Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Fluorescent light
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:30:18 +0000, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article , Fredxxx writes: On 26/06/2015 21:00, Brian-Gaff wrote: Less flicker with the hf, but more radio interference probably. Brian Given that even electronic ballasts are driven by 50Hz mains, why would they produce less flicker? There is no energy storage as such in electronic ballasts. Yes there is - first thing they do is rectify mains to 340VDC, and use a storage capacitor. Secondly, the high frequency driving circuit does not care about having some ripple on the DC supply, since it's driving the tubes at constant current. If the capacitor significantly fails, you can get 100Hz ripple creeping through - you can't see that, but the light output will be noticably reduced. It's rare though. Thirdly, you don't get 50Hz flicker which you can with magnetic ballasts (due to the tube partially rectifying near end of life, and from tube ends sometimes too). The tube runs at 20-50kHz instead, which apart from not being visible, actually means the tube won't extinguish as the current passes through the zero point, because that's a shorter duration than the mercury ion decay time (which is of the order 1/10000th of a second). Which is the very reason why using 10 to 20 KHz ac current instead of 50 or 60Hz gives something like a 10% or so boost in lamp efficacy. IIRC, large department stores were one of the early adopters of using a dedicated high frequency lighting supply feed to modified luminaries. They didn't go to the extreme of 10KHz but, afaicr, chose a common 3KHz supply generated by a Thyristor based frequency converter[1] which allowed the use of lighter more efficient inductive ballast chokes in each luminary. Nevertheless, the higher frequency supply did improve the efficacy of the tubes, reducing running costs sufficiently to justify the capital investment in the system. [1] The Thyristor based frequency conversion technology used by such department stores required the use of a three phase supply afaicr. I suppose the less than ideal choice of 3KHz was a compromise over conversion and distribution losses that would have otherwise been incurred with a 10KHz supply. -- Johnny B Good |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Fluorescent light
In article ,
Johnny B Good writes: On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 22:30:18 +0000, Andrew Gabriel wrote: In article , Fredxxx writes: On 26/06/2015 21:00, Brian-Gaff wrote: Less flicker with the hf, but more radio interference probably. Brian Given that even electronic ballasts are driven by 50Hz mains, why would they produce less flicker? There is no energy storage as such in electronic ballasts. Yes there is - first thing they do is rectify mains to 340VDC, and use a storage capacitor. Secondly, the high frequency driving circuit does not care about having some ripple on the DC supply, since it's driving the tubes at constant current. If the capacitor significantly fails, you can get 100Hz ripple creeping through - you can't see that, but the light output will be noticably reduced. It's rare though. Thirdly, you don't get 50Hz flicker which you can with magnetic ballasts (due to the tube partially rectifying near end of life, and from tube ends sometimes too). The tube runs at 20-50kHz instead, which apart from not being visible, actually means the tube won't extinguish as the current passes through the zero point, because that's a shorter duration than the mercury ion decay time (which is of the order 1/10000th of a second). Which is the very reason why using 10 to 20 KHz ac current instead of 50 or 60Hz gives something like a 10% or so boost in lamp efficacy. IIRC, large department stores were one of the early adopters of using a dedicated high frequency lighting supply feed to modified luminaries. They didn't go to the extreme of 10KHz but, afaicr, chose a common 3KHz supply generated by a Thyristor based frequency converter[1] which allowed the use of lighter more efficient inductive ballast chokes in each luminary. Nevertheless, the higher frequency supply did improve the efficacy of the tubes, reducing running costs sufficiently to justify the capital investment in the system. [1] The Thyristor based frequency conversion technology used by such department stores required the use of a three phase supply afaicr. I suppose the less than ideal choice of 3KHz was a compromise over conversion and distribution losses that would have otherwise been incurred with a 10KHz supply. Probably the RFI too. The full boost in efficiency is normally quoted as occuring at 5kHz. Note that in the EU, you won't get any more light from an electronic ballast because EU rules now require them to all underrun the tubes by the same amount for energy efficiency reasons. If your ballast is marked EEI=AA1 or AA2, then it underruns its tubes, and if it isn't marked with one of these efficiency ratings, it's illegal to import or manufacture in the EU. -- Andrew Gabriel [email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup] |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Fluorescent light
In article ,
Fredxxx wrote: On 26/06/2015 21:00, Brian-Gaff wrote: Less flicker with the hf, but more radio interference probably. Brian Given that even electronic ballasts are driven by 50Hz mains, why would they produce less flicker? The clue is in the name - HF ballast. Stands for high frequency. Transformers are smaller and cheaper to make for HF. There is no energy storage as such in electronic ballasts. -- *If at first you don't succeed, destroy all evidence that you tried * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Fluorescent light
On 27/06/2015 01:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article , Fredxxx wrote: On 26/06/2015 21:00, Brian-Gaff wrote: Less flicker with the hf, but more radio interference probably. Brian Given that even electronic ballasts are driven by 50Hz mains, why would they produce less flicker? The clue is in the name - HF ballast. Stands for high frequency. Transformers are smaller and cheaper to make for HF. HF is the drive to the tube, where as you say inductors are smaller and cheaper. On the other hand capacitors are expensive. If someone asked me to make a HF ballast, the first thing I would do is eliminate such a component that is both costly and unreliable; and allow the HF to be modulated at 100Hz. Hell, I could even design a unit to have near perfect Power Factor. After looking at circuits, I do see that most have a ~33uF 400V cap to provide a "smoothed" nominal 325V DC supply. I'm just surprised. There is no energy storage as such in electronic ballasts. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Fluorescent light
Interesting that for what I'd call a normal florry with say a 5ft or so
tube, neither LedHut or TLC sell replacement LED tubes for. Wonder why that is? -- *The older you get, the better you realize you were. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Fluorescent light
In message , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes Interesting that for what I'd call a normal florry with say a 5ft or so tube, neither LedHut or TLC sell replacement LED tubes for. Wonder why that is? LEDhut do: http://www.ledhut.co.uk/led-strip-li...ight-1500mm-5f t.html -- Chris French |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Fluorescent light
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 01:16:42 +0100, Chris French wrote:
In message , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes Interesting that for what I'd call a normal florry with say a 5ft or so tube, neither LedHut or TLC sell replacement LED tubes for. Wonder why that is? LEDhut do: http://www.ledhut.co.uk/led-strip-li...-24w-led-tube- light-1500mm-5f t.html I note that it has a 90L/W efficiency and the need to slightly modify the wiring in the luminary (a common requirement for many such 'drop in' tube replacements). At ten or more times the price of a regular tube, I do wonder at the point of such an exercise right now. In my view, it makes more sense to wait for the 200 to 300 lumens per watt LEDs to finally materialise in the stores sometime in the next 12 months or so according the the promises being made by the likes of Cree and Philips Lighting Technology. One more replacement fluorescent tube aught see you through till then. -- Johnny B Good |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Fluorescent light
在 2015年6月26日星期五 UTC+8下午3:40:59,Corporal Jones写道:
Need a new Fluorescent light fitting for the kitchen as the old one has given up, what are the pros and cons between a standard ballast and a high frequency one, looking to get one from Wickes. Barry Qianshenglight.com can supply high quality LED lighting such as spot light, tube light, panel light, strip light and street light, our email: |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Convert fluorescent shop light to grow light? | Home Repair | |||
Outside fluorescent light | Home Repair | |||
converting kitchen fluorescent light to recessed light | Home Repair | |||
fluorescent light | Home Ownership | |||
Fluorescent Light, Need help | Woodturning |