Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
Hi,
I never have any experience with Table Saw Molding Head, maybe the experts in this forum could give their opinion. I saw a tabl saw molding head with one blade. Is it good? Would it worth buying? How does it compare to the typical 3 blade head? Thanks in advance for any opinion given. Best Regards, Jo -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
Jo wrote:
I saw a tabl saw molding head with one blade. Is it good? Would it worth buying? How does it compare to the typical 3 blade head? SFWIW, I threw my Craftsman set, unused, in the trash years ago. Lew |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Jo" wrote in message .47... Hi, I never have any experience with Table Saw Molding Head, maybe the experts in this forum could give their opinion. I saw a tabl saw molding head with one blade. Is it good? Would it worth buying? How does it compare to the typical 3 blade head? What brand? I saw a sewing machine that was electric, is it good? A 3 cutter head will last longer. |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Lew Hodgett" wrote in message buying? How does it compare to the typical 3 blade head? SFWIW, I threw my Craftsman set, unused, in the trash years ago. Har! I never used the set I bought 30 years ago. I'm sure it's around here somewhere, but damned if I know where. |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
On 27 Mar 2007 05:51:07 GMT, Jo wrote:
Hi, I never have any experience with Table Saw Molding Head, maybe the experts in this forum could give their opinion. I saw a tabl saw molding head with one blade. Is it good? Would it worth buying? How does it compare to the typical 3 blade head? Thanks in advance for any opinion given. Best Regards, Jo Before I had a properly tooled shaper I used a three knife molding cutterhead quite a bit with a great deal of success. never used , nor even have seen, a single knife cutter. The downside to molding cutterhead is low surface speed, I would say, and because of it , controlling tearout is much more difficult. You can get acceptable results, however if you are careful about backing your cut and use slow feed rates. At least that was my experience. |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
Personally, I have never heard of a one-blade moulding head. I have had a
three-blade cutter for 30 years. It used to get a fair amount of use but bigger, better routers and router bits seem to be replacing it, The three-blader can do a fairly good job if you feed slowly. Remember that most routers are running in the 18,000 to 22,000 rpm range. A shaper (which the moulding head is trying to simulate) also runs quite a bit faster than your table saw, which is in the 3,000-4,000 rpm range. If you start shallow, and work up to final cutting depth, and feed slowly then can do the job - but not as well as the router or shaper. I would approach a one head cutter with a fair amount of caution. RonB "Jo" wrote in message .47... Hi, I never have any experience with Table Saw Molding Head, maybe the experts in this forum could give their opinion. I saw a tabl saw molding head with one blade. Is it good? Would it worth buying? How does it compare to the typical 3 blade head? Thanks in advance for any opinion given. Best Regards, Jo -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Charley" wrote in message ... It is absolutely necessary that the molding head is balanced when it is running. I've never heard of a one cutter molding head, so I suspect that it's a 2 cutter molding head with one cutter missing. No, they do make them. Presumably they are balanced more or less properly. But 3 cutter heads are dangerous enough; using a 1 cutter would be crazy. |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
It is absolutely necessary that the molding head is balanced when it is
running. I've never heard of a one cutter molding head, so I suspect that it's a 2 cutter molding head with one cutter missing. DON'T USE IT, until you are absolutely sure that it's got all of the knives in place that it's supposed to, and make absolutely sure that all of the knives are properly secured in place before you even put it on your saw. Even then, always stand well out of line of it when you turn the saw on, as these molding heads have been known to throw a knife occasionally. I have had a 3 knife Craftsman for over 30 years and I have used it quite a few times, but less and less as I get older and less brave. I've always felt very un-safe whenever I have used it, even after taking extra time to be sure that all of the feather boards and necessary guards were in place. I feel much safer doing the job with a router or shaper. These table saw molding heads can get the job done, but they run much slower, cause more chip-out, and are much less safe then doing the same job with a router or a shaper. I have had pieces of molding completely shatter when cutting them with one of these, sending large splinters all over the shop. They definitely aren't for the timid or un-skilled user. I haven't trashed mine yet, because every once in a while I still find a need for it, but I avoid using it whenever possible. -- Charley "RonB" wrote in message ... Personally, I have never heard of a one-blade moulding head. I have had a three-blade cutter for 30 years. It used to get a fair amount of use but bigger, better routers and router bits seem to be replacing it, The three-blader can do a fairly good job if you feed slowly. Remember that most routers are running in the 18,000 to 22,000 rpm range. A shaper (which the moulding head is trying to simulate) also runs quite a bit faster than your table saw, which is in the 3,000-4,000 rpm range. If you start shallow, and work up to final cutting depth, and feed slowly then can do the job - but not as well as the router or shaper. I would approach a one head cutter with a fair amount of caution. RonB "Jo" wrote in message .47... Hi, I never have any experience with Table Saw Molding Head, maybe the experts in this forum could give their opinion. I saw a tabl saw molding head with one blade. Is it good? Would it worth buying? How does it compare to the typical 3 blade head? Thanks in advance for any opinion given. Best Regards, Jo -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Charley" wrote in message ... ......... Even then, always stand well out of line of it when you turn the saw on, as these molding heads have been known to throw a knife occasionally. Yeah - I have occasionally been tempted to calculate the tip speed of the cutters running on my table saw and compare it to a 30-06. I'll bet they are in the same neighborhood if one came off. Like I said earlier, mine is on the shelf but doesn't get a lot of use. Of course you could say the same about other tools. RonB RonB |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"RonB" wrote Yeah - I have occasionally been tempted to calculate the tip speed of the cutters running on my table saw and compare it to a 30-06. I'll bet they are in the same neighborhood if one came off. I had a safety freak shop teacher in high school who used ask questions on his tests of how many times a tool could hit you or cut you before the signal would reach the brain to react. The big damage is done long before you pull the hand away. Fast moving metal and flesh are not compatable. |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
In article , "Charley" wrote:
It is absolutely necessary that the molding head is balanced when it is running. I've never heard of a one cutter molding head, so I suspect that it's a 2 cutter molding head with one cutter missing. Don't you think he'd notice if there was a cutter missing? In fact, there is such a thing as a one-cutter head. Sears used to sell one, but it seems they don't any more. It's not perfectly circular; there are strategically-placed flat spots to keep it balanced. Somebody sold one on eBay recently: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=200086210874 Pic shows both 1-blade and 3-blade Sears molding heads. FWIW... I've never heard of a 2-cutter molding head. All I've ever seen is 1- and 3-cutter heads. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
In article , "RonB" wrote:
Yeah - I have occasionally been tempted to calculate the tip speed of the cutters running on my table saw and compare it to a 30-06. I'll bet they are in the same neighborhood if one came off. Not even close, actually. Following is a very rough approximation: Typical molding head has a diameter of 7 or 8 inches. Circumference then is about two feet. 2' x 4500 rpm = 9000 fpm = 150 fps or about 100mph. Much too fast to dodge, but nowhere near the muzzle velocity of any rifle. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Charley" wrote in message ... It is absolutely necessary that the molding head is balanced when it is running. I've never heard of a one cutter molding head, so I suspect that it's a 2 cutter molding head with one cutter missing. DON'T USE IT, until you are absolutely sure that it's got all of the knives in place that it's supposed to, and make absolutely sure that all of the knives are properly secured in place before you even put it on your saw. Even then, always stand well out of line of it when you turn the saw on, as these molding heads have been known to throw a knife occasionally. Craftsman had the 1 cutter version also. The cutter head that that cutter fits into is not perfectly round and compensates of the single cutter. |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"RonB" wrote in message ... "Charley" wrote in message ... ......... Even then, always stand well out of line of it when you turn the saw on, as these molding heads have been known to throw a knife occasionally. Yeah - I have occasionally been tempted to calculate the tip speed of the cutters running on my table saw and compare it to a 30-06. I'll bet they are in the same neighborhood if one came off. Like I said earlier, mine is on the shelf but doesn't get a lot of use. No, the tip speed on you TS is no where near a 30-06, or a 22 for that matter. The typical 10" blade turns at about 3600 rpm. The blade is 31.4 inches around or 2.61 feet around. 2.61' x 3600 + 9420' per minute. That comes out to about 107 MPH. IIRC the typical 22 has a muzzle velocity of around 1100 feet per second and that comes out to about 7 times faster. A 30-06 with a 150 grain bullet travels at about 2700 feet per second or about 17 times faster than your saw blade. If you are spinning a smaller diameter dado or molding cutter the tip speed would be slower than the 10" blade. |
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Toller" wrote in message ... "Charley" wrote in message ... It is absolutely necessary that the molding head is balanced when it is running. I've never heard of a one cutter molding head, so I suspect that it's a 2 cutter molding head with one cutter missing. No, they do make them. Presumably they are balanced more or less properly. But 3 cutter heads are dangerous enough; using a 1 cutter would be crazy. Could you explain how 1 cutter would be crazy? |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
No, the tip speed on you TS is no where near a 30-06, or a 22 for that
matter. The typical 10" blade turns at about 3600 rpm. The blade is 31.4 inches around or 2.61 feet around. 2.61' x 3600 + 9420' per minute. That comes out to about 107 MPH. IIRC the typical 22 has a muzzle velocity of around 1100 feet per second and that comes out to about 7 times faster. A 30-06 with a 150 grain bullet travels at about 2700 feet per second or about 17 times faster than your saw blade. If you are spinning a smaller diameter dado or molding cutter the tip speed would be slower than the 10" blade. It would still earn you a trip to the emergency room - or worse. |
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
Leon, wrote the following at or about 3/27/2007 3:46 PM:
"Toller" wrote in message ... "Charley" wrote in message ... It is absolutely necessary that the molding head is balanced when it is running. I've never heard of a one cutter molding head, so I suspect that it's a 2 cutter molding head with one cutter missing. No, they do make them. Presumably they are balanced more or less properly. But 3 cutter heads are dangerous enough; using a 1 cutter would be crazy. Could you explain how 1 cutter would be crazy? Not sure that it would necessarily be crazy but I think it might be a bit more prone to get a bit too much material in there, a bit too quickly and watch it (hopefully that's all) go flying. Three bits, means you're removing the material 3x faster. This makes for a smoother finish. It also means that at a given feed rate it will remove 3x the material. Just seems that it would be more likely, with one cutter, to be able to feed a bit much in and wind up with a big ker-chunk and a load of splinters flying or the whole damn thing taking off on you. I've had the 3 head unit from Craftsman for about 35 years and recall that they sold the single head at that time as well. The three head cutter (on a RAS, no less) and set up with proper guards, fencing, feather boards, etc. is pretty scary. It does a nice job if you take your time on setup and feed slow. One thing you won't like get is complacency when using that puppy. It seems to provide its own wake-up call every time you power upg |
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Unquestionably Confused" wrote in message t... Not sure that it would necessarily be crazy but I think it might be a bit more prone to get a bit too much material in there, a bit too quickly and watch it (hopefully that's all) go flying. I have had the 3 head set for almost that long. LOL Since 1978 IIRC. Three bits, means you're removing the material 3x faster. This makes for a smoother finish. It also means that at a given feed rate it will remove 3x the material. I agree with probably a smoother finish but at a given feed rate, the material removal would be the same on either the 1 or 3 cutter design. The single cutter would actually be removing more material at that given feed rate. Just seems that it would be more likely, with one cutter, to be able to feed a bit much in and wind up with a big ker-chunk and a load of splinters flying or the whole damn thing taking off on you. Perhaps so but with the cutter tip speed being approximately 50 MPH (73' per "second") and your feed speed being say 5' per "minute", a double feed rate of 10' per "minute", the ratio of feed to spin speed is still quite steep. I think the feed rate would have to be much higher, 100 peet per minute before the 1 cutter design would be more likely to take a huge bite than the 3 cutter design. I've had the 3 head unit from Craftsman for about 35 years and recall that they sold the single head at that time as well. The three head cutter (on a RAS, no less) and set up with proper guards, fencing, feather boards, etc. is pretty scary. Yeah I had this set up on a RAS also. It does a nice job if you take your time on setup and feed slow. One thing you won't like get is complacency when using that puppy. It seems to provide its own wake-up call every time you power upg I absolutely agree. ;~) |
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"RonB" wrote in message ... No, the tip speed on you TS is no where near a 30-06, or a 22 for that matter. The typical 10" blade turns at about 3600 rpm. The blade is 31.4 inches around or 2.61 feet around. 2.61' x 3600 + 9420' per minute. That comes out to about 107 MPH. IIRC the typical 22 has a muzzle velocity of around 1100 feet per second and that comes out to about 7 times faster. A 30-06 with a 150 grain bullet travels at about 2700 feet per second or about 17 times faster than your saw blade. If you are spinning a smaller diameter dado or molding cutter the tip speed would be slower than the 10" blade. It would still earn you a trip to the emergency room - or worse. If the whole cutter came loose and hit you I would agree. If a small fragment came loose, probably not. |
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
On Mar 27, 6:04 pm, "Leon" wrote:
"RonB" wrote in message ... No, the tip speed on you TS is no where near a 30-06, or a 22 for that matter. The typical 10" blade turns at about 3600 rpm. The blade is 31.4 inches around or 2.61 feet around. 2.61' x 3600 + 9420' per minute. That comes out to about 107 MPH. IIRC the typical 22 has a muzzle velocity of around 1100 feet per second and that comes out to about 7 times faster. A 30-06 with a 150 grain bullet travels at about 2700 feet per second or about 17 times faster than your saw blade. If you are spinning a smaller diameter dado or molding cutter the tip speed would be slower than the 10" blade. It would still earn you a trip to the emergency room - or worse. If the whole cutter came loose and hit you I would agree. If a small fragment came loose, probably not. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hello,new here but seems strange that tommorow I will be using the cutter head (3) again and yes I am afraid of it, the weird noise and the wind it makes. Although have you tried it on a radial arm? Now that is spooky but hey by the end of this year I will have the router completely set up, and I feel fairly safe with the router. Have a good evening Jim in WI |
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
Toller said this, remember.
"Leon" wrote in message .. . Could you explain how 1 cutter would be crazy? |
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Leon" wrote in message t... "Unquestionably Confused" wrote in message t... Not sure that it would necessarily be crazy but I think it might be a bit more prone to get a bit too much material in there, a bit too quickly and watch it (hopefully that's all) go flying. I have had the 3 head set for almost that long. LOL Since 1978 IIRC. Three bits, means you're removing the material 3x faster. This makes for a smoother finish. It also means that at a given feed rate it will remove 3x the material. I agree with probably a smoother finish but at a given feed rate, the material removal would be the same on either the 1 or 3 cutter design. The single cutter would actually be removing more material at that given feed rate. THe single cutter at a continuous feed rate would remove the same ammount .......BUT ... the 3 cutter removes it in 3 smaller chips as opposed to one large one giving much better quality finish. Just seems that it would be more likely, with one cutter, to be able to feed a bit much in and wind up with a big ker-chunk and a load of splinters flying or the whole damn thing taking off on you. Perhaps so but with the cutter tip speed being approximately 50 MPH (73' per "second") and your feed speed being say 5' per "minute", a double feed rate of 10' per "minute", the ratio of feed to spin speed is still quite steep. I think the feed rate would have to be much higher, 100 peet per minute before the 1 cutter design would be more likely to take a huge bite than the 3 cutter design. At any given feed rate the single cutter is taking a larger bite. I've had the 3 head unit from Craftsman for about 35 years and recall that they sold the single head at that time as well. The three head cutter (on a RAS, no less) and set up with proper guards, fencing, feather boards, etc. is pretty scary. Yeah I had this set up on a RAS also. It does a nice job if you take your time on setup and feed slow. One thing you won't like get is complacency when using that puppy. It seems to provide its own wake-up call every time you power upg I absolutely agree. ;~) |
#23
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Leon" wrote in message ... "RonB" wrote in message ... No, the tip speed on you TS is no where near a 30-06, or a 22 for that matter. The typical 10" blade turns at about 3600 rpm. The blade is 31.4 inches around or 2.61 feet around. 2.61' x 3600 + 9420' per minute. That comes out to about 107 MPH. IIRC the typical 22 has a muzzle velocity of around 1100 feet per second and that comes out to about 7 times faster. A 30-06 with a 150 grain bullet travels at about 2700 feet per second or about 17 times faster than your saw blade. If you are spinning a smaller diameter dado or molding cutter the tip speed would be slower than the 10" blade. It would still earn you a trip to the emergency room - or worse. If the whole cutter came loose and hit you I would agree. If a small fragment came loose, probably not. Although it would be a relativly small hole at those speeds it would go straight throug you assuming you hit no bone. Assuming also you have hit no major organs I hope you keep at least 2 band aids in your safety kit. |
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
Having done a lot of moulding work over the years I would not touch a single
cutter cutter head on that type of setup. I would sit down and scrape the mould by hand using no more than a blunt butter knife rather than use it. It is possible that the head may be balanced with a counterweight opposite the knife. The only problem with this theory is how do you compensate for different size/shape/projection/weight knives? I can not imagine how but maybe the head is designed with a depth limiter to limit feed rates. If it is not you are talking a major risk of kickback at that diameter and speed. Although not a recomended practice but an accepted practice is to use different shaped cutters on the same head at times on spindals (shapers). Occasionally for a one of run you might only grind 1 knife and just use a blank on the opposite side. Whenever I do this I always have a rubber lined 1/4" plate guard between me and the cutters. The rubber is to catch the chips of the end of the cutter when it hits the guard. Even the ammount of knife projection has a marked effect on the inbalance.On a spindle we are only talking about a 3" head running on very heavy bearings and shaft compared to the 8" you are talking on a TS on relativly light bearings and smaller shaft. A spindle running collars runs at around 4000rpm, 4500 is the maximum recomended for that type of cutter. That gives a spindle cutter a surface speed of 4,188'/Min (4,712'/Min at max) allowing 1/2" projection for cutter. Assuming 8" moulding head on TS you are looking at 7,200'/Min.surface speed with no cutter projection. On a spindle even if the knives are roughly the same size the ammount of vibration due to the inbalance is incredible. And needless to say the risk of throwing a knife and kickback increases dramaticly as well as lower quality finish. I used to have the formula for working out the inbalance taking centrifigal force into account but forget it now. Maybe someone else in here can shed dome light on that subject. I know I for one would be interested in knowing it again. -- Every hour, every day I am learning more. The more I learn the less I know about before. The less I know the more I want to look around. Always digging deeper for clues on higher ground. "Jo" wrote in message .47... Hi, I never have any experience with Table Saw Molding Head, maybe the experts in this forum could give their opinion. I saw a tabl saw molding head with one blade. Is it good? Would it worth buying? How does it compare to the typical 3 blade head? Thanks in advance for any opinion given. Best Regards, Jo -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Paul D" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in message t... I agree with probably a smoother finish but at a given feed rate, the material removal would be the same on either the 1 or 3 cutter design. The single cutter would actually be removing more material at that given feed rate. THe single cutter at a continuous feed rate would remove the same ammount ......BUT ... the 3 cutter removes it in 3 smaller chips as opposed to one large one giving much better quality finish. What I was trying to get at was that the single cutter removes more "per cutter" than the 3 cutter design at any given rate. Just seems that it would be more likely, with one cutter, to be able to feed a bit much in and wind up with a big ker-chunk and a load of splinters flying or the whole damn thing taking off on you. Perhaps so but with the cutter tip speed being approximately 50 MPH (73' per "second") and your feed speed being say 5' per "minute", a