|
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
Brian Reay wrote:
Stephen Cole wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Irelands border before long; Gibraltars 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patels hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. Im just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. Its €śinteresting€ť that you dont seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On 20 Aug 2019 08:04:14 GMT, Stephen Cole
wrote: Brian Reay wrote: Stephen Cole wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Ireland’s border before long; Gibraltar’s 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months – and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patel’s hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. I’m just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. It’s “interesting” that you don’t seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. the only disruption that will occur is any generated by parties who have bad will -- www.abelard.org |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On 20 Aug 2019, Stephen Cole wrote
(in article ): Brian Reay wrote: Stephen wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Irelands border before long; Gibraltars 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patels hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. Im just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. Its €śinteresting€ť that you dont seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No chemicals to treat the water supply? Is this country incapable of manufacturing chlorine based chemicals? Is this country capable of manufacturing anything? |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
"Keema's Nan" wrote in message news.com... On 20 Aug 2019, Stephen Cole wrote (in article ): Brian Reay wrote: Stephen wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Irelands border before long; Gibraltars 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patels hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. Im just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. Its €śinteresting€ť that you dont seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No chemicals to treat the water supply? Is this country incapable of manufacturing chlorine based chemicals? Is this country capable of manufacturing anything? And is free to import that stuff before 29-Oct. |
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:36:47 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: No chemicals to treat the water supply? Is this country incapable of manufacturing chlorine based chemicals? Is this country capable of manufacturing anything? And is free to import that stuff before 29-Oct. Nobody talked to you, senile Ozzie pest! -- Norman Wells addressing senile Rot: "Ah, the voice of scum speaks." MID: |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On 20/08/2019 09:38, Keema's Nan wrote:
On 20 Aug 2019, Stephen Cole wrote (in article ): Brian Reay wrote: Stephen wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Irelands border before long; Gibraltars 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patels hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. Im just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. Its €śinteresting€ť that you dont seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No chemicals to treat the water supply? Is this country incapable of manufacturing chlorine based chemicals? Is this country capable of manufacturing anything? Just ignore him. He was whining before about too much chlorine, he's never happy ;-) |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On 20/08/2019 09:04, Stephen Cole wrote:
Brian Reay wrote: Stephen Cole wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Irelands border before long; Gibraltars 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patels hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. Im just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. Its €śinteresting€ť that you dont seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No, you are worried about KFC and advising people to arm themselves. |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
EU Citizen Brian Reay G8OSN wrote:
On 20/08/2019 09:04, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Reay wrote: Stephen Cole wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Irelands border before long; Gibraltars 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patels hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. Im just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. Its €śinteresting€ť that you dont seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No, you are worried about KFC and advising people to arm themselves. Why do you hate children with cancer, Brian? -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On 20/08/2019 13:10, Stephen Cole wrote:
EU Citizen Brian Reay G8OSN wrote: On 20/08/2019 09:04, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Reay wrote: Stephen Cole wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Irelands border before long; Gibraltars 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patels hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. Im just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. Its €śinteresting€ť that you dont seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No, you are worried about KFC and advising people to arm themselves. Why do you hate children with cancer, Brian? Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
EU Citizen Brian Reay G8OSN wrote:
On 20/08/2019 13:10, Stephen Cole wrote: EU Citizen Brian Reay G8OSN wrote: On 20/08/2019 09:04, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Reay wrote: Stephen Cole wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Irelands border before long; Gibraltars 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patels hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. Im just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. Its €śinteresting€ť that you dont seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No, you are worried about KFC and advising people to arm themselves. Why do you hate children with cancer, Brian? Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. Im in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why arent you, Brian? -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
Brian Reay wrote:
On 20/08/2019 13:10, Stephen Cole wrote: EU Citizen Brian Reay G8OSN wrote: On 20/08/2019 09:04, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Reay wrote: Stephen Cole wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Ireland's border before long; Gibraltar's 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patel's hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. I'm just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. It's "interesting" that you don't seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No, you are worried about KFC and advising people to arm themselves. Why do you hate children with cancer, Brian? Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. On the contrary, if idiotic political decisions are going to affect children with cancer then it would seem essential. After all, we could negotiate a complete break with the common market after a transition period and achieve the same result as a "no-deal" Brexit without all the drama and disruption, it that is what you people really want. -- Roger Hayter |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? -- *Always borrow money from pessimists - they don't expect it back * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On 20/08/2019 15:05, Roger Hayter wrote:
On the contrary, if idiotic political decisions are going to affect children with cancer then it would seem essential. It would, but they are not. Its just more FUD. After all, we could negotiate a complete break with the common market after a transition period and achieve the same result as a "no-deal" Brexit without all the drama and disruption, it that is what you people really want That is exactly what we ARE doing. We have had three years of transition period to get the ducks in a row. Of course no one expected remainers to essentially render us as unprepared as possible in order to sway public opnion away from leaving altogether. Matthew Hancock has assured the House that the NHS is ready. -- €śSome people like to travel by train because it combines the slowness of a car with the cramped public exposure of €¨an airplane.€ť Dennis Miller |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 14:35:41 UTC+1, Brian Reay wrote:
On 20/08/2019 13:10, Stephen Cole wrote: EU Citizen Brian Reay G8OSN wrote: On 20/08/2019 09:04, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Reay wrote: Stephen Cole wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Irelands border before long; Gibraltars 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patels hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it.. Im just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. Its €śinteresting€ť that you dont seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No, you are worried about KFC and advising people to arm themselves. Why do you hate children with cancer, Brian? Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. Use students instead :) |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
In article ,
Stephen Cole wrote: Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. Chivalry? On ukra? You're having a laugh? -- *Eat well, stay fit, die anyway Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 15:25:58 UTC+1, Stephen Cole wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. What about equality though :) |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:49:24 +0100, Brian Reay wrote:
On 20/08/2019 09:04, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Reay wrote: Stephen Cole wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Irelands border before long; Gibraltars 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months €“ and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patels hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. Im just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. Its €śinteresting€ť that you dont seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No, you are worried about KFC and advising people to arm themselves. I bet cocaine and heroin gets in ok. |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Is it really necessary to ask such a question ? Children with cancer or any other serious illness always attract the greatest sympathy as they stand to lose far more years of life than do adults. They never get the chance to fulfil their potential or conversley to chance to show that they never really had any to start with. If Corbyn wasn't completely gormless he would right now be asking for categorical guarentees from both Johnson and Gove that no child with cancer will die as a result of a shortage of medication following a No Deal Brexit. No if or buts but a straightforward guarentee. michael adams .... |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
"Keema's Nan" wrote in message news.com... No chemicals to treat the water supply? Is this country incapable of manufacturing chlorine based chemicals? Of course not. The problem is when Boris tried to convince Donald Tusk that the UK could have all the necessary factories all built and up and runninhg within the space of a couple of weeks the latter found it difficult not to burst out laughing michael adams .... |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On 20/08/2019 19:41, michael adams wrote:
"Keema's Nan" wrote in message news.com... No chemicals to treat the water supply? Is this country incapable of manufacturing chlorine based chemicals? Of course not. The problem is when Boris tried to convince Donald Tusk that the UK could have all the necessary factories all built and up and runninhg within the space of a couple of weeks the latter found it difficult not to burst out laughing One of the largest facilities in Europe producing chlorine is in the UK, Runcorn to be more exact. Perhaps you should think before inventing silly stories. |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:42:00 +0100, Brian Reay wrote:
On 20/08/2019 09:38, Keema's Nan wrote: On 20 Aug 2019, Stephen Cole wrote (in article ): Brian Reay wrote: Is this country incapable of manufacturing chlorine based chemicals? Is this country capable of manufacturing anything? Just ignore him. He was whining before about too much chlorine, he's never happy ;-) Chlorine will be in plentiful supply post Brexit, just rinse Trumps rancid chicken out, and use lot's of chillies on the sunday roast :-) AB |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... On 20/08/2019 19:41, michael adams wrote: "Keema's Nan" wrote in message news.com... No chemicals to treat the water supply? Is this country incapable of manufacturing chlorine based chemicals? Of course not. The problem is when Boris tried to convince Donald Tusk that the UK could have all the necessary factories all built and up and runninhg within the space of a couple of weeks the latter found it difficult not to burst out laughing One of the largest facilities in Europe producing chlorine is in the UK, Runcorn to be more exact. And to be even more exact the manufacture of "chlorine based chemicals" clearly involves processes and additional chemicals over and above what's necessary to produce chlorine. Otherwise these chemicals would all simply be called er, chlorine, Perhaps you should think before inventing silly stories. Maybe you could find somebody who is able explain to you the difference beween chlorine, and "chlorine based chemicals" in language you can understand. hint: you'll probably find the manufacture of the latter is a bit more complicated, if only because it consists of three words rather than one. HTH michael adams .... |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
Brian Gaff wrote:
Actually the best thing for the EU to do to confuse borris is to say, no deal leaving is not allowed and either force the deal or delay the leaving again. That would make him a liar and may even save him from a treasonable offence as I think that taking Britain out with no deal in the direct way he will is against Parliaments wishes as we have seen already. A constitutional crisis should mean that some independent group manages the country till the legal wrangling is sorted out. We need a proper constitution in my view as at the moment there is an impasse and really looking at the numbers who did not vote to leave or vote at all its by no means clear that leaving is what the public wants. its a hell of a mess. Brian I didnt think anyone was more out of touch with reality than Steve until I read the above. |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
"whisky-dave" wrote in message ... On Tuesday, 20 August 2019 15:25:58 UTC+1, Stephen Cole wrote: Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. What about equality though :) ****it. |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
On 20/08/2019 15:25, Stephen Cole wrote:
Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. That might make sense now, but I have often thought that in the past it would have meant the husband/father dying and his dependents finding themselves destitute. SteveW |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
"michael adams" wrote in message ... "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Is it really necessary to ask such a question ? Children with cancer or any other serious illness always attract the greatest sympathy as they stand to lose far more years of life than do adults. They never get the chance to fulfil their potential or conversley to chance to show that they never really had any to start with. If Corbyn wasn't completely gormless he would right now be asking for categorical guarentees from both Johnson and Gove that no child with cancer will die as a result of a shortage of medication following a No Deal Brexit. No if or buts but a straightforward guarentee. Completely silly. No one can every guarantee that no child with cancer will never die and when one does, its never going to be possible to know what killed them. |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... On 20/08/2019 19:41, michael adams wrote: "Keema's Nan" wrote in message news.com... No chemicals to treat the water supply? Is this country incapable of manufacturing chlorine based chemicals? Of course not. The problem is when Boris tried to convince Donald Tusk that the UK could have all the necessary factories all built and up and runninhg within the space of a couple of weeks the latter found it difficult not to burst out laughing One of the largest facilities in Europe producing chlorine is in the UK, Runcorn to be more exact. Perhaps you should think before inventing silly stories. He can't. Ear to ear dog **** isnt capable of thought. |
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:04:41 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. What about equality though :) ****it. If someone wanted to hear an asshole, they'd have farted, senile asshole! -- Norman Wells addressing senile Rot: "Ah, the voice of scum speaks." MID: |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
Brian Gaff wrote
Actually the best thing for the EU to do to confuse borris is to say, no deal leaving is not allowed Boris knows that that’s a lie and that that happens automatically if there is no agreement by 29-Oct. and either force the deal Not even possible to do that. The UK parliament has to accept any deal. or delay the leaving again. Not possible. Article 50 only allows a delay by mutual agreement and Boris has said repeatedly that he won’t be having any more delay. That would make him a liar Nope, because it can't happen. and may even save him from a treasonable offence There is no such treasonable offence. as I think that taking Britain out with no deal in the direct way he will is against Parliaments wishes as we have seen already. Irrelevant to what Article 50 provides for. Parliament chose to invoke that by a massive majority and it gets to wear that now. A constitutional crisis should mean that some independent group manages the country till the legal wrangling is sorted out. Fantasy given that a no deal brexit happens on 29-Oct if the EU doesn’t cave on the backstop which is what Boris requires to agree to any deal the EU comes up with. And there is no constitutional mechanism to stop Boris driving the bus before 29-Oct. The most parliament can do is pass a no confidence motion, see Boris tell Liz that the general election is after 29-Oct and given that the purdur rule means that the govt can't take any new action, the UK leaves the EU completely automatically with no deal. We need a proper constitution in my view as at the moment there is an impasse and really looking at the numbers who did not vote to leave or vote at all its by no means clear that leaving is what the public wants. its a hell of a mess. It was always going to be that given how divided the country is on leaving. "Moomin" wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:49:24 +0100, Brian Reay wrote: On 20/08/2019 09:04, Stephen Cole wrote: Brian Reay wrote: Stephen Cole wrote: The Yellowhammer leak has certainly put the cat amongst the pigeons but I noted with mild amusement when reading commentary this morning that the likely (note *not* worst-case) ramifications of leaving with no deal are exactly as I predicted and called here months ago, from Polly Toynbee; Pause here to reprise the Yellowhammer analysis: ports chaos for three months and then only restored to 50% of their function; diabetics and children with cancer not guaranteed their drugs; no chemicals to treat the water supply; fresh food shortages; food riots; sterling plunging and banks disrupted; two refineries to possibly close, accompanied by strikes and fuel shortages; civil unrest around Ireland's border before long; Gibraltar's 15,000 workers delayed for hours daily at the border; embassies besieged by expat visa and passport worries; clashes at sea with our 12 vessels unable to police UK waters; care homes closing within months - and a lot more. Add to that the outrages which will be caused by Priti Patel's hostile Home Office closing the border to Europeans on the stroke of midnight on 31 October: expect children separated from parents; doctors and nurses barred from returning to work; mayhem and scandal across Europe at our brutal behaviour ///end quote Sunlit uplands, then, Brian? You just keep trying to reassure yourself Steve, you seem to need it. I'm just very concerned about children with cancer running out of medicine, Brian. I would expect most decent people to be so, tbh. It's "interesting" that you don't seem to care one way or the other. HTH, OM. No, you are worried about KFC and advising people to arm themselves. I bet cocaine and heroin gets in ok. |
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:26:55 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: If Corbyn wasn't completely gormless he would right now be asking for categorical guarentees from both Johnson and Gove that no child with cancer will die as a result of a shortage of medication following a No Deal Brexit. No if or buts but a straightforward guarentee. Completely silly. No one can every guarantee that no child with cancer will never die and when one does, its never going to be possible to know what killed them. Of course, it's possible, you senile idiot and notorious bull**** artist! -- addressing nym-shifting senile Rodent: "You on the other hand are a heavyweight bull****ter who demonstrates your particular prowess at it every day." MID: |
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:30:24 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: He can't. Ear to ear dog **** isnt capable of thought. So why don't you replace the **** you got for brains, senile ****head? -- Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 85-year-old trolling senile cretin from Oz: https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/ |
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:50:53 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: Actually the best thing for the EU to do to confuse borris is to say, no deal leaving is not allowed Boris knows Boris? UK? EU? NONE of yours, you obnoxious senile Ozzie cretin! -- Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 85-year-old trolling senile cretin from Oz: https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/ |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
"Steve Walker" wrote in message ... On 20/08/2019 15:25, Stephen Cole wrote: Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. That might make sense now, but I have often thought that in the past it would have meant the husband/father dying and his dependents finding themselves destitute. But they mostly did use those in wartime anyway. Corse that silly cow Budica was one exception. |
Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:22:12 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: FLUSH senile troll's troll**** -- Website (from 2007) dedicated to the 85-year-old trolling senile cretin from Oz: https://www.pcreview.co.uk/threads/r...d-faq.2973853/ |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
Steve Walker wrote:
On 20/08/2019 15:25, Stephen Cole wrote: Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. That might make sense now, but I have often thought that in the past it would have meant the husband/father dying and his dependents finding themselves destitute. Perhaps, but I think it has an explanation if you consider biology; the genetic imperative demands that a persons (the mans) offspring are protected and nurtured well enough by them to ensure the continuation of the genetic line, so €śwomen and children first€ť and a husband sacrificing himself to save them makes sense in that regard. -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
Stephen Cole wrote:
Steve Walker wrote: On 20/08/2019 15:25, Stephen Cole wrote: Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. That might make sense now, but I have often thought that in the past it would have meant the husband/father dying and his dependents finding themselves destitute. Perhaps, but I think it has an explanation if you consider biology; the genetic imperative demands that a persons (the mans) offspring are protected and nurtured well enough by them to ensure the continuation of the genetic line, so €śwomen and children first€ť and a husband sacrificing himself to save them makes sense in that regard. Interesting choice of words. Where does that leave those who arent married? BTW, nature makes a nonsense of your claim. The natural world is peppered with examples of the female being the protector or the offspring being simply left to get of with it. In other words, biology has nothing to do with it. The women and children first concept comes from the kind of values you spend your time rubbishing. |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
EU Citizen Brian Reay G8OSN wrote:
Stephen Cole wrote: Steve Walker wrote: On 20/08/2019 15:25, Stephen Cole wrote: Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. That might make sense now, but I have often thought that in the past it would have meant the husband/father dying and his dependents finding themselves destitute. Perhaps, but I think it has an explanation if you consider biology; the genetic imperative demands that a persons (the mans) offspring are protected and nurtured well enough by them to ensure the continuation of the genetic line, so €śwomen and children first€ť and a husband sacrificing himself to save them makes sense in that regard. Interesting choice of words. Where does that leave those who arent married? Did cavemen get married in the Stone Age, Brian? BTW, nature makes a nonsense of your claim. The natural world is peppered with examples of the female being the protector or the offspring being simply left to get of with it. This thread is about human beings. Please learn to reading comprehension, OM. TIA. In other words, biology has nothing to do with it. The women and children first concept comes from the kind of values you spend your time rubbishing. The values that I spend time rubbishing are those that espouse depriving children of cancer medicine in exchange for a blue passport. HTH, OM. -- M0TEY // STC www.twitter.com/ukradioamateur |
Brexit going well, eh? LOL
"Stephen Cole" wrote in message ... Steve Walker wrote: On 20/08/2019 15:25, Stephen Cole wrote: Dave Plowman (News) wrote: In article , Stephen Cole wrote: Trying to use children with cancer as political ammunition is beneath contempt Steve. I'm in favour of children with cancer having an unbroken supply of medication. Why aren't you, Brian? Just children, then? Other cancer patients don't matter? Women and children first, OM. First law of chivalry. HTH. That might make sense now, but I have often thought that in the past it would have meant the husband/father dying and his dependents finding themselves destitute. Perhaps, but I think it has an explanation if you consider biology; the genetic imperative demands that a person's (the man's) offspring are protected and nurtured well enough by them to ensure the continuation of the genetic line, so "women and children first" and a husband sacrificing himself to save them makes sense in that regard. **** no let them starve we don't want any more fruitcakes like you ........don't object to you popping your clogs though..... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter