 |
|
| UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
|
|
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 02:00:37 -0800 (PST), harry
wrote: https://www.thebrexitparty.org/read-this/#compare Yup, an awful lot at risk and so something we shouldn't rush into (especially without supermajority support). Cheers, T i m |
|
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
On 05/11/2019 10:00, harry wrote:
https://www.thebrexitparty.org/read-this/#compare It's Brexit Jim, but not as you know it. -- Colin Bignell |
|
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 11:54:03 +0000, nightjar wrote:
On 05/11/2019 10:00, harry wrote: https://www.thebrexitparty.org/read-this/#compare It's Brexit Jim, but not as you know it. Or more accurately, as any of the fanatical Brexiteers hoped / guessed it might be? They behave like 'Q', thinking what they do is good, right and in the best interest of everyone (when it's generally none of those). ;-) Cheers, T i m |
|
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
On Tue, 05 Nov 2019 02:00:37 -0800, harry wrote:
https://www.thebrexitparty.org/read-this/#compare https://www.monckton.com/whats-or-wh...johnson-draft- withdrawal-agreement-bill/ Just for a bit of context and detail. Cheers Dave R -- AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 7 Pro x64 -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
|
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
On 05/11/2019 10:00, harry wrote:
https://www.thebrexitparty.org/read-this/#compare You won, live with it! |
|
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 12:22:39 UTC, T i m wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 11:54:03 +0000, nightjar wrote: On 05/11/2019 10:00, harry wrote: https://www.thebrexitparty.org/read-this/#compare It's Brexit Jim, but not as you know it. Or more accurately, as any of the fanatical Brexiteers hoped / guessed it might be? They behave like 'Q', thinking what they do is good, right and in the best interest of everyone (when it's generally none of those). ;-) The Q isn't one person but a continuum of Qs all members of the are called Q male, or female or whatever they all refer to each other as Q. In fact the Q continuum is beyond the comprehension of humans so I wouldn't try equating it with brexit. ;-P Cheers, T i m |
|
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
In article ,
Spike wrote: Well, we've had nearly five decades to see how the EEC/EC/EU runs, and it's resulted in a significant fall in support. Given it has been the fall guy for much of the UK press during that time, not surprising. -- *Don't byte off more than you can view * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
|
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
On 05/11/2019 13:09, dennis@home wrote:
On 05/11/2019 10:00, harry wrote: https://www.thebrexitparty.org/read-this/#compare You won, live with it! Quite. You lost, live with it. Now let's move on. |
|
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
On Tue, 05 Nov 2019 13:38:14 +0000, Spike wrote:
Well, we've had nearly five decades to see how the EEC/EC/EU runs, and it's resulted in a significant fall in support. A supermajority in 1975 wasn't a requirement for staying in, but ~66 percent didn't vote to stay in in 2016, so it could be said there was a supermajority for leaving. At least, that's what the bigger picture looks like. Well, I think you make a fair point there, Spike. The BIG difference of course is we were told membership was only about a *common market* for goods and services - a proposition no rational person would reject. NOW, however, we *know* membership involves far, far, far more than that: membership of a United States of Europe - a prospect that no rational person could possibly *accept*. -- Leave first - THEN negotiate! |
|
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
OT Boris' BREXIT (Not actually Brexit)
In article ,
Cursitor Doom wrote: On Tue, 05 Nov 2019 13:38:14 +0000, Spike wrote: Well, we've had nearly five decades to see how the EEC/EC/EU runs, and it's resulted in a significant fall in support. A supermajority in 1975 wasn't a requirement for staying in, but ~66 percent didn't vote to stay in in 2016, so it could be said there was a supermajority for leaving. At least, that's what the bigger picture looks like. Well, I think you make a fair point there, Spike. The BIG difference of course is we were told membership was only about a *common market* for goods and services - a proposition no rational person would reject. NOW, however, we *know* membership involves far, far, far more than that: membership of a United States of Europe - a prospect that no rational person could possibly *accept*. We know you don't even want a United Kingdom, since you've left it. -- *Why do we say something is out of whack? What is a whack? Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
