"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Friday, 3 July 2015 20:25:34 UTC+1, Rod Speed wrote:
"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Thursday, 2 July 2015 22:55:58 UTC+1, Rod Speed wrote:
"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, 1 July 2015 22:59:03 UTC+1, Rod Speed wrote:
"Nightjar.me.uk" "cpb"@ insert my surname here wrote in message
...
On 01/07/2015 21:13, Rod Speed wrote:
...
and is a major reason why vehicle insurance premiums are
significantly
higher for the under 25s. They simply don't have the same
awareness
of
danger.

That one is very arguable and it could just as easily be
inexperience that is the main reason for the higher claims...

That is a separate premium weighting, which is applied to anybody
who
has
been driving for less than one year, whatever their age.

But they don't necessarily get that good at driving in
a year on the question of avoiding having accidents.

They must do, insurance companies wouldn't get this wrong.

They have always got it wrong.

They've always managed to make a profit

Some of them have in fact failed to do that and have
gone bust or been swallowed up by better operations.

and some haven't, the ones that know what they're doing are still in
business
and those that have always got it wrong are no longer in business.

What I said, ****wit.

In fact most people get much better at driving after the first hour.

BULL****. And I have taught a number of people to drive.

If you don't know how to drive and teh first few minutes of instruction
tell you where the brake, accelarator and clutch are and how to use
them

Almost everyone knows those basics before they start learning to drive.

Knowing the basics and being able use them to good effect is where the
differnce lies,

Wrong, as always.

As you say you've taught people to drive and during
your instruction they haven't got any better at driving,

I never ever said anything even remotely like
that, you silly little pathological lying ****wit/
pathetic excuse for a lying troll.

If you watch someone starting a car up and driving off for the first
time
they
are likely to stall, not turn quick enough or too quick same with
breakaing
and accelerating, after an hour they're far better than they were.

But they are so distracted by that stuff that becomes automatic
with time that they are much more likely to have an accident
when something unexpected happens with the other traffic
like someone else doing something completely stupid.

More experinced drivers know that,

And learners in the second hour etc don't.

That's why it's called experiance and is ongoing.

Duh.

What they don't learn in the 1st hour they
might learn in their 2nd 3rd or 4th etc...

You quite sure you ain't one of those rocket scientist
pathetic excuses for a lying troll/****wit ?

Which doesn;t mean they are perfect driver after a year

In fact they are nothing like that, particularly if they are kids
who just drive a little locally like so many girls do and then
have to drive around in very heavy traffic in the business
center of a state or country capital etc.

So you agree then,

Duh.

the less you drive the worse you are likely to be at it in general.

That's not necessarily true either with cautious drivers.

a cautious isn't necessarily a safer driver,

Duh.

in some case they can cause more accidents.

But not necessarily for themselves.

Inexperienced drivers are more likely to be classed a cautious driver.

Even sillier and more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

http://www.brake.org.uk/news/15-fact...the-hard-facts

Why are young drivers more at risk?

Research shows that the combination of youth and
inexperience puts younger drivers at high risk.

What I said.

No it isn't this is what you said.

Everyone can see for themselves that it is.

Yep.


In fact most people get much better at driving after the first hour.

BULL****. And I have taught a number of people to drive.

You've claimed people don't get better the more they drive,

Everyone can see for themselves that you are lying
thru your teeth, as you always do when you have
got done like a ****ing dinner, as you always are.

reams of your pathetic excuse for a troll that any 2 year
old could leave for dead flushed where it belongs

If you can't do any better than this pathetic excuse for
a troll, I'll be flushing your **** where it belongs, again

On Monday, 6 July 2015 11:49:22 UTC+1, Rod Speed wrote:
"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Friday, 3 July 2015 20:25:34 UTC+1, Rod Speed wrote:
"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Thursday, 2 July 2015 22:55:58 UTC+1, Rod Speed wrote:
"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...
On Wednesday, 1 July 2015 22:59:03 UTC+1, Rod Speed wrote:
"Nightjar.me.uk" "cpb"@ insert my surname here wrote in message
...
On 01/07/2015 21:13, Rod Speed wrote:
...
and is a major reason why vehicle insurance premiums are
significantly
higher for the under 25s. They simply don't have the same
awareness
of
danger.

That one is very arguable and it could just as easily be
inexperience that is the main reason for the higher claims...

That is a separate premium weighting, which is applied to anybody
who
has
been driving for less than one year, whatever their age.

But they don't necessarily get that good at driving in
a year on the question of avoiding having accidents.

They must do, insurance companies wouldn't get this wrong.

They have always got it wrong.

They've always managed to make a profit

Some of them have in fact failed to do that and have
gone bust or been swallowed up by better operations.

and some haven't, the ones that know what they're doing are still in
business
and those that have always got it wrong are no longer in business.

What I said, ****wit.

Nothing like what you saidn as usual.


In fact most people get much better at driving after the first hour.

BULL****. And I have taught a number of people to drive.

If you don't know how to drive and teh first few minutes of instruction
tell you where the brake, accelarator and clutch are and how to use
them

Almost everyone knows those basics before they start learning to drive..

Knowing the basics and being able use them to good effect is where the
differnce lies,

Wrong, as always.

right as always, otherwise you'd only have a theory test in order to get your driving license wouldn't you.


As you say you've taught people to drive and during
your instruction they haven't got any better at driving,

I never ever said anything even remotely like
that, you silly little pathological lying ****wit/
pathetic excuse for a lying troll.

Here what you said.

In fact most people get much better at driving after the first hour.

BULL****. And I have taught a number of people to drive.

I thionk people get better at driving with practice, but when you teach them they don;t get any better at driving do they, so what are the point of driving lessons if they don't teach you how to drive. All you'd need is a multi-choice Q/A on a wastie to get a license, why do you think they waste time and money employing people to 'test' others driving ability.





What they don't learn in the 1st hour they
might learn in their 2nd 3rd or 4th etc...

You quite sure you ain't one of those rocket scientist
pathetic excuses for a lying troll/****wit ?

More so than you are it seems.


Duh.


the less you drive the worse you are likely to be at it in general.

That's not necessarily true either with cautious drivers.

a cautious isn't necessarily a safer driver,

Duh.

Having problems understanding, thought so.


in some case they can cause more accidents.

But not necessarily for themselves.

True, as those drivers that haevn't exceeded the 40MPH
might cause prob;mes on amotorway when other vehicals are draving at 60+

Some drunken ****wit desperately cowering behind
whisky-dave wrote just
the pathetic excuse for a troll that always pours from
the back of it. All flushed where it belongs, as warned.

On Monday, 6 July 2015 21:06:30 UTC+1, Rod Speed wrote:
Some drunken ****wit desperately cowering behind
whisky-dave wrote just
the pathetic excuse for a troll that always pours from
the back of it. All flushed where it belongs, as warned.

Says the person that teaches others to drive and then says they are not better drivers after being taught by him, that says a lot doesn't it. :-D

Some drunken ****wit desperately cowering behind
whisky-dave wrote just
the pathetic excuse for a troll that always pours from
the back of it. All flushed where it belongs, as warned.