double feed rate of 10' per "minute", the ratio of feed to spin speed is still quite steep. I think the feed rate would have to be much higher, 100 peet per minute before the 1 cutter design would be more likely to take a huge bite than the 3 cutter design. At any given feed rate the single cutter is taking a larger bite. Which I do not dispute, given the cutter speed vs. feed rates the single cutter does remove more per revolution but certainly not 3 times "dangerous capacity". Regardless of which configuration is being used the cutters are not removing a large quantity of wood. The feed rate would have to be close to the speed of the cutter head, "50 mph" for the 3 to 1 capacity ratio to come into effect. More likely for each revolution and the typical feed rate, each triple cutter probably removes 1 or 2% of its capacity and the single probably removes 3 to 6% of its capacity. I believe feed rate would have to be drastically increased before a significant increase in danger would be noticed between the 3 and single cutter head design. By comparison, a 30 tooth blade is not much more likely to cause a tragic problem than a 90 tooth blade. |
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Paul D" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in message ... "RonB" wrote in message ... No, the tip speed on you TS is no where near a 30-06, or a 22 for that matter. The typical 10" blade turns at about 3600 rpm. The blade is 31.4 inches around or 2.61 feet around. 2.61' x 3600 + 9420' per minute. That comes out to about 107 MPH. IIRC the typical 22 has a muzzle velocity of around 1100 feet per second and that comes out to about 7 times faster. A 30-06 with a 150 grain bullet travels at about 2700 feet per second or about 17 times faster than your saw blade. If you are spinning a smaller diameter dado or molding cutter the tip speed would be slower than the 10" blade. It would still earn you a trip to the emergency room - or worse. If the whole cutter came loose and hit you I would agree. If a small fragment came loose, probably not. Although it would be a relativly small hole at those speeds it would go straight throug you assuming you hit no bone. Assuming also you have hit no major organs I hope you keep at least 2 band aids in your safety kit. Naw. The fragment might cut you cut certainly not go through you. I have been hit by fragments of wood many times thought the years and they mostly bounce off. And while that is only wood, I have also had fragments of carbide go flying also and never see any signs of it hitting anything. Do you think a pro baseball pitcher could throw a small fragment of carbide hard enough to go through your arm or hand? Not likely and he can throw pretty much as fast as the tip speed op a 10" blade on a TS. I have had a fragment of a 22 bullet hit me and it did not penetrate although I did receive a red spot. There simply is not enough mass to overcome the resistance. Now if a whole tooth or cutter came loose, that would be a different story, still I don't think it would go through you as a 22 bullet seldom goes through at speeds 7 time faster. |
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Paul D" wrote in message ... Having done a lot of moulding work over the years I would not touch a single cutter cutter head on that type of setup. I would sit down and scrape the mould by hand using no more than a blunt butter knife rather than use it. After doing that for several days on end, you might reconsider using the single cutter design. LOL If you have never seen one in operation, don't knock it. It is possible that the head may be balanced with a counterweight opposite the knife. Tthe counter ballance is more likely engenereed to be dynamically balanced like car tires are balanced. Counter balance weights are spread over an averaged out area in multiple spots so that minor variations are not so significant. Typical wheel weights on automobiles are placed in as many as 4 locations to off set the heavy spot when tires are staticly palanced. If a single weight is thrown off the unbalanced effect is much less dramatic than if a single weight is thrown off opposite the heavy spot. The only problem with this theory is how do you compensate for different size/shape/projection/weight knives? I can not imagine how but maybe the head is designed with a depth limiter to limit feed rates. If it is not you are talking a major risk of kickback at that diameter and speed. Size and shape will not have any effect on balance if the cutter unit is balanced. Balance on a spinning object concerns weight, not shape or size. I strontly suspect that different shaped cutters made ofr a single head cutter will be shorter or longer so that different profiles each has equal mass regardless of shape. You would not want to run the cutter head with out a cutter in it or a 3 cutter head with only 1 or 2 cutters in it. Although not a recomended practice but an accepted practice is to use different shaped cutters on the same head at times on spindals (shapers). This would be a totally different situation and while it may be accepted, that is truely throwing the cutter head out of balance by introducing different weights in other locations. Occasionally for a one of run you might only grind 1 knife and just use a blank on the opposite side. Whenever I do this I always have a rubber lined 1/4" plate guard between me and the cutters. The rubber is to catch the chips of the end of the cutter when it hits the guard. Even the ammount of knife projection has a marked effect on the inbalance.On a spindle we are only talking about a 3" head running on very heavy bearings and shaft compared to the 8" you are talking on a TS on relativly light bearings and smaller shaft. Again, if the single cutter is balanced the load on the bearings is a non issue. A spindle running collars runs at around 4000rpm, 4500 is the maximum recomended for that type of cutter. That gives a spindle cutter a surface speed of 4,188'/Min (4,712'/Min at max) allowing 1/2" projection for cutter. Assuming 8" moulding head on TS you are looking at 7,200'/Min.surface speed with no cutter projection. On a spindle even if the knives are roughly the same size the ammount of vibration due to the inbalance is incredible. Again, a single cutter head cutter will be balanced so vibration will not be as great as you make it out to be. A cutter does not have to be perfecetly symetrical to be balanced. And needless to say the risk of throwing a knife and kickback increases dramaticly as well as lower quality finish. While I'll bite at the possiblilty of a kick back providing your feed rate is "much faster" than recomended , the increase chance of throwing a knife is non existant when copmpared to a 3, 12 , or 90 tooth cutter. Think about single flute router bits that spin at 25,000 rpm. It's all about balance when it comes to spinning irregular shaped objects. |
