Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
Anyone with Jet 16-32 sander, what is your evaluation of it?
Pros and cons. Also is this a rebadged performax? -- Frank Howell ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
Frank Howell wrote:
Anyone with Jet 16-32 sander, what is your evaluation of it? Pros and cons. Also is this a rebadged performax? They bought Performax quite a while ago. -- dadiOH ____________________________ dadiOH's dandies v3.06... ....a help file of info about MP3s, recording from LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that. Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
"Frank Howell" wrote in message ... Anyone with Jet 16-32 sander, what is your evaluation of it? Pros and cons. Also is this a rebadged performax? -- Frank Howell ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- I was looking at it just before Christmas and ended up buying the 22/44. I did however have a strange tracking problem that magically cured itself. You certainly do need a dust collector. Is it a rebadged Performax? Probably however my 22/44 weight in excess of 200 lbs and is mostly cast iron. IIRC the 16-32 is mostly aluminum. Pros, Its great for smoothing or "slowly" thicknessing figured wood that is likely to tear out if you use a planer. The drum moves up and down and not the conveyor when changing settings. Cons, it can be slow so don't count on it replacing a planer. |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:31:25 GMT, "Leon"
wrote: Cons, it can be slow so don't count on it replacing a planer. When you NEED it, you'll wonder how you lived without it! I've used my 22-44 in a configuration where trim boards are exiting my planer, getting turned around, and put back through the sander @ 120 grit, where they are stacked for finishing. The sanders also cannot be beat for highly figured stock. I keep 24 & 36 grit handy for just such an occasion. |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
"B A R R Y" wrote in message ... On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:31:25 GMT, "Leon" wrote: Cons, it can be slow so don't count on it replacing a planer. When you NEED it, you'll wonder how you lived without it! I've used my 22-44 in a configuration where trim boards are exiting my planer, getting turned around, and put back through the sander @ 120 grit, where they are stacked for finishing. The sanders also cannot be beat for highly figured stock. I keep 24 & 36 grit handy for just such an occasion. Why not let the planer feed directly into the sander???? ;~) LOL. |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 00:02:02 GMT, "Leon"
wrote: Why not let the planer feed directly into the sander???? ;~) LOL. Like you never thought of trying! Enjoying that cool brew while cleaning up, you look across the room and think "Hey..." G |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
Leon wrote:
"Frank Howell" wrote in message ... Anyone with Jet 16-32 sander, what is your evaluation of it? Pros and cons. Also is this a rebadged performax? -- Frank Howell ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- I was looking at it just before Christmas and ended up buying the 22/44. I did however have a strange tracking problem that magically cured itself. You certainly do need a dust collector. Is it a rebadged Performax? Probably however my 22/44 weight in excess of 200 lbs and is mostly cast iron. IIRC the 16-32 is mostly aluminum. Pros, Its great for smoothing or "slowly" thicknessing figured wood that is likely to tear out if you use a planer. The drum moves up and down and not the conveyor when changing settings. Cons, it can be slow so don't count on it replacing a planer. Thanks for the reply. I did see that the 16-32 is about 50 lbs. lighter then the 22/44. Also I noticed that both machines use 20A 110, with no provision to change to 220. Is that how your sander is? Seems to me if using 20A 110 , you would be right at the edge of popping circuit breaker. What has been your experience. Frank Howell -- Frank Howell ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
B A R R Y wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:31:25 GMT, "Leon" wrote: Cons, it can be slow so don't count on it replacing a planer. When you NEED it, you'll wonder how you lived without it! I've used my 22-44 in a configuration where trim boards are exiting my planer, getting turned around, and put back through the sander @ 120 grit, where they are stacked for finishing. The sanders also cannot be beat for highly figured stock. I keep 24 & 36 grit handy for just such an occasion. Did you look at any other brands before you bought? I know that these are slow machines, but they must still be faster then hand sanding or using ROS. -- Frank Howell ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
"Frank Howell" wrote in
: B A R R Y wrote: On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:31:25 GMT, "Leon" wrote: Cons, it can be slow so don't count on it replacing a planer. When you NEED it, you'll wonder how you lived without it! I've used my 22-44 in a configuration where trim boards are exiting my planer, getting turned around, and put back through the sander @ 120 grit, where they are stacked for finishing. The sanders also cannot be beat for highly figured stock. I keep 24 & 36 grit handy for just such an occasion. Did you look at any other brands before you bought? I know that these are slow machines, but they must still be faster then hand sanding or using ROS. Consider that they are more for consistency than speed. A large surface to be sanded, by a wide sanding drum makes everything pretty even. I bought a 16/32, three or four years ago. I forget. Kept it for maybe 90-120 days, fought with it, and found it didn't suit MY needs. YMMV. Sold it to someone in the club, but I don't remember who. After the drum sanding, there may be a need for ROS and/or hand sanding anyway. You'll have to decide yourself. Like almost every other tool, not everyone needs to own one. Patriarch, owner of too many tools now... |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
"Frank Howell" wrote in message ... Did you look at any other brands before you bought? I know that these are slow machines, but they must still be faster then hand sanding or using ROS. Much faster than hand sanding not a whole lot faster than a ROS. Then again, a hand sanding does not compare in speed to a ROS. If you are thinking of getting one to speed sanding you will probably be disappointed. They do however do a very good of sanding to a consistent flat thickness. |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
"Frank Howell" wrote in message ... Thanks for the reply. I did see that the 16-32 is about 50 lbs. lighter then the 22/44. Also I noticed that both machines use 20A 110, with no provision to change to 220. Is that how your sander is? Seems to me if using 20A 110 , you would be right at the edge of popping circuit breaker. What has been your experience. Frank Howell My machine is strictly 110 volt, I am told because of the motor on the conveyor. Sanding narrow stock lightly I can run the sander and dust collector off of the same 15 amp circuit. Both machines indicated that a 20 amp circuit would be necessary. When I am sanding wider, harder, and faster I do plug the sander into a separate 20 amp circuit. |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 09:15:44 -0700, "Frank Howell"
wrote: Did you look at any other brands before you bought? Are there other brands I can see? G I can't see Grizzly without spending $350 on Avgas & cab fare to get to Muncy. Performax was about it for the 22" open ended drum sanders that I could see. ** http://www.bburke.com/woodworking.html ** |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Jet 16-32 sander
On Sat, 09 Jun 2007 18:13:34 GMT, "Leon"
wrote: They do however do a very good of sanding to a consistent flat thickness. And much better than a planer on figured or thin stock when loaded with 24 or 36 grit paper. ** http://www.bburke.com/woodworking.html ** |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Jet Disc/Belt Sander | Woodworking | |||
Jet spindle sander problems | Woodworking | |||
JET 6X48 and 12" disc closed stand sander in Dallas area | Woodworking | |||
Difference bewteen a Random Orbit Sander and a palm Sander? | Woodworking | |||
Hand belt sander converts to stationary table sander? | Woodworking |