Clean Power, No Thanks to Al Gore
By Andy Kessler, 9/20/20, Wall St. Journal

Heres a fun game. Ask an environmentalist about his top plan of action to fight climate change. Youll likely get a quick answer urging a carbon-neutral or net-zero-emission clean-energy economy, usually by 2050, echoing the Paris climate agreement. OK, now ask if hes for nuclear power, which has zero carbon emissions, at which point hell usually stare at his shoes and mumble something about high costs.

€œThe biggest problem with nuclear power,€� activist Bill McKibben of 350.org told Techonomy, is that €œits really expensive.€� Al Gore, who sounds more and more like a revivalist preacher, told Reuters last month, €œTheyve priced themselves out of the market. Electricity from nuclear power plants is by far the most expensive in the world,€� while the cost of renewables €œis continuing to go down.€�

Thats funny, because in 1994 the Clinton-Gore administration canceled research funding for the Integral Fast Reactor, which sure could have helped us down the learning curve to lower-cost carbon-free electricity today. The U.S. has constructed a tiny handful of new nuclear plants in the past four decades. Yes, the same folks who fought nuclear energy tooth and nail are now complaining that its too expensive€”like saying theyre orphans after killing their parents.

I mention all this now because earlier this month, and almost miraculously, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved the design and issued a final safety evaluation report for a Small Modular Reactor, or SMR, by NuScale based in Portland, Ore. NuScales design, funded by engineering firm Fluor and the U.S. Energy Department, joins six older federally approved designs. But its the first that looks as if it can scale and reduce costs.

In most nuclear fission reactors, uranium pellets are sealed in metal tubes known as fuel rods. These rods are submerged in water along with control rods that usually contain cadmium or boron, which absorb neutrons. When the control rods are removed, released neutrons cause a fission chain reaction, splitting atoms and releasing heat. This heats the water, which circulates through a heat exchanger with a separate water stream, producing steam to turn an electricity-generating turbine.

The NuScale reactor is smaller€”only 65 feet tall and 9 feet in diameter, with much installed below grade. It has a really small core, 1/20th the size of larger reactors, and, importantly, it comes with passive safety features. Using buoyancy, water circulates internally without pumps. Motors lift the control rods such that if electricity is lost, gravity drops them back into the core, stopping the reactor. Safety first.

Each SMR can generate 60 megawatts of power, and a dozen can be linked together at one site. Californias recent blackouts were from a shortage of 4,000 megawatts of power, so only six SMR groupings could have solved the problem, carbon free.

Because NuScale reactors are so small and modular, they can be manufactured in factories rather than custom-made on site. Hopefully that reduces costs over time. At about $3 billion, €œNuScales first plant offers a competitive overnight capital cost in comparison to large gigawatt nuclear facilities,€� CEO John Hopkins tells me about their 12-module 683-megawatt (net) plant. €œAs subsequent NuScale plants are built, our already competitive cost will continue to decrease.€� The first potential customers are utility companies in Utah with rollout beginning in the mid-2020s, though some prospective buyers have dropped out.

As for climate change, Im somewhat in the Bjørn Lomborg camp: The world is warming and that might even be man-made, but the remedies are a waste of societal wealth and wouldnt make much difference, and the money is better spent improving quality of life for earths population. So lets spend productively.

Remember, theres no energy solution without extraneous costs. Hydroelectric dams are ugly and hurt salmon. Wind turbines gore golden eagles. And utility-scale solar takes up lots of space, 5 to 10 acres per megawatt. One NuScale cluster on 30 acres replaces 11 square miles of solar panels.

NuScale is not alone. Bill Gates has reportedly invested $500 million or more in TerraPower, which started in 2006 and was hoping to build SMRs in China before Trump trade tensions put the kibosh on those plans.

No one likes nuclear bombs and nuclear accidents€”the industry needs a marketing makeover. The HBO series €œChernobyl€� was haunting but overblown. How about some rebranding? Instead of nuclear, call it carbon-free heavy metals. No? Maybe particle power? Quark spark? Anything but nukes.

Either way, this sets up a great test. Joe Biden has promised to spend $2 trillion on clean energy and €œachieve a carbon pollution-free power sector by 2035.€� If there is a Biden administration and it doesnt encourage the rollout of nuclear power, then, like Messrs. McKibben and Gore and other alarmists, thats proof theyre not really serious about climate change. So what is their agenda?

https://www.wsj.com/articles/clean-p...re-11600633749

On 26/09/2020 07:36, David P wrote:
Clean Power, No Thanks to Al Gore
By Andy Kessler, 9/20/20, Wall St. Journal


Totally US-centric view.

My greenie friends are currently up in arms as HS2 projects start to
roll out. While the "go" decision was made a few months ago, Covid does
seem to me to throw additional doubt on this whole project. The Japanese
pull-out from Wylfa doesn't seem surprising and the current government
won't support the Chinese projects. Whether there is any hope of
Rolls-Royce led small modular reactor projects getting off the ground
remains to be seen.

I really do not understand the problem with China, it has more to do with
other trade issues than it has to do with their involvement in large
projects.
Brian

--
--
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"newshound" wrote in message
o.uk...
On 26/09/2020 07:36, David P wrote:
Clean Power, No Thanks to Al Gore
By Andy Kessler, 9/20/20, Wall St. Journal


Totally US-centric view.

My greenie friends are currently up in arms as HS2 projects start to roll
out. While the "go" decision was made a few months ago, Covid does seem to
me to throw additional doubt on this whole project. The Japanese pull-out
from Wylfa doesn't seem surprising and the current government won't
support the Chinese projects. Whether there is any hope of Rolls-Royce led
small modular reactor projects getting off the ground remains to be seen.

In article ,
Brian Gaff \(Sofa\) wrote:
I really do not understand the problem with China, it has more to do
with other trade issues than it has to do with their involvement in
large projects.

I'd guess the US and us never spy on anyone. Which is why we expect China
not to do so either.

--
*Why do psychics have to ask you for your name? *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On 27/09/2020 11:09, Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote:
I really do not understand the problem with China, it has more to do with
other trade issues than it has to do with their involvement in large
projects.
Brian


The USA needs an Ogre; the Soviet Union has gone and Russia is harder to
sell as the same sort of threat.

The real problem is that in the next few decades China will overtake
America in GDP, maybe even in GDP per capita. So all possible "threats"
will be used: military power, expansionism, colonialism, trade power,
cyber security.

Meanwhile China is consolidating its power via major infrastructure
investments in Africa and Europe. Not a new game.

In article ,
newshound wrote:
On 27/09/2020 11:09, Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote:
I really do not understand the problem with China, it has more to do with
other trade issues than it has to do with their involvement in large
projects.
Brian


The USA needs an Ogre; the Soviet Union has gone and Russia is harder to
sell as the same sort of threat.

The real problem is that in the next few decades China will overtake
America in GDP, maybe even in GDP per capita. So all possible "threats"
will be used: military power, expansionism, colonialism, trade power,
cyber security.

Meanwhile China is consolidating its power via major infrastructure
investments in Africa and Europe. Not a new game.

The hotel that overlooks the pasage into Faslane naval base is Chinese
owned. I gather teh same applies to Portsmouth and amny US naval bases, too.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England
"I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle