OT More on Brexit
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:05:06 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ITbhTu2BBQ ******* like that only go to show that all those years back Charles de Gaulle was right to try to exclude Britain. No One could understand how someone we gave so much assistance to, could reject our common market membership. Onward and upward, next stop Dublin. Thanks Brexiters, just don't come back! AB Want to know how much the harry lot are costing us? £100 billion, that is life in luxuary while the NHS staff get paid peanuts. 1% pay rise for the best and the opposite harry lot vermin live in paradise. No wonder so little works. |
OT More on Brexit
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:51:31 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio
wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:05:06 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ITbhTu2BBQ ******* like that only go to show that all those years back Charles de Gaulle was right to try to exclude Britain. No One could understand how someone we gave so much assistance to, could reject our common market membership. Onward and upward, next stop Dublin. Thanks Brexiters, just don't come back! AB Want to know how much the harry lot are costing us? £100 billion, that is life in luxuary while the NHS staff get paid peanuts. 1% pay rise for the best and the opposite harry lot vermin live in paradise. No wonder so little works. Money does not enter into it at all. The racist bigot only sees things in terms of them and us. As far as his ilk are concerned, I'm proud to be one of "them". Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. I paid taxes into the system all my life and it certainly wasn't in order to support a select few inward looking racists. People that live and work in a place are entitled to the same benefits as the rest of the population. Although after Brexit the true reasons for the Conservative push will become clear. Zero hour contracts and no employment protection. And Harry will still have vast quantities of foreigners to focus the vitriol upon. Fox is going to complain to the BBC about painting a poor picture of Brexit. The BBC are not telling half of it. The Guardian, Independent and Irish times would make real depressing reading for Fox. Ireland are planning a new second city as Dublin absorbs the financial institutions that wish to maintain an EU presence. Apparently May said the exodus wouldn't happen. Is there anything the plonkers have actually got right? I can just see the next wheeze the Tory think tank comes up with, outdo Labour with a black female PM. Dianne Abbot will be recycled yet!! AB |
OT More on Brexit
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:46:17 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote:
Ireland are planning a new second city as Dublin absorbs the financial institutions that wish to maintain an EU presence. Dream on. The Irish can plan whatever they like but they're still on the bones of their arse and will have to raise taxes pretty damn soon; economists know this well and so do the banks! If there is an exodus of banks from the City (yay good riddance!) Ireland is about the last place they'll re-settle. -- This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition. |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:02:39 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:46:17 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Ireland are planning a new second city as Dublin absorbs the financial institutions that wish to maintain an EU presence. Dream on. The Irish can plan whatever they like but they're still on the bones of their arse and will have to raise taxes pretty damn soon; economists know this well and so do the banks! If there is an exodus of banks from the City (yay good riddance!) Ireland is about the last place they'll re-settle. Obviously the Sun hasn't gone beyond which celebrity is revealing a bit of cleavage. You seem to reveal a level of ignorance that is quite astounding, even for a Sun reading bigot. AB |
OT More on Brexit
"Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message ... On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:51:31 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:05:06 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ITbhTu2BBQ ******* like that only go to show that all those years back Charles de Gaulle was right to try to exclude Britain. No One could understand how someone we gave so much assistance to, could reject our common market membership. Onward and upward, next stop Dublin. Thanks Brexiters, just don't come back! AB Want to know how much the harry lot are costing us? £100 billion, that is life in luxuary while the NHS staff get paid peanuts. 1% pay rise for the best and the opposite harry lot vermin live in paradise. No wonder so little works. Money does not enter into it at all. The racist bigot only sees things in terms of them and us. As far as his ilk are concerned, I'm proud to be one of "them". Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. And we will be deafened by the cheering. I paid taxes into the system all my life and it certainly wasn't in order to support a select few inward looking racists. You're free to leave... People that live and work in a place are entitled to the same benefits as the rest of the population. Depends on whether they are there legally or not. Although after Brexit the true reasons for the Conservative push will become clear. Yeah, yeah, its those damned jews conspiring in smoke filled rooms to shaft us all, again... Zero hour contracts and no employment protection. Even sillier than you usually manage. And Harry will still have vast quantities of foreigners to focus the vitriol upon. But he gets stuck with them when he is too lazy to do his own DIY. Fox is going to complain to the BBC about painting a poor picture of Brexit. Hardly the end of civilisation as we know it. The BBC are not telling half of it. The Guardian, Independent and Irish times would make real depressing reading for Fox. Ireland are planning a new second city as Dublin absorbs the financial institutions that wish to maintain an EU presence. They 'planned' all sorts of things with new housing too, and ended up with the most obscene mess the west has seen for centurys too. You're free to head off there and pay for that too. Apparently May said the exodus wouldn't happen. It wont, you watch. Is there anything the plonkers have actually got right? Yep, that you remoaners would keep remoaning forever. I can just see the next wheeze the Tory think tank comes up with, outdo Labour with a black female PM. Dianne Abbot will be recycled yet!! Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed remoaner fantasys. |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +1000, "Rod Speed"
wrote: "Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message ... On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:51:31 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:05:06 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ITbhTu2BBQ ******* like that only go to show that all those years back Charles de Gaulle was right to try to exclude Britain. No One could understand how someone we gave so much assistance to, could reject our common market membership. Onward and upward, next stop Dublin. Thanks Brexiters, just don't come back! AB Want to know how much the harry lot are costing us? £100 billion, that is life in luxuary while the NHS staff get paid peanuts. 1% pay rise for the best and the opposite harry lot vermin live in paradise. No wonder so little works. Money does not enter into it at all. The racist bigot only sees things in terms of them and us. As far as his ilk are concerned, I'm proud to be one of "them". Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. And we will be deafened by the cheering. I paid taxes into the system all my life and it certainly wasn't in order to support a select few inward looking racists. You're free to leave... People that live and work in a place are entitled to the same benefits as the rest of the population. Depends on whether they are there legally or not. Although after Brexit the true reasons for the Conservative push will become clear. Yeah, yeah, its those damned jews conspiring in smoke filled rooms to shaft us all, again... You Brexit bigots never miss a trick, do you? Zero hour contracts and no employment protection. Even sillier than you usually manage. No. The EU has very few countries with that type of contract. In Ireland for instance a 25% wage must be paid as a minimum. Thus removing the need for taxpayers to artificially keep companies that wont pay a living wage afloat. And Harry will still have vast quantities of foreigners to focus the vitriol upon. But he gets stuck with them when he is too lazy to do his own DIY. Fox is going to complain to the BBC about painting a poor picture of Brexit. Hardly the end of civilisation as we know it. The BBC are not telling half of it. The Guardian, Independent and Irish times would make real depressing reading for Fox. Ireland are planning a new second city as Dublin absorbs the financial institutions that wish to maintain an EU presence. They 'planned' all sorts of things with new housing too, and ended up with the most obscene mess the west has seen for centurys too. No they didn't. Some estates were ghost towns, but the market has recovered. Property prices are increasing rapidly again. You're free to head off there and pay for that too. It's all paid for. Irelands on the up. Apparently May said the exodus wouldn't happen. It wont, you watch. No, the EU will more than welcome a return to groats and guineas. Is there anything the plonkers have actually got right? Yep, that you remoaners would keep remoaning forever. No, I'm not a remainer. Britain can leave. I am beginning to realise what tremendous opportunities will come of it. I just dont want to be in Britain when the disaster unfolds. I can just see the next wheeze the Tory think tank comes up with, outdo Labour with a black female PM. Dianne Abbot will be recycled yet!! Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed remoaner fantasys. Really? I would chose her over May any day. Not that she's much of an asset to any institution, but look at the rubbish in number 10 now. AB |
OT More on Brexit
"Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +1000, "Rod Speed" wrote: "Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message ... On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:51:31 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:05:06 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ITbhTu2BBQ ******* like that only go to show that all those years back Charles de Gaulle was right to try to exclude Britain. No One could understand how someone we gave so much assistance to, could reject our common market membership. Onward and upward, next stop Dublin. Thanks Brexiters, just don't come back! AB Want to know how much the harry lot are costing us? £100 billion, that is life in luxuary while the NHS staff get paid peanuts. 1% pay rise for the best and the opposite harry lot vermin live in paradise. No wonder so little works. Money does not enter into it at all. The racist bigot only sees things in terms of them and us. As far as his ilk are concerned, I'm proud to be one of "them". Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. And we will be deafened by the cheering. I paid taxes into the system all my life and it certainly wasn't in order to support a select few inward looking racists. You're free to leave... People that live and work in a place are entitled to the same benefits as the rest of the population. Depends on whether they are there legally or not. Although after Brexit the true reasons for the Conservative push will become clear. Yeah, yeah, its those damned jews conspiring in smoke filled rooms to shaft us all, again... You Brexit bigots never miss a trick, do you? I don't care if Britain leaves the EU or not. What matters is that the majority who bothered to vote decided that they want Britain to leave. Zero hour contracts and no employment protection. Even sillier than you usually manage. No. Yep. The EU has very few countries with that type of contract. Irrelevant to your stupid pig ignorant claim that the Torys are deliberately attempting to engineer those by leaving the EU. The Torys didn't even want Britain to leave the EU. In Ireland for instance a 25% wage must be paid as a