Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Parabolic shape for reflector
I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of
parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Thanks (I am aware of the professionally priced reflectors from Sweden.) -- M Stewart Milton Keynes, UK http://www.megalith.freeserve.co.uk/oddimage.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Malcolm Stewart wrote:
I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Old (solid) satellite dish. For 7Khz song, you need surface accuracy of 1/4 * 340m/s /7000Hz = 1.25cm. One way of cheating is to take a strip of plywood. Now, form it into a curve. Yes, it's flat, but as long as it's only a small strip, it can fairly well approximate a strip of a parabola. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Ian
Stirling writes Malcolm Stewart wrote: I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Old (solid) satellite dish. There are some plastic lightweight transparent dishes around., Have a Google for them.... -- Tony Sayer |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Malcolm Stewart
writes I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Thanks (I am aware of the professionally priced reflectors from Sweden.) I'm sure I've seen el cheapo ones somewhere, maybe maplin -- geoff |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Malcolm Stewart" wrote in message ... I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. I had ideas about this years ago and considered taking a papier mache mould of the round end of a spacehopper. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In message , OG
writes "Malcolm Stewart" wrote in message ... I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. I had ideas about this years ago and considered taking a papier mache mould of the round end of a spacehopper. Not a parabola though, is it -- geoff |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"raden" wrote in message ... In message , OG writes I had ideas about this years ago and considered taking a papier mache mould of the round end of a spacehopper. Not a parabola though, is it True, but I'm not sure how important it is for sound. Spherical Aberration is a problem for optical systems were the reflected wavefront has to have pixel sharp focus; but so long as all (or most of) the sound falls on the front of the microphone you won't lose much information. I'm happy to be corrected though. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"OG" wrote in message ... "raden" wrote in message ... In message , OG writes I had ideas about this years ago and considered taking a papier mache mould of the round end of a spacehopper. Not a parabola though, is it True, but I'm not sure how important it is for sound. Spherical Aberration is a problem for optical systems were the reflected wavefront has to have pixel sharp focus; but so long as all (or most of) the sound falls on the front of the microphone you won't lose much information. I'm happy to be corrected though. Spherical aberration doesn't apply to a parabola. Spherical aberrations is normally associated with a crude simple lens where the focal point depends on its distance from the optic axis. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In message , OG
writes "raden" wrote in message ... In message , OG writes I had ideas about this years ago and considered taking a papier mache mould of the round end of a spacehopper. Not a parabola though, is it True, but I'm not sure how important it is for sound. Spherical Aberration is a problem for optical systems were the reflected wavefront has to have pixel sharp focus; but so long as all (or most of) the sound falls on the front of the microphone you won't lose much information. I'm happy to be corrected though. A parabola will take parallel (which anything from any reasonable distance approximates to) waves and focus them on a single point at the locus - which is where you stick the microphone A trepanned sphere (I can't remember the correct term offhand either) won't focus on a point which is important if you have a small microphone -- geoff |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 23:59:21 -0000, "Malcolm Stewart"
babbled like a waterfall and said: I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Thanks (I am aware of the professionally priced reflectors from Sweden.) Blow up a balloon. Coat it with wax polish and then cover a suitable end in glass fibre to the shape you require. They are better if you also have a tube on the front to prevent side noise. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Malcolm Stewart wrote:
I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Thanks (I am aware of the professionally priced reflectors from Sweden.) What I would do is glue chunks of blue foam together, then make a parabilic shaped template, and use a wire brush and maybe spinnin the lot and sand a parabola on that. You can then lay upo a fibergallss one obver teh top, nd when set, rip the foam away and use acetone to clen it all off. Voila! a parbolic reflctor. Or just nick someones sky dish instead. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Malcolm Stewart wrote:
I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. How about printing yourself a parabola on a graph (using excel or something), use that to cut some templates from ply which you then assemble into a star pattern. Finally lay it up with firbreglass tissue and resin.... -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Malcolm Stewart" wrote in message ... I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Be aware that most satellite dishes are offset and the dish axis doesn't point directly at the satellite. Given a dish (eg Sky) which is nominally vertical and the satellite is at approx 36 deg. elevation or so (from London) the offset is 36 deg and the LNB is 36 deg below the dish parabolic axis. Dishes which are true parabolic have the LNB on the central axis usually on a tripod arrangement and the dish is pointed up directly at the satellite. john |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"John" wrote in message ... "Malcolm Stewart" wrote in message ... I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Be aware that most satellite dishes are offset and the dish axis doesn't point directly at the satellite. Given a dish (eg Sky) which is nominally vertical and the satellite is at approx 36 deg. elevation or so (from London) the offset is 36 deg and the LNB is 36 deg below the dish parabolic axis. Dishes which are true parabolic have the LNB on the central axis usually on a tripod arrangement and the dish is pointed up directly at the satellite. john Anybody want to buy a 1.8m centre lnb dish on a tripod mount? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:21:31 +0000 (UTC), "John"
wrote: Anybody want to buy a 1.8m centre lnb dish on a tripod mount? I think he was wondering about how to listen to tweeting noises at the end of his garden, not the lower crested twit on the surface of Mars Andrew |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Andrew McKay wrote: Anybody want to buy a 1.8m centre lnb dish on a tripod mount? I think he was wondering about how to listen to tweeting noises at the end of his garden, not the lower crested twit on the surface of Mars The one I used for ball being kicked FX at Wembley was IIRC about 2 metres in diameter. -- *If a mute swears, does his mother wash his hands with soap? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
In message , Andrew McKay
writes On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:21:31 +0000 (UTC), "John" wrote: Anybody want to buy a 1.8m centre lnb dish on a tripod mount? I think he was wondering about how to listen to tweeting noises at the end of his garden, not the lower crested twit on the surface of Mars Earth calling Beagle II, Earth calling beagle II ... -- geoff |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 22:37:32 GMT, raden wrote:
Earth calling Beagle II, Earth calling beagle II ... I tried selling Beagle II on ebay with an instruction "buyer must collect". Didn't get any takers for some reason Andrew |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
In message , John
writes "John" wrote in message ... "Malcolm Stewart" wrote in message ... I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Be aware that most satellite dishes are offset and the dish axis doesn't point directly at the satellite. Given a dish (eg Sky) which is nominally vertical and the satellite is at approx 36 deg. elevation or so (from London) the offset is 36 deg and the LNB is 36 deg below the dish parabolic axis. Dishes which are true parabolic have the LNB on the central axis usually on a tripod arrangement and the dish is pointed up directly at the satellite. john Anybody want to buy a 1.8m centre lnb dish on a tripod mount? Put it in an envelope and post it down ... Put it aside in the pigsty for me -- geoff |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 23:59:21 -0000, Malcolm Stewart wrote:
I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Thanks (I am aware of the professionally priced reflectors from Sweden.) Not a domestic item but ... http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...m=75020720 78 |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
How about a Wok
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:31:30 +0000 (UTC), Alex wrote:
How about a Wok Mine's more a section of a sphere (must be a name for that) raher than a parabola. The particular property of a parabola he needs to exploit is that there's a point of focus. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
nog wrote in
: How about a Wok on the wild side? mike |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
On 20 Mar 2005 10:13:52 GMT, mike ring wrote:
nog wrote in : How about a Wok on the wild side? You haven't quoted anything of what I said - you're actually responding to Alex's posting. Not such a big deal in this instance but it's not hard to envisage cases where it could lead to serious misunderstandings. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
"Alex" wrote in message ... How about a Wok That is not a bad idea at all. I have seen really big woks for sale at Wing Yips Chinese super markets. I estimate the largest available in store are about a metre in diameter. They are pretty deep though probably not a true parabola I am sure they would concentrate the sound and cut out unwanted noise quite well. Unfortunately the largest ones they sell on line are only 14" dia. So give them a call to find out the sizes and prices. I was not looking for a big wok when I saw them so I did not note the prices but they were remarkably cheap. IFIRC about £35 for the really big ones. At the worst you could use one at a large scale barbeque ! They are definitely bigger than the domed BBQ cooking kettles that I have seen and are a lot less expensive. Happy recording and/or stir-fries :-) Richard. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Malcolm Stewart wrote: I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. How about a big torch, the sort that takes a lantern battery? Enough room in there also to do a small battery powered preamplifier. -- Tony Williams. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Tony Williams wrote:
