On 25/01/2018 07:30, ss wrote:


The original ball point will have indented the paper, and possibly
any sheets underneath it. This may be more visible from the rear.

Also, the colours on the copies are unlikely to exactly match the
original, although the copies may well match each other.


This a macro image of the copy:
https://imgur.com/a/42EIn

This I think is the original:
https://imgur.com/ITvu29X

I am basing it on the `copy` is more solid colour and if correct as one
poster has stated the wet ink on the original shows the fibres of the
paper.

Agree, disagree?

I think your first photo is the copy because the tracks are all thicker,
and small white bits in the blob and the curl are not there. That
signature does not look like ballpoint that has a constant width of stroke.
--
Dave W