Oh, more tax waste then?

"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.

On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

In message , Tim Watts
writes
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.

No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Well said Tim! :-)

Not to mention a similar situation here, where the attraction is
Balmoral. Doubtless the same at Windsor and Sandringham.

--
Graeme

On 02/05/15 13:41, News wrote:
In message , Tim Watts
writes
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.

No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Well said Tim! :-)

Not to mention a similar situation here, where the attraction is
Balmoral. Doubtless the same at Windsor and Sandringham.


And everyone conveniently forgets the civil list is in exchange for
handing over a very large amount of lands...

"Tim Watts" wrote in message
...
On 02/05/15 13:41, News wrote:
In message , Tim Watts
writes
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.

No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Well said Tim! :-)

Not to mention a similar situation here, where the attraction is
Balmoral. Doubtless the same at Windsor and Sandringham.


And everyone conveniently forgets the civil list is in exchange for
handing over a very large amount of lands...

Than which their forefathers "stole" in the first place.

On 02/05/15 13:54, Huge wrote:
On 2015-05-02, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:41, News wrote:
In message , Tim Watts
writes
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.

No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Well said Tim! :-)

Not to mention a similar situation here, where the attraction is
Balmoral. Doubtless the same at Windsor and Sandringham.


And everyone conveniently forgets the civil list is in exchange for
handing over a very large amount of lands...

And if we emulated the French and lopped off their useless, inbred, empty,
German heads, we could have the land *and* get rid of the Civil List.



and have President Blair?

No thanks - and yes, you know it WOULD happen...

"Huge" wrote in message
...
On 2015-05-02, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:41, News wrote:
In message , Tim Watts
writes
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.

No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Well said Tim! :-)

Not to mention a similar situation here, where the attraction is
Balmoral. Doubtless the same at Windsor and Sandringham.


And everyone conveniently forgets the civil list is in exchange for
handing over a very large amount of lands...

And if we emulated the French

I would rather not.

--
Adam

On Saturday, 2 May 2015 13:55:00 UTC+1, Huge wrote:
And if we emulated the French

What would you like to emulate about the French? Their plumbing?

Owain

"Huge" wrote in message
...
And if we emulated the French and lopped off their useless, inbred, empty,
German heads, we could have the land *and* get rid of the Civil List.

The atrocities committed by the Norman invaders and their descendant spawn
far exceed anything done by the Nazis, and set back the well-being of the
people of
Brit by several centuries.

Had the Nazis been successful in over-running this country, would those
silly
and ridiculous folk who kowtow to the monarchy with simpering adulation
now be equally exuberant in their arse-licking for Hitler's great
grandchild?

On 02/05/2015 13:24, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for
the UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

"Bod" wrote in message
...
On 02/05/2015 13:24, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for the
UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

How much funding have they ever given you?

On 02/05/2015 13:45, Bod wrote:

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for
the UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

Is it 62p? Have you seen the amount security that accompanies a Royal
when they turn up anywhere?

The same number of tourists would visit if we didn't have a Royal
Family. Chinese tourists appear to be bussed out on mass to out-of-town
retail outlets on trading estates.

--
mailto: news {at} admac {dot] myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

"alan_m" wrote in message
...
On 02/05/2015 13:45, Bod wrote:

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for
the UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

Is it 62p? Have you seen the amount security that accompanies a Royal
when they turn up anywhere?

And all the other paid grovellers and fawners.

The same number of tourists would visit if we didn't have a Royal Family.

That is unlikely, particularly in the years where there is a major royal
event.

Chinese tourists appear to be bussed out on mass to out-of-town retail
outlets on trading estates.

Nothing compared with what happens with a major royal event year.

Sooner Liz carks it the better for tourism IMO.

On 02/05/2015 22:31, alan_m wrote:
On 02/05/2015 13:45, Bod wrote:

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for
the UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

Is it 62p? Have you seen the amount security that accompanies a Royal
when they turn up anywhere?

The same number of tourists would visit if we didn't have a Royal
Family. Chinese tourists appear to be bussed out on mass to out-of-town
retail outlets on trading estates.

Hmm!
"A new report today reveals that Buckingham Palace is the "dream"
activity for people in 15 out of 19 countries surveyed by tourist chiefs
at Visit Britain, including Australians, Americans, the Chinese,
Italians and the Mexicans."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...-tourists.html

On 02/05/15 13:52, Huge wrote:

62p wasted.




2 things to get a debate going:

Farage
The Royals.

I say Charles should dump Camilla, get gay and marry Nigel, then become
king and prince consort. I'd pay for that just to see the head explodage ;-

On 02/05/15 14:15, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:52, Huge wrote:

62p wasted.




2 things to get a debate going:

Farage
The Royals.

I say Charles should dump Camilla, get gay and marry Nigel, then become
king and prince consort. I'd pay for that just to see the head explodage
;-

Oh that's not fair. Look Charles is bear of very little brain, but he's
finally found someone who actually likes him for what he is. A kindly
well meaning old fool. Leave em be.

Nigel would make a decent enough king.



--
Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except for the
rare story of which you happen to have first-hand knowledge. €“ Erwin Knoll

In article ,
Huge writes:
On 2015-05-02, Bod wrote:
On 02/05/2015 13:24, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for
the UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

62p wasted.

Income to the exchequer from royal estates is around £260M/year.
15% of this is paid back to the royal family to fund their official
duties, including upkeep of the buildings/estates. (This replaced the
civil list payments and payments from various government departments
for things like royal travel which were abolished a few years ago.)

Policing, security, and other costs for royals are around £300M/year.

A normal year brings in around £500M of foreign tourist revenue
for royal events. In a year with a royal wedding, jubilee, birth, etc,
this figure exceeds £1B.

So, they are always significantly profitable for the UK, and in special
years, they are extremely profitable for the UK.

--
Andrew Gabriel
[email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup]

On 02/05/2015 17:14, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article ,
Huge writes:
On 2015-05-02, Bod wrote:
On 02/05/2015 13:24, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for
the UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

62p wasted.

Income to the exchequer from royal estates is around £260M/year.
15% of this is paid back to the royal family to fund their official
duties, including upkeep of the buildings/estates. (This replaced the
civil list payments and payments from various government departments
for things like royal travel which were abolished a few years ago.)

Policing, security, and other costs for royals are around £300M/year.

A normal year brings in around £500M of foreign tourist revenue
for royal events. In a year with a royal wedding, jubilee, birth, etc,
this figure exceeds £1B.

So, they are always significantly profitable for the UK, and in special
years, they are extremely profitable for the UK.

Spot on.

"Andrew Gabriel" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Huge writes:
On 2015-05-02, Bod wrote:
On 02/05/2015 13:24, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for
the UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

62p wasted.

Income to the exchequer from royal estates is around £260M/year.
15% of this is paid back to the royal family to fund their official
duties, including upkeep of the buildings/estates. (This replaced the
civil list payments and payments from various government departments
for things like royal travel which were abolished a few years ago.)

Policing, security, and other costs for royals are around £300M/year.

A normal year brings in around £500M of foreign tourist revenue
for royal events. In a year with a royal wedding, jubilee, birth, etc,
this figure exceeds £1B.

So, they are always significantly profitable for the UK, and in special
years, they are extremely profitable for the UK.

Please tell us how this has benefited the people who do not live in the
south.

On 02/05/15 17:14, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article ,
Huge writes:
On 2015-05-02, Bod wrote:
On 02/05/2015 13:24, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for
the UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

62p wasted.

Income to the exchequer from royal estates is around £260M/year.
15% of this is paid back to the royal family to fund their official
duties, including upkeep of the buildings/estates. (This replaced the
civil list payments and payments from various government departments
for things like royal travel which were abolished a few years ago.)

Policing, security, and other costs for royals are around £300M/year.

A normal year brings in around £500M of foreign tourist revenue
for royal events. In a year with a royal wedding, jubilee, birth, etc,
this figure exceeds £1B.

So, they are always significantly profitable for the UK, and in special
years, they are extremely profitable for the UK.


Interesting...

"Andrew Gabriel" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Huge writes:
On 2015-05-02, Bod wrote:
On 02/05/2015 13:24, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for
the UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

62p wasted.

Income to the exchequer from royal estates is around £260M/year.
15% of this is paid back to the royal family to fund their official
duties, including upkeep of the buildings/estates. (This replaced the
civil list payments and payments from various government departments
for things like royal travel which were abolished a few years ago.)

Policing, security, and other costs for royals are around £300M/year.

A normal year brings in around £500M of foreign tourist revenue
for royal events. In a year with a royal wedding, jubilee, birth, etc,
this figure exceeds £1B.

So, they are always significantly profitable for the UK, and in special
years, they are extremely profitable for the UK.

So you are another socialist, having government do that.

"Huge" wrote in message
...
On 2015-05-02, Bod wrote:
On 02/05/2015 13:24, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Yup and it's a fact that our Royal family generate far more money for
the UK than it costs each person in the UK.
62p per person per year to fund our Royal family. A bargain.

62p wasted.

You must be a (brain dead) socialist.
Don't know the difference between an asset and a liability.

"Tim Watts" wrote in message
...
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

**** poor was that.
More money is spent on the parasites by the tax payer than is raised by the
tourists looking at **** House.

"Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote in message ...


"Tim Watts" wrote in message
...
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

**** poor was that.
More money is spent on the parasites by the tax payer than is raised by the
tourists looking at **** House.

Aw, you are one sad puddle of ****.

"Richard" wrote in message
...
"Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote in message ...


"Tim Watts" wrote in message
...
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

**** poor was that.
More money is spent on the parasites by the tax payer than is raised by
the tourists looking at **** House.

Aw, you are one sad puddle of ****.

Are you a cyclist?

On 02/05/15 13:24, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

+1. One T bliar can do a lot worse than one royal baby.


--
Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except for the
rare story of which you happen to have first-hand knowledge. €“ Erwin Knoll

"Tim Watts" wrote in message
...
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Exactly so.
And Scotty Broon ****ed up the economy.
And Blair/Broon between them borrowed shed loads of cash to buy votes from
arseholes.
The same pair ****ed up the NHS with PFI schemes and changing GP's
contracts.

And let arsholes from third world/ex-commie coutries flood the UK because
they might vote socialist.
And caused massive divisions in the UK with "devolution".

Yet there are brain dead clowns here want to vote for them?????

On Sat, 02 May 2015 13:24:07 +0100 Tim Watts wrote :
No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted
**** knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

No one wanted? Conservative MPs, unlike their Labour opposites,
voted overwhelmingly in favour of the Iraq war and no doubt the
Daily Mail and friends were all behind them. If they'd followed the
LibDem opposition to it, the war - or UK involvement in it -
probably wouldn't have happened.

--
Tony Bryer, Greentram: 'Software to build on',
Melbourne, Australia www.greentram.com

"Huge" wrote in message
...
On 2015-05-02, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Someone else who's never been to Versailles. It's rammed with tourists, and
the French executed their royals hundreds of years ago, which is the best
thing that could happen to them.


In France, Nicolas Sarkozy set an annual budget for his establishment at
the Elysée of 110 million euros (£90 million). Last year, the French head
of state's expenses were audited for the first time since the reign of
Louis XVI; it revealed a flower bill of 275,809 euros and 3,000 euros
in fines for late payment of electricity and gas.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...r-Britain.html


The diminutive French President runs up a gigantic £10,000 daily food and drinks
bill on entertaining guests

Mr Sarkozy’s total expenditure in 2011 was about £95million – including £200,000
on flowers. His fleet of 121 cars cost £275,000 a year to fuel, he has an
expensive taste in clothes and wears a Rolex.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...nicolas-674876

HTH


michael adams

....

On 02/05/2015 14:20, michael adams wrote:

Mr Sarkozy’s total expenditure in 2011 was about £95million – including £200,000
on flowers. His fleet of 121 cars cost £275,000 a year to fuel, he has an
expensive taste in clothes and wears a Rolex.



And the equivalent UK Government department spending on similar is?

Flowers approx £200,000 per year
Cars £3.8 million
etc.




--
mailto: news {at} admac {dot] myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

In article ,
Huge writes:
Someone else who's never been to Versailles. It's rammed with tourists, and
the French executed their royals hundreds of years ago, which is the best
thing that could happen to them.

That's probably why the French* spend so much money coming
here to see our royals. They might not bother if they still
had their own.

*Americans and French being the biggest spending foreign
tourists here.

--
Andrew Gabriel
[email address is not usable -- followup in the newsgroup]

On 02/05/2015 18:46, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article ,
Huge writes:
Someone else who's never been to Versailles. It's rammed with tourists, and
the French executed their royals hundreds of years ago, which is the best
thing that could happen to them.

That's probably why the French* spend so much money coming
here to see our royals. They might not bother if they still
had their own.

*Americans and French being the biggest spending foreign
tourists here.

Yup and one of the main attractions is our Royal family/Buck house and
also our palaces and castles.

"Bod" wrote in message
...
On 02/05/2015 18:46, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
In article ,
Huge writes:
Someone else who's never been to Versailles. It's rammed with tourists,
and
the French executed their royals hundreds of years ago, which is the
best
thing that could happen to them.

That's probably why the French* spend so much money coming
here to see our royals. They might not bother if they still
had their own.

*Americans and French being the biggest spending foreign
tourists here.

Yup and one of the main attractions is our Royal family/Buck house and
also our palaces and castles.

Their castles, not our castles. Their palaces, not our palaces.
Keep tugging the old forelock.

From a not so local rag:
http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/ne...girl-1-7241791
Take a look at the comments. This is the real world, not your bubble.

"Huge" wrote in message
...
On 2015-05-02, Tim Watts wrote:
On 02/05/15 13:16, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Yes.



No - that tax waste was when Tony B Liar, elected no less, wasted ****
knows how much on 2 wars noone wanted.

Net benefit - everyone hates even more than you hate the South.

At least Buck House has arse loads of tourists swanning around outside
paying into our economy.

Someone else who's never been to Versailles. It's rammed with tourists,
and
the French executed their royals hundreds of years ago, which is the best
thing that could happen to them.

You are brain dead.

There would be evenmore if the French royal family still existed,

Anyway you are wrong. The French royal family resumed after Napoleon was
defeated.

Who incidently tried to set up his own dynasty.
As revolutionaries do.
ie,it was a coup, not surge of democracy.

In article ,
Broadback wrote:
Oh, more tax waste then?

But it should cut down on their spare bedroom tax that everyone has to pay
on publicly owned houses. Or have I missed something?

--
*Someday, we'll look back on this, laugh nervously and change the subject

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

On Sat, 02 May 2015 12:40:00 +0100, Broadback wrote:

Oh, more tax waste then?

Have the Con/Lib coalition claimed credit yet?

Happened on their watch.

Yours cynically

Dave R


--
Windows 8.1 on PCSpecialist box

"David" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 02 May 2015 12:40:00 +0100, Broadback wrote:

Oh, more tax waste then?

Have the Con/Lib coalition claimed credit yet?

Happened on their watch.

Yours cynically

Dave R

Unsurprisingly, she could only stand two and a half hours of being in
labour.

"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Kate lives on an estate, has no job and two kids.

She'll be on the Jeremy Kyle show next week

"Phil L" wrote in message
...

"Broadback" wrote in message
...
Oh, more tax waste then?

Kate lives on an estate, has no job and two kids.

She'll be on the Jeremy Kyle show next week

Is she the one with the big tits, or am I thinking of another royal slut?