Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just a quick(!) question, why would a weeping soldered fitting continue
to weep at the same rate when the supply is turned off and the pressure removed (by opening a tap) ? Is this just a "They all do that" thing? .... Background if interested, this is a soldered "T" in an inaccessible place (aren't they always?) and it's currently weeping at about 1 drop an hour. I'm worried that could worsen, possibly without further warning. The weep is coming from a "carbuncle" on the fitting itself, I'm guessing it's a flux residue problem. Getting to it is not going to be easy, barely got enough access to see it, the current preferred plan is to just run another pipe and nix the bath tap that the other end of this one is connected to. Never use that tap anyway (because shower) and there is a refit in the budget at some point ![]() ![]() |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Lee wrote: Just a quick(!) question, why would a weeping soldered fitting continue to weep at the same rate when the supply is turned off and the pressure removed (by opening a tap) ? Is this just a "They all do that" thing? It can't leak water if there's none in the pipes. ;-) But running a tap isn't guaranteed to empty the pipes completely. As you'll find if attempting to solder ones which have been in use. I tend to blow them through with a compressed air supply before attempting a repair. ... Background if interested, this is a soldered "T" in an inaccessible place (aren't they always?) and it's currently weeping at about 1 drop an hour. I'm worried that could worsen, possibly without further warning. You need quite a bit of space to dismantle a soldered joint and re-make properly. But then you do with a compression fitting too. The weep is coming from a "carbuncle" on the fitting itself, I'm guessing it's a flux residue problem. I've seen brand new fittings with a pin hole in them. Before just how well soldered it was comes into it. Getting to it is not going to be easy, barely got enough access to see it, the current preferred plan is to just run another pipe and nix the bath tap that the other end of this one is connected to. Never use that tap anyway (because shower) and there is a refit in the budget at some point ![]() ![]() Could you cut the pipes in a more accessible place and perhaps pre-fabricate the T including pipe ends? Then used end feed couplers? -- *Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/03/2018 13:32, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Lee wrote: Just a quick(!) question, why would a weeping soldered fitting continue to weep at the same rate when the supply is turned off and the pressure removed (by opening a tap) ? Is this just a "They all do that" thing? You said it was dripping at 1 drop per hour. So capillary action is possibly more important than pressure. It can't leak water if there's none in the pipes. ;-) But running a tap isn't guaranteed to empty the pipes completely. As you'll find if attempting to solder ones which have been in use. I tend to blow them through with a compressed air supply before attempting a repair. I used a wet and dry vacuum cleaner recently. It worked a treat. Could you cut the pipes in a more accessible place and perhaps pre-fabricate the T including pipe ends? Then used end feed couplers? Push fit might be a lot easier in a confined space. |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 12:33:01 +0000, Lee wrote:
Just a quick(!) question, why would a weeping soldered fitting continue to weep at the same rate when the supply is turned off and the pressure removed (by opening a tap) ? If there is any water left above the weep the weep is still under presure from the weight of that water. The weep is coming from a "carbuncle" on the fitting itself, I'm guessing it's a flux residue problem. Or faulty fitting? A "temporary" fix for something that slow would be to bind it with self amalgamting tape. -- Cheers Dave. |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/03/2018 13:49, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 12:33:01 +0000, Lee wrote: Just a quick(!) question, why would a weeping soldered fitting continue to weep at the same rate when the supply is turned off and the pressure removed (by opening a tap) ? If there is any water left above the weep the weep is still under presure from the weight of that water. The weep is coming from a "carbuncle" on the fitting itself, I'm guessing it's a flux residue problem. Or faulty fitting? A "temporary" fix for something that slow would be to bind it with self amalgamting tape. I have some of that, but to be fair if I had the access to do that it wouldn't be too much harder to remake the fitting ![]() |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/03/2018 13:32, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Lee wrote: Just a quick(!) question, why would a weeping soldered fitting continue Snip It can't leak water if there's none in the pipes. ;-) Indeed ![]() amount. But probably it is capillary action then, as GB notes. Snip Could you cut the pipes in a more accessible place and perhaps pre-fabricate the T including pipe ends? Then used end feed couplers? Not unless I either change size considerably or pull the bath out, which would necessitate a fair degree of destruction due to the way it's been installed. Fortunately access to the shower pipes is a little more straightforward so an alternate pipe route looks favourable. |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/03/2018 13:48, GB wrote:
Big Snip Push fit might be a lot easier in a confined space. That's the current plan... |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 1:49:37 PM UTC, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 12:33:01 +0000, Lee wrote: Just a quick(!) question, why would a weeping soldered fitting continue to weep at the same rate when the supply is turned off and the pressure removed (by opening a tap) ? If there is any water left above the weep the weep is still under presure from the weight of that water. .... and so turning off the tap might actually result in the leak stopping. Robert |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, 1 March 2018 14:21:36 UTC, wrote:
On Thursday, March 1, 2018 at 1:49:37 PM UTC, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 12:33:01 +0000, Lee wrote: Just a quick(!) question, why would a weeping soldered fitting continue to weep at the same rate when the supply is turned off and the pressure removed (by opening a tap) ? If there is any water left above the weep the weep is still under presure from the weight of that water. ... and so turning off the tap might actually result in the leak stopping.. Robert How easy is it to get a blow torch to it? During some building work I was having done, the builder knocked a pipe which was below any drain off possibilities. A soldered joint started leaking so I ended up getting 2 blow torches to it and eventually was able to get it hot enough to melt the solder (having added flux first) and fix the joint. From memory (it was a good few years ago!) I *think* I ended up draining what I could first so assume the blow torches effectively evaporated the water enough to get hot enough for the solder to flow in. |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
wrote: How easy is it to get a blow torch to it? During some building work I was having done, the builder knocked a pipe which was below any drain off possibilities. A soldered joint started leaking so I ended up getting 2 blow torches to it and eventually was able to get it hot enough to melt the solder (having added flux first) and fix the joint. From memory (it was a good few years ago!) I *think* I ended up draining what I could first so assume the blow torches effectively evaporated the water enough to get hot enough for the solder to flow in. Thing with soldering a pipe which has water in it is even if you do get it hot enough, there's a chance the steam generated will stop the solder joint being made properly. -- *You're never too old to learn something stupid. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018 12:33:01 +0000
Lee wrote: Just a quick(!) question, why would a weeping soldered fitting continue to weep at the same rate when the supply is turned off and the pressure removed (by opening a tap) ? Are you sure it's a leak and not condensation? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sealing a weeping soldered pipe joint. | UK diy | |||
Source of 6mm copper pipe soldered fittings... | UK diy | |||
T+G Joint From Wreck Discussion - Full Joint Line From Above - Full Joint Line From Top.jpg (0/1) | Woodworking Plans and Photos | |||
Fixing slow drip from soldered copper joint | Home Repair | |||
Undoing and re-making soldered copper pipe... | UK diy |