misinterpreted the specifications or used the wrong set of specs. You disgust me. Well, we have something in common. You disgust me too. :-) |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
Gunner wrote:
On 16 Dec 2007 00:28:31 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote: I don't know where you get the idea that I'm a China-apologist. I haven't taken them off the hook whatsoever. What I have said is own up to your responsibility. They're given a spec. They arbitrarily decide to deviate from the spec and use something cheaper and toxic. And then YOU defend them. Im fascinated by the fact the buffoon thinks that the end user or retailer is supposed to act as the QA department of a manufacturer 3500 miles away, and with 3 degrees of separation. Two of the major recalls were of toys sold by Mattel. They are not a retailer and yes they bloody well _are_ supposed to act as the QA. Several were from Toys R Us, which is not some neighborhood shop, they're a very large franchise operation with centralized purchasing and they also should bloody well be making sure that what they are selling in their stores does not violate the safety laws. Jo-Ann fabrics the same way. Put it this way, if you bought a saw from Sears and it threw the blade at you, would you be angry at Sears or would you be angry at the Chinese because in your opinion it wasn't Sears' responsibility to perform quality control on the products they sold? Thats idiocy. No, idiocy was Mattel failing to ensure that what was sent to them was what was ordered. -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
J. Clarke wrote:
Gunner wrote: On 16 Dec 2007 00:28:31 GMT, Dave Hinz wrote: I don't know where you get the idea that I'm a China-apologist. I haven't taken them off the hook whatsoever. What I have said is own up to your responsibility. They're given a spec. They arbitrarily decide to deviate from the spec and use something cheaper and toxic. And then YOU defend them. Im fascinated by the fact the buffoon thinks that the end user or retailer is supposed to act as the QA department of a manufacturer 3500 miles away, and with 3 degrees of separation. Two of the major recalls were of toys sold by Mattel. They are not a retailer and yes they bloody well _are_ supposed to act as the QA. Several were from Toys R Us, which is not some neighborhood shop, they're a very large franchise operation with centralized purchasing and they also should bloody well be making sure that what they are selling in their stores does not violate the safety laws. Jo-Ann fabrics the same way. Put it this way, if you bought a saw from Sears and it threw the blade at you, would you be angry at Sears or would you be angry at the Chinese because in your opinion it wasn't Sears' responsibility to perform quality control on the products they sold? Thats idiocy. No, idiocy was Mattel failing to ensure that what was sent to them was what was ordered. Amen. Buffoon indeed. 35 miles away or 3500 miles away. Makes no difference. Importers are responsible for QC. But as I indicated in another post, I had used the term retailer when I should have used importer. -- Tanus This is not really a sig. http://www.home.mycybernet.net/~waugh/shop/ |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:22:09 -0500, J. Clarke wrote:
Gunner wrote: Im fascinated by the fact the buffoon thinks that the end user or retailer is supposed to act as the QA department of a manufacturer 3500 miles away, and with 3 degrees of separation. Two of the major recalls were of toys sold by Mattel. They are not a retailer and yes they bloody well _are_ supposed to act as the QA. Two? There were 30+ last week. Several were from Toys R Us, which is not some neighborhood shop, they're a very large franchise operation with centralized purchasing and they also should bloody well be making sure that what they are selling in their stores does not violate the safety laws. Jo-Ann fabrics the same way. Yup, Jo-Ann Fabrics is another prime importer of lead-painted Chinese stuff. I blame them as well as the manufacturers. Put it this way, if you bought a saw from Sears and it threw the blade at you, would you be angry at Sears or would you be angry at the Chinese because in your opinion it wasn't Sears' responsibility to perform quality control on the products they sold? Both. But Sears is the only entity with a USA'n presense that I could have any recourse with. No, idiocy was Mattel failing to ensure that what was sent to them was what was ordered. What was worse was the chairman of Mattel apologizing TO THE CHINESE for the lead paint recalls. W. T. F. |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:56:14 -0500, Tanus wrote:
Amen. Buffoon indeed. 35 miles away or 3500 miles away. Makes no difference. How so? If they're 35 miles away, they follow USA'n laws. In China, obviously, not. Importers are responsible for QC. NO. Manufacturers are responsible to follow the damn spec and not just apologize if caught. But as I indicated in another post, I had used the term retailer when I should have used importer. Backpedal noted. |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
If I buy something for resale, then resell it to someone who is
injured because of something intrinsic to the product, whose fault is it? Mine! If the product met my specifications, it's my fault because it was manufactured to my specification. If the product didn't meet my specifications, it's my fault because I didn't insure that what I received was what I ordered before I resold it. True, I may have recourse to the supplier, but that's not my customer's problem. His beef is with me. What's so hard to understand about that? Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
Tanus wrote:
Amen. Buffoon indeed. 35 miles away or 3500 miles away. Makes no difference. Importers are responsible for QC. But as I indicated in another post, I had used the term retailer when I should have used importer. Not when the manufacturer is paid to do it. -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Tanus wrote: Amen. Buffoon indeed. 35 miles away or 3500 miles away. Makes no difference. Importers are responsible for QC. But as I indicated in another post, I had used the term retailer when I should have used importer. Not when the manufacturer is paid to do it. Yes when the manufacturer is paid to do it. Boeing is paid to provide the airlines with quality airplanes. You think the airline taking delivery just puts the plane in service without having their mechanics go over it? -- -- --John to email, dial "usenet" and validate (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
"J. Clarke" wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote: Tanus wrote: Amen. Buffoon indeed. 35 miles away or 3500 miles away. Makes no difference. Importers are responsible for QC. But as I indicated in another post, I had used the term retailer when I should have used importer. Not when the manufacturer is paid to do it. Yes when the manufacturer is paid to do it. Boeing is paid to provide the airlines with quality airplanes. You think the airline taking delivery just puts the plane in service without having their mechanics go over it? Do you thionk that comapres to a cheap toy? -- Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to prove it. Member of DAV #85. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:27:28 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: "J. Clarke" wrote: Michael A. Terrell wrote: Tanus wrote: Not when the manufacturer is paid to do it. Yes when the manufacturer is paid to do it. Boeing is paid to provide the airlines with quality airplanes. You think the airline taking delivery just puts the plane in service without having their mechanics go over it? Do you thionk that comapres to a cheap toy? As far as the principle involved is concerned, yes, I believe it is comparable. Tom Veatch Wichita, KS USA |
please check syntax error (grammar mistakes) for me
wrote in message ... On Dec 13, 2:05 pm, "Stupendous Man" wrote: I have corrected the document foor you. Here it is in proper English Much copy and paste verbage deleted. Here is someone who obviously is trying to learn and improve their English, and all you do is dredge up some stuff that is irrelavant. Dan Just a quick question: How is metallurgy relevant to a lap steel newsgroup, other than possibly in the resonant qualities of the bridge/tailpiece or the steel bar itself? Why ask about tech-note grammar HERE? As for China as a nation, many U.S. manufacturing jobs were eliminated here and sent to China by greedy corporations whose only interest was in putting more money in their own pockets. It left many Americans either jobless or working for less pay at Walmart selling the very goods they used to make. Forgive the sour grapes, but I don't feel the need to like the current situation. Also, if some Chinese goods are shoddy or dangerous, that's kind of an important point. If you disagree, give YOUR child a Thomas the Tank Engine to suck on. Oh, and, please note that if the original post is truly from China, there's an excellent chance that this thread is being monitored. Think about that.----JMS |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter