"Scratch Ankle" wrote in message

Obviously you didn't get the point since you only looked at that one
sentence rather than the context.

Nope ... I just "quoted" the one sentence so that you might better get the
point.

So to explain it clearly -- if relying on
what the internet information found involves stupidity if someone is
looking
for information about an operating system then it would seem that coming
here to get information about wood turning is the same stupidity.

Classic "post hoc ergo propter hoc" logic ... IOW, flawed.

And, the word is "ignorance", not "stupidity" ... ignorance is curable and
has no shame attached to it, unless it is willful.

Everyone is ignorant to some extent.

If you come here for advice on "wood turning" you are admittedly ignorant of
the information you are requesting, otherwise you wouldn't be seeking it.

If the person giving you the information/advice is also ignorant of "wood
turning", which happens frequently on the Internet, where does that leave
you?

Still ignorant.

Now repeat that bad/ignorant advice/information and spread if far and wide
over the Internet ... hell, you read it on the Internet, so it has to be
true, right?

Now, replace "wood turning" with "brain surgery" and see if that helps you
better understand that it is risky to take at face value any "information"
you receive on the Internet.

The same goes for "opinions".

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 3/8/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Upscale wrote:

You're trying to get your opinion across about Vista, but as a reference
you're quoting someone whom you find amusing, funny and out for attention.
Don't ever take part in a debate class of any type because your reasoning
skills are woefully inadequate. In other words, at this point all you've
done is make a fool of yourself.

Yet it's you that looks the fool. Go figure!

--
Jack
http://jbstein.com

Swingman wrote:

LOL ... As an OS/2 enthusiast in the 21st century, it's _you_ who would be
much more familiar with that terrain.

I haven't been an OS/2 enthusiast since IBM pulled the plug in the last
century. You have your head further up your ass than I first thought.

--
Jack
http://jbstein.com

"Jack Stein" wrote in message

Yet it's you that looks the fool. Go figure!
Jack

Great conversational skills you have there Jack. Are you expecting to
graduate from grade school this time?

"Jack Stein" wrote in message
I haven't been an OS/2 enthusiast since IBM pulled the plug in the last
century. You have your head further up your ass than I first thought.
http://jbstein.com

That's odd considering that 20% of your website has OS/2 files and OS/2
links on it. Did you put your website up last century and then just forget
that it existed? If you're not an OS/2 enthusiast like you claim, then
you're either lying or you need to visit your doctor and be examined for
Alzheimer's.

"Jack Stein" wrote in message
. ..
Swingman wrote:

LOL ... As an OS/2 enthusiast in the 21st century, it's _you_ who would
be
much more familiar with that terrain.

I haven't been an OS/2 enthusiast since IBM pulled the plug in the last
century. You have your head further up your ass than I first thought.

Hehe ... sure you haven't ... "last century", eh?

"Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:27:13 AM - I have a few files related to OS/2
that I feel are excellent, and that I use. One is GETSET.CMD, a REXX
Script I wrote to see and manipulate OS/2 OBJECTS. Another is a group of
OS/2 Utilities written by Jonathan De Boyne Pollard. He is an OS/2 Guru,
and if you run OS/2, they are worth grabbing. The rest of the files are all
being used by me, and are top quality software everyone runnning OS/2 should
have, or give an in-depth look-see. You'll find a list and description of
some of my favorite OS/2 files and can down load those you find
interesting."

Having a bit of trouble with the truth, are we Jack?

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 3/8/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Swingman wrote:
LOL ... As an OS/2 enthusiast in the 21st century, it's _you_ who
would be much more familiar with that terrain.

"Jack Stein" wrote in message
I haven't been an OS/2 enthusiast since IBM pulled the plug in the last
century. You have your head further up your ass than I first thought.

Upscale wrote:
That's odd considering that 20% of your website has OS/2 files and OS/2
links on it.

Odd perhaps, but not as odd as you two fools claiming I'm an OS/2
enthusiast in the 21st Century! More over, I've always been a Unix
enthusiast more than anything, and Unix isn't even mentioned on my Web
site. OS/2 simply was windows that worked, unlike any version of
windows released by Gates. It's the operating system everyone that
knows little about computing should be using, instead of Windows.

Did you put your website up last century and then just forget
that it existed?

Yes, put it up last century and see/saw no reason to change it.

If you're not an OS/2 enthusiast like you claim,

I'll claim that OS/2 actually worked as advertised, unlike any version
of windows.

then you're either lying or you need to visit your doctor and be examined for
Alzheimer's.

Your logic is exactly what I would expect from a fool.

--
Jack
http://jbstein.com

Swingman wrote:

"Jack Stein" wrote

I haven't been an OS/2 enthusiast since IBM pulled the plug in the last
century. You have your head further up your ass than I first thought.

Hehe ... sure you haven't ... "last century", eh?

"Thursday, December 06, 2001 7:27:13 AM - I have a few files related to OS/2
that I feel are excellent, and that I use. One is GETSET.CMD, a REXX
Script I wrote to see and manipulate OS/2 OBJECTS. Another is a group of
OS/2 Utilities written by Jonathan De Boyne Pollard. He is an OS/2 Guru,
and if you run OS/2, they are worth grabbing. The rest of the files are all
being used by me, and are top quality software everyone runnning OS/2 should
have, or give an in-depth look-see. You'll find a list and description of
some of my favorite OS/2 files and can down load those you find
interesting."

Having a bit of trouble with the truth, are we Jack?

Chuckle, that was written when I still had an OPUS BBS running on
Fidonet, yes, last century. You still have no clue, and just keep
digging deeper into that dark abyss between your legs. Give your dumb
ass buddy Upscale a kiss whilst up there...

--
Jack
http://jbstein.com

"Jack Stein" wrote

You still have no clue, and just keep
digging deeper into that dark abyss between your legs. Give your dumb
ass buddy Upscale a kiss whilst up there...

Imagewise, Jack, you really need to come up with another insult ... one that
makes your anal fixation problem publicly less obvious.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 3/8/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

Swingman wrote:

"Jack Stein" wrote

You still have no clue, and just keep
digging deeper into that dark abyss between your legs. Give your dumb
ass buddy Upscale a kiss whilst up there...

Imagewise, Jack, you really need to come up with another insult ... one that
makes your anal fixation problem publicly less obvious.

You provide the imagery, I'm just exploiting it!

--
Jack
http://jbstein.com

"Jack Stein" wrote

Swingman wrote:

"Jack Stein" wrote

You still have no clue, and just keep
digging deeper into that dark abyss between your legs. Give your dumb
ass buddy Upscale a kiss whilst up there...

Imagewise, Jack, you really need to come up with another insult ... one
that
makes your anal fixation problem publicly less obvious.

You provide the imagery, I'm just exploiting it!

LOL ... "Imagery", by definition, is a product of imagination, Jack, and in
the case of the anally fixated insults you introduced into this thread, that
comes _solely_ from _yours_.

Wanna try again?

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 3/8/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

"Upscale" wrote

As usual, you're confusing your words. It's your fixation on assholes
that's
evident.

Gee, I wished you hadn't put it quite like that!!

Even a Jack Stein will be able to come up with a comeback to that!

Oh well ... it was fun while it lasted. G

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 3/8/08
KarlC@ (the obvious)

"Jack Stein" wrote in message

Imagewise, Jack, you really need to come up with another insult ... one
that
makes your anal fixation problem publicly less obvious.

You provide the imagery, I'm just exploiting it!

As usual, you're confusing your words. It's your fixation on assholes that's
evident. "Exploiting" is 'what' you obviously want to do. Sorry, but you're
going to have to look elsewhere. The only thing you could exploit here is a
wooden dowel.

Upscale wrote:

As usual, you're confusing your words. It's your fixation on assholes that's
evident.

Yes, who would have thought OS assholes would expose themselves on a
woodwork imagery group?

--
Jack
http://jbstein.com

Swingman wrote:

LOL ... "Imagery", by definition, is a product of imagination, Jack, and in
the case of the anally fixated insults you introduced into this thread, that
comes _solely_ from _yours_.

Wanna try again?

Nah, I had it right the first time!

--
Jack
http://jbstein.com

"Swingman" wrote in message
Gee, I wished you hadn't put it quite like that!!

Even a Jack Stein will be able to come up with a comeback to that!

Yeah, but it will be the same topic. It's evident he can't think of anything
else.