Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodturning (rec.crafts.woodturning) To discuss tools, techniques, styles, materials, shows and competitions, education and educational materials related to woodturning. All skill levels are welcome, from art turners to production turners, beginners to masters. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
roughing gouge disclaimer in Craft supplies new catalog
Hi Group,
I just got Craft Supplies new catalog and noticed they have added a disclaimer note for every roughing gouge they sell. The note states that roughing gouges should not be used for bowls. Does any one know if this was generated by a lawsuit or customer complaints? I know some here use roughing gouges for bowls, what are your opinions of Craft Supplies new policy. Tony Manella ndd1"at"prolog.net (remove "at") http://home.ptd.net/~ndd1/ Lehigh Valley Woodturners http://www.lehighvalleywoodturners.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
I say with the oncoming Veep, they're covering their six.
There used to be a saying that nothing is foolproof, because there's always a bigger fool somewhere. If you misuse a tool, you can find yourself eating it. If you don't understand the physics, you'd better be prepared for the consequences. My lawn mower had a disclaimer that it was not to be gripped, elevated, and used as a hedge clipper. The manuals on new tools are about 50/50 warnings and instruction lately. "Tony Manella" ndd1 at prolog.net wrote in message ... Hi Group, I just got Craft Supplies new catalog and noticed they have added a disclaimer note for every roughing gouge they sell. The note states that roughing gouges should not be used for bowls. Does any one know if this was generated by a lawsuit or customer complaints? I know some here use roughing gouges for bowls, what are your opinions of Craft Supplies new policy. Tony Manella ndd1"at"prolog.net (remove "at") http://home.ptd.net/~ndd1/ Lehigh Valley Woodturners http://www.lehighvalleywoodturners.com/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"George" wrote: (clip) The manuals on new tools are about 50/50 warnings and instruction lately.(clip) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ My cable come-along came with a warning that it is not to be used for lifting. Yeah, right! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Leo Lichtman" wrote:
"George" wrote: (clip) The manuals on new tools are about 50/50 warnings and instruction lately.(clip) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ My cable come-along came with a warning that it is not to be used for lifting. Yeah, right! When food says 'not for human consumption', then you worry. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
When food says 'not for human consumption', then you worry.
I worry now when I read the contents from the label. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Rubenstein" wrote in message
. net... snip Now, another idea about lining up all the lawyers against a wall -- that one is for later. I read something some ago which advocated rounding up all the good laywers and placing them on ships in the North Sea. Then you shoot every other lawyer left. Then you sink the ships... Just a thought, Frank --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 27/10/2004 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
If there are any lawyers in this newsgroup, I am sure they are good lawyers,
and good people. Maybe we should consider their feelings. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Leo:
I thought of that. That is why I didn't complete the thought. Bill In article , says... If there are any lawyers in this newsgroup, I am sure they are good lawyers, and good people. Maybe we should consider their feelings. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
It may not be the lawyers so much as the people who hire
them...............Barry "Leo Lichtman" wrote in message ... If there are any lawyers in this newsgroup, I am sure they are good lawyers, and good people. Maybe we should consider their feelings. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 00:46:51 GMT, "Leo Lichtman"
wrote: If there are any lawyers in this newsgroup, I am sure they are good lawyers, and good people. Maybe we should consider their feelings. Tell me about it.... My wife started law school in August... I have less than 4 years to re-learn my feelings about attorneys... Why don't sharks eat attorneys? Professional courtesy... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Frankly, I believe that we should not print warnings such as: "don't use
this hair drier in the shower". Omitting warning about such potential hazards can accomplish nothing but improve the human gene pool -- Pennsylvania recently removed the requirement for motorcycle riders to wear a helmet. Another step to improve the gene pool. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Should solve the shortage of donated organs if they handle it right.
In another month it'll be snowmobilers here. Boy versus birch is a clear victory for birch, and a potential second chance for someone else. "Harry B. Pye" wrote in message groups.com... Frankly, I believe that we should not print warnings such as: "don't use this hair drier in the shower". Omitting warning about such potential hazards can accomplish nothing but improve the human gene pool -- Pennsylvania recently removed the requirement for motorcycle riders to wear a helmet. Another step to improve the gene pool. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Barry N. Turner wrote:
It may not be the lawyers so much as the people who hire them...............Barry Or maybe society in general for allowing the legal system get so far removed from common sense and justice. -- Derek Andrews, woodturner http://www.seafoamwoodturning.com Wedding Favors ~ Artisan Crafted Gifts ~ One-of-a-Kind Woodturning |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Well, to be serious for a moment, the pros advise against using a roughing
gouge for bowls.That's what bowl gouges are for. The roughing gouge has an aggressive business end and a small tang that can bend or even break. Craft Supplies probably hired a lawyer who found that out and sought to avoid a potential law suit. Also, it's not bad advice. Then there are 99 percent of lawyers who give the rest a bad reputation! Joe Keeler |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Rubenstein wrote in message .net...