How about a big torch, the sort that takes a lantern battery? Enough room in there also to do a small battery powered preamplifier. Similar idea was suggested in an issue of Everyday Electronics, many years ago...or was that the infrared torch link? Was a long time ago Lee -- Email address is valid, but is unlikely to be read. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Malcolm Stewart wrote: I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Currently, I'm having difficulty thinking of domestic items which I could cannibalise for their parabolic shape. Any ideas would be welcome. Best I've thought of so far is an old radiant heater with the cylindrical heating element at the centre of a spun reflector. Don't think metal is a good idea - too much 'ring' to it. Glass fibre would be my choice. As others have said, an old satellite dish of the large type you plonked in the garden? IMHO, you'll need something larger than a metre or so for decent results. -- *A hangover is the wrath of grapes. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:11:57 +0000 (GMT), Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
IMHO, you'll need something larger than a metre or so for decent results. Depends how much MF and LF response he wants... there is a relationship between dish diameter and the lowest frequency that it will focus effectively. They do have a lot of "suck" and directivity though at the expense of frequency response. Do a UK google search on "sound mirrors" for real parabs... Last time I rigged a parab was at Headingly on a test match to get the whack of leather on willow, there where also mics buried in the pitch and cabled back, these had to be delayed. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
In article om,
Dave Liquorice wrote: IMHO, you'll need something larger than a metre or so for decent results. Depends how much MF and LF response he wants... there is a relationship between dish diameter and the lowest frequency that it will focus effectively. They do have a lot of "suck" and directivity though at the expense of frequency response. Yes. I'm not sure they're exactly of the best quality, as the ones I've seen tend to have been used with any old mic that was lying around. Last time I rigged a parab was at Headingly on a test match to get the whack of leather on willow, there where also mics buried in the pitch and cabled back, these had to be delayed. Yet another problem to add to digital this and that. But I suppose at least that parab would have been fixed since the balls are hit only on one axis? -- *Reality? Is that where the pizza delivery guy comes from? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
In article om, Dave
Liquorice writes On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:11:57 +0000 (GMT), Dave Plowman (News) wrote: IMHO, you'll need something larger than a metre or so for decent results. Depends how much MF and LF response he wants... there is a relationship between dish diameter and the lowest frequency that it will focus effectively. They do have a lot of "suck" and directivity though at the expense of frequency response. Do a UK google search on "sound mirrors" for real parabs... Last time I rigged a parab was at Headingly on a test match to get the whack of leather on willow, there where also mics buried in the pitch and cabled back, these had to be delayed. He's only after birds song and I don't suppose they do Baritone and Bass) -- Tony Sayer |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Don't think metal is a good idea - too much 'ring' to it
In the 1960's Granpian used to sell a parab spun from aluminium. It was about 2 feet in diameter and was very widely used before rifle mics became commonplace. In fact a parab is a particularly good solution under certain circumstances. A rifle mic works by cancelling out the off-axis sound, while a parab works by magnifying the wanted sound. However it isn't directional at all frequencies, but if you're wanting to record s quietish high frequency sound, such as bird song, the parab has much to recommend it. I can remember some articles about the theory, construction and usage of parabs published in 'Wireless World' around 1970, a reference library might have copies on file. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
Roly wrote: Don't think metal is a good idea - too much 'ring' to it In the 1960's Granpian used to sell a parab spun from aluminium. It was about 2 feet in diameter and was very widely used before rifle mics became commonplace. Yes. But I'd not want to use one for quality recording. -- *Born free...Taxed to death. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Plowman said
Yes. But I'd not want to use one for quality recording. But the fact remains that for many years they were pretty well the only option available and some extremely good recordings, particularly of birdsong, have been made with them. These days I own a number of rifle mics made by Sennheiser, AKG and Neumann, but there are occasions when I still wish that I had kept my old Grampian parab to try under unusual circumstances. I owned a Grampian one and then when I joined the BBC in the 1960's I noticed them at Kendal Avenue and also at Ealing. They were certainly in KA until the late 1070s. Admittedly KA also favoured much bigger parabs converted from 4 foot ( metal ) radar dishes which were lined with Sorbo rubber foam on the reverse, to deaden any ringing. The size of a parab governs the lowest frequency which it offers gain. The amount of gain is governed by the size and the geometry. Anything from 2 feet upwards will work well on birdsong and similar sounds which have minimal low to mid frequency content. The bass response will be that of the microphone used to pick up the sound. As the wanted sound is being magnified by the parab, there will be less need to boost the gain of the microphone, so the lower gain will also mean that unwanted sound ( most likely traffic noise ) will be at a lower level in the first place and there will be less of a need to filter it. Gary Cavie refers to a Gatlin mic made from varying lengths of tubing. I wouldn't bother with 1" tubing. Imagine the diameter of a bundle of 36x 1" tubes and then imagine how you might couple a microphone to them. Many years ago I used to use a commercial microphone of that type. It was made by Electrovoice and was about 7 feet long ( it broke into two parts for less inconvenient travel than would otherwise have been the case ). From memory, I would guess that the tubes were thin walled brass of about 1/4" diameter. The whole thing had to be mounted on a sturdy U shaped yoke in order to operate it. To call it an unwieldy microphone is to be polite about it and I was glad to see it pass, although it retained it's directionality to a much lower frequency than rifle mics of the time did. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
Roly wrote: Gary Cavie refers to a Gatlin mic made from varying lengths of tubing. I wouldn't bother with 1" tubing. Imagine the diameter of a bundle of 36x 1" tubes and then imagine how you might couple a microphone to them. Many years ago I used to use a commercial microphone of that type. It was made by Electrovoice and was about 7 feet long ( it broke into two parts for less inconvenient travel than would otherwise have been the case ). From memory, I would guess that the tubes were thin walled brass of about 1/4" diameter. The whole thing had to be mounted on a sturdy U shaped yoke in order to operate it. I well remember a trial of that mic in TV Theatre. Something that could pick up - say - tap dancing, while keeping well out of shot, would have been useful. But it just didn't work. It required so much gain to get any useful level that the end result was noisy. And so much bass cut that it sounded like a telephone, because without that it was omni-directional at high bass frequencies. The first practical rifle mic IMHO was the Sennheiser 805. Which provided the gain makeup through clever internal electronics. -- *Everyone has a photographic memory. Some don't have film * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 23:59:21 -0000, "Malcolm Stewart"
wrote: I'd like to try recording birdsong using a microphone at the focus of parabolic reflector. Some good suggestions have been made in this thread. However, have you thought about putting the microphone close to where the birdies are tweeting? You could run an extension cable for the microphone etc. Or maybe set up a tiny radio microphone like this one: http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...14955 08&rd=1 My knowledge of parabolic reflectors is very limited, but I thought the general idea was to focus everything coming in from one specific direction into a focal point (where your microphone would be). So wouldn't it be the case that if the birdies weren't in line with wherever the parabola is pointing then their enthusiastic singing would be missed, or at best subdued? Andrew |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Andrew McKay wrote: My knowledge of parabolic reflectors is very limited, but I thought the general idea was to focus everything coming in from one specific direction into a focal point (where your microphone would be). So wouldn't it be the case that if the birdies weren't in line with wherever the parabola is pointing then their enthusiastic singing would be missed, or at best subdued? If you just wanted general bird song, then any mic would do. But if trying for one specific bird - and not getting close enough to scare it off - parabola is a very good way of doing it. You listen to the output of the mic and point it to get best results. The beauty of a parabola is it adds gain and directionality to the chosen mic 'for free'. Rifle type mics work by rejecting unwanted sounds so sort of lose gain. Of course a rifle mic is easy to carry and handle - not so a large parabola. Last time I actually used a parabola was on a cup final at Wembley (mutter) years ago. The idea was to get close up sound of the ball being kicked - from the top of the grandstand.;-) Worked much better than rifle mics on the touchline. Must have been about the most boring job ever - panning it around after that ball. -- *If at first you don't succeed, avoid skydiving.* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:29:59 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote: Must have been about the most boring job ever - panning it around after that ball. In this day and age you'd think they'd put a little something into the ball so that it was self-tracking. Alternatively, pass a bung to all the other players to ensure they give the ball to Michael Owen. That way it won't be going anywhere Andrew |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Andrew McKay wrote: Must have been about the most boring job ever - panning it around after that ball. In this day and age you'd think they'd put a little something into the ball so that it was self-tracking. Wasn't this day and age, though. ;-) -- *Why doesn't Tarzan have a beard? * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
In message , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes In article , Andrew McKay wrote: My knowledge of parabolic reflectors is very limited, but I thought the general idea was to focus everything coming in from one specific direction into a focal point (where your microphone would be). So wouldn't it be the case that if the birdies weren't in line with wherever the parabola is pointing then their enthusiastic singing would be missed, or at best subdued? If you just wanted general bird song, then any mic would do. But if trying for one specific bird - and not getting close enough to scare it off - parabola is a very good way of doing it. You listen to the output of the mic and point it to get best results. Of course, you (not Dave) could always buy a bird song cassette and fake it or .... Contact the RSPB in Sandy Beds and ask them for suggestions -- geoff |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Shape for a pressure washer fan nozzle | Metalworking | |||
When to shape and when to route? | Woodworking | |||
Clean Cutting og Shape From 1/2" Plate? | Metalworking | |||
Identify logo - hysteresis shape? | Electronics Repair | |||
sphere shape supplier wanted | Woodturning |