Paint help for kitchen.
 

jim k Wrote in message:
Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 08:55:52 UTC+1, jim wrote:
tabbypurr Wrote in message:

Well, lets look at the facts. I've been using this painting method for about 13 years, and it's served me just fine. The basic theory of glue content in paint isn't complex, and the theory behind this method adds up too. You on the other hand have never tried the method, have no valid facts or argument to offer, and can only resort to verbal abuse, as is your tendency. Not much more need be said.

But how many times have you done this?

I haven't kept count. At a rough estimate maybe a dozen times.


NT


So you're saying that at least once a year for 13
years you've
been painting bare plaster?


Sounds a little unusual to me....

The fact you're ignoring the question is not unusual in the
slightest ;-)

--
Jim K


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Paint help for kitchen.
 

On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 21:28:06 UTC+1, jim wrote:
jim k Wrote in message:
tabbypurr Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 08:55:52 UTC+1, jim wrote:
tabbypurr Wrote in message:

Well, lets look at the facts. I've been using this painting method for about 13 years, and it's served me just fine. The basic theory of glue content in paint isn't complex, and the theory behind this method adds up too. You on the other hand have never tried the method, have no valid facts or argument to offer, and can only resort to verbal abuse, as is your tendency. Not much more need be said.

But how many times have you done this?

I haven't kept count. At a rough estimate maybe a dozen times.

So you're saying that at least once a year for 13
years you've
been painting bare plaster?


Sounds a little unusual to me....

The fact you're ignoring the question is not unusual in the
slightest ;-)

No. I wonder why.


NT

Paint help for kitchen.
 

Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 21:28:06 UTC+1, jim wrote:
jim k Wrote in message:
tabbypurr Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 08:55:52 UTC+1, jim wrote:
tabbypurr Wrote in message:

Well, lets look at the facts. I've been using this painting method for about 13 years, and it's served me just fine. The basic theory of glue content in paint isn't complex, and the theory behind this method adds up too. You on the other hand have never tried the method, have no valid facts or argument to offer, and can only resort to verbal abuse, as is your tendency. Not much more need be said.

But how many times have you done this?

I haven't kept count. At a rough estimate maybe a dozen times.

So you're saying that at least once a year for 13
years you've
been painting bare plaster?


Sounds a little unusual to me....

The fact you're ignoring the question is not unusual in the
slightest ;-)

No. I wonder why.


NT


I'm quite sure that's plainly obvious to all readers of this tale
- you're making it up again nige ;-)

What could NT also stand for?...

Not Tried
Not Tested
Not True
Not Thought through

Any more I wonder?

--
Jim K


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Paint help for kitchen.
 

On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 23:20:36 UTC+1, jim wrote:
tabbypurr Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 21:28:06 UTC+1, jim wrote:

The fact you're ignoring the question is not unusual in the
slightest ;-)

No. I wonder why.

I'm quite sure that's plainly obvious to all readers of this tale
- you're making it up again nige ;-)

What could NT also stand for?...

Not Tried
Not Tested
Not True
Not Thought through

Any more I wonder?

thank you for reminding us why you're mostly worth ignoring.

Paint help for kitchen.
 

Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 23:20:36 UTC+1, jim wrote:
tabbypurr Wrote in message:
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 21:28:06 UTC+1, jim wrote:

The fact you're ignoring the question is not unusual in the
slightest ;-)

No. I wonder why.

I'm quite sure that's plainly obvious to all readers of this tale
- you're making it up again nige ;-)

What could NT also stand for?...

Not Tried
Not Tested
Not True
Not Thought through

Any more I wonder?

thank you for reminding us why you're mostly worth ignoring.


G'night nige

--
Jim K


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Paint help for kitchen.
 

On 15/07/2016 18:45, wrote:




It doesn't. It soaks in. It's very fast to do. But keep telling us about things of which you know nothing as usual.



Buy a pump up garden sprayer, fill with water, pump up, set spray to
fine, spray large surface in a minute. Wait a few minutes to check
surface, spray again if required and then begin painting normally

--
mailto: news {at} admac {dot] myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

Paint help for kitchen.
 

alan_m wrote:
On 15/07/2016 18:45, wrote:




It doesn't. It soaks in. It's very fast to do. But keep telling us
about things of which you know nothing as usual.



Buy a pump up garden sprayer, fill with water, pump up, set spray to
fine, spray large surface in a minute. Wait a few minutes to check
surface, spray again if required and then begin painting normally


All you have managed to achieve is to thin the first coat of paint
if it is emulsion. You'll now need a second coat to get good coverage!

Paint help for kitchen.
 

On Friday, 22 July 2016 10:22:59 UTC+1, Capitol wrote:
alan_m wrote:
On 15/07/2016 18:45, tabbypurr wrote:

It doesn't. It soaks in. It's very fast to do. But keep telling us
about things of which you know nothing as usual.

Buy a pump up garden sprayer, fill with water, pump up, set spray to
fine, spray large surface in a minute. Wait a few minutes to check
surface, spray again if required and then begin painting normally

I have wondered if that would work.

All you have managed to achieve is to thin the first coat of paint
if it is emulsion. You'll now need a second coat to get good coverage!

The paint isn't thinned at all, the water soaks into the board. It just stops the suction.


NT

Paint help for kitchen.
 

wrote in message
...
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 08:55:52 UTC+1, jim wrote:
tabbypurr Wrote in message:

Well, lets look at the facts. I've been using this painting method for
about 13 years, and it's served me just fine. The basic theory of glue
content in paint isn't complex, and the theory behind this method adds
up too. You on the other hand have never tried the method, have no valid
facts or argument to offer, and can only resort to verbal abuse, as is
your tendency. Not much more need be said.

But how many times have you done this?

I haven't kept count. At a rough estimate maybe a dozen times.




Why not get the next one up on YouTube?



--
Adam

Paint help for kitchen.
 

On Friday, 22 July 2016 13:07:21 UTC+1, tabbypurr wrote:
On Friday, 22 July 2016 10:22:59 UTC+1, Capitol wrote:

All you have managed to achieve is to thin the first coat of paint
if it is emulsion. You'll now need a second coat to get good coverage!

The paint isn't thinned at all, the water soaks into the board. It just stops the suction.

If you don't wait long enough before painting and there is till water on the surface, you don't get any paint where the water is, brush & paint just glide over the water.


NT