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"SWDeveloper" wrote in message ... Maybe not crazy, but not as safe as a perfectly balanced molding head. The more balanced the the cutter head, the less vibration. A well-balanced blade assembly will give you a cleaner cut too. Ok, lets stop and think here for a moment. This single head cutter is not a fluke, flash in the pan tool that was here today and gone tomorrow. I first saw them some 25 years ago. I have heard of no incidents regarding problems with the cutter, have you? True they probably do not leave as smooth of a cut given the same feed rate but as long as the cutter is balanced there should be no vibration. I suspect that if there was significant vibration that the tool would have never made it out of the R&D department. Huge and heavy by comparison engine crank shafts are very irregular in shape and when balanced can spin at speeds in excess of 12,000 rpms. |
#29
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Leon" wrote in message t... "Paul D" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in message t... I agree with probably a smoother finish but at a given feed rate, the material removal would be the same on either the 1 or 3 cutter design. The single cutter would actually be removing more material at that given feed rate. THe single cutter at a continuous feed rate would remove the same ammount ......BUT ... the 3 cutter removes it in 3 smaller chips as opposed to one large one giving much better quality finish. What I was trying to get at was that the single cutter removes more "per cutter" than the 3 cutter design at any given rate. Just seems that it would be more likely, with one cutter, to be able to feed a bit much in and wind up with a big ker-chunk and a load of splinters flying or the whole damn thing taking off on you. Perhaps so but with the cutter tip speed being approximately 50 MPH (73' per "second") and your feed speed being say 5' per "minute", a double feed rate of 10' per "minute", the ratio of feed to spin speed is still quite steep. I think the feed rate would have to be much higher, 100 peet per minute before the 1 cutter design would be more likely to take a huge bite than the 3 cutter design. At any given feed rate the single cutter is taking a larger bite. Which I do not dispute, given the cutter speed vs. feed rates the single cutter does remove more per revolution but certainly not 3 times "dangerous capacity". Regardless of which configuration is being used the cutters are not removing a large quantity of wood. Leon, I think we are misinterperating each other somewhere.To hopefully make things clearer we will exagerate things a bit. Material is being fed at a constant rate. Keyword being constant, Regardless of that being 5" per hour or 50mph. Lets say that the stock moves into the cutter 3/16" and the cutter has done one revolotion. The 3 knife cutter has removed 3 X 1/16" chips through this 1 revolution. The single knife has removed 1 X 3/16" chip. The same amount of material is removed in either case. It is just the size of the chip(s) that has varied. The feed rate would have to be close to the speed of the cutter head, "50 mph" for the 3 to 1 capacity ratio to come into effect. Regardless of the feed rate you still have one head cutting one chip per revolution compared to the other cutting 3 small chips per revilution. You can feed a 1000mph if you like the number of cuts per revolution does not change. The one knife head will still cut one and the 3 knife head will still cut 3 per revolution. More likely for each revolution and the typical feed rate, each triple cutter probably removes 1 or 2% of its capacity and the single probably removes 3 to 6% of its capacity I'm sorry, maybe I am spinning in reverse, but i don't follow what you are trying to say here. Per revolution each cutter should remove 100% of its capacity. Three knife will revove 33.3% per cutter and the single tooth 100%. Either way you still get 100% cut. My previous 2 comments explain this. I believe feed rate would have to be drastically increased before a significant increase in danger would be noticed between the 3 and single cutter head design. Any increase in feedrate always generates larger cut regardless of number of knives an thus increases risk of kickback. Refer previous comments on chip size By comparison, a 30 tooth blade is not much more likely to cause a tragic problem than a 90 tooth blade. That I agree with, but here you are talking a totally different cenario. Thats like comparing a triangular or square wheel to a round wheel.There is a major difference between 1 tooth going chunk, chunk, chunk compared to to a 30 or 90 tooth saw blade running smoothly through a revolution.(once again chip size) A 30 tooth blade is slightly more likely to cause kick back than a 90 but it is a very very marginal ammount. I hope that clears things up little. In summary Slower feed rate regardless of number of cutters means smaller chip size which in turn means better finish and less danger. Higher feedrate means larger chip size which means poorer finish and greater danger. More cutters at specific feedrate means smaller chip size which means better quality finish and less danger of kickback. |
#30
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:46:47 GMT, "Leon"
wrote: "Toller" wrote in message ... "Charley" wrote in message ... It is absolutely necessary that the molding head is balanced when it is running. I've never heard of a one cutter molding head, so I suspect that it's a 2 cutter molding head with one cutter missing. No, they do make them. Presumably they are balanced more or less properly. But 3 cutter heads are dangerous enough; using a 1 cutter would be crazy. Could you explain how 1 cutter would be crazy? Maybe not crazy, but not as safe as a perfectly balanced molding head. The more balanced the the cutter head, the less vibration. A well-balanced blade assembly will give you a cleaner cut too. |
#31
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Leon" wrote in
t: "Jo" wrote in message .47... Hi, I never have any experience with Table Saw Molding Head, maybe the experts in this forum could give their opinion. I saw a tabl saw molding head with one blade. Is it good? Would it worth buying? How does it compare to the typical 3 blade head? What brand? I saw a sewing machine that was electric, is it good? A 3 cutter head will last longer. Craftsman. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#32
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Paul D" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in message t... "Paul D" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in message t... SNIP. LOL... I think we are probably on the same page here Paul. I am only trying to make the point that while a 3 cutter vs. a 1 cutter head probably makes a smoother cut, with a given constant recommended feed rate cutters on both units are most likely well within their capacity of making a safe cut. While your example of the amount removed ratio is correct, I suspect that the amount removed by either stile cutter head at operating rpm is in the low thousands of an inch per cutter pass. If the 3 cutter head is removing 10 thousandths per cutter the single cutter is removing 30 thousandths. That said, LOL, the single cutter is probably more likely to give a crisp clean cut than a 3 head cutter providing your feed rate is 1/3 that of the 3 cutter version. I have the 3 head version and the cutters do not perfectly fit in alignment with each other. When I use the beading bit the resulting bead is not as perfectly formed as the profile on any single cutter. Because they do not register in perfect alignment on the head they each cut at a slightly different location resulting in a profile that is not exactly like any one cutter. |
#33
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
I've had the 3 head unit from Craftsman for about 35 years and recall
that they sold the single head at that time as well. The three head cutter (on a RAS, no less) ........ Yeah -- Old memories. My cousin was cutting moulding with a Craftsman 3-blader many years ago on a RAS. He felt a thud on one hand and looked down at his shirt which was covered with blood, tissue and bone fragments. You can guess the rest. The damage was limited to the end of one finger above the joint. The surgery and recoup from trying to restore part of the fingertip was almost worse than the injury itself. Horrible looking mess. He was a union utility worker at the time and had to have all of his digets in working order. He is a talented woodworker to this day but the old RAS, and moulding head is ancient history to him. RonB RonB |
#34
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Mike Marlow" wrote in message ... Not even close to the same neighborhood. In fact, the table saw isn't even close to the lead sled speed of a .45ACP. CORRECT. LOL And the 22 caliber is 7 times faster than a 10" TS blade tip and only 2/3's the muzzle velocity of a 45. |
#35
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"RonB" wrote in message ... "Charley" wrote in message ... ......... Even then, always stand well out of line of it when you turn the saw on, as these molding heads have been known to throw a knife occasionally. Yeah - I have occasionally been tempted to calculate the tip speed of the cutters running on my table saw and compare it to a 30-06. I'll bet they are in the same neighborhood if one came off. Like I said earlier, mine is on the shelf but doesn't get a lot of use. Not even close to the same neighborhood. In fact, the table saw isn't even close to the lead sled speed of a .45ACP. -- -Mike- |
#36
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Jim" wrote in message oups.com... Hello,new here but seems strange that tommorow I will be using the cutter head (3) again and yes I am afraid of it, the weird noise and the wind it makes. Although have you tried it on a radial arm? Now that is spooky but hey by the end of this year I will have the router completely set up, and I feel fairly safe with the router. Have a good evening I too would prefer a router or a shaper for the job, but that's because I generally try to stay away from tools that have been adapted to a secondary use. Having said that, if you think about the speed of your router and the speed of your table saw, and you throw in the fact that routers have been known to throw carbide (especially with cheap bits), you might be more concerned about that router. It's typically somewhere near 3 to 6 times faster than that table saw blade. -- -Mike- |
#37
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Leon" wrote in message t... "Paul D" wrote in message ... Having done a lot of moulding work over the years I would not touch a single cutter cutter head on that type of setup. I would sit down and scrape the mould by hand using no more than a blunt butter knife rather than use it. After doing that for several days on end, you might reconsider using the single cutter design. LOL Doubt it I have lots of patients and besides if its achoice between somthing taking a long time or having the hands to do it with, the hands wins hands down If you have never seen one in operation, don't knock it. Its asicly the same as set of collars with one knife and one blank except larger. It is possible that the head may be balanced with a counterweight opposite the knife. Tthe counter ballance is more likely engenereed to be dynamically balanced like car tires are balanced. Counter balance weights are spread over an averaged out area in multiple spots so that minor variations are not so significant. Typical wheel weights on automobiles are placed in as many as 4 locations to off set the heavy spot when tires are staticly palanced. If a single weight is thrown off the unbalanced effect is much less dramatic than if a single weight is thrown off opposite the heavy spot. The only problem with this theory is how do you compensate for different size/shape/projection/weight knives? I can not imagine how but maybe the head is designed with a depth limiter to limit feed rates. If it is not you are talking a major risk of kickback at that diameter and speed. The only practical option i see here that might wirk to allow for differing weights/projections would be a fluid filled head working on the same principle as an. automatic transmition torque converter,You must also remember that increasing projection also upsets balance. Size and shape will not have any effect on balance if the cutter unit is balanced. Balance on a spinning object concerns weight, not shape or size. I strongly disagree here. Change the weight or the amount of projection and you affect balance considerably. For a spinning object to balance it must be balanced at that particular configeration. Change that configeration and you upset the balance. I strontly suspect that different shaped cutters made ofr a single head cutter will be shorter or longer so that different profiles each has equal mass regardless of shape. Even at equal mass if one cutter projects further than another it will affect balance. You would not want to run the cutter head with out a cutter in it or a 3 cutter head with only 1 or 2 cutters in it. Although not a recomended practice but an accepted practice is to use different shaped cutters on the same head at times on spindals (shapers). This would be a totally different situation and while it may be accepted, that is truely throwing the cutter head out of balance by introducing different weights in other locations. So is changing the one cutter in a single cutter head Occasionally for a one of run you might only grind 1 knife and just use a blank on the opposite side. Whenever I do this I always have a rubber lined 1/4" plate guard between me and the cutters. The rubber is to catch the chips of the end of the cutter when it hits the guard. Even the ammount of knife projection has a marked effect on the inbalance.On a spindle we are only talking about a 3" head running on very heavy bearings and shaft compared to the 8" you are talking on a TS on relativly light bearings and smaller shaft. Again, if the single cutter is balanced the load on the bearings is a non issue. that is true IF a single cutter is balanced. A spindle running collars runs at around 4000rpm, 4500 is the maximum recomended for that type of cutter. That gives a spindle cutter a surface speed of 4,188'/Min (4,712'/Min at max) allowing 1/2" projection for cutter. Assuming 8" moulding head on TS you are looking at 7,200'/Min.surface speed with no cutter projection. On a spindle even if the knives are roughly the same size the ammount of vibration due to the inbalance is incredible. Again, a single cutter head cutter will be balanced so vibration will not be as great as you make it out to be. Unless it has some form of dynamic balancing that will 'adjust' itself on the run it will not balance with varying knives A cutter does not have to be perfecetly symetrical to be balanced. No it does not. I have some knives which are different but designed to run as a pair. But the design of knives in this situation takes considerable design considerations taking into account weight distribution in relation to projection to compensate for varying shapes and centrifigal force. And needless to say the risk of throwing a knife and kickback increases dramaticly as well as lower quality finish. While I'll bite at the possiblilty of a kick back providing your feed rate is "much faster" than recomended , the increase chance of throwing a knife is non existant when copmpared to a 3, 12 , or 90 tooth cutter. Sorry I do not follow your point there. The increased risk of throwing a knife is due to the inbalance, nothing to do with the number of knives Think about single flute router bits that spin at 25,000 rpm. It's all about balance when it comes to spinning irregular shaped objects. Thats right ... weight is distributed equally in any direction from centre, bit is balanced although oposing sides are different. Now lets take that same router bit and grind or break half the carbide tip of ( simulating changing cutter shape) ...... woops what happened to that perfectly balanced bit. |
#38
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Jo" wrote in message .47... Craftsman. Not the best brand but it will do the job. Be very careful, use guards, and feed very slowly with hold down and push sticks. Wear eye protection and preferabley a face mask. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#39
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
"Leon" wrote in message ... "Paul D" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in message t... "Paul D" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in message t... SNIP. LOL... I think we are probably on the same page here Paul. I am only trying to make the point that while a 3 cutter vs. a 1 cutter head probably makes a smoother cut, with a given constant recommended feed rate cutters on both units are most likely well within their capacity of making a safe cut. While your example of the amount removed ratio is correct, I suspect that the amount removed by either stile cutter head at operating rpm is in the low thousands of an inch per cutter pass. If the 3 cutter head is removing 10 thousandths per cutter the single cutter is removing 30 thousandths. I did say I was exagerating a bit. 3/16 was just a nice convenient figure to work with. Maybe i shoul have went to 3/8 LOL That said, LOL, the single cutter is probably more likely to give a crisp clean cut than a 3 head cutter providing your feed rate is 1/3 that of the 3 cutter version. I theory the single knife cutter head at 1/3 the feed rate should give exactly the same quality of finish. I dont know about you but I am not getting any younger and might not have enough time left to take 3 times as long to do the same job I have the 3 head version and the cutters do not perfectly fit in alignment with each other. When I use the beading bit the resulting bead is not as perfectly formed as the profile on any single cutter. Because they do not register in perfect alignment on the head they each cut at a slightly different location resulting in a profile that is not exactly like any one cutter. Any multi knife cutter suffers from the same problem. It is the combination of the shape of the 2 or 3 knives whatever the case might be that determins the final outcome. When hand grinding knives like I do it takes quite a considerable number of years practice before you can grind a near perfect set of knives so that they all do their fair share of work and are balanced. Note I said near perfect. Although it is possible to make a perfectly matched pair of knives freehand the time involved far outweighs the benefits. I did do it once for a very special set of knives but you wouldn't want to be paying me for the hours spent stoning / checking/ stoning / checking .... and it goes on. At times this 'feature' is actually useful. Lets say I am grinding a set of knives for a particular moulding to match clients house and I accidently go a little deep in one spot .... woops ... not to worry I just have to make sure that that particular spot on the other knife is correct. Just as a side point for anyone interested, grinding a set of knives to match a particular moulding is not as simple as 'tracing' the shape onto the cutter and grinding away. The shape has to be projected to take into account the rake angle of the particular head you are using and the projection of the knives. Set up those knives in the same head a second time but project them out a little more or pull them back a bit and you will get a slightly different shape on the moulding. Put those knives into another head with a different rake angle and once again you get a slightly different shape moulding. The difference is not that noticable to look at but don'y try to mitre or butt join the two pieces together ... it will make you look like a poor woodworker. |
#40
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Table Saw Molding Head
Now maybe you should compare the energy of the 200 grain bullet with the
weight of the cutter and compare the total energy of both? "Leon" wrote in message t... "Mike Marlow" wrote in message ... Not even close to the same neighborhood. In fact, the table saw isn't even close to the lead sled speed of a .45ACP. CORRECT. LOL And the 22 caliber is 7 times faster than a 10" TS blade tip and only 2/3's the muzzle velocity of a 45. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TABLE SAW MOLDING | Woodworking | |||
sharpening molding head cutters | Woodworking | |||
molding head set ?s - how to | Woodworking | |||
gloat (Delta molding head) | Woodworking |