Frankly, I believe that we should not print warnings such as: "don't use this hair drier in the shower". Omitting warning about such potential hazards can accomplish nothing but improve the human gene pool -- Bill Mr. Rubenstein, I attempted to turn my Stubby into a mechanical bull by mounting a severely out of balance piece of wood and a saddle between centers. It seemed like a good idea. I put some old pillows on the floor,drank a sixer of the cheapest beer they had at the Kwik-Chek and put on my ten gallon hat. Due to the absence of a speed indicator on the lathe I must have chosen a very high speed and was quickly thrown from the beast. I'm sure I will never walk the same again. What do you and Omega Tools intend to do to remedy this situation? Be aware I have studied a little law. Alex Lifeson would still be incarcerated were it not for my efforts. I'm a genius. God Bless, Al Kyder |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The roughing gouge has an aggressive business end and
a small tang that can bend or even break I notice Lee Valley now has a roughing gouge with a heavy duty round tang. It looks like a beauty. -mike paulson, fort collins, co |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Likely there's no one answer when Dale Nish and many here find little
use for a roughing gouge, while Soren Berger and a lot of us find several uses for the tool. BTW, is it still a skew when the edge is not askew? My bi-bevelled skews and parting tools often have sharper edges than my gouges and bedans because two bevels are ground or honed. It's difficult for me not to round over the edge on the flat side opposite the bevel of a gouge. Turn to Safety, Arch Fortiter, http://community.webtv.net/almcc/MacsMusings |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Doesn't matter what size the tang as long as you keep leverage on your side
of the rest. It's the small percentage of turners who muck things up by not thinking who make the loudest noise. "Mike Paulson" wrote in message ... The roughing gouge has an aggressive business end and a small tang that can bend or even break I notice Lee Valley now has a roughing gouge with a heavy duty round tang. It looks like a beauty. -mike paulson, fort collins, co |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:35:53 +0100, "Frank McVey"
wrote: "Bill Rubenstein" wrote in message .net... snip Now, another idea about lining up all the lawyers against a wall -- that one is for later. I read something some ago which advocated rounding up all the good laywers and placing them on ships in the North Sea. "...ships...?" I think a couple of kayaks would probably do the trick. -- Chuck *#:^) chaz3913(AT)yahoo(DOT)com Anti-spam sig: please remove "NO SPAM" from e-mail address to reply. September 11, 2001 - Never Forget ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
I think that Missouri has done the same thing. Some people don't want anybody to tell them
what or what not to do regardless of the how stupid the thing they want to do is. I have no problem with helmet-less motorcycle riders as long as I don't end up paying to keep them in a vegetative state for years and years after they have a brush with a truck or concrete. Maybe the law should be that if they don't wear a helmet they must drive at least 60 mph. That way their chance of survival would be almost nill. If you use a roughing gouge on a bowl you must turn at 3000 rpm or higher. I have a friend who owns a bunch of cars including a mid-70s Porsche 911. He loves driving fast -- I remember slowing down to 125 to pass a car on a county road. He sold his motorcycle after one too many scares. Bill In article ps.com, says... Frankly, I believe that we should not print warnings such as: "don't use this hair drier in the shower". Omitting warning about such potential hazards can accomplish nothing but improve the human gene pool -- Pennsylvania recently removed the requirement for motorcycle riders to wear a helmet. Another step to improve the gene pool. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Helmet and seat belt laws aren't for the safety of the suicidally
"free", they're for the safety of other people who are on the same piece of concrete with them. A helmet-less motorcyclist who hits a bird or even a large bug at 60-80 MPH becomes a missile on the same road with my wife and kids. Ditto seat belts, a pickup with bench seats and no seat belt becomes a 2-4,000 pound unguided missile in the event of a panic lane change or bad blowout because the driver may inadvertently move into the "passenger" category rather abruptly. This is first-hand experience talking. I was lucky and didn't kill myself or anyone else. Mike On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:12:25 GMT, Bill Rubenstein wrote: I think that Missouri has done the same thing. Some people don't want anybody to tell them what or what not to do regardless of the how stupid the thing they want to do is. I have no problem with helmet-less motorcycle riders as long as I don't end up paying to keep them in a vegetative state for years and years after they have a brush with a truck or concrete. Maybe the law should be that if they don't wear a helmet they must drive at least 60 mph. That way their chance of survival would be almost nill. If you use a roughing gouge on a bowl you must turn at 3000 rpm or higher. I have a friend who owns a bunch of cars including a mid-70s Porsche 911. He loves driving fast -- I remember slowing down to 125 to pass a car on a county road. He sold his motorcycle after one too many scares. Bill In article ps.com, says... Frankly, I believe that we should not print warnings such as: "don't use this hair drier in the shower". Omitting warning about such potential hazards can accomplish nothing but improve the human gene pool -- Pennsylvania recently removed the requirement for motorcycle riders to wear a helmet. Another step to improve the gene pool. Mike Patterson Please remove the spamtrap to email me. "I always wanted to be somebody...I should have been more specific..." - Lily Tomlin |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Likely there's no one answer when Dale Nish and many here find little
use for a roughing gouge, while Soren Berger and a lot of us find several uses for the tool. Arch, I love my roughing gouge. A couple quick passes with the Wolverine jig and it is ready. I've been turning a lot of pens for the Freedom Pen Project and the roughing gouge gets the pen blanks 'in the ball park' really quickly. And rolled over and with the handle pushed to one side it cuts almost as smoothly as the skew. My bi-bevelled skews and parting tools often have sharper edges than my gouges and bedans because two bevels are ground or honed. It's difficult for me not to round over the edge on the flat side opposite the bevel of a gouge. My skews are probably sharper too. I usually do them by hand. I have the Oneway skew attachment for my Wolverine system but have better results cleaning up the edges of my skew by hand on a stone. I take my gouge from the wheel to the lathe. It doesn't pay to 'over think' some of these things! Harry |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
We are way O T here and it is my fault, I think. But...
My idea to clean up politics... You are disqualified from being in politics if... 1) you are a lawyer 2) you are not neutered Bill ....snip Let's have a law that no judge can now be, or ever have been a lawyer or ever taken any law courses. ....snip |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What model is Sioux pneumatic sander sold by Craft Supplies? | Woodturning | |||
Pen Turning Initial Shopping List | Woodworking | |||
Draft review of P&N tools | Woodturning | |||
Roughing gouge for bowl blanks? | Woodturning | |||
Roughing Gouges - Poorly Designed? | Woodturning |