Grik-*******o®™ wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:27:30 +0100, MM wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:16:42 -0700, Grik-*******o®™
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:23:31 +0100, MM wrote:

Yesterday I drove home up the M40. Every now and again there are
information gantries that usually announce how long till the next
junction, but I saw two that had wording to the effect that "UK is
leaving the EU on October 31. You may need further papers."

The message was obviously primarily directed at international
truckers.

Last night's TV adverts also included a message from HM Government
stating that "UK is leaving on October 31" (I paraphrase.)

So the government is now *assuming* that we will definitely leave on
the "do or die" date. There'll be much egg-on-face if after all we do
not leave then.

Why shouldn't we leave then? That is the default position (a REAL
one, compared to your advisory referendum default). The only hope for
you mainland-worshipping Remoaners is that all the mainland countries
approve a delay, in which case we will have the same exact problem on
31st January. Sooner or later, one of the mainland countries will
veto any further delays. It's inevitable.

It's not inevitable at all.

It's totally inevitable. All it takes is one ****ty little mainland
country to say NO and the Brexit extension is ****ED.


When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

"Stephen Cole" wrote in message
...
Grik-*******o®„¢ wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:27:30 +0100, MM wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:16:42 -0700, Grik-*******o®„¢
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:23:31 +0100, MM wrote:

Yesterday I drove home up the M40. Every now and again there are
information gantries that usually announce how long till the next
junction, but I saw two that had wording to the effect that "UK is
leaving the EU on October 31. You may need further papers."

The message was obviously primarily directed at international
truckers.

Last night's TV adverts also included a message from HM Government
stating that "UK is leaving on October 31" (I paraphrase.)

So the government is now *assuming* that we will definitely leave on
the "do or die" date. There'll be much egg-on-face if after all we do
not leave then.

Why shouldn't we leave then? That is the default position (a REAL
one, compared to your advisory referendum default). The only hope for
you mainland-worshipping Remoaners is that all the mainland countries
approve a delay, in which case we will have the same exact problem on
31st January. Sooner or later, one of the mainland countries will
veto any further delays. It's inevitable.

It's not inevitable at all.

It's totally inevitable. All it takes is one ****ty little mainland
country to say NO and the Brexit extension is ****ED.


When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

Not while ever Boris is PM they wont.

Rod Speed wrote:


"Stephen Cole" wrote in message
...
Grik-*******o®„¢ wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:27:30 +0100, MM wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:16:42 -0700, Grik-*******o®„¢
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:23:31 +0100, MM wrote:

Yesterday I drove home up the M40. Every now and again there are
information gantries that usually announce how long till the next
junction, but I saw two that had wording to the effect that "UK is
leaving the EU on October 31. You may need further papers."

The message was obviously primarily directed at international
truckers.

Last night's TV adverts also included a message from HM Government
stating that "UK is leaving on October 31" (I paraphrase.)

So the government is now *assuming* that we will definitely leave on
the "do or die" date. There'll be much egg-on-face if after all we do
not leave then.

Why shouldn't we leave then? That is the default position (a REAL
one, compared to your advisory referendum default). The only hope for
you mainland-worshipping Remoaners is that all the mainland countries
approve a delay, in which case we will have the same exact problem on
31st January. Sooner or later, one of the mainland countries will
veto any further delays. It's inevitable.

It's not inevitable at all.

It's totally inevitable. All it takes is one ****ty little mainland
country to say NO and the Brexit extension is ****ED.


When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

Not while ever Boris is PM they wont.

Boris wont be PM by Christmas.

--
M0TEY // STC
www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur

"Stephen Cole" wrote in message
...
Rod Speed wrote:


"Stephen Cole" wrote in message
...
Grik-*******o®„¢ wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:27:30 +0100, MM wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:16:42 -0700, Grik-*******o®„¢
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:23:31 +0100, MM wrote:

Yesterday I drove home up the M40. Every now and again there are
information gantries that usually announce how long till the next
junction, but I saw two that had wording to the effect that "UK is
leaving the EU on October 31. You may need further papers."

The message was obviously primarily directed at international
truckers.

Last night's TV adverts also included a message from HM Government
stating that "UK is leaving on October 31" (I paraphrase.)

So the government is now *assuming* that we will definitely leave on
the "do or die" date. There'll be much egg-on-face if after all we
do
not leave then.

Why shouldn't we leave then? That is the default position (a REAL
one, compared to your advisory referendum default). The only hope
for
you mainland-worshipping Remoaners is that all the mainland countries
approve a delay, in which case we will have the same exact problem on
31st January. Sooner or later, one of the mainland countries will
veto any further delays. It's inevitable.

It's not inevitable at all.

It's totally inevitable. All it takes is one ****ty little mainland
country to say NO and the Brexit extension is ****ED.


When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

Not while ever Boris is PM they wont.

Boris wont be PM by Christmas.

Bet he is, and its irrelevant who the PM is by Xmas if the EU doesnt agree
to an
extension, revoking article 50 will have to be done before that if the EU
doesnt.

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:40:05 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH senile asshole troll's troll****

Get the **** out of normally evolved humans' ngs, you senile trolling
asshole from Oz!

--
Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 85-year-old trolling senile
cretin from Oz:
https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/

The point though is, even if we think we leave on that date, its a bit like
the Village in The film The Prisoner, you actually never leave, or maybe a
better analogy is Hotel California, though that is a coming of age and
realisation of your situation song.

Brian

--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...


"Stephen Cole" wrote in message
...
Grik-*******o®T wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:27:30 +0100, MM wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:16:42 -0700, Grik-*******o®T
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:23:31 +0100, MM wrote:

Yesterday I drove home up the M40. Every now and again there are
information gantries that usually announce how long till the next
junction, but I saw two that had wording to the effect that "UK is
leaving the EU on October 31. You may need further papers."

The message was obviously primarily directed at international
truckers.

Last night's TV adverts also included a message from HM Government
stating that "UK is leaving on October 31" (I paraphrase.)

So the government is now *assuming* that we will definitely leave on
the "do or die" date. There'll be much egg-on-face if after all we do
not leave then.

Why shouldn't we leave then? That is the default position (a REAL
one, compared to your advisory referendum default). The only hope for
you mainland-worshipping Remoaners is that all the mainland countries
approve a delay, in which case we will have the same exact problem on
31st January. Sooner or later, one of the mainland countries will
veto any further delays. It's inevitable.

It's not inevitable at all.

It's totally inevitable. All it takes is one ****ty little mainland
country to say NO and the Brexit extension is ****ED.


When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

Not while ever Boris is PM they wont.

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 16:29:33 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

Not

LOL He did it again!

--
Kerr-Mudd,John addressing senile Rot:
"Auto-contradictor Rod is back! (in the KF)"
MID:

On 29 Sep 2019, Stephen Cole wrote
(in article ):

wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:27:30 +0100, wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:16:42 -0700, Grik-*******o®„¢
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:23:31 +0100, wrote:

Yesterday I drove home up the M40. Every now and again there are
information gantries that usually announce how long till the next
junction, but I saw two that had wording to the effect that "UK is
leaving the EU on October 31. You may need further papers."

The message was obviously primarily directed at international
truckers.

Last night's TV adverts also included a message from HM Government
stating that "UK is leaving on October 31" (I paraphrase.)

So the government is now *assuming* that we will definitely leave on
the "do or die" date. There'll be much egg-on-face if after all we do
not leave then.

Why shouldn't we leave then? That is the default position (a REAL
one, compared to your advisory referendum default). The only hope for
you mainland-worshipping Remoaners is that all the mainland countries
approve a delay, in which case we will have the same exact problem on
31st January. Sooner or later, one of the mainland countries will
veto any further delays. It's inevitable.

It's not inevitable at all.

It's totally inevitable. All it takes is one ****ty little mainland
country to say NO and the Brexit extension is ****ED.

When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

Except that Britain does not have a government. It has a bunch of overpaid
self serving rabble rousers, but they are not governing - precisely the
opposite, in fact and the chance of revoking A50 (when a majority of almost
400 voted to give May the green light to invoke it) is nil.

Britain will have a government after a general election; but as the rabble
rousers know, it will be a Tory government with a three figure majority.

In your dreams. I think that the only way that will happen is if most of the
rest stay home on poling day.
The whole point has been missed and as many said at the time, regardless of
you position on leave or stay, the referendum was flawed in so many ways. No
threshold turn out , no majority based on the actual voters who turned out,
then both sides campaigns blatantly lying or over simplifying the problem of
leaving
Did nobody foresee what everyone else did here?
Brian

--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"Keema's Nan" wrote in message
news.com...
On 29 Sep 2019, Stephen Cole wrote
(in article ):

wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:27:30 +0100, wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:16:42 -0700, Grik-*******o®T
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:23:31 +0100,
wrote:

Yesterday I drove home up the M40. Every now and again there are
information gantries that usually announce how long till the next
junction, but I saw two that had wording to the effect that "UK
is
leaving the EU on October 31. You may need further papers."

The message was obviously primarily directed at international
truckers.

Last night's TV adverts also included a message from HM
Government
stating that "UK is leaving on October 31" (I paraphrase.)

So the government is now *assuming* that we will definitely leave
on
the "do or die" date. There'll be much egg-on-face if after all
we do
not leave then.

Why shouldn't we leave then? That is the default position (a REAL
one, compared to your advisory referendum default). The only hope
for
you mainland-worshipping Remoaners is that all the mainland
countries
approve a delay, in which case we will have the same exact problem
on
31st January. Sooner or later, one of the mainland countries will
veto any further delays. It's inevitable.

It's not inevitable at all.

It's totally inevitable. All it takes is one ****ty little mainland
country to say NO and the Brexit extension is ****ED.

When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

Except that Britain does not have a government. It has a bunch of overpaid
self serving rabble rousers, but they are not governing - precisely the
opposite, in fact and the chance of revoking A50 (when a majority of
almost
400 voted to give May the green light to invoke it) is nil.

Britain will have a government after a general election; but as the rabble
rousers know, it will be a Tory government with a three figure majority.

On 29 Sep 2019, Brian Gaff wrote
(in article ):

In your dreams.

Not at all.

Based on the latest polling figures of Con 37% Lab 25% LD 16% Brexit 13%

The new 600 seat parliament (assuming that is adopted) would have 367 Tories
to 157 Labour and 19 LDs.

The old 650 seat parliament would be 386 Tory, 181 Labour and 26 LDs.

I think that the only way that will happen is if most of the
rest stay home on poling day.
The whole point has been missed and as many said at the time, regardless of
you position on leave or stay, the referendum was flawed in so many ways. No
threshold turn out , no majority based on the actual voters who turned out,
then both sides campaigns blatantly lying or over simplifying the problem of
leaving
Did nobody foresee what everyone else did here?
Brian

You just cant handle the truth.

If Labour had even a slim chance of getting the most seats, Corbyn would have
fallen over himself to have called an election weeks ago.

At least Corbyn knows the truth, although the snowflakes will continue to
believe his lies about why he cant call an election at the moment however
much he wants to.

Keema's Nan wrote:
On 29 Sep 2019, Brian Gaff wrote
(in article ):

In your dreams.

Not at all.

Based on the latest polling figures of Con 37% Lab 25% LD 16% Brexit 13%

The new 600 seat parliament (assuming that is adopted) would have 367 Tories
to 157 Labour and 19 LDs.

The old 650 seat parliament would be 386 Tory, 181 Labour and 26 LDs.

I think that the only way that will happen is if most of the
rest stay home on poling day.
The whole point has been missed and as many said at the time, regardless of
you position on leave or stay, the referendum was flawed in so many ways. No
threshold turn out , no majority based on the actual voters who turned out,
then both sides campaigns blatantly lying or over simplifying the problem of
leaving
Did nobody foresee what everyone else did here?
Brian

You just cant handle the truth.

If Labour had even a slim chance of getting the most seats, Corbyn would have
fallen over himself to have called an election weeks ago.

At least Corbyn knows the truth, although the snowflakes will continue to
believe his lies about why he cant call an election at the moment however
much he wants to.




The current crop of MPs are hanging on to their seats as long as they can
to milk the system.

"Keema's Nan" wrote in message
news.com...
On 29 Sep 2019, Brian Gaff wrote
(in article ):

In your dreams.

Not at all.

Based on the latest polling figures of Con 37% Lab 25% LD 16% Brexit 13%

Even you should have noticed that UKIP got something like 10%
in the polls and didnt manage even a single MP, just the one
refugee from the Torys whose constituency would have re-elected
him even if he had moved to the monster raving loony party.

The new 600 seat parliament (assuming that is adopted)
would have 367 Tories to 157 Labour and 19 LDs.

And when the general election happens, even you will
discover that the numbers are actually nothing like that.

The old 650 seat parliament would be 386 Tory, 181 Labour and 26 LDs.

Pity about the polls before that particular general election.

I think that the only way that will happen is if most of the
rest stay home on poling day.
The whole point has been missed and as many said at the time, regardless
of
you position on leave or stay, the referendum was flawed in so many ways.
No
threshold turn out , no majority based on the actual voters who turned
out,
then both sides campaigns blatantly lying or over simplifying the problem
of
leaving
Did nobody foresee what everyone else did here?

You just cant handle the truth.

You wouldnt know what the truth was if it bit you on your lard arse.

If Labour had even a slim chance of getting the most seats, Corbyn
would have fallen over himself to have called an election weeks ago.

Not necessarily if he believes the result would be better if he waited.

At least Corbyn knows the truth, although the snowflakes
will continue to believe his lies about why he cant call an
election at the moment however much he wants to.

On 29 Sep 2019, Rod Speed wrote
(in article ):


"Keema's Nan" wrote in message
news.com...
On 29 Sep 2019, Brian Gaff wrote
(in article ):

In your dreams.

Not at all.

Based on the latest polling figures of Con 37% Lab 25% LD 16% Brexit 13%

Even you should have noticed that UKIP got something like 10%
in the polls and didnt manage even a single MP, just the one
refugee from the Torys whose constituency would have re-elected
him even if he had moved to the monster raving loony party.

The new 600 seat parliament (assuming that is adopted)
would have 367 Tories to 157 Labour and 19 LDs.

And when the general election happens, even you will
discover that the numbers are actually nothing like that.

Maybe, but a 30% swing to Labour is just as unlikely and especially so when
the LDs are splitting the remain vote.

The Tories could cope easily with a majority of 10-15.



The old 650 seat parliament would be 386 Tory, 181 Labour and 26 LDs.

Pity about the polls before that particular general election.

I think that the only way that will happen is if most of the
rest stay home on poling day.
The whole point has been missed and as many said at the time, regardless
of
you position on leave or stay, the referendum was flawed in so many ways.
No
threshold turn out , no majority based on the actual voters who turned
out,
then both sides campaigns blatantly lying or over simplifying the problem
of
leaving
Did nobody foresee what everyone else did here?

You just cant handle the truth.

You wouldnt know what the truth was if it bit you on your lard arse.

Ad hominems so quickly? You cant have much of a valid argument.



If Labour had even a slim chance of getting the most seats, Corbyn
would have fallen over himself to have called an election weeks ago.

Not necessarily if he believes the result would be better if he waited.

If he believes that, then he needs to consider being sectioned.



At least Corbyn knows the truth, although the snowflakes
will continue to believe his lies about why he cant call an
election at the moment however much he wants to.

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 20:02:07 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

Not at all.

Based on the latest polling figures of Con 37% Lab 25% LD 16% Brexit 13%

Even you should have noticed

Even he noticed that you are a trolling piece of senile Ozzie ****!

--
Keema Nam addressing nym-shifting senile Rodent:
"You are now exposed as a liar, as well as an ignorant troll."
"MID: .com"

On 29/09/2019 09:11, Brian Gaff wrote:
In your dreams. I think that the only way that will happen is if most of the
rest stay home on poling day.
The whole point has been missed and as many said at the time, regardless of
you position on leave or stay, the referendum was flawed in so many ways. No
threshold turn out , no majority based on the actual voters who turned out,
then both sides campaigns blatantly lying or over simplifying the problem of
leaving
Did nobody foresee what everyone else did here?
Brian


A C Grayling put it most succinctly in August 2016. It bears repeating
(particularly Reason 1).

http://acgrayling.com/letter-to-mps

"Keema's Nan" wrote in message
news.com...
On 29 Sep 2019, Stephen Cole wrote
(in article ):

wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:27:30 +0100, wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:16:42 -0700, Grik-*******o®„¢
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:23:31 +0100,
wrote:

Yesterday I drove home up the M40. Every now and again there are
information gantries that usually announce how long till the next
junction, but I saw two that had wording to the effect that "UK
is
leaving the EU on October 31. You may need further papers."

The message was obviously primarily directed at international
truckers.

Last night's TV adverts also included a message from HM
Government
stating that "UK is leaving on October 31" (I paraphrase.)

So the government is now *assuming* that we will definitely leave
on
the "do or die" date. There'll be much egg-on-face if after all
we do
not leave then.

Why shouldn't we leave then? That is the default position (a REAL
one, compared to your advisory referendum default). The only hope
for
you mainland-worshipping Remoaners is that all the mainland
countries
approve a delay, in which case we will have the same exact problem
on
31st January. Sooner or later, one of the mainland countries will
veto any further delays. It's inevitable.

It's not inevitable at all.

It's totally inevitable. All it takes is one ****ty little mainland
country to say NO and the Brexit extension is ****ED.

When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

Except that Britain does not have a government. It has a bunch of overpaid
self serving rabble rousers, but they are not governing - precisely the
opposite, in fact and the chance of revoking A50 (when a majority of
almost
400 voted to give May the green light to invoke it) is nil.

Britain will have a government after a general election;

Much more likely to be even worse of a shambles than now.

but as the rabble rousers know, it will be a Tory
government with a three figure majority.

Bet it isnt unless Boris can achieve a viable brexit. Even then,
with half the voters preferring to remain, its unlikely it will
be anything even remotely like a 3 figure majority.

"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...


"Keema's Nan" wrote in message
news.com...
On 29 Sep 2019, Stephen Cole wrote
(in article ):

wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:27:30 +0100, wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:16:42 -0700, Grik-*******o®„¢
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:23:31 +0100,
wrote:

Yesterday I drove home up the M40. Every now and again there are
information gantries that usually announce how long till the
next
junction, but I saw two that had wording to the effect that "UK
is
leaving the EU on October 31. You may need further papers."

The message was obviously primarily directed at international
truckers.

Last night's TV adverts also included a message from HM
Government
stating that "UK is leaving on October 31" (I paraphrase.)

So the government is now *assuming* that we will definitely
leave on
the "do or die" date. There'll be much egg-on-face if after all
we do
not leave then.

Why shouldn't we leave then? That is the default position (a REAL
one, compared to your advisory referendum default). The only hope
for
you mainland-worshipping Remoaners is that all the mainland
countries
approve a delay, in which case we will have the same exact problem
on
31st January. Sooner or later, one of the mainland countries will
veto any further delays. It's inevitable.

It's not inevitable at all.

It's totally inevitable. All it takes is one ****ty little mainland
country to say NO and the Brexit extension is ****ED.

When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

Except that Britain does not have a government. It has a bunch of
overpaid
self serving rabble rousers, but they are not governing - precisely the
opposite, in fact and the chance of revoking A50 (when a majority of
almost
400 voted to give May the green light to invoke it) is nil.

Britain will have a government after a general election;

Much more likely to be even worse of a shambles than now.

but as the rabble rousers know, it will be a Tory
government with a three figure majority.

Bet it isnt unless Boris can achieve a viable brexit. Even then,
with half the voters preferring to remain, its unlikely it will
be anything even remotely like a 3 figure majority.

And if Boris does manage to get a no deal brexit, there wont
be a general election because even that fool Corbyn knows
that half the Labour MPs will lose their seats and he will be
politically assassinated if that happens.

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 19:27:52 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


And if Boris

Getting no feedbacks any more in most groups and threads that you infest,
you senile trolling pest? So you now you post your own feedbacks? LMAO

--
addressing nym-shifting senile Rodent:
"You on the other hand are a heavyweight bull****ter who demonstrates
your particular prowess at it every day."
MID:

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 18:49:13 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:



Bet it isnt unless Boris

NONE of yours, you trolling piece of senile Ozzie ****!

--
about senile Rot Speed:
"This is like having a conversation with someone with brain damage."
MID:

On 29 Sep 2019 06:16:08 GMT, Stephen Cole
wrote:

Grik-*******o®? wrote:
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:27:30 +0100, MM wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 09:16:42 -0700, Grik-*******o®?
wrote:

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:23:31 +0100, MM wrote:

Yesterday I drove home up the M40. Every now and again there are
information gantries that usually announce how long till the next
junction, but I saw two that had wording to the effect that "UK is
leaving the EU on October 31. You may need further papers."

The message was obviously primarily directed at international
truckers.

Last night's TV adverts also included a message from HM Government
stating that "UK is leaving on October 31" (I paraphrase.)

So the government is now *assuming* that we will definitely leave on
the "do or die" date. There'll be much egg-on-face if after all we do
not leave then.

Why shouldn't we leave then? That is the default position (a REAL
one, compared to your advisory referendum default). The only hope for
you mainland-worshipping Remoaners is that all the mainland countries
approve a delay, in which case we will have the same exact problem on
31st January. Sooner or later, one of the mainland countries will
veto any further delays. It's inevitable.

It's not inevitable at all.

It's totally inevitable. All it takes is one ****ty little mainland
country to say NO and the Brexit extension is ****ED.


When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

No, it simply won't.

On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 05:05:07 -0700, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "Grik-bahstard®™", farted again:


When that does happen, the British government will simply revoke A50.

No, it simply won't.

That's not for a psychopathic pedophilic dreckserb like you to decide,
Razovic!

--
Pedophilic dreckserb Razovic arguing in favour of pedophilia, again:
"Isn't it time that paedophiles were admitted to the LGBTQ rainbow?
Now that every other sexual deviation seems to have been accommodated?"
MID: