"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 06 May 2021 00:18:29 +0100, TMS320 wrote:

On 05/05/2021 19:35, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 04 May 2021 03:01:29 +0100, rbowman wrote:

On 05/03/2021 10:13 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Is it to warn you? Even my toilet cistern can slow down smoothly.

On cars? Yes. Cutting the engine abruptly when you hit the red line
wouldn't be good so they simulate ignition breakup to give you a hint.

But at that point you've already gone over the peak of the power curve.
I'd just make it drop the curve more quickly so it can never go too
fast. The driver would still feel the lack of power.

Engines that run stochiometric have to be all or nothing. Diesel are
smoothly limited. It ought to be possible to smooth limit stratified
petrol but I don't know from experience because mine just shifts up and
keeps going.

It must be possible, all it has to do is what you would do if you wanted
to hold it there - adjust how far you press the accelerator. I guess that
gets more expensive as it would have to have a bit of intelligence to
monitor how much it had throttled it. But aren't most modern cars already
throttle controlled through a circuit board?

Still easier to just cut the sparks instead of tweaking whats injected.

And easier to indicate to the driver that the system is limiting
the revs in a way that only a technoklutz could ignore.


And you havent fixed the uk.diy in this thread.

On Fri, 7 May 2021 03:40:32 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots,
Birdbrain and Rodent Speed:

Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring."

Senile Rodent: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring."

Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first."

Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth."

Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths."

Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them."

Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws."

Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see."

Message-ID:

On 7/05/21 6:26 am, Peeler wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2021 03:40:32 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

Peeler also has a well-developed dermal capillary network that supplies
the skin with oxygen when he is buried in anoxic mud, as well as a high
tolerance for both hypoxia and anoxia, with a well developed anaerobic
metabolism.

On Fri, 7 May 2021 10:58:26 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay little
masochist, blabbered again:

On Fri, 7 May 2021 03:40:32 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

Peeler also has a well-developed dermal capillary network that supplies
the skin with oxygen when he is buried in anoxic mud, as well as a high
tolerance for both hypoxia and anoxia, with a well developed anaerobic
metabolism.

LOL Poor demented gay cyclist!

On 7/05/21 8:16 pm, Peeler wrote:
On Fri, 7 May 2021 10:58:26 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay little
masochist, blabbered again:

On Fri, 7 May 2021 03:40:32 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

Peeler also has a well-developed dermal capillary network that supplies
the skin with oxygen when he is buried in anoxic mud, as well as a high
tolerance for both hypoxia and anoxia, with a well developed anaerobic
metabolism.

LOL Poor demented gay cyclist!


Peeler's eyes lack lenses, extraocular muscles, and the three motor
cranial nerves (III, IV, and VI) found in more complex vertebrates.

Peeler also has a well-developed dermal capillary network that supplies
the skin with oxygen when he is buried in anoxic mud, as well as a high
tolerance for both hypoxia and anoxia, with a well developed anaerobic
metabolism.

LOL Poor demented gay cyclist!


Peeler's eyes lack lenses, extraocular muscles, and the three motor
cranial nerves (III, IV, and VI) found in more complex vertebrates.

LOL Like I already said: you poor demented gay cyclist! LOL

On Thu, 06 May 2021 18:40:32 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 06 May 2021 00:18:29 +0100, TMS320 wrote:

On 05/05/2021 19:35, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 04 May 2021 03:01:29 +0100, rbowman wrote:

On 05/03/2021 10:13 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Is it to warn you? Even my toilet cistern can slow down smoothly.

On cars? Yes. Cutting the engine abruptly when you hit the red line
wouldn't be good so they simulate ignition breakup to give you a hint.

But at that point you've already gone over the peak of the power curve.
I'd just make it drop the curve more quickly so it can never go too
fast. The driver would still feel the lack of power.

Engines that run stochiometric have to be all or nothing. Diesel are
smoothly limited. It ought to be possible to smooth limit stratified
petrol but I don't know from experience because mine just shifts up and
keeps going.

It must be possible, all it has to do is what you would do if you wanted
to hold it there - adjust how far you press the accelerator. I guess that
gets more expensive as it would have to have a bit of intelligence to
monitor how much it had throttled it. But aren't most modern cars already
throttle controlled through a circuit board?

Still easier to just cut the sparks instead of tweaking whats injected.

Easier yes, but I wouldn't have thought it was drastically easier, especially since the engine is already computer monitored and controlled for a variety of other things.

And easier to indicate to the driver that the system is limiting
the revs in a way that only a technoklutz could ignore.

The driver doesn't need to know, provided it's not harmful to reach the revs it limits at.

And you havent fixed the uk.diy in this thread.

You already did it for me. Or if this is the second thread I made like that, it's because I typed it wrong again. I can't get out of that habit. and I know of no way in this newsreader to post to multiple groups without typing them in.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 06 May 2021 18:40:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 06 May 2021 00:18:29 +0100, TMS320 wrote:

On 05/05/2021 19:35, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 04 May 2021 03:01:29 +0100, rbowman
wrote:

On 05/03/2021 10:13 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Is it to warn you? Even my toilet cistern can slow down smoothly.

On cars? Yes. Cutting the engine abruptly when you hit the red line
wouldn't be good so they simulate ignition breakup to give you a
hint.

But at that point you've already gone over the peak of the power
curve.
I'd just make it drop the curve more quickly so it can never go too
fast. The driver would still feel the lack of power.

Engines that run stochiometric have to be all or nothing. Diesel are
smoothly limited. It ought to be possible to smooth limit stratified
petrol but I don't know from experience because mine just shifts up and
keeps going.

It must be possible, all it has to do is what you would do if you wanted
to hold it there - adjust how far you press the accelerator. I guess
that
gets more expensive as it would have to have a bit of intelligence to
monitor how much it had throttled it. But aren't most modern cars
already
throttle controlled through a circuit board?

Still easier to just cut the sparks instead of tweaking whats injected.

Easier yes, but I wouldn't have thought it was drastically easier,
especially since the engine is already computer monitored and controlled
for a variety of other things.

And easier to indicate to the driver that the system is limiting
the revs in a way that only a technoklutz could ignore.

The driver doesn't need to know,

They do because otherwise they will be telling mechanics
something goes wrong at the higher revs.

provided it's not harmful to reach the revs it limits at.

And you havent fixed the uk.diy in this thread.

You already did it for me.

But I cant with the others you reply to in this thread like the turnip.

Or if this is the second thread I made like that, it's because I typed it
wrong again.

Yes you did.

I can't get out of that habit.

You mostly do get it right.

and I know of no way in this newsreader to post to multiple groups without
typing them in.

Dunno. With mine you can select from a list of the
groups you have subscribed to or type it in.

On Wed, 12 May 2021 04:32:18 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots,
Birdbrain and Rodent Speed:

Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring."

Senile Rodent: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring."

Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first."

Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth."

Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths."

Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them."

Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws."

Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see."

Message-ID:

On 12/05/21 7:22 am, Peeler wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2021 04:32:18 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather


The nasal capsule is considerably expanded in Peeler, comprising a
fibrous sheath lined with cartilage rings.

On Wed, 12 May 2021 11:13:04 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather


The nasal capsule is considerably expanded in Peeler, comprising a
fibrous sheath lined with cartilage rings.

Doesn't it hurt to be as stupid as you are, you dumb gay cyclist? LOL

On 05/11/2021 11:52 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 06 May 2021 18:40:32 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 06 May 2021 00:18:29 +0100, TMS320 wrote:

On 05/05/2021 19:35, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 04 May 2021 03:01:29 +0100, rbowman
wrote:

On 05/03/2021 10:13 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Is it to warn you? Even my toilet cistern can slow down smoothly.

On cars? Yes. Cutting the engine abruptly when you hit the red line
wouldn't be good so they simulate ignition breakup to give you a
hint.

But at that point you've already gone over the peak of the power
curve.
I'd just make it drop the curve more quickly so it can never go too
fast. The driver would still feel the lack of power.

Engines that run stochiometric have to be all or nothing. Diesel are
smoothly limited. It ought to be possible to smooth limit stratified
petrol but I don't know from experience because mine just shifts up and
keeps going.

It must be possible, all it has to do is what you would do if you wanted
to hold it there - adjust how far you press the accelerator. I guess
that
gets more expensive as it would have to have a bit of intelligence to
monitor how much it had throttled it. But aren't most modern cars
already
throttle controlled through a circuit board?

Still easier to just cut the sparks instead of tweaking whats injected.

Easier yes, but I wouldn't have thought it was drastically easier,
especially since the engine is already computer monitored and controlled
for a variety of other things.

Limiters predated the widespread use of FI. While the industry has come
a long way in the past 30 years there still is a tendency to stick with
what worked in the past.

On Tue, 11 May 2021 18:58:50 -0600, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


Limiters predated the widespread use of FI. While the industry has come
a long way in the past 30 years there still is a tendency to stick with
what worked in the past.

But not as much as you stick to the unwashed trolling ******'s cock,
lowbrowwoman! G

On 12/05/21 8:29 pm, Peeler wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2021 18:58:50 -0600, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


Limiters predated the widespread use of FI. While the industry has come
a long way in the past 30 years there still is a tendency to stick with
what worked in the past.

But not as much as you stick to the unwashed trolling ******'s cock,
lowbrowwoman! G


Very little is known about Peeler's reproduction. Obtaining embryos and
observing reproductive behaviour are difficult due to the deep-sea
habitat of him.

On Wed, 12 May 2021 22:19:26 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay masochistic
little cyclist, blabbered again:


Limiters predated the widespread use of FI. While the industry has come
a long way in the past 30 years there still is a tendency to stick with
what worked in the past.

But not as much as you stick to the unwashed trolling ******'s cock,
lowbrowwoman! G


Very little is known about Peeler's reproduction. Obtaining embryos and
observing reproductive behaviour are difficult due to the deep-sea
habitat of him.

Were you born that retarded or did you practice becoming as retarded as you
are? BG