Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult
to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote:
Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. why zat ?...got me worried |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 11:04, Jimmy Stewart ... wrote:
On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. why zat ?...got me worried My thoughts too. With banks now responsible for losses through hacks I would say now is a good time. A saving account payment is likely to be required to be channelled through a current account so an additional level of protection. |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fredxx posted
On 27/02/2021 11:04, Jimmy Stewart ... wrote: On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. why zat ?...got me worried My thoughts too. With banks now responsible for losses through hacks I would say now is a good time. Banks aren't responsible for push payment frauds though, which are the most common at the moment. Nor for cloned website frauds. A saving account payment is likely to be required to be channelled through a current account so an additional level of protection. True, if you set up the savings account with the genuine provider in the first place. -- Algernon |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 14:00, Algernon Goss-Custard wrote:
Fredxx posted On 27/02/2021 11:04, Jimmy Stewart ... wrote: On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. why zat ?...got me worried My thoughts too. With banks now responsible for losses through hacks I would say now is a good time. Banks aren't responsible for push payment frauds though, which are the most common at the moment. Nor for cloned website frauds. They like to argue that, but the law is not totally in their favour on this - especially if they don't implement confirmation of payee: https://excellolaw.co.uk/excellolaw-...fraud-victims/ -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 15:18, John Rumm wrote:
On 27/02/2021 14:00, Algernon Goss-Custard wrote: Fredxx posted On 27/02/2021 11:04, Jimmy Stewart ... wrote: On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. why zat ?...got me worried My thoughts too. With banks now responsible for losses through hacks I would say now is a good time. Banks aren't responsible for push payment frauds though, which are the most common at the moment. Nor for cloned website frauds. They like to argue that, but the law is not totally in their favour on this - especially if they don't implement confirmation of payee: The cases discussed there (Quinecare and Singularis) involved in essence fraud carried out by an agent of the account holder (the latter a director of a company on the company's account). I don't think they give much comfort to the personal account holder who authorises a transfer as a result of a scam. The High Court confirmed last month that the "Quinecare duty of care" doesn't extend to the individuals. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=3eb91ee6-dedc-4d89-9393-6afe517a868b -- Robin reply-to address is (intended to be) valid |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the main issues about any on line financial services is proving who
you are. Increasingly complicated and often inaccessible ways to prove you are a human and indeed the account holder make the use so onerous that its easier over the telephone quite often. Brian -- This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please Note this Signature is meaningless.! "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 27/02/2021 11:04, Jimmy Stewart ... wrote: On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. why zat ?...got me worried My thoughts too. With banks now responsible for losses through hacks I would say now is a good time. A saving account payment is likely to be required to be channelled through a current account so an additional level of protection. |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Gaff (Sofa" wrote
One of the main issues about any on line financial services is proving who you are. Increasingly complicated and often inaccessible ways to prove you are a human and indeed the account holder Bull**** with the best fingerprint and facial recognition on your phone. make the use so onerous that its easier over the telephone quite often. Bull****. "Fredxx" wrote in message ... On 27/02/2021 11:04, Jimmy Stewart ... wrote: On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. why zat ?...got me worried My thoughts too. With banks now responsible for losses through hacks I would say now is a good time. A saving account payment is likely to be required to be channelled through a current account so an additional level of protection. |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 19:32:29 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the trolling senile pest's latest troll**** -- "Who or What is Rod Speed? Rod Speed is an entirely modern phenomenon. Essentially, Rod Speed is an insecure and worthless individual who has discovered he can enhance his own self-esteem in his own eyes by playing "the big, hard man" on the InterNet." https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/ |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/02/2021 08:32, Rod Speed wrote:
Brian Gaff (Sofa" wrote One of the main issues about any on line financial services is proving who you are. Increasingly complicated and often inaccessible ways to prove you are a human and indeed the account holder Bull**** with the best fingerprint and facial recognition on your phone. Some of us use desktops. Both of those techniques have weaknesses. Try changing your fingerprint after this: https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...-defence-firms make the use so onerous that its easier over the telephone quite often. Bull****. I have to use my phone to get a number to log into my account on a desktop. While it will be quicker than making a call if I'm wearing a headset I could still get on with things around me. |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Rod Speed" wrote in message ... Brian Gaff (Sofa" wrote One of the main issues about any on line financial services is proving who you are. Increasingly complicated and often inaccessible ways to prove you are a human and indeed the account holder Bull**** with the best fingerprint and facial recognition on your phone. and how do you prove to the financial institute that it was you who first registered their face/fingerprint on the phone? anyone could buy a phone and pretend that it belongs to me, for this purpose |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rod Speed wrote:
Bull**** with the best fingerprint and facial recognition on your phone. Why is it you think your phone is trustworthy? Especially if it's an android, given the almost universally poor update provision for them. For that matter, why is it you trust the fingerprint & facial recognition algorithms? Or, and merely as a parting shot, you understand, why is it you assume the guy who might have just nicked your phone doesn't know anyone who can help out? #Paul |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote:
Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. Why ?. If you use strong passwords and/or 2FA and you aren't using a hotmail account as part of your login I don't see what the issue is. Surely everyone now knows about these scams and is or should be suspicious of anyone phoning and claiming to be from your bank. I have a suspicion that those Santander accounts where you got an economically impossible rate of interest on your current account are the ones that the fraudsters with inside bank information preyed on. Since base rate is 0.1% and 10 year gilts are about 0.7% you might as well stick the whole lot in premium bonds until interest rates are closer to where they should be (inflation + 1%). |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 14:26, Andrew wrote:
On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. Why ?. If you use strong passwords and/or 2FA and you aren't using a hotmail account as part of your login I don't see what the issue is. Surely everyone now knows about these scams and is or should be suspicious of anyone phoning and claiming to be from your bank. I have a suspicion that those Santander accounts where you got an economically impossible rate of interest on your current account are the ones that the fraudsters with inside bank information preyed on. Since base rate is 0.1% and 10 year gilts are about 0.7% you might as well stick the whole lot in premium bonds until interest rates are closer to where they should be (inflation + 1%). I did ... can't wait 'till Monday |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew wrote:
Since base rate is 0.1% and 10 year gilts are about 0.7% you might as well stick the whole lot in premium bonds until interest rates are closer to where they should be (inflation + 1%). You might as well spend it all! :-) -- Chris Green · |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 15:47, Chris Green wrote:
Andrew wrote: Since base rate is 0.1% and 10 year gilts are about 0.7% you might as well stick the whole lot in premium bonds until interest rates are closer to where they should be (inflation + 1%). You might as well spend it all! :-) That will create inflation though, which the worry that is sending US 10Y bond yields over 1.5% and heading north since mid january. |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew wrote:
On 27/02/2021 15:47, Chris Green wrote: Andrew wrote: Since base rate is 0.1% and 10 year gilts are about 0.7% you might as well stick the whole lot in premium bonds until interest rates are closer to where they should be (inflation + 1%). You might as well spend it all! :-) That will create inflation though, which the worry that is sending US 10Y bond yields over 1.5% and heading north since mid january. 1.5% is hardly big money yet is it! -- Chris Green · |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 20:16, Chris Green wrote:
Andrew wrote: On 27/02/2021 15:47, Chris Green wrote: Andrew wrote: Since base rate is 0.1% and 10 year gilts are about 0.7% you might as well stick the whole lot in premium bonds until interest rates are closer to where they should be (inflation + 1%). You might as well spend it all! :-) That will create inflation though, which the worry that is sending US 10Y bond yields over 1.5% and heading north since mid january. 1.5% is hardly big money yet is it! It was enough to knock 20% off US tech valuations last week. What people forget is that even when building societies were offering 1,2,3 year deposits paying 7%, it was because 10-year bond yields were slightly higher, and more importantly inflation was probably about 6%. People don't notice inflation until it gets out of hand and bank base rate (which was always politically motivated) goes up. If we are heading back to a period of higher inflation then it might be better time to think about with-profits funds again, shock horror. |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew" wrote in message ... On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. Why ?. If you use strong passwords and/or 2FA and you aren't using a hotmail account as part of your login I don't see what the issue is. Surely everyone now knows about these scams and is or should be suspicious of anyone phoning and claiming to be from your bank. I have a suspicion that those Santander accounts where you got an economically impossible rate of interest on your current account are the ones that the fraudsters with inside bank information preyed on. Since base rate is 0.1% and 10 year gilts are about 0.7% you might as well stick the whole lot in premium bonds maximum 50,000! |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Towill wrote
Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. Completely effortless for me. |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 01:41:20 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** unread 01:41??? And it's trolling time for you ALREADY, you disgusting perverted senile swine and troll from Oz? -- Richard addressing senile Rodent Speed: "**** you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll." MID: |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote:
Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. Only difficult for the stupid. -- mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 16:06, alan_m wrote:
On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. Only difficult for the stupid. In which case people with learning difficulties should get extra protection. Or are you one who feels that handicapped people aren't worth bothering about? Bill |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote:
Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. The government are remarkably releuctant to issue Covid vaccine passports but have done nothing about the fact that for all practical purpose you have to own a mobile phone as banks like to use them to verify who you are. -- Michael Chare |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Chare wrote:
On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. The government are remarkably releuctant to issue Covid vaccine passports but have done nothing about the fact that for all practical purpose you have to own a mobile phone as banks like to use them to verify who you are. What is the connection between these two unrelated things? There is absolutely no need for a mobile phone to use bank 2FA, there are quite a few alternatives. -- Chris Green · |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27/02/2021 19:55, Michael Chare wrote:
On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. The government are remarkably releuctant to issue Covid vaccine passports but have done nothing about the fact that for all practical purpose you have to own a mobile phone as banks like to use them to verify who you are. Are you suggesting we should be able to pickup Covid Vaccine Passports, like you do mobile phones at phone shops using a few folding beer tokens? That's a new one! Can I get a Covid Vaccine Passport for each bank? How many would I need? |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Chare" wrote in message ... On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. The government are remarkably releuctant to issue Covid vaccine passports but have done nothing about the fact that for all practical purpose you have to own a mobile phone as banks like to use them to verify who you are. doesn't need to be a smart phone though my candy bar works perfectly well for such verification |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28/02/2021 10:42, tim... wrote:
"Michael Chare" wrote in message ... On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. The government are remarkably releuctant to issue Covid vaccine passports but have done nothing about the fact that for all practical purpose you have to own a mobile phone as banks like to use them to verify who you are. doesn't need to be a smart phone though my candy bar works perfectly well for such verification you can't beat a nokia 1100 |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , tim...
writes "Michael Chare" wrote in message ... On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them The government are remarkably releuctant to issue Covid vaccine passports but have done nothing about the fact that for all practical purpose you have to own a mobile phone as banks like to use them to verify who you are. doesn't need to be a smart phone though my candy bar works perfectly well for such verification Huh! Amazon 2 factor requires me to click a link:-( -- Tim Lamb |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Lamb" wrote in message ... In message , tim... writes "Michael Chare" wrote in message ... On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them The government are remarkably releuctant to issue Covid vaccine passports but have done nothing about the fact that for all practical purpose you have to own a mobile phone as banks like to use them to verify who you are. doesn't need to be a smart phone though my candy bar works perfectly well for such verification Huh! Amazon 2 factor requires me to click a link:-( last time I looked Amazon wasn't a bank -- Tim Lamb |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , tim...
writes "Tim Lamb" wrote in message .. . In message , tim... writes "Michael Chare" wrote in message ... On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them The government are remarkably releuctant to issue Covid vaccine passports but have done nothing about the fact that for all practical purpose you have to own a mobile phone as banks like to use them to verify who you are. doesn't need to be a smart phone though my candy bar works perfectly well for such verification Huh! Amazon 2 factor requires me to click a link:-( last time I looked Amazon wasn't a bank Indeed. Same assumption that all customers have a smart phone though. -- Tim Lamb |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tim... wrote:
"Michael Chare" wrote in message ... On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. The government are remarkably releuctant to issue Covid vaccine passports but have done nothing about the fact that for all practical purpose you have to own a mobile phone as banks like to use them to verify who you are. doesn't need to be a smart phone though my candy bar works perfectly well for such verification It can receive SMS messages, yes. But how will it verify your vaccination status? -- Chris Green · |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris Green" wrote in message ... tim... wrote: "Michael Chare" wrote in message ... On 27/02/2021 11:03, John Towill wrote: Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. The government are remarkably releuctant to issue Covid vaccine passports but have done nothing about the fact that for all practical purpose you have to own a mobile phone as banks like to use them to verify who you are. doesn't need to be a smart phone though my candy bar works perfectly well for such verification It can receive SMS messages, yes. But how will it verify your vaccination status? it wont therefore it is wrong of HMG to assume everyone has suitable phone for that, because they already have one to do online banking -- Chris Green · |
#34
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How exactly have they done that then? Brian
-- This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please Note this Signature is meaningless.! "John Towill" wrote in message ... Sad to say the scammers have won, they have made it incredibly difficult to operate a savings account on line, blast and damn them all. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|