Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodturning (rec.crafts.woodturning) To discuss tools, techniques, styles, materials, shows and competitions, education and educational materials related to woodturning. All skill levels are welcome, from art turners to production turners, beginners to masters. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I get more into turning I see works that baffle me.
Not because of their complexity, or the perceived difficulty in turning such things, but because of the apparent waste of time and a misuse of the medium and the method - turning. I'm probably going to step in it big time but - Why go to all the trouble of precisely cutting a bunch of pieces of several different kinds of wood, glue them together and then turn them to look like a ceramic piece whose patterns are created with glazes when glazed ceramic does it so much better? The thing that makes turned wood different is the grain and color of the wood and the finish(es) it will take. But most segmented turnings I've seen don't add these characteristics of wood to the piece because the individual pieces are so small. I can see doing laminates and segmented stuff for the handle of a pool cue, but a pot or vase? Why take a piece of wood and turn it into a cowboy hat? The medium doesn't lend itself to this application. The wood doesn't add anything to the form. So why turn a cowboy hat? I wonder about the beautiful turned form, with the spikes and knobs somehow added. Why, when other mediums lend themselves to this type of thing so much better - and easier? These things seem to me to be misuses of the medium. With all the things one can created with wood, a lathe, some tools, hard earned skills and techniques, why put them to these uses? I can understand turning forms that could be created in other ways, but are done quicker and easier on a lathe, out of wood. And the wood can add to the form to make a more interesting/pleasing object. I can understand turning a hollow form so thin that it becomes translucent. That can really show off the wonderousness of some woods. The longevity of the piece I question - but this type of thing is pretty and fun to look at and examine. I guess it's a Sir Edmund Hilary thing, a version of "Because it's there" - in this case "Because I can." When I was a teacher, I made it a point to repeatedly say "There's no such thing as a dumb question. If you want to know/understand something, have tried to find the answer and haven't found the answer - you won't be asking a dumb question.". In that spirit I ask "Why segmented bowls? Why turned wooden cowboy hats? " charlie b an admirer of woods and the people who use it well |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(Q) Practice segmented turning with SYP | Woodturning | |||
First segmented turning | Woodturning | |||
Concrete blocks: medium density or aerated type? | UK diy | |||
Segmented Bowl Glue Line Creep | Woodturning |