Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house
http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted1.jpg Yep he has removed the ceiling joists and the back wall. This is a photo of the neighbours house to show you what it looked liked before he started http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted9.jpg More photos of the nice works here http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted2.jpg http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted3.jpg I call someone with an acro http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted4.jpg Time to fit the new doors - just needs leveling up on the left hand side http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted5.jpg All levelled up and you can see how much the wall has moved by http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted6.jpg Use the acro in reverse - just needs a couple of volunters to hold it iin place until it bites http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. Enjoy -- Adam |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/11/14 08:18, ARW wrote:
Dunno what their final solution will be. Sounds like a couple of tie timbers (aka ceiling joists) would do nicely ![]() Just how often do you get sidetracked off the main job? ;-) |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tim Watts" wrote in message
... On 17/11/14 08:18, ARW wrote: Dunno what their final solution will be. Sounds like a couple of tie timbers (aka ceiling joists) would do nicely ![]() Just how often do you get sidetracked off the main job? ;-) On this job - lots of times:-). At work not so often. Although when the agency labourer ****ed off home at midday I downed my snips and I fire stopped the building before the building inspector arrived. And it passed the inspection with flying colours. -- Adam |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My then neighbour some years ago decided to remove all the downstairs walls
and make it open plan, and then build a single storey extension on the back and knocked the back wall of the house out as well. All in a terrace of four on one of the inner houses next to mine. Using mainly mates from the trade he did jack things up and put the right bits of old iron in, but still managed to damage all our roofs cementing and crack the render on the outside walls as the structure moved slightly with the change in weight bearing. Also he came unstuck by burying the soil pipe from the toilet under the concrete floor of the extension and had to have it dug up. Very noisy that was. I do sometimes wonder if enough consideration is payed to neighbouring property when folk get the urge to do 'home improvements'. Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "ARW" wrote in message ... "Tim Watts" wrote in message ... On 17/11/14 08:18, ARW wrote: Dunno what their final solution will be. Sounds like a couple of tie timbers (aka ceiling joists) would do nicely ![]() Just how often do you get sidetracked off the main job? ;-) On this job - lots of times:-). At work not so often. Although when the agency labourer ****ed off home at midday I downed my snips and I fire stopped the building before the building inspector arrived. And it passed the inspection with flying colours. -- Adam |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/11/2014 08:18, ARW wrote:
On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted1.jpg Yep he has removed the ceiling joists and the back wall. 'kinell, lucky the whole lot did not just splay out at the top and dump the whole roof into the room under it! Use the acro in reverse - just needs a couple of volunters to hold it iin place until it bites Nice recovery... http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. Would be worth sticking that quick overview into the wiki to go with the photos. Nicely illustrates what the "floor/ceiling" joists do in traditional roof framing. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/11/2014 11:30, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , John Rumm wrote: On 17/11/2014 08:18, ARW wrote: On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted1.jpg Yep he has removed the ceiling joists and the back wall. 'kinell, lucky the whole lot did not just splay out at the top and dump the whole roof into the room under it! Use the acro in reverse - just needs a couple of volunters to hold it iin place until it bites Nice recovery... http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. Would be worth sticking that quick overview into the wiki to go with the photos. Nicely illustrates what the "floor/ceiling" joists do in traditional roof framing. And, for constructional know-nothings like me, it would be useful to have a brief overview of how things would be done differently, if there'd been no extension there and one wanted to build what the DIYer had been trying to convert it to, i.e., an extension with a vaulted ceiling. The main issue is one of "thrust". Nail a couple of bits of wood together to form an apex, and then add weight to the top (tiles etc), you will tend to flatten out the apex - pushing the free ends apart (and if you are unlucky, pushing the walls over into the bargain). Normally a roof truss or framed roof will have cross members that will act in tension to resist the spread of the base. So even if the apex joint is a relatively weak nailed one, it all stays together since the apex joint is only subject to compression rather than rotational moments. I'm curious since the house I owned in California had a vaulted ceiling main living-room. If you want a vaulted ceiling, then you need to deal with the thrust - either eliminate it or cope with it. One way is to modify the ceiling structure to eliminate the thrust - either with some tie beams across (don't need them on every rafter, and they can be quite high up making an A frame). You could use a ring frame of some form around the perimeter at the base. This works well for hipped vaulted ceilings with 4 sloping sides. The counters the thrust by placing the 4 hip rafters into compression. Alternatively with a gable wall at each end you can stick a heavy ridge beam in to transfer the loads from the tops of all the rafters onto the game walls. The loads from the bottom end of the rafters is then carried by the side walls. All those will eliminate the thrust. An alternative is to design the supporting structure to be able to cope with the outward thrust, such that it can supply the restraint to the roof's thrust. (so perpendicular walls, or other buttress arrangements for the side walls) -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/11/2014 12:00, John Rumm wrote:
Alternatively with a gable wall at each end you can stick a heavy ridge beam in to transfer the loads from the tops of all the rafters onto the game walls. The loads from the bottom end of the rafters is then carried ^^^^ make that "gable" -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-11-17, John Rumm wrote:
On 17/11/2014 12:00, John Rumm wrote: Alternatively with a gable wall at each end you can stick a heavy ridge beam in to transfer the loads from the tops of all the rafters onto the game walls. The loads from the bottom end of the rafters is then carried ^^^^ make that "gable" Oh, I thought you meant where you hang the dartboard. ;-) |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You could always try you hand at a flying buttress.Go all gothic
|
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/11/2014 13:09, fred wrote:
You could always try you hand at a flying buttress.Go all gothic Gothic designed frequently sidestepped the issue with gothic arches, which transfer all the weight downwards and have little or no sideways thrust. (unlike the rounder Norman arches that predated them) -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tim Streater" wrote in message
.. . In article , John Rumm wrote: On 17/11/2014 08:18, ARW wrote: On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted1.jpg Yep he has removed the ceiling joists and the back wall. 'kinell, lucky the whole lot did not just splay out at the top and dump the whole roof into the room under it! Use the acro in reverse - just needs a couple of volunters to hold it iin place until it bites Nice recovery... http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. Would be worth sticking that quick overview into the wiki to go with the photos. Nicely illustrates what the "floor/ceiling" joists do in traditional roof framing. And, for constructional know-nothings like me, it would be useful to have a brief overview of how things would be done differently, if there'd been no extension there and one wanted to build what the DIYer had been trying to convert it to, i.e., an extension with a vaulted ceiling. I'm curious since the house I owned in California had a vaulted ceiling main living-room. Did it have a missing gable wall:-)?. -- Adam |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/11/2014 12:55, Tim Streater wrote:
I'm trying to picture it, sold it more than 20 years ago. Allegedly it had been built in the 20s by a property developer for his mistress. English cottage look to it. Lathe and plaster everywhere with knob/tube wiring in the walls. No, the living room had a wall with a gable at the far end, with a loft behind at the top and bedrooms behind, underneath. Then at the other end there was a gable built over a set of doors that led to the entrance hall. I don't think there were any A-frame beams. Can you remember what the roof was made of? Might it have been covered with felt tiles - or somesuch - which would have been a lot lighter than slates or concrete tiles? -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/11/2014 17:15, Roger Mills wrote:
On 17/11/2014 12:55, Tim Streater wrote: I'm trying to picture it, sold it more than 20 years ago. Allegedly it had been built in the 20s by a property developer for his mistress. English cottage look to it. Lathe and plaster everywhere with knob/tube wiring in the walls. No, the living room had a wall with a gable at the far end, with a loft behind at the top and bedrooms behind, underneath. Then at the other end there was a gable built over a set of doors that led to the entrance hall. I don't think there were any A-frame beams. Can you remember what the roof was made of? Might it have been covered with felt tiles - or somesuch - which would have been a lot lighter than slates or concrete tiles? It might have had steel "V" plates at the apex to discourage the rafters from flattening. |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/11/2014 17:24, Tim Streater wrote:
In article , Roger Mills wrote: On 17/11/2014 12:55, Tim Streater wrote: I'm trying to picture it, sold it more than 20 years ago. Allegedly it had been built in the 20s by a property developer for his mistress. English cottage look to it. Lathe and plaster everywhere with knob/tube wiring in the walls. No, the living room had a wall with a gable at the far end, with a loft behind at the top and bedrooms behind, underneath. Then at the other end there was a gable built over a set of doors that led to the entrance hall. I don't think there were any A-frame beams. Can you remember what the roof was made of? Might it have been covered with felt tiles - or somesuch - which would have been a lot lighter than slates or concrete tiles? One slope gave into the loft, the other to the outside. The vaulted ceiling was T&G much like a floor. I think there was tar paper or similar, and then there were redwood shakes [1] above that. If I'd lived there much longer I'd have had the roof redone, it's typically good for 25 years IIRC. Course that meant no insulation possible for a good chunk of the roof. [1] Tiles, essentially. But made of redwood. Yes, I think they were generally called shingles. Would have been much lighter than 'conventional' tiles, as I suspected. -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Tim Streater
writes In article , John Rumm wrote: On 17/11/2014 08:18, ARW wrote: On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted1.jpg Yep he has removed the ceiling joists and the back wall. 'kinell, lucky the whole lot did not just splay out at the top and dump the whole roof into the room under it! Use the acro in reverse - just needs a couple of volunters to hold iin place until it bites Nice recovery... http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. Would be worth sticking that quick overview into the wiki to go with the photos. Nicely illustrates what the "floor/ceiling" joists do in traditional roof framing. And, for constructional know-nothings like me, it would be useful to have a brief overview of how things would be done differently, if there'd been no extension there and one wanted to build what the DIYer had been trying to convert it to, i.e., an extension with a vaulted ceiling. A couple of flying buttresses and you are sorteed. -- Chris French |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tim Streater" wrote in message .. . In article , John Rumm wrote: On 17/11/2014 08:18, ARW wrote: On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted1.jpg Yep he has removed the ceiling joists and the back wall. 'kinell, lucky the whole lot did not just splay out at the top and dump the whole roof into the room under it! Use the acro in reverse - just needs a couple of volunters to hold it iin place until it bites Nice recovery... http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. Would be worth sticking that quick overview into the wiki to go with the photos. Nicely illustrates what the "floor/ceiling" joists do in traditional roof framing. And, for constructional know-nothings like me, it would be useful to have a brief overview of how things would be done differently, if there'd been no extension there and one wanted to build what the DIYer had been trying to convert it to, i.e., an extension with a vaulted ceiling. I'm curious since the house I owned in California had a vaulted ceiling main living-room. The traditional alternative is purlins supporting the rafters. There may need to be an intermediate truss/other support. |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I continue to be amazed how many people managed to stay alive well
into adulthood with a complete inability to perceive the world around them and notice things like weight at X does stuff to Y, how many digits their town's telephone numbers have, containers cannot have additional contents added until existing passengers depart, etc. jgh |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:18:30 +0000, ARW wrote:
On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted1.jpg Yep he has removed the ceiling joists and the back wall. This is a photo of the neighbours house to show you what it looked liked before he started http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted9.jpg More photos of the nice works here http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted2.jpg http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted3.jpg I call someone with an acro http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted4.jpg Time to fit the new doors - just needs leveling up on the left hand side http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted5.jpg All levelled up and you can see how much the wall has moved by http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted6.jpg Use the acro in reverse - just needs a couple of volunters to hold it iin place until it bites http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. Enjoy You haven't yet told us why. -- Windows 8.1 on PCSpecialist box |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, November 17, 2014 8:19:28 AM UTC, ARW wrote:
i.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. That has to be DIY save of the year :-) Enjoy -- Adam |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/11/2014 01:10, Adam Aglionby wrote:
On Monday, November 17, 2014 8:19:28 AM UTC, ARW wrote: i.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. That has to be DIY save of the year :-) Enjoy -- Adam If they want it to have a vaulted ceiling then some wire ties to replace the wood they have hacked out would be easy to fit and sould look better than bolting some 4x2 timbers back. |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18/11/2014 15:25, Dennis@home wrote:
On 18/11/2014 01:10, Adam Aglionby wrote: On Monday, November 17, 2014 8:19:28 AM UTC, ARW wrote: i.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. That has to be DIY save of the year :-) Enjoy -- Adam If they want it to have a vaulted ceiling then some wire ties to replace the wood they have hacked out would be easy to fit and sould look better than bolting some 4x2 timbers back. or make a structural truss to hide behind the plastic triangle of the window. Use that to support a beefed up ridge beam that could be inserted under the existing ridge, and hung from a metal shoe bolted to the wall at the other end. -- Cheers, John. /================================================== ===============\ | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------| | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \================================================= ================/ |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/11/2014 08:18, ARW wrote:
On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted1.jpg Yep he has removed the ceiling joists and the back wall. This is a photo of the neighbours house to show you what it looked liked before he started http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted9.jpg More photos of the nice works here http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted2.jpg http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted3.jpg I call someone with an acro http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted4.jpg Time to fit the new doors - just needs leveling up on the left hand side http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted5.jpg All levelled up and you can see how much the wall has moved by http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted6.jpg Use the acro in reverse - just needs a couple of volunters to hold it iin place until it bites http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted7.jpg Screw in a few timbers to hold it in place - including a ceiling joist and it looks OK. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted8.jpg Dunno what their final solution will be. Enjoy Good job it wasn't snowing. Saying that it looks like some migratory H5 carriers would have flattened that if they had visited. |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, November 17, 2014 8:19:28 AM UTC, ARW wrote:
On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house Do you have an (approx) width of the rear extension, and the deflection of the wall in mm? A structural engineer I know would be interested in this. Owain |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... On Monday, November 17, 2014 8:19:28 AM UTC, ARW wrote: On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house Do you have an (approx) width of the rear extension, and the deflection of the wall in mm? A structural engineer I know would be interested in this. The rear extension is about 3m wide. Now the joiner who helped with the acro's (the one who built the internal studding) says that the tops of the wall were both about 20mm out (ie both 20mm out) but the RHS wall (facing from the outside) was not plumb when he built the internal studding and that the LH wall had moved further. The LH wall had a crack appear at floor level. This picture of the LH wall shows (to the best of my ability) how the top and rear of that wall splayed out more than the rest of the wall. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=File:026.JPG -- Adam |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:43:37 +0000, ARW wrote:
On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house Do you have an (approx) width of the rear extension, and the deflection of the wall in mm? A structural engineer I know would be interested in this. The rear extension is about 3m wide. Now the joiner who helped with the acro's (the one who built the internal studding) says that the tops of the wall were both about 20mm out (ie both 20mm out) but the RHS wall (facing from the outside) was not plumb when he built the internal studding and that the LH wall had moved further. The LH wall had a crack appear at floor level. This picture of the LH wall shows (to the best of my ability) how the top and rear of that wall splayed out more than the rest of the wall. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=File:026.JPG At what stage do you say "Sod this", step well away, and await (or help along) the inevitable? |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Adrian" wrote in message
... On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:43:37 +0000, ARW wrote: On Saturday I arrived at work to discover this at the customers house Do you have an (approx) width of the rear extension, and the deflection of the wall in mm? A structural engineer I know would be interested in this. The rear extension is about 3m wide. Now the joiner who helped with the acro's (the one who built the internal studding) says that the tops of the wall were both about 20mm out (ie both 20mm out) but the RHS wall (facing from the outside) was not plumb when he built the internal studding and that the LH wall had moved further. The LH wall had a crack appear at floor level. This picture of the LH wall shows (to the best of my ability) how the top and rear of that wall splayed out more than the rest of the wall. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=File:026.JPG At what stage do you say "Sod this", step well away, and await (or help along) the inevitable? When they stop paying me:-) It's not their rash attitude to diy that bothers me - it's their OCD with socket and spotlight positions. Sometimes I feel like saying "If you want a socket in position x then just ****ing put an x on the wall where you want it and I will put the socket there. I do not need or want a lecture on feng shui or your mathematical calculations on the best position for the socket - however as you are paying me by the hour I will listen to your ******** before fitting the socket." -- Adam |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:55:09 PM UTC, ARW wrote:
It's not their rash attitude to diy that bothers me - it's their OCD with socket and spotlight positions. Ta for t'other info. So why have they listed to the 'you're not allowed to DIY electrics' mantra of the PartPee-ophiles but ignored the 'don't make your house fall down' whisper of common sense? Owain |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-11-19, Adrian wrote:
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 18:43:37 +0000, ARW wrote: The rear extension is about 3m wide. Now the joiner who helped with the acro's (the one who built the internal studding) says that the tops of the wall were both about 20mm out (ie both 20mm out) but the RHS wall (facing from the outside) was not plumb when he built the internal studding and that the LH wall had moved further. The LH wall had a crack appear at floor level. This picture of the LH wall shows (to the best of my ability) how the top and rear of that wall splayed out more than the rest of the wall. http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=File:026.JPG At what stage do you say "Sod this", step well away, and await (or help along) the inevitable? *Before* it falls on his head? At least so far... ;-) |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 08:18:30 -0000, "ARW"
wrote: http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?...:Avaulted5.jpg That is a remarkable example of prime stupidity. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What's your most stupid DIY cockup? | UK diy |