minimum. Then **** off there if you prefer that approach. Thus removing the need for taxpayers to artificially keep companies that wont pay a living wage afloat. Then **** off there if you prefer that approach. And get to wear the complete ****up they made of new housing. And Harry will still have vast quantities of foreigners to focus the vitriol upon. But he gets stuck with them when he is too lazy to do his own DIY. Fox is going to complain to the BBC about painting a poor picture of Brexit. Hardly the end of civilisation as we know it. The BBC are not telling half of it. The Guardian, Independent and Irish times would make real depressing reading for Fox. Ireland are planning a new second city as Dublin absorbs the financial institutions that wish to maintain an EU presence. They 'planned' all sorts of things with new housing too, and ended up with the most obscene mess the west has seen for centurys too. No they didn't. Corse they did. Some estates were ghost towns, but the market has recovered. They came close to bankrupting the entire ****ing country and it was only the bailout by the EU that saved their bacon on that. Property prices are increasing rapidly again. Hardly surprising when they were completely ****ing worthless. You're free to head off there and pay for that too. It's all paid for. Irelands on the up. Then **** off there if you believe that. Apparently May said the exodus wouldn't happen. It wont, you watch. No, the EU will more than welcome a return to groats and guineas. How odd that its compulsory for new joiners to the EU to be in the eurozone. Is there anything the plonkers have actually got right? Yep, that you remoaners would keep remoaning forever. No, I'm not a remainer. More of your bull**** and lies. Britain can leave. They are leaving. You get no say what so ever on whether they can or not. I am beginning to realise what tremendous opportunities will come of it. I just dont want to be in Britain when the disaster unfolds. No disaster will unfold and you are free to **** off any time. I can just see the next wheeze the Tory think tank comes up with, outdo Labour with a black female PM. Dianne Abbot will be recycled yet!! Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed remoaner fantasys. Really? Yep, really, you watch. I would chose her over May any day. You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly irrelevant. She's never gunna be a ****ing Tory. Not that she's much of an asset to any institution, but look at the rubbish in number 10 now. You're free to **** off to Ireland where they do what the ****ing pope wants if you like. |
OT More on Brexit
On 23/07/17 23:46, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote:
Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. Why wait? -- You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. Al Capone |
OT More on Brexit
"Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message ... On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:51:31 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote: Ireland are planning a new second city as Dublin absorbs the financial institutions that wish to maintain an EU presence. they don't need to plan a second city they've still got thousands of empty houses from the last boom and bust tim |
OT More on Brexit
"Cursitor Doom" wrote in message ... On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:46:17 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Ireland are planning a new second city as Dublin absorbs the financial institutions that wish to maintain an EU presence. Dream on. The Irish can plan whatever they like but they're still on the bones of their arse and will have to raise taxes pretty damn soon; economists know this well and so do the banks! If there is an exodus of banks from the City (yay good riddance!) Ireland is about the last place they'll re-settle. actually not it's higher up the list than Paris (too many restrictive employment laws, taxes too high) and Frankfurt (a cultural desert) That the French and German banks might be moving back to France and Germany doesn't not prove that the American banks will tim |
OT More on Brexit
tim... posted
"Cursitor Doom" wrote in message ... On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:46:17 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Ireland are planning a new second city as Dublin absorbs the financial institutions that wish to maintain an EU presence. Dream on. The Irish can plan whatever they like but they're still on the bones of their arse and will have to raise taxes pretty damn soon; economists know this well and so do the banks! If there is an exodus of banks from the City (yay good riddance!) Ireland is about the last place they'll re-settle. actually not it's higher up the list than Paris (too many restrictive employment laws, taxes too high) and Frankfurt (a cultural desert) That the French and German banks might be moving back to France and Germany They're not. doesn't not prove that the American banks will Nobody will "move" anywhere. The most that might happen is that some banks will set up subsidiary offices in an EU member state that they might not have done before. -- Jack |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 06:49:12 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote: On 23/07/17 23:46, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. Why wait? To maximise my cash in the UK I am also modifying the property I live in to make it more marketable to tenants. And when the pound has plummeted, yet before the regulatory system changes to allow the Americans and every other cheapskate country to offload their toxic carcinigenic crud on the UK, I'll be gone. AB |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:04:58 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote: In article , Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 06:49:12 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/07/17 23:46, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. Why wait? To maximise my cash in the UK I am also modifying the property I live in to make it more marketable to tenants. And when the pound has plummeted, yet before the regulatory system changes to allow the Americans and every other cheapskate country to offload their toxic carcinigenic crud on the UK, I'll be gone. Er, why would the regulatory system change to do that? And which "toxic carcinogenic crud" did you have in mind? The whole lot will change. The fishermen are getting geared up for sales of the "accidental" By catch. Maybe it didn't make the BBC, but Fox is drumming up business in the US. Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea, but that's what we'll be buying into. Food apart, I couldn't even chlorinate final effluent due to the contamination of the organic matter. Final effluent isn't a foodstuff. Rancid American chicken portions are. Of course deregulation is a wonderful tool for business, it brought us mad cow, salmonella, antibiotic resistance, E coli. The Conservatives are great at deregulation, they will play a blinder for the US business, they have a tremendous track record. Many years back, Maggie was warned what happens when you feed dead herbivores to live ones. As usual it was just red tape holding business back. The only good that ever came of it was the episode where Gummer was shown up by his daughter to be the inane useless pillock that he was. I seem to recollect reading a very interesting tome while in Dubai during Ramadan, I'm not a muslim, but they do seem to incorporate the basics needed for survival into their religion, and expect the rules to be followed. Feeding animals to herbivores hundreds of years back was something that they knew wasn't right, then along come the Conservatives with an eye for profit and a desire to wipe the rulebook clean. AB |
OT More on Brexit
"Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message
... On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 06:49:12 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/07/17 23:46, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. Why wait? To maximise my cash in the UK I am also modifying the property I live in to make it more marketable to tenants. And when the pound has plummeted, yet before the regulatory system changes to allow the Americans and every other cheapskate country to offload their toxic carcinigenic crud on the UK, I'll be gone. No you won't, unfortunately. If you were that honest about all the ******** you talk, you'd have been long gone. Sadly, the UK will have to put up with you whilst you wither and decay all the while becoming an increasing burden on the honest citizens until you finally pop yer clogs. |
OT More on Brexit
Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote:
Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/ignore-the-scare-stories-from-remainers-over-chlorinated-chicken |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:41:48 +0100, "Richard"
wrote: "Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 06:49:12 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/07/17 23:46, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. Why wait? To maximise my cash in the UK I am also modifying the property I live in to make it more marketable to tenants. And when the pound has plummeted, yet before the regulatory system changes to allow the Americans and every other cheapskate country to offload their toxic carcinigenic crud on the UK, I'll be gone. No you won't, unfortunately. If you were that honest about all the ******** you talk, you'd have been long gone. Sadly, the UK will have to put up with you whilst you wither and decay all the while becoming an increasing burden on the honest citizens until you finally pop yer clogs. A very reasoned argument. You work in the food industry? You work in water treatment? There were no end of thick simpletons who ignored the warnings regarding BSE also. Mr Gummer being a notable example. The risks from Chlorine contamination of organics are well documented. Again simple logic when applied provides a few clues. Many industries have gone away from chlorine to ozone for EFFLUENT treatment. Now why would they stop treating effluent with something nice and cheap like a hypo solution? Why would something deemed unfit for effluent treatment be acceptable for the food industry? I do love that instant response, going full blast with your stupid inorant "righteous" indignation. You are just another flag waving tosspot who thinks patriotism excuses the need for common sense. What's more, your ilk will dump everything of value this country has in order to do buy cheap substandard crud from the US. I sincerely hope you feel good, "making America Great Again" AB |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:42:13 +0100, Andy Burns
wrote: Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/ignore-the-scare-stories-from-remainers-over-chlorinated-chicken That article is misleading. It ignores a basic, fundamental fact. Properly produced, fresh meat does not need chlorine. Chlorine is bad for the individual and bad for the environment. A considerable number of factions would be dead against these products, The Brexit connection simply means that products of this nature are going to flood the British market without due regard for the risks. Americans are not nice when it comes to business, it's cash first and worry about the consequences after, AB |
OT More on Brexit
"Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message
... On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:41:48 +0100, "Richard" wrote: "Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 06:49:12 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/07/17 23:46, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. Why wait? To maximise my cash in the UK I am also modifying the property I live in to make it more marketable to tenants. And when the pound has plummeted, yet before the regulatory system changes to allow the Americans and every other cheapskate country to offload their toxic carcinigenic crud on the UK, I'll be gone. No you won't, unfortunately. If you were that honest about all the ******** you talk, you'd have been long gone. Sadly, the UK will have to put up with you whilst you wither and decay all the while becoming an increasing burden on the honest citizens until you finally pop yer clogs. A very reasoned argument. You work in the food industry? You work in water treatment? There were no end of thick simpletons who ignored the warnings regarding BSE also. Mr Gummer being a notable example. The risks from Chlorine contamination of organics are well documented. Again simple logic when applied provides a few clues. Many industries have gone away from chlorine to ozone for EFFLUENT treatment. Now why would they stop treating effluent with something nice and cheap like a hypo solution? Why would something deemed unfit for effluent treatment be acceptable for the food industry? I do love that instant response, going full blast with your stupid inorant "righteous" indignation. You are just another flag waving tosspot who thinks patriotism excuses the need for common sense. What's more, your ilk will dump everything of value this country has in order to do buy cheap substandard crud from the US. I sincerely hope you feel good, "making America Great Again" Am I close to being warm guessing that you don't celebrate the 4th July, Thanksgiving and don't watch American football? |
OT More on Brexit
Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote:
Andy Burns wrote: I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/ignore-the-scare-stories-from-remainers-over-chlorinated-chicken Chlorine is bad for the individual and bad for the environment. It's in water, and I gather salmonella isn't so good for you either. If the chlorine washed meat is as white as is claimed, I'm sure you'll be able to tell it apart from the yellow corn-fed chicken ... at a price. |
OT More on Brexit
Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp posted
Americans are not nice when it comes to business, it's cash first and worry about the consequences after, "The racist bigot only sees things in terms of them and us" (c) Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsop (for it is he) in this very thread. -- Jack |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 20:34:00 +0100, Andy Burns
wrote: Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Andy Burns wrote: I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/ignore-the-scare-stories-from-remainers-over-chlorinated-chicken Chlorine is bad for the individual and bad for the environment. It's in water, and I gather salmonella isn't so good for you either. If the chlorine washed meat is as white as is claimed, I'm sure you'll be able to tell it apart from the yellow corn-fed chicken ... at a price. Give that man a kewpie doll! It is in the water, that's correct. Before it goes in the water, the water is filtered, treated with poly aluminum chloride, polyelectrolytes and often goes through a dedicated filter press prior to dosing with hypochlorate. The catchword is organics. Clean water isn't a risk, although it may be a good idea to break out the Colgate if the choppers are a bit on the slimy side. I was surprised really, but I heard on the news about four years or so back, that a food processing company in Birmingham was caught recycling waste chicken. They were washing rancid fillets with bleach and petting them back in the food chain. They were prosecuted!! AB |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 20:29:16 +0100, "Richard"
wrote: "Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:41:48 +0100, "Richard" wrote: "Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 06:49:12 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/07/17 23:46, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. Why wait? To maximise my cash in the UK I am also modifying the property I live in to make it more marketable to tenants. And when the pound has plummeted, yet before the regulatory system changes to allow the Americans and every other cheapskate country to offload their toxic carcinigenic crud on the UK, I'll be gone. No you won't, unfortunately. If you were that honest about all the ******** you talk, you'd have been long gone. Sadly, the UK will have to put up with you whilst you wither and decay all the while becoming an increasing burden on the honest citizens until you finally pop yer clogs. A very reasoned argument. You work in the food industry? You work in water treatment? There were no end of thick simpletons who ignored the warnings regarding BSE also. Mr Gummer being a notable example. The risks from Chlorine contamination of organics are well documented. Again simple logic when applied provides a few clues. Many industries have gone away from chlorine to ozone for EFFLUENT treatment. Now why would they stop treating effluent with something nice and cheap like a hypo solution? Why would something deemed unfit for effluent treatment be acceptable for the food industry? I do love that instant response, going full blast with your stupid inorant "righteous" indignation. You are just another flag waving tosspot who thinks patriotism excuses the need for common sense. What's more, your ilk will dump everything of value this country has in order to do buy cheap substandard crud from the US. I sincerely hope you feel good, "making America Great Again" Am I close to being warm guessing that you don't celebrate the 4th July, Thanksgiving and don't watch American football? I use Allen Bradley PLC's and Mettler Toledo pH instruments. The food industry isn't a speciality, but the snippets I have heard about the American business approach are scary, and when it comes to food, I don't think one country should be allowed to produce and police new genetic strains without a balanced oversight. The Irish potato famine was a prime example of what happens when people are overly dependent on a crop or a common feature of a range of crops. What happens when Monsanto trigger the the botanic equivalent of the WGA program? Unfortunately in the short term, the biggest US export will be NHS managers, they will soon be running out of customers in the states, and like the tobacco companies, they will have to go further afield to fleece the "fresh meat", because all of their customer base have died paupers. AB |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:11:50 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote: In article , Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:04:58 +0100, Tim Streater wrote: In article , Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 06:49:12 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 23/07/17 23:46, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. Why wait? To maximise my cash in the UK I am also modifying the property I live in to make it more marketable to tenants. And when the pound has plummeted, yet before the regulatory system changes to allow the Americans and every other cheapskate country to offload their toxic carcinigenic crud on the UK, I'll be gone. Er, why would the regulatory system change to do that? And which "toxic carcinogenic crud" did you have in mind? The whole lot will change. The fishermen are getting geared up for sales of the "accidental" By catch. Maybe it didn't make the BBC, but Fox is drumming up business in the US. Hmm, I see you're suffering from verbal diarrhoea. Have you been to the doctor about it? Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea, but that's what we'll be buying into. As has been pointed out, you get many times more chlorine from drinking water than you'll ever get from eating imported US chickens. Water shouldn't contain organic material. If it did, no water utility would dose chlorine into it. The organics are ALL removed prior to dosing. Food apart, I couldn't even chlorinate final effluent due to the contamination of the organic matter. Final effluent isn't a foodstuff. Rancid American chicken portions are. It isn't rancid. D'ye need a dictionary? Of course deregulation is a wonderful tool for business, it brought us mad cow, salmonella, antibiotic resistance, E coli. Anyone got one of those white jackets with the long sleeves? The Conservatives are great at deregulation, they will play a blinder for the US business, they have a tremendous track record. Many years back, Maggie was warned what happens when you feed dead herbivores to live ones. As usual it was just red tape holding business back. The only good that ever came of it was the episode where Gummer was shown up by his daughter to be the inane useless pillock that he was. You think that a herbivore never ingested animal matter before then? Not on a commercial scale, no. AB |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:13:46 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote: In article , Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:42:13 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/0...rom-remainers- over-chlorinated-chicken That article is misleading. It ignores a basic, fundamental fact. Properly produced, fresh meat does not need chlorine. Nice shimmy, Mr Biscuit-Barrel: you have no argument so you shift the goal posts. I think you miss the point. Chlorine kills bacteria and removes smells. Like wearing hard hats or dust masks, it is far better to remove the problem at source instead of taking precautions. If chicken is produced in a clean hygenic environment, chlorine is an irrellevence and can only reduce the flavour and quality of the finished product. In other words it's either old stock or produced in a filthy slaughterhouse. AB |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:39:46 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote: In article , Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 21:13:46 +0100, Tim Streater wrote: In article , Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:42:13 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/0...s-from-remaine rs- over-chlorinated-chicken That article is misleading. It ignores a basic, fundamental fact. Properly produced, fresh meat does not need chlorine. Nice shimmy, Mr Biscuit-Barrel: you have no argument so you shift the goal posts. I think you miss the point. Chlorine kills bacteria and removes smells. Like wearing hard hats or dust masks, it is far better to remove the problem at source instead of taking precautions. Hear that chaps? We don't actually need to wear hard hats, protective glasses, or dust masks. You really don't understand the "system" do you. Basic H&S, remove the risk at source, PPE is a last resort. Not really a mystery. The most basic operator on a civil's site would grunt something in agreement. You should get out more. I think the "chaps" might be having a bit of a chuckle behind your back incidentally If chicken is produced in a clean hygenic environment, ... Good luck with that. It's chumps like you, the people that don't see the need for regulations or standards that are a risk to us all. If companies get away with food production in a fithy environment, then they can undercut the company paying skilled cleaning staff. Soon there is a shortage of honest decent suppliers, as competition isn't possible if the market is skewed by malpractice. Malpractice and filth needs chlorine. Clean, fresh produce doesn't. Got it yet?? AB |
OT More on Brexit
On 24/07/2017 20:20, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:42:13 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/ignore-the-scare-stories-from-remainers-over-chlorinated-chicken That article is misleading. It ignores a basic, fundamental fact. Properly produced, fresh meat does not need chlorine. Chlorine is bad for the individual and bad for the environment. Just as well we don't stick it in the drinking water then.... -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
OT More on Brexit
On 25/07/17 12:14, John Rumm wrote:
On 24/07/2017 20:20, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:42:13 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/ignore-the-scare-stories-from-remainers-over-chlorinated-chicken That article is misleading. It ignores a basic, fundamental fact. Properly produced, fresh meat does not need chlorine. Chlorine is bad for the individual and bad for the environment. Just as well we don't stick it in the drinking water then.... Of course 'properely produced' is a meaningless stament. My parents generation especailly those who lived on farms and grew their own food suffered contrinuosly from upseet stomacahs. Salmonella was a way of life and all poultry carry the disease. But thatn Traquin is a complete plonker anyway, which is why he's plonked -- Karl Marx said religion is the opium of the people. But Marxism is the crack cocaine. |
OT More on Brexit
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 25/07/17 12:14, John Rumm wrote: On 24/07/2017 20:20, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:42:13 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/ignore-the-scare-stories-from-remainers-over-chlorinated-chicken That article is misleading. It ignores a basic, fundamental fact. Properly produced, fresh meat does not need chlorine. Chlorine is bad for the individual and bad for the environment. Just as well we don't stick it in the drinking water then.... Of course 'properely produced' is a meaningless stament. My parents generation especailly those who lived on farms and grew their own food suffered contrinuosly from upseet stomacahs. Salmonella was a way of life and all poultry carry the disease. But thatn Traquin is a complete plonker anyway, which is why he's plonked I can't believe it, are you really a plonker like Dave? You don't HAVE to read posts, you know. Getting the computer to moderate what you read? LMFAO. |
OT More on Brexit
On 25/07/17 13:45, bm wrote:
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 25/07/17 12:14, John Rumm wrote: On 24/07/2017 20:20, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:42:13 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/ignore-the-scare-stories-from-remainers-over-chlorinated-chicken That article is misleading. It ignores a basic, fundamental fact. Properly produced, fresh meat does not need chlorine. Chlorine is bad for the individual and bad for the environment. Just as well we don't stick it in the drinking water then.... Of course 'properely produced' is a meaningless stament. My parents generation especailly those who lived on farms and grew their own food suffered contrinuosly from upseet stomacahs. Salmonella was a way of life and all poultry carry the disease. But thatn Traquin is a complete plonker anyway, which is why he's plonked I can't believe it, are you really a plonker like Dave? You don't HAVE to read posts, you know. Getting the computer to moderate what you read? LMFAO. I don't have time for Tarquin It removes the temptation to respond to his trolling It declutters te newgropup so more interesting people are not lost oin the noise. It is of course not moderation. So that makes you a plonkable troll as well bye -- The biggest threat to humanity comes from socialism, which has utterly diverted our attention away from what really matters to our existential survival, to indulging in navel gazing and faux moral investigations into what the world ought to be, whilst we fail utterly to deal with what it actually is. |
OT More on Brexit
On Sunday, 23 July 2017 22:53:55 UTC+1, Nomen Nescio wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:05:06 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ITbhTu2BBQ ******* like that only go to show that all those years back Charles de Gaulle was right to try to exclude Britain. No One could understand how someone we gave so much assistance to, could reject our common market membership. Onward and upward, next stop Dublin. Thanks Brexiters, just don't come back! AB Want to know how much the harry lot are costing us? £100 billion, that is life in luxuary while the NHS staff get paid peanuts. 1% pay rise for the best and the opposite harry lot vermin live in paradise. No wonder so little works. But don't forget the nurses have had to put up with the 1% cap for 5 years UNDER the EU, while we employ cheaper nurses from the EU and elsewhere. Now we've run out of cheap EU nurses so are looking further a field for cheap nurses rather than train our own, and now they are leaving. |
OT More on Brexit
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 25/07/17 13:45, bm wrote: "The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... On 25/07/17 12:14, John Rumm wrote: On 24/07/2017 20:20, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:42:13 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/07/ignore-the-scare-stories-from-remainers-over-chlorinated-chicken That article is misleading. It ignores a basic, fundamental fact. Properly produced, fresh meat does not need chlorine. Chlorine is bad for the individual and bad for the environment. Just as well we don't stick it in the drinking water then.... Of course 'properely produced' is a meaningless stament. My parents generation especailly those who lived on farms and grew their own food suffered contrinuosly from upseet stomacahs. Salmonella was a way of life and all poultry carry the disease. But thatn Traquin is a complete plonker anyway, which is why he's plonked I can't believe it, are you really a plonker like Dave? You don't HAVE to read posts, you know. Getting the computer to moderate what you read? LMFAO. I don't have time for Tarquin It removes the temptation to respond to his trolling It declutters te newgropup so more interesting people are not lost oin the noise. It is of course not moderation. So that makes you a plonkable troll as well bye LOL, what a plonker. |
OT More on Brexit
In message , Archibald
Tarquin Blenkinsopp writes Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea, but that's what we'll be buying into. Although I'm a Remainer, I can see little problem with chlorinated chicken. Presumably it's effective at killing the bugs, and I guess there'll be very little chlorine in it by the time you come to eat it. -- Ian |
OT More on Brexit
In message , John
Rumm writes On 24/07/2017 20:20, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:42:13 +0100, Andy Burns wrote: Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea I don't eat meat, so haven't got a cock in this fight, but ... https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/0...stories-from-r emainers-over-chlorinated-chicken That article is misleading. It ignores a basic, fundamental fact. Properly produced, fresh meat does not need chlorine. Chlorine is bad for the individual and bad for the environment. Just as well we don't stick it in the drinking water then.... or swimming baths. -- Ian |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 13:31:01 +0100, Handsome Jack
