| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
More of Mike's kittens
http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8852.PNG
http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8843.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8849.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8841.JPG Cuter than a cute thing in a cute basket. -- Adam |
More of Mike's kittens
ARW wrote
http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8852.PNG Funky haircut. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8843.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8849.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8841.JPG Yeah, Zeke does look pretty aggressive. Cuter than a cute thing in a cute basket. |
More of Mike's kittens
On Sunday, 2 April 2017 19:20:01 UTC+1, ARW wrote:
http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8852.PNG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8843.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8849.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8841.JPG Cuter than a cute thing in a cute basket. .... not that that's news. Maybe we need a kittens category on wiki. NT |
More of Mike's kittens
On Monday, 3 April 2017 08:43:25 UTC+1, Graham. wrote:
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 17:31:41 -0700 (PDT), tabbypurr wrote: On Sunday, 2 April 2017 19:20:01 UTC+1, ARW wrote: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8852.PNG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8843.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8849.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8841.JPG Cuter than a cute thing in a cute basket. ... not that that's news. Maybe we need a kittens category on wiki. NT restringing violins? I thought that was sheep. NT |
More of Mike's kittens
On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 17:31:41 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
On Sunday, 2 April 2017 19:20:01 UTC+1, ARW wrote: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8852.PNG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8843.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8849.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8841.JPG Cuter than a cute thing in a cute basket. ... not that that's news. Maybe we need a kittens category on wiki. Agreed, anywhere but here. OOI, I wonder if it's only those who have had their brains turned to mush by some accidental exposure to cats (some time in the future we will probably work out it's some form of mind control / cat borne parasite that does this to 'real men' g) and of what percentage here actually find such things any more 'cute' than any other mammal (especially) baby? If they actually aren't (and I don't believe they are), how come this d-i-y newsgroup isn't littered (excuse the pun) with pictures of other baby mammals, typically the most commonly kept as a 'companion animal' in the UK, the dog? Maybe the non brain mushed can show some constraint? ;-) I believe I've already suggested the reason, a feline version of the Jedi mind control, something most effective on those weak of mind of course. ;-) Cheers, T i m p.s. Sister came round yesterday with their remaining (rescue) whippet and we introduced it to our daughters rabbits who were out in their run. I think the rabbits can 'sense' when a true predator is around as one hopped up to the wire and rabbit and whippet were nose to nose for a few seconds and neither seemed particular perturbed or bothered about the other. Apparently the whippet went to chase sisters runner duck when it saw it loose in the garden for the first time and a firm 'no' was all it took to stop it (now the whippet takes no notice and is in fact 'seen off' by the duck). That's not that it couldn't dispatch the duck pretty quickly if it wanted of course, just that it is keen to please it's mistress and so doesn't. Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? |
More of Mike's kittens
On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote:
Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain |
More of Mike's kittens
On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote:
On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. NT |
More of Mike's kittens
On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote:
On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
More of Mike's kittens
T i m wrote:
On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m + 1 |
More of Mike's kittens
"T i m" wrote in message ... On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 17:31:41 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Sunday, 2 April 2017 19:20:01 UTC+1, ARW wrote: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8852.PNG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8843.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8849.JPG http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/File:IMG_8841.JPG Cuter than a cute thing in a cute basket. ... not that that's news. Maybe we need a kittens category on wiki. Agreed, anywhere but here. OOI, I wonder if it's only those who have had their brains turned to mush by some accidental exposure to cats (some time in the future we will probably work out it's some form of mind control / cat borne parasite that does this to 'real men' g) and of what percentage here actually find such things any more 'cute' than any other mammal (especially) baby? If they actually aren't (and I don't believe they are), how come this d-i-y newsgroup isn't littered (excuse the pun) with pictures of other baby mammals, typically the most commonly kept as a 'companion animal' in the UK, the dog? Maybe the non brain mushed can show some constraint? ;-) I believe I've already suggested the reason, a feline version of the Jedi mind control, something most effective on those weak of mind of course. ;-) Cheers, T i m p.s. Sister came round yesterday with their remaining (rescue) whippet and we introduced it to our daughters rabbits who were out in their run. I think the rabbits can 'sense' when a true predator is around as one hopped up to the wire and rabbit and whippet were nose to nose for a few seconds and neither seemed particular perturbed or bothered about the other. Apparently the whippet went to chase sisters runner duck when it saw it loose in the garden for the first time and a firm 'no' was all it took to stop it (now the whippet takes no notice and is in fact 'seen off' by the duck). That's not that it couldn't dispatch the duck pretty quickly if it wanted of course, just that it is keen to please it's mistress and so doesn't. Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? Doesn't typically work with most dogs when they are in a fight with another dog either. |
More of Mike's kittens
On 03/04/2017 19:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m + 1 Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) Cheers, T i m --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
More of Mike's kittens
On 03/04/2017 19:59, Rod Speed wrote:
snip Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? Doesn't typically work with most dogs when they are in a fight with another dog either. Maybe not, (and you mean 'aggressive' - out_of_control / poorly trained dogs) but the point was that the chances are it wouldn't work on most cats under most circumstances. Definition for something that is nearly impossible ... 'it's like herding cats' ... Cheers, T i m --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
More of Mike's kittens
On 03/04/2017 12:25, T i m wrote
Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? You mean having it's dinner? Of course your dog only eats animal products from a tin, animals that have no doubt been raised and slaughtered in a loving and caring way. -- Adam |
More of Mike's kittens
T i m wrote:
On 03/04/2017 19:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m + 1 Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) Real MEN do not keep cats. |
More of Mike's kittens
On 03/04/2017 21:19, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 19:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m + 1 Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) Real MEN do not keep cats. Well, I think I understand from the catists here that few people 'keep cats' (unless it's an 'indoor cat') but that the cats just keep them around to service their needs. OOI, I wonder how many (men) here actually went out and got their cats themselves (rather then becoming a an owner by chance etc) or if they actually only became involved by marriage etc? You know, the Mrs gets a cat, your brain turns to mush and you think it's yours. ;-) We (the first wife and I) only got our first (rescue) dog because she said the doctor said she couldn't have children. Turns out she was never told any such thing and she went on to have 3 children (and I'll not speak ill of the dead). Cheers, T i m --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
More of Mike's kittens
"T i m" wrote in message ... On 03/04/2017 19:59, Rod Speed wrote: snip Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? Doesn't typically work with most dogs when they are in a fight with another dog either. Maybe not, No maybe about it. (and you mean 'aggressive' - out_of_control / poorly trained dogs) Nope. but the point was that the chances are it wouldn't work on most cats under most circumstances. Doesn’t work with most dogs in most circumstances when they get into a dog fight either. Definition for something that is nearly impossible ... 'it's like herding cats' ... You clearly havent tried herding dogs either. |
More of Mike's kittens
"T i m" wrote in message ... On 03/04/2017 21:19, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 19:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m + 1 Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) Real MEN do not keep cats. Well, I think I understand from the catists here that few people 'keep cats' (unless it's an 'indoor cat') but that the cats just keep them around to service their needs. OOI, I wonder how many (men) here actually went out and got their cats themselves (rather then becoming a an owner by chance etc) or if they actually only became involved by marriage etc? You know, the Mrs gets a cat, your brain turns to mush and you think it's yours. ;-) We (the first wife and I) only got our first (rescue) dog because she said the doctor said she couldn't have children. Turns out she was never told any such thing and she went on to have 3 children So she didn’t want yours. Understandable. |
More of Mike's kittens
On 03/04/2017 21:01, ARW wrote:
On 03/04/2017 12:25, T i m wrote Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? You mean having it's dinner? I have been informed by catists that their 'companion animals' (that are rarely there) often bring dead animals in and don't eat them, preferring their pouch of Scottish farmed salmon or factory reared rabbit. Of course your dog only eats animal products from a tin, animals that have no doubt been raised and slaughtered in a loving and caring way. Yes, the would have been quickly slaughtered (often for us), not tormented to death over a long period of time. It's not to do with what is done, it's how it's done. We recently rescued a mouse from a neighbours cat that it had been 'playing with' for some time. Kill it and / or then eat it. We were also taught as kids it wasn't good to play with our food and even worse to torment / torture animals (like some other animals do, like killer whales do with seals). But then thy aren't generally kept as domestic pets ... ;-) If you want to see pest control being done quickly and efficiently, check Youtube for (Jack Russell typically) terriers and ratting. Cheers, T i m --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
More of Mike's kittens
On Monday, 3 April 2017 20:31:14 UTC+1, T i m wrote:
Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. This is the 21st century. We've overcome outdated prejudices of what being a 'geezer' involves. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24939873 Owain |
More of Mike's kittens
On 03/04/2017 22:25, wrote:
On Monday, 3 April 2017 20:31:14 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. This is the 21st century. We've overcome outdated prejudices of what being a 'geezer' involves. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24939873 Hehe, any catists we recognise from here? ;-) Cheers, T i m --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
More of Mike's kittens
On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 21:01:18 +0100, ARW wrote:
On 03/04/2017 12:25, T i m wrote Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? You mean having it's dinner? Of course your dog only eats animal products from a tin, animals that have no doubt been raised and slaughtered in a loving and caring way. It's infested with cats round here, so I bought a Patterdale Terrier to keep the stinky little bags of **** out of my garden. I haven't seen a cat in my garden since I got the dog - well, not a whole cat, anyway. |
More of Mike's kittens
On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 21:58:39 -0000 (UTC), Steve
wrote: On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 21:01:18 +0100, ARW wrote: On 03/04/2017 12:25, T i m wrote Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? You mean having it's dinner? Of course your dog only eats animal products from a tin, animals that have no doubt been raised and slaughtered in a loving and caring way. It's infested with cats round here, so I bought a Patterdale Terrier to keep the stinky little bags of **** out of my garden. I haven't seen a cat in my garden since I got the dog - well, not a whole cat, anyway. ;-) It's 'natures way'. ;-) Now all our dogs are all gone we have a similarly effective cat deterrent in the form of a PIR triggered water cannon. ;-) I saw some bloke and his two lads wandering about in our front garden the other day looking under around our stuff in a very suspicious way. Then he pulled a packet of cat food out of his packet and shook it and I was quite expecting to see a cat burst out of the wall (like the TV advert). I'm guessing it must have come out as they all walked back to their house a few doors along. I can't remember in all the years we have had dogs in the family (55) *ever* having to go onto someone else's property to recover them. Cheers, T i m |
More of Mike's kittens
"Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote in message ... T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 19:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m + 1 Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) Real MEN do not keep cats. Adam does and is much more of a real man than you are. |
More of Mike's kittens
|
More of Mike's kittens
On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 08:09:06 UTC+1, Mike Tomlinson wrote:
This is the 21st century. We've overcome outdated prejudices of what being a 'geezer' involves. Oh dear, D i m is so insecure and repressed he feels the need to prove his macho credentials. Real men love rubbing their faces in warm pussy fur. I'll say no more. Owain |
More of Mike's kittens
On 03-Apr-17 10:08 PM, T i m wrote:
On 03/04/2017 21:01, ARW wrote: On 03/04/2017 12:25, T i m wrote Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? You mean having it's dinner? I have been informed by catists that their 'companion animals' (that are rarely there) often bring dead animals in and don't eat them, ... That is usually a female cat that has noticed that its human isn't hunting, so it brings in prey for it to practice on, just as it would for its kittens. -- -- Colin Bignell |
More of Mike's kittens
|
More of Mike's kittens
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:40:23 +0100, Nightjar wrote:
On 03-Apr-17 10:08 PM, T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 21:01, ARW wrote: On 03/04/2017 12:25, T i m wrote Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? You mean having it's dinner? I have been informed by catists that their 'companion animals' (that are rarely there) often bring dead animals in and don't eat them, ... That is usually a female cat that has noticed that its human isn't hunting, so it brings in prey for it to practice on, just as it would for its kittens. I saw something somewhere how you are supposed to deal with that so they learn to not do it again (some cat whisperer type logic)? Cheers, T i m |
More of Mike's kittens
On 04/04/2017 11:52, T i m wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 00:34:20 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 08:09:06 UTC+1, Mike Tomlinson wrote: This is the 21st century. We've overcome outdated prejudices of what being a 'geezer' involves. Oh dear, D i m is so insecure and repressed he feels the need to prove his macho credentials. Real men love rubbing their faces in warm pussy fur. I'll say no more. Best not but on that we can especially agree. ;-) I wonder (outside of Adam of course) how many of the catists get the other sort of action? You can picture the likes of Tomlinson, sitting alone but surrounded by cats and Linux terminal windows. ;-) Actually I cannot picture that. However my past is catching up with me. I cannot say where I am working but one of the top brass came onto site today (basically to choose the colour the walls were to be painted[1]). When she was introduced to me there was a bit of a silence. So she is now married and is still very attractive, slim with long red hair - just like she was back in 1996 when she was 17 and I took her to London for the weekend. [1] women get the most important jobs:-) -- Adam |
More of Mike's kittens
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 18:00:49 +0100, ARW
wrote: On 04/04/2017 11:52, T i m wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 00:34:20 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 08:09:06 UTC+1, Mike Tomlinson wrote: This is the 21st century. We've overcome outdated prejudices of what being a 'geezer' involves. Oh dear, D i m is so insecure and repressed he feels the need to prove his macho credentials. Real men love rubbing their faces in warm pussy fur. I'll say no more. Best not but on that we can especially agree. ;-) I wonder (outside of Adam of course) how many of the catists get the other sort of action? You can picture the likes of Tomlinson, sitting alone but surrounded by cats and Linux terminal windows. ;-) Actually I cannot picture that. Of course you can't, your brain has now been cat mushed. ;-) However my past is catching up with me. I cannot say where I am working but one of the top brass came onto site today (basically to choose the colour the walls were to be painted[1]). When she was introduced to me there was a bit of a silence. So she is now married and is still very attractive, slim with long red hair - just like she was back in 1996 when she was 17 and I took her to London for the weekend. Sweet. [1] women get the most important jobs:-) The general manager at my last job was also a very, tall, slim and fit (she used to go to the gym every day before work) woman. For some strange reason, when I turned up on my first day she greeted me with a big open armed 'Tim!' and we hugged ... and that was how it was from then on (for 7 years). Initially I thought that was her std MO but it turns out it wasn't ... not that I was complaining of course .... ;-) Happy memories ... sigh Cheers, T i m |
More of Mike's kittens
On 04/04/2017 19:22, T i m wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 18:00:49 +0100, ARW wrote: On 04/04/2017 11:52, T i m wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 00:34:20 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 08:09:06 UTC+1, Mike Tomlinson wrote: This is the 21st century. We've overcome outdated prejudices of what being a 'geezer' involves. Oh dear, D i m is so insecure and repressed he feels the need to prove his macho credentials. Real men love rubbing their faces in warm pussy fur. I'll say no more. Best not but on that we can especially agree. ;-) I wonder (outside of Adam of course) how many of the catists get the other sort of action? You can picture the likes of Tomlinson, sitting alone but surrounded by cats and Linux terminal windows. ;-) Actually I cannot picture that. Of course you can't, your brain has now been cat mushed. ;-) However my past is catching up with me. I cannot say where I am working but one of the top brass came onto site today (basically to choose the colour the walls were to be painted[1]). When she was introduced to me there was a bit of a silence. So she is now married and is still very attractive, slim with long red hair - just like she was back in 1996 when she was 17 and I took her to London for the weekend. Sweet. Or course she is now too old for me. -- Adam |
More of Mike's kittens
On 04/04/2017 06:50, Rod Speed wrote:
"Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote in message ... Real MEN do not keep cats. Adam does and is much more of a real man than you are. Pounder is under the impression that poisoning cats makes you a real man. -- Adam |
More of Mike's kittens
"T i m" wrote in message ... On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 00:34:20 -0700 (PDT), wrote: On Tuesday, 4 April 2017 08:09:06 UTC+1, Mike Tomlinson wrote: This is the 21st century. We've overcome outdated prejudices of what being a 'geezer' involves. Oh dear, D i m is so insecure and repressed he feels the need to prove his macho credentials. Real men love rubbing their faces in warm pussy fur. I'll say no more. Best not but on that we can especially agree. ;-) I wonder (outside of Adam of course) how many of the catists get the other sort of action? Bet some do given the number of cats around. You can picture the likes of Tomlinson, sitting alone but surrounded by cats and Linux terminal windows. ;-) With Zeke gnawing on his leg. |
More of Mike's kittens
Rod Speed wrote:
"Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote in message ... T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 19:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m + 1 Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) Real MEN do not keep cats. Adam does and is much more of a real man than you are. Adam is a pikey spark living on a pikey council estate and that is all he ever will be. I've done better. |
More of Mike's kittens
On 04/04/2017 20:59, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Rod Speed wrote: "Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote in message ... T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 19:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m + 1 Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) Real MEN do not keep cats. Adam does and is much more of a real man than you are. Adam is a pikey spark living on a pikey council estate and that is all he ever will be. I've done better. Says the bloke with plastic butterflies on sticks in his garden. -- Adam |
More of Mike's kittens
ARW wrote:
On 04/04/2017 06:50, Rod Speed wrote: "Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote in message ... Real MEN do not keep cats. Adam does and is much more of a real man than you are. Pounder is under the impression that poisoning cats makes you a real man. I've never said that. Did I tell you that the catman next door laughed in my face when I casually mentioned his stinking cats ****ting in my garden? Did I tell you that he said, "That is the way it goes mate". I spent money trying to stop his stinking cats ****ting in my garden. Nothing worked. He no longer has stinking cats. |
More of Mike's kittens
On 04/04/17 11:53, T i m wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:40:23 +0100, Nightjar wrote: On 03-Apr-17 10:08 PM, T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 21:01, ARW wrote: On 03/04/2017 12:25, T i m wrote Does 'no' typically work on a cat when it's teasing a wild bird or mouse to death? You mean having it's dinner? I have been informed by catists that their 'companion animals' (that are rarely there) often bring dead animals in and don't eat them, ... That is usually a female cat that has noticed that its human isn't hunting, so it brings in prey for it to practice on, just as it would for its kittens. I saw something somewhere how you are supposed to deal with that so they learn to not do it again (some cat whisperer type logic)? Cheers, T i m Allegedly not shout at them in case they think it's not sufficient, and bag something bigger. |
More of Mike's kittens
"Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote in message ... Rod Speed wrote: "Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote in message ... T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 19:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m + 1 Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) Real MEN do not keep cats. Adam does and is much more of a real man than you are. Adam is a pikey spark living on a pikey council estate and that is all he ever will be. I've done better. He leaves you for dead real man wise. |
More of Mike's kittens
"ARW" wrote in message ... On 04/04/2017 20:59, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Rod Speed wrote: "Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote in message ... T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 19:46, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: T i m wrote: On 03/04/2017 18:08, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 13:24:47 UTC+1, wrote: On Monday, 3 April 2017 12:25:34 UTC+1, T i m wrote: Does 'no' typically work on a cat No :-) Owain It doesn't work on people that post drivel about cats either. Quite, but it's like I said, the contact with cats has turned their brains to mush. ;-( Cheers, T i m + 1 Well I mean ... big hairy d-i-y / angle grinder wielding 'geezers' fawning over pictures of kittens ffs. We will get pictures of their 'My little Pony' collections next. ;-) Real MEN do not keep cats. Adam does and is much more of a real man than you are. Adam is a pikey spark living on a pikey council estate and that is all he ever will be. I've done better. Says the bloke with plastic butterflies on sticks in his garden. They arent on sticks, they are attached to the fence. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:58 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter