Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
FWW Article: "you can't be serious" abount clamping.
|
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
FWW Article: "you can't be serious" abount clamping.
|
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
FWW Article: "you can't be serious" abount clamping.
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:15:48 -0400, "J. Clarke"
wrote: J T wrote: Tue, Oct 9, 2007, 2:20am (EDT+4) (LRod) did sayeth: I moved on the instant I saw the glue up with the QuickGrips on it. He asserts you can get greater pressure with them than K-Bodies? Please. I bought my first QuickGrips probably 20 years ago. It took me all of about five minutes to figure out they were possibly okay for some tasks, but you couldn't depend on them staying clamped and they definitely couldn't be clamped really hard. Those first ones were also my last ones. I never bought any cause they look so weak - and pricey. Actually, they look like plastic, but I never handled one, so can't say for sure. Got some metal equivalents at Big Lots for around $1.50 each. They work about like a caulking gun, and sure exert adequate pressure, have no problem with them staying clamped. I try to pick up one or two, if in stock, and about $2 each, which is not often. The other day they were $4+ each. Only 6" capacity, but no problem to cut one in half, then rivet or weld a metal extension in, to extend it a foot or so. Can be very handy at times. So which is it, did you never buy any QuickGrips or did you buy your first ones 20 years ago? The "first ones 20 years ago" was from my post. He doesn't know how to set webtv to identify quotes. I've fixed that in this one to what it is supposed to look like. -- LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997 email addy de-spam-ified due to 1,000 spams per month. If you can't figure out how to use it, I probably wouldn't care to correspond with you anyway. |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
FWW Article: "you can't be serious" abount clamping.
Fri, Oct 12, 2007, 8:24pm (EDT+4) (LRod) doth
claimeth:: The "first ones 20 years ago" was from my post. He doesn't know how to set webtv to identify quotes. I've fixed that in this one to what it is supposed to look like. snip Pardon? "I" don't know how to quote? OK, this is your quote of what I wrote when I quoted "you": J T wrote: Tue, Oct 9, 2007, 2:20am (EDT+4) (LRod) did sayeth: I moved on the instant I saw the glue up with the QuickGrips on it. He asserts you can get greater pressure with them than K-Bodies? Please. I bought my first QuickGrips probably 20 years ago. snip of the rest I quoted "you", who said "you" bought about 20 years ago. Looks clear to me. Also, looks to me like he read it wrong. I'll keep on quoting the same way I have for the last 10 or so years. JOAT "I'm an Igor, thur. We don't athk quethtionth." "Really? Why not?" "I don't know, thur. I didn't athk." |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
FWW Article: "you can't be serious" abount clamping.
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:54:23 -0400, (J T)
wrote: Fri, Oct 12, 2007, 8:24pm (EDT+4) (LRod) doth claimeth:: The "first ones 20 years ago" was from my post. He doesn't know how to set webtv to identify quotes. I've fixed that in this one to what it is supposed to look like. snip Pardon? "I" don't know how to quote? OK, this is your quote of what I wrote when I quoted "you": J T wrote: Tue, Oct 9, 2007, 2:20am (EDT+4) (LRod) did sayeth: I moved on the instant I saw the glue up with the QuickGrips on it. He asserts you can get greater pressure with them than K-Bodies? Please. I bought my first QuickGrips probably 20 years ago. snip of the rest I quoted "you", who said "you" bought about 20 years ago. Looks clear to me. Also, looks to me like he read it wrong. I'll keep on quoting the same way I have for the last 10 or so years. Then you'll keep doing it wrong. It's not just a matter of including the text (which admittedly is quoting the poster). It's also a matter of making it clear who's doing the talking. That's what the "quoted text markers" are for. They might be or : They indicate quoted text, but they also have to reflect the level of quote, and do that by placing two for a quote of a quote. or three for a quote of a quote of a quote. In your example above everything from "Fri, Oct 12, 2007, 8:24pm " to "quoting the same way I have " is preceded by a single . That indicates to newsreaders that all 18 lines (in my reader) were uttered by the same author. In fact, the text beginning with "The "first ones 20 years ago" and ending with "supposed to look like" is my work, and should have been preceded in your post by a or : which would have made them a or :: in this reply. In your post that text isn't. Consequently, it looks to readers as if you wrote the whole post, and clearly you didn't. He didn't read it wrong. You posted it wrong. There are settings in news readers which do that automatically. I figured out 10 (or so) years ago what they meant and how to do it. It's marginally acceptable for you to continue to do it the way you're doing, so long as you don't mind expecting others to do your work for you. Say, isn't that why you get so upset with people asking where to find stuff? You're doing exactly the same thing to us. Next time you go off on someone for asking where to find something I'm going to remind you that by your standards it's okay if they keep on asking the same way they have for the last 10 (or so) years. See how you like it. -- LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997 email addy de-spam-ified due to 1,000 spams per month. If you can't figure out how to use it, I probably wouldn't care to correspond with you anyway. |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
FWW Article: "you can't be serious" abount clamping.
On 12 Oct 2007 21:36:19 -0400, Maxwell Lol wrote:
LRod writes: You're doing exactly the same thing to us. Next time you go off on someone for asking where to find something I'm going to remind you that by your standards it's okay if they keep on asking the same way they have for the last 10 (or so) years. See how you like it. Don't be so hard on him. He's not using a computer. I know he's not. I even mentioned that two posts up. One of these days..... Are you kidding? He buys his clamps at Big Lots... -- LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997 email addy de-spam-ified due to 1,000 spams per month. If you can't figure out how to use it, I probably wouldn't care to correspond with you anyway. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FWW Article: "you can't be serious" abount clamping. | Woodworking | |||
anyine recall an article on "sculpted" joints | Woodworking | |||
HEADSUP: Project estimating/pricing ARTICLE in "Woodwork" mag! | Woodworking | |||
Orange Peel Texture? "Knockdown" or "Skip Trowel" also "California Knock-down" | Home Repair | |||
Need help finding a "Fine Woodworking"article | Woodworking |