Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
[Power] WIPP begins receiving shipments of nuclear waste again following 2014 accident
"The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in Carlsbad, New Mexico, began accepting shipments of transuranic waste this month for the first time since February 2014 when an explosion of a drum of plutonium and americium waste halted all deliveries" https://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-polic...aste-facility- receives-its-first-shipment-since-2014-accident/ It seems to me the Americans have their long-term waste repositories built and up and running (WIPP, Yucca Mountain). What about the UK? What are we doing with our waste? -- (\_/) (='.'=) "Between two evils, I always pick (")_(") the one I never tried before." - Mae West |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
[Power] WIPP begins receiving shipments of nuclear waste again following 2014 accident
En el artículo , Mike Tomlinson
escribió: What about the UK? What are we doing with our waste? Answering my own question: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-35096566 -- (\_/) (='.'=) "Between two evils, I always pick (")_(") the one I never tried before." - Mae West |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
[Power] WIPP begins receiving shipments of nuclear waste againfollowing 2014 accident
On 4/28/2017 8:48 AM, Brian Gaff wrote:
Can we not use the heat generated low grade though it is to make more power? After all plutonium generators are powering spacecraft all over the Solar system and beyond. Brian Only the high level waste generates enough heat to use. I don't recall the figures but if I said 1 watt thermal per person it would give you the right idea. Thermoelectric generators are even more inefficient and expensive than renewables. As people like Walter Marshall and (I think) Jim Lovelock have said, they would be happy to have a few kW down the garden as a compact source for a heat pump. So would I. And to follow up another point from the OP, Yucca Mountain has been built but never used because of endless legal challenges. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
[Power] WIPP begins receiving shipments of nuclear waste againfollowing 2014 accident
On 4/27/2017 8:28 AM, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
"The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) in Carlsbad, New Mexico, began accepting shipments of transuranic waste this month for the first time since February 2014 when an explosion of a drum of plutonium and americium waste halted all deliveries" https://arstechnica.co.uk/tech-polic...aste-facility- receives-its-first-shipment-since-2014-accident/ It seems to me the Americans have their long-term waste repositories built and up and running (WIPP, Yucca Mountain). What about the UK? What are we doing with our waste? WIPP is for weapons waste. Yucca Mountain, for civil waste, is built but has never been used because of legal challenges. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
[Power] WIPP begins receiving shipments of nuclear waste againfollowing 2014 accident
On 4/28/2017 10:54 AM, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , newshound wrote: On 4/28/2017 8:48 AM, Brian Gaff wrote: Can we not use the heat generated low grade though it is to make more power? After all plutonium generators are powering spacecraft all over the Solar system and beyond. Brian Only the high level waste generates enough heat to use. I don't recall the figures but if I said 1 watt thermal per person it would give you the right idea. Thermoelectric generators are even more inefficient and expensive than renewables. I didn't catch the earlier part of the thread, but if the plutonium referred to is e.g. in waste from reactors, it'll probably be the wrong isotope. Obtaining the right one (Pu-238) would be a bloody expensive way to generate a few hundred watts. The suggestion was "Why not use the heat from *standard* high level waste". The answer is that it is not, in general, economic. Trying to think of a valid counter-example, I suppose if you had something like a small manned scientific base in the arctic or antarctic, you might be able to reduce the fuel cost of heating this way, although you would still presumably need fossil fuel for electricity (and that would give you useful waste heat). Perhaps a windy enough location could survive on windmills and batteries (plus heat). You could probably engineer a passive heating system which had no dependency on electrical power. But it would not be cheap. |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
[Power] WIPP begins receiving shipments of nuclear waste againfollowing 2014 accident
On 28/04/17 13:49, newshound wrote:
The suggestion was "Why not use the heat from *standard* high level waste". The answer is that it is not, in general, economic. And that is largely because of radiation legislation. Throwing a semi critical lump of whatever into a cast iron aga and using e.g. a DHW pump to control the heats of the ovens and plates is perfectly simply and feasible. Until Fear Of Radiation makes it completely impossible Trying to think of a valid counter-example, I suppose if you had something like a small manned scientific base in the arctic or antarctic, you might be able to reduce the fuel cost of heating this way, although you would still presumably need fossil fuel for electricity (and that would give you useful waste heat). Perhaps a windy enough location could survive on windmills and batteries (plus heat). You could probably engineer a passive heating system which had no dependency on electrical power. But it would not be cheap. Actually it would cost nothing if you didnt care about radiation. -- "Socialist governments traditionally do make a financial mess. They always run out of other people's money. It's quite a characteristic of them" Margaret Thatcher |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
[Power] WIPP begins receiving shipments of nuclear waste againfollowing 2014 accident
On 4/28/2017 2:09 PM, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 13:55:57 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote: On 28/04/17 13:49, newshound wrote: The suggestion was "Why not use the heat from *standard* high level waste". The answer is that it is not, in general, economic. And that is largely because of radiation legislation. Throwing a semi critical lump of whatever into a cast iron aga and using e.g. a DHW pump to control the heats of the ovens and plates is perfectly simply and feasible. Until Fear Of Radiation makes it completely impossible Trying to think of a valid counter-example, I suppose if you had something like a small manned scientific base in the arctic or antarctic, you might be able to reduce the fuel cost of heating this way, although you would still presumably need fossil fuel for electricity (and that would give you useful waste heat). Perhaps a windy enough location could survive on windmills and batteries (plus heat). You could probably engineer a passive heating system which had no dependency on electrical power. But it would not be cheap. Actually it would cost nothing if you didnt care about radiation. The problem would be that terrorists of all sorts would start accumulating the heat sources and build themselves a bomb, probably only a dirty bomb rather than thermonuclear, and in reality it probably wouldn't do much damage, either explosively or radiation-wise, but the psychological impact of a cloud of 'radiation' spread over e.g. the City of London, would be enormous. Back to fear of radiation, again. High level waste has to be shielded before it is approachable. If it is engineered into a suitable sealed container, particularly if it is large (as it is going to be, for a useful energy source), it becomes useless to terrorists. |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
[Power] WIPP begins receiving shipments of nuclear waste againfollowing 2014 accident
On Friday, 28 April 2017 10:48:22 UTC+1, newshound wrote:
On 4/28/2017 8:48 AM, Brian Gaff wrote: Can we not use the heat generated low grade though it is to make more power? After all plutonium generators are powering spacecraft all over the Solar system and beyond. Brian Only the high level waste generates enough heat to use. I don't recall the figures but if I said 1 watt thermal per person it would give you the right idea. Thermoelectric generators are even more inefficient and expensive than renewables. As people like Walter Marshall and (I think) Jim Lovelock have said, they would be happy to have a few kW down the garden as a compact source for a heat pump. So would I. And to follow up another point from the OP, Yucca Mountain has been built but never used because of endless legal challenges. No, this is the reason. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_...on_Pilot_Plant |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
[Power] WIPP begins receiving shipments of nuclear waste again following 2014 accident
En el artículo ,
newshound escribió: And to follow up another point from the OP, Yucca Mountain has been built but never used because of endless legal challenges. Yes, I'm aware of that. Thanks. I recall seeing a news article recently that the main obstacle is the Republican Senator for Nevada, Harry Reid, who by all accounts seems to be a total arsehole. Reading between the lines, they're just waiting for him to drop dead or get voted out then they can get on with commissioning it. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ds-retirement- may-revive-yucca-mountain-n/ -- (\_/) (='.'=) "Between two evils, I always pick (")_(") the one I never tried before." - Mae West |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
World Nuclear Assoc: Nuclear power in the UK - a very interesting read | UK diy | |||
OT Nuclear waste. | UK diy | |||
OT Nuclear waste. | UK diy | |||
Accident at at Sizewell B nuclear reactor? | UK diy | |||
Accident at at Sizewell B nuclear reactor? | UK diy |