Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/10/2019 13:51, John Rumm wrote:
On 03/10/2019 11:53, Chris B wrote: I have had 3 extra lights and a fan added to a single lighting circuit. The base circuit was installed completely new less than two years ago as part of a CU change and came with anĀ* Electrical Installation Certificate. The minor works certificate shows that the extra lights and fan have had the following effect on the particular circuit characteristics Circuit Impedance R1+R2 reduced to 0.77 Ohms from 1.31 Earth Fault Loop Impedance reduced to 0.98 from 1.62 RCD Operation Time measured at 24 ms (was 33 ms @I and 16ms @5I) I would not worry about the RCD time since its a pass in either case. These changes look quite significant to me but I would like expert opinion are they 1) Typical for what might be expected following this sort of a mod. If measuring like for like, then no. 2) Typical variation between test meters as two different electricians were involved. Possibly. 3) Some combination of 1&2 4) A fault in the installation which requires further investigation Unlikely IMHO 5) Some other issue. Its possible that the original measurements were made at the furthest lighting point on the circuit, while the new ones were made either at the newly installed positions, or at a different "furthest" point on the circuit[1]. If the new readings were made closer to the CU, then that might account for the difference. It could also be the original readings were artificially high for some reason, e.g. test lead resistance not accounted for, or meter calibration difference. Less likely, but possible, if could also be there was a lose connection that was corrected during the new installation work. As its over two months since the work was done and I have only just managed to extract the certificate I was wondering if it is possible that testing was never carried out and they might just be random numbers that happen to be compliant? [1] Remember that lighting circuits are typically radials, and might have any number of branches rather than being one sequential run of cable from each light to the next. So you would need a table of the R1+R2 or ELI at all the lighting positions to get the full picture. -- Chris B (News) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|