wrote: tim... posted "Cursitor Doom" wrote in message ... On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:46:17 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Ireland are planning a new second city as Dublin absorbs the financial institutions that wish to maintain an EU presence. Dream on. The Irish can plan whatever they like but they're still on the bones of their arse and will have to raise taxes pretty damn soon; economists know this well and so do the banks! If there is an exodus of banks from the City (yay good riddance!) Ireland is about the last place they'll re-settle. actually not it's higher up the list than Paris (too many restrictive employment laws, taxes too high) and Frankfurt (a cultural desert) That the French and German banks might be moving back to France and Germany They're not. France is working very strongly attract the banks. doesn't not prove that the American banks will Nobody will "move" anywhere. The most that might happen is that some banks will set up subsidiary offices in an EU member state that they might not have done before. That's quite naive. If they think they are going to get a good deal they'll relocate. |
OT More on Brexit
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 13:43:38 +1000, "Rod Speed"
wrote: "Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 10:25:38 +1000, "Rod Speed" wrote: "Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp" wrote in message ... On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 23:51:31 +0200 (CEST), Nomen Nescio wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 20:05:06 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 09:09:27 -0700 (PDT), harry wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ITbhTu2BBQ ******* like that only go to show that all those years back Charles de Gaulle was right to try to exclude Britain. No One could understand how someone we gave so much assistance to, could reject our common market membership. Onward and upward, next stop Dublin. Thanks Brexiters, just don't come back! AB Want to know how much the harry lot are costing us? £100 billion, that is life in luxuary while the NHS staff get paid peanuts. 1% pay rise for the best and the opposite harry lot vermin live in paradise. No wonder so little works. Money does not enter into it at all. The racist bigot only sees things in terms of them and us. As far as his ilk are concerned, I'm proud to be one of "them". Come Brexit, I'm going to say stuff the UK. And we will be deafened by the cheering. I paid taxes into the system all my life and it certainly wasn't in order to support a select few inward looking racists. You're free to leave... People that live and work in a place are entitled to the same benefits as the rest of the population. Depends on whether they are there legally or not. Although after Brexit the true reasons for the Conservative push will become clear. Yeah, yeah, its those damned jews conspiring in smoke filled rooms to shaft us all, again... You Brexit bigots never miss a trick, do you? I don't care if Britain leaves the EU or not. You seem to based on many previous posts. What matters is that the majority who bothered to vote decided that they want Britain to leave. A very small one, and many were mislead by lies from the Brexit campaigns. Zero hour contracts and no employment protection. Even sillier than you usually manage. No. Yep. The EU has very few countries with that type of contract. Irrelevant to your stupid pig ignorant claim that the Torys are deliberately attempting to engineer those by leaving the EU. The Torys didn't even want Britain to leave the EU. They seem to now. |
OT More on Brexit
On 25 Jul 2017 15:41:56 GMT, Huge wrote:
On 2017-07-25, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp writes Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea, but that's what we'll be buying into. Although I'm a Remainer, I can see little problem with chlorinated chicken. Presumably it's effective at killing the bugs, and I guess there'll be very little chlorine in it by the time you come to eat it. Even the EU's scientists don't think there's a problem with "chlorinated chicken". (It's no such thing, of course.) The ban is merely to protect European chicken producers, and their reasoning ("farm to fork") is nonsense. Can we believe any of this though? |
OT More on Brexit
In article ,
Mark wrote: Nobody will "move" anywhere. The most that might happen is that some banks will set up subsidiary offices in an EU member state that they might not have done before. That's quite naive. If they think they are going to get a good deal they'll relocate. They certainly will if the reason they chose London as a head office was to give access to the EU. -- *Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
OT More on Brexit
On 25/07/17 16:41, Huge wrote:
On 2017-07-25, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp writes Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea, but that's what we'll be buying into. Although I'm a Remainer, I can see little problem with chlorinated chicken. Presumably it's effective at killing the bugs, and I guess there'll be very little chlorine in it by the time you come to eat it. Even the EU's scientists don't think there's a problem with "chlorinated chicken". (It's no such thing, of course.) The ban is merely to protect European chicken producers, and their reasoning ("farm to fork") is nonsense. I can't see how this is any different to washing out a baby's bottle with Milton which is based on sodium hypochlorite aka standard household bleach. As long as the concentrations are set at a safe level and the bird is drained, it seems like quite a reasonable idea given the prevalence of poultry to harbour nasty surface bugs. |
OT More on Brexit
In article ,
Chris Hogg wrote: On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:35:19 +0100, Archibald Tarquin Blenkinsopp wrote: Chlorinated chicken isn't a good idea, but that's what we'll be buying into. Food apart, I couldn't even chlorinate final effluent due to the contamination of the organic matter. Final effluent isn't a foodstuff. Rancid American chicken portions are. OOI, why should they be rancid. Do you think Americans would eat rancid chicken, or Brits for that matter? isn't that what curry is for? -- from KT24 in Surrey, England |
OT More on Brexit
Tim Watts wrote:
I can't see how this is any different to washing out a baby's bottle with Milton which is based on sodium hypochlorite aka standard household bleach. Do people avoid eating American chicken if they go there (or anywhere that imports from there) on holidays? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter