http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

"harry" wrote in message
...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

We deserve everything that we are going to get.
Dumb Britain.

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"Rod Speed" wrote in message
...
harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

Nothing to do with you either.
**** off back to your stinking crawling ******** of a country and die there.

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British citizen al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years later.
He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents knew or were complicit in his mistreatment and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay silent."

--
You know you've spent too much time on the computer when you spill milk and the first thing you think is, 'Edit, Undo.'

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 18:17:28 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:


"harry" wrote in message
...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

We deserve everything that we are going to get.
Dumb Britain.

Er.... agreed. Reluctantly.

--
You know you've spent too much time on the computer when you spill milk and the first thing you think is, 'Edit, Undo.'

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

That's odd, the newspaper hasn't removed all the "racist" comments.

--
You know you've spent too much time on the computer when you spill milk and the first thing you think is, 'Edit, Undo.'

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents knew or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.


--
You know you've spent too much time on the computer when you spill milk
and the first thing you think is, 'Edit, Undo.'

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents knew or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

--
I married my wife for her looks...but not the ones she's been giving me lately!

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents knew or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents knew or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

--
Why did kamikaze pilots wear helmets?

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years
later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents knew or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesnt decide stuff like that.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesnt do that stuff even if you dont.

On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years
later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents knew or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesnt decide stuff like that.

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years
later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents knew
or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesnt decide stuff like that.

His party does.

Nope, its the legal system which does.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesnt do that stuff even if you dont.

Yet you don't know who does.

Just told you who does.

On 10/10/2015 5:51 PM, harry wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.



Whatever the truth, after being slapped around as a terrorist for years
of my life, I might just consider who my enemies really are?

--
One click voting to change the world.
..https://secure.avaaz.org/en/index.php
Join Now! Be a part of people power.

Phase Conjugate Waves
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3wwdmwv0zk

....and, Why You Know Nothing
http://www.delusionalinsects.com/sty...-32/index.html

Startpage - The PRIVATE Search Engine!

On Sunday, 11 October 2015 04:18:41 UTC+1, RayL12 wrote:
On 10/10/2015 5:51 PM, harry wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.



Whatever the truth, after being slapped around as a terrorist for years
of my life, I might just consider who my enemies really are?



Clearly he was a terrorist and Bliar was so stupid as to think he was innocent.
Brain dead as are all socialists.

In article , Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blair‘s government, British
citizen al-Harith — who had pleaded his innocence — was let out
two years later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents
knew or were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesn‘t decide stuff like that.

His party does.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers‘ money to stay silent."

That wasn‘t due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesn‘t do that stuff even if you don‘t.

Yet you don't know who does.

-- When advised that France had announced it would not assist, become
allied with, or otherwise support the US in any war on Iraq, former US
Presidential candidate Ross Perot reportedly said: "Having to go to war
without France is sorta like having to go deer hunting without an
accordion".

However, France was involved in Gulf 1 and very successfully, too.

--
Please note new email address:

"charles" wrote in message
...
In article , Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blair's government, British
citizen al-Harith - who had pleaded his innocence - was let out
two years later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents
knew or were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesn't decide stuff like that.

His party does.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers' money to stay
silent."

That wasn't due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesn't do that stuff even if you don't.

Yet you don't know who does.

-- When advised that France had announced it would not assist, become
allied with, or otherwise support the US in any war on Iraq, former US
Presidential candidate Ross Perot reportedly said: "Having to go to war
without France is sorta like having to go deer hunting without an
accordion".

However, France was involved in Gulf 1

Only very marginally. Lots of troops, but they did **** all.

and very successfully, too.

Nope, they did **** all.

On 11/10/2015 00:24, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html


Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years
later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents
knew or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesnt decide stuff like that.

His party does.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesnt do that stuff even if you dont.

Yet you don't know who does.

Well, I'd imagine being in the illegal detention camp would probably turn
most people away from our cause, which is why I'm surprised its still being
used.
I guess if they could just make people vanish as per South American
dictators it might have actually been better!

Brian


--
From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active
Remember, if you don't like where I post
or what I say, you don't have to
read my posts! :-)
"harry" wrote in message
...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 03:05:18 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years
later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents knew
or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesnt decide stuff like that.

His party does.

Nope, its the legal system which does.

Under his party's decisions. They can change the law and overrule things.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesnt do that stuff even if you dont.

Yet you don't know who does.

Just told you who does.

You mentioned no names.

--
Why does a one-story brothel make more money than a two-story brothel?
Because there's no ****ing overhead.

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 03:05:18 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years
later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents
knew
or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesnt decide stuff like that.

His party does.

Nope, its the legal system which does.

Under his party's decisions.

Nope, it wasnt Labour that decided that.

They can change the law and overrule things.

Not that they can't retrospectively.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay
silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesnt do that stuff even if you dont.

Yet you don't know who does.

Just told you who does.

You mentioned no names.

Chase the names up for yourself.

On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:23:07 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 03:05:18 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government, British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two years
later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents
knew
or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesnt decide stuff like that.

His party does.

Nope, its the legal system which does.

Under his party's decisions.

Nope, it wasnt Labour that decided that.

They were in power, they had the ultimate decision.

They can change the law and overrule things.

Not that they can't retrospectively.

Can. In America it's called a presidential pardon or something.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay
silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesnt do that stuff even if you dont.

Yet you don't know who does.

Just told you who does.

You mentioned no names.

Chase the names up for yourself.

I know who it was, you're the one that thinks it was someone else.

--
My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch.

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:23:07 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 03:05:18 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government,
British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two
years
later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents
knew
or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesnt decide stuff like that.

His party does.

Nope, its the legal system which does.

Under his party's decisions.

Nope, it wasnt Labour that decided that.

They were in power, they had the ultimate decision.

Not with something like that they didnt.

They can change the law and overrule things.

Not that they can't retrospectively.

Can.

Nope.

In America it's called a presidential pardon or something.

Blair had no such thing.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay
silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesnt do that stuff even if you dont.

Yet you don't know who does.

Just told you who does.

You mentioned no names.

Chase the names up for yourself.

I know who it was,

Everyone can see that you dont.

you're the one that thinks it was someone else.

I'm one of the ones that knows it was someone else.

On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 23:48:02 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:23:07 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 03:05:18 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government,
British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two
years
later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents
knew
or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesnt decide stuff like that.

His party does.

Nope, its the legal system which does.

Under his party's decisions.

Nope, it wasnt Labour that decided that.

They were in power, they had the ultimate decision.

Not with something like that they didnt.

They can change the law and overrule things.

Not that they can't retrospectively.

Can.

Nope.

In America it's called a presidential pardon or something.

Blair had no such thing.

We can't be more ****ed up than America.

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay
silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesnt do that stuff even if you dont.

Yet you don't know who does.

Just told you who does.

You mentioned no names.

Chase the names up for yourself.

I know who it was,

Everyone can see that you dont.

You're the only ne in the conversation.

you're the one that thinks it was someone else.

I'm one of the ones that knows it was someone else.

THE one that THINKS it was someone else.

--
Patient: Doctor, I think I need glasses.
Madam: I think so, too. This is a brothel.

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 23:48:02 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 20:23:07 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 03:05:18 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 00:19:54 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 23:02:30 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:16:57 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 20:58:22 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

harry wrote

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ined-ISIS.html

Wonderful fellow that Mr Bliar.

Nothing to do with Blair.

"But after intense campaigning by Tony Blairs government,
British
citizen
al-Harith €“ who had pleaded his innocence €“ was let out two
years
later.

Yes, that was due to Blair.

He launched a compensation claim on the grounds British agents
knew
or
were complicit in his mistreatment

Yes, but that was not due to Blair, that was due to al-Harith.

Blair let him do so.

Blair got no say on that.

Nobody else could have come up with all that money.

Nothing to do with Blair, the PM doesnt decide stuff like that.

His party does.

Nope, its the legal system which does.

Under his party's decisions.

Nope, it wasnt Labour that decided that.

They were in power, they had the ultimate decision.

Not with something like that they didnt.

They can change the law and overrule things.

Not that they can't retrospectively.

Can.

Nope.

In America it's called a presidential pardon or something.

Blair had no such thing.

We can't be more ****ed up than America.

You are on that alone.

In spades with the House of Lords and Liz and Phil.

Why should some fat little german woman and her
wog husband get any say on anything at all, ever ?

and was handed up to £1million of taxpayers money to stay
silent."

That wasnt due to Blair either.

then who gave him it?

Someone other then Blair.

So you have no idea, you're guessing.

I know that the PM doesnt do that stuff even if you dont.

Yet you don't know who does.

Just told you who does.

You mentioned no names.

Chase the names up for yourself.

I know who it was,

Everyone can see that you dont.

You're the only ne in the conversation.

So you dont exist ? Figures.

you're the one that thinks it was someone else.

I'm one of the ones that knows it was someone else.

THE one that THINKS it was someone else.

The one that KNOWS it was someone else.