Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
I have to make a series of holes for fence posts, in ground that's extremely
stony: basically it's a mix of clay and shingle. I've manually dug holes in the past and it's very hard going, so I'm wondering about buying or hiring an augur, either powered or hand-operated. Previous discussions on this subject have seen varying recommendations but no-one mentioned ground quite as stone-infested as mine: would a mechanical hole-borer be a worthwhile investment? And if so, petrol or electric? Many thanks. Bert |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 21/07/2014 10:47, Bert Coules wrote:
I have to make a series of holes for fence posts, in ground that's extremely stony: basically it's a mix of clay and shingle. I've manually dug holes in the past and it's very hard going, so I'm wondering about buying or hiring an augur, either powered or hand-operated. Previous discussions on this subject have seen varying recommendations but no-one mentioned ground quite as stone-infested as mine: would a mechanical hole-borer be a worthwhile investment? And if so, petrol or electric? Many thanks. Bert You could try a manual one, they are not very expensive, I think mine came from Toolstation, and that might give you an idea on the prospect of success. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/POST-HOLE-...em56543e 93e8 I would certainly hire before buying if I was considering a powered one. I get the impression that hydraulic ones attached to several tons of tractor will cope with most things. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 21/07/2014 10:47, Bert Coules wrote:
I have to make a series of holes for fence posts, in ground that's extremely stony: basically it's a mix of clay and shingle. I've manually dug holes in the past and it's very hard going, so I'm wondering about buying or hiring an augur, either powered or hand-operated. Previous discussions on this subject have seen varying recommendations but no-one mentioned ground quite as stone-infested as mine: would a mechanical hole-borer be a worthwhile investment? And if so, petrol or electric? Many thanks. Bert I've found manual ones - in conjunction with a long spike to dislodge stones - reasonably good. But it's not a quick job. I fear that you may end up going on a few involuntary roundabout rides if you use a powered one! A corkscrew on the back of a tractor would do the job well, but that ain't going to be cheap. -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
Thanks to Newshound and Roger for the replies and advice. Toolstation's
"Auger Post Hole Drill" is a very reasonable £15.10, so I'll give that a go first I think, in conjunction with the suggested long spike. The tractor-based solution is very attractive but a tad impractical in my particular setting, I'm afraid. Bert |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
"Bert Coules" wrote:
Thanks to Newshound and Roger for the replies and advice. Toolstation's "Auger Post Hole Drill" is a very reasonable £15.10, so I'll give that a go first I think, in conjunction with the suggested long spike. The tractor-based solution is very attractive but a tad impractical in my particular setting, I'm afraid. Bert Don't discount a basic post hole digger. http://toolstoday.co.uk/product/1014...FUgCwwodIg0AVA Very useful tool and as long as your rocks aren't too big, should cope well. Tim |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 21/07/2014 13:38, Tim+ wrote:
"Bert wrote: Thanks to Newshound and Roger for the replies and advice. Toolstation's "Auger Post Hole Drill" is a very reasonable £15.10, so I'll give that a go first I think, in conjunction with the suggested long spike. The tractor-based solution is very attractive but a tad impractical in my particular setting, I'm afraid. Bert Don't discount a basic post hole digger. http://toolstoday.co.uk/product/1014...FUgCwwodIg0AVA Very useful tool and as long as your rocks aren't too big, should cope well. Tim Should work well in conjunction with an auger - for removing the loose spoil. -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
Tim and Roger, thanks for that. Toolstation have a similar one, with a link
to it from the auger page. I glanced at it but now I'll take a longer look. Bert |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
/Should work well in conjunction with an auger - for removing the loose spoil. /q
Shurely pulling up the auger now and then will remove the spoil? Jim K |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 21/07/2014 16:27, JimK wrote:
/Should work well in conjunction with an auger - for removing the loose spoil. /q Shurely pulling up the auger now and then will remove the spoil? Jim K In theory. But if the ground is a bit crumbly, resulting in a hole a bit bigger than the auger, some spoil will fall off the edges of the spiral as you lift it out. -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
/n theory. But if the ground is a bit crumbly, resulting in a hole a bit
bigger than the auger, some spoil will fall off the edges of the spiral as you lift it out. /q Meh, if the ground is as bad as the OP says, I would expect him to be regularly on his knees with arm down the hole scooping out asstd debris, never mind pratting about with a separate tool... Jim K |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
It sounds as though the sensible approach might be to get hold of a manual
auger and try that first. If the holes do start falling in on themselves then I can add the hole-digger. That's assuming that I can get any joy from my soil with hand-power only... Bert |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 21/07/2014 13:53, Roger Mills wrote:
On 21/07/2014 13:38, Tim+ wrote: "Bert wrote: Thanks to Newshound and Roger for the replies and advice. Toolstation's "Auger Post Hole Drill" is a very reasonable £15.10, so I'll give that a go first I think, in conjunction with the suggested long spike. The tractor-based solution is very attractive but a tad impractical in my particular setting, I'm afraid. Bert Don't discount a basic post hole digger. http://toolstoday.co.uk/product/1014...FUgCwwodIg0AVA Very useful tool and as long as your rocks aren't too big, should cope well. Tim Should work well in conjunction with an auger - for removing the loose spoil. I had one of these before I got an auger, and didn't find it particularly effective. Strength (yours), technique, and ground condition will all have an influence. I did find it useful when trying to locate a new spring (in order to decide where drain pipe needed to go), for removing material displaced by the auger and a mattock. |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
A few of the holes I'm going to dig have to be just too close to a nearby
wall to allow the use of a manual auger. The hole-digger (or a mechanical auger) would however both be usable in the space. Bert |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:10:52 -0700 (PDT), JimK
wrote: /n theory. But if the ground is a bit crumbly, resulting in a hole a bit bigger than the auger, some spoil will fall off the edges of the spiral as you lift it out. /q Meh, if the ground is as bad as the OP says, I would expect him to be regularly on his knees with arm down the hole scooping out asstd debris, never mind pratting about with a separate tool... Jim K If it is that dry and crumbly then a vacuum cleaner can be useful if it is not too delicate, I found a small vacuum at jumble sale intended to collect soot ,that Ald/ lidli sell for about £35 . At the jumble I paid £5 and can abuse the thing with a clear conscience such as if the soil is dry enough vacuuming holes to plant beans etc in. G.Harman |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
If it is that dry and crumbly then a vacuum cleaner can be useful if
it is not too delicate... That's a technique which I don't think would ever have occurred to me. Thanks. Bert |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 21/07/2014 20:39, Bert Coules wrote:
A few of the holes I'm going to dig have to be just too close to a nearby wall to allow the use of a manual auger. The hole-digger (or a mechanical auger) would however both be usable in the space. Bert I'm pretty sure mine doesn't have a welded handle but a tube going through an eye, locked with a set screw. So by removing the screw it should be possible to go close to a wall. It might be the Draper one from Amazon and this is what their Q&A says: Q: Is the handle movable along its length (or welded in) as I need some holes near a stone wall Many thanks A: The handle can be moved from left to right so you should be able to use this close to a wall although it may take a while to make a deep hole. |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
Bert Coules wrote:
If it is that dry and crumbly then a vacuum cleaner can be useful if it is not too delicate... That's a technique which I don't think would ever have occurred to me. Thanks. Around Nottingham they have found vacuum excavation very useful for the works to extend the tram route. It means that they can expose services with less risk of damage. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFEc2NBbB8U Chris -- Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK Plant amazing Acers. |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 21/07/2014 20:39, Bert Coules wrote:
A few of the holes I'm going to dig have to be just too close to a nearby wall to allow the use of a manual auger. The hole-digger (or a mechanical auger) would however both be usable in the space. Bert If you are talking about stones bigger than a half bat then you will struggle with the manual digger and will need to break them up. I use a meter long masonry drill in a 5kg sds drill. Smaller than that and it should only take about 10-15 minutes to do a 3 foot deep hole. |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
"newshound" wrote:
I'm pretty sure mine doesn't have a welded handle but a tube going through an eye, locked with a set screw. So by removing the screw it should be possible to go close to a wall. It might be the Draper one from Amazon and this is what their Q&A says: That would be ideal, thanks for the info. I'll check the Toolstation model and if that doesn't have the adjustable handle I'll go for the Draper one. Bert |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 22/07/2014 16:49, Dennis@home wrote:
On 21/07/2014 20:39, Bert Coules wrote: A few of the holes I'm going to dig have to be just too close to a nearby wall to allow the use of a manual auger. The hole-digger (or a mechanical auger) would however both be usable in the space. Bert If you are talking about stones bigger than a half bat then you will struggle with the manual digger and will need to break them up. I use a meter long masonry drill in a 5kg sds drill. Smaller than that and it should only take about 10-15 minutes to do a 3 foot deep hole. Agreed. I was certainly assuming only stones which would "pass through" the screw. |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
Dennis,
If you are talking about stones bigger than a half bat... That wasn't a term I was familiar with, but having looked it up I can say that the stones in my spoil are all considerably smaller than half of a standard house brick. Smaller than that and it should only take about 10-15 minutes to do a 3 foot deep hole. And since three feet is deeper than I need to go, that's also good news. Many thanks. Bert |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
Chris J Dixon wrote:
Around Nottingham they have found vacuum excavation very useful for the works to extend the tram route. That's fascinating Chris, many thanks. Bert |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 22/07/2014 16:08, Chris J Dixon wrote:
Around Nottingham they have found vacuum excavation very useful for the works to extend the tram route. It means that they can expose services with less risk of damage. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFEc2NBbB8U Chris Thanks for that - a very interesting video. -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:06:57 +0100, Bert Coules wrote:
Smaller than that and it should only take about 10-15 minutes to do a 3 foot deep hole. And since three feet is deeper than I need to go, that's also good news. 3' deep is about what you should have for a 8' to 9 post above ground. A rough rule of thumb for post depth is 1/3 in the ground. 4' high fence post 2' in the ground, depends what this fence is for. Is it to keep livestock caontained or just "decorative"? For the latter 18" would probably do. -- Cheers Dave. |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
Dave Liquorice wrote:
A rough rule of thumb for post depth is 1/3 in the ground... depends what this fence is for. Is it to keep livestock contained or just "decorative"? Purely decorative (or at least not holding back any animal life) and with posts 30" high. By the one-third rule that seems to suggest just 10" in the ground, which sounds pretty minimal. I might go a bit deeper than that, ground conditions permitting. Bert |
#26
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 21/07/2014 13:38, Tim+ wrote:
"Bert Coules" wrote: Thanks to Newshound and Roger for the replies and advice. Toolstation's "Auger Post Hole Drill" is a very reasonable £15.10, so I'll give that a go first I think, in conjunction with the suggested long spike. The tractor-based solution is very attractive but a tad impractical in my particular setting, I'm afraid. Bert Don't discount a basic post hole digger. http://toolstoday.co.uk/product/1014...FUgCwwodIg0AVA Very useful tool and as long as your rocks aren't too big, should cope well. Tim That's my weapon of choice, along with a demolition crowbar http://www.wickes.co.uk/Demolition-C...-1-5m/p/167422 -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#27
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:28:48 +0100, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 21/07/2014 13:38, Tim+ wrote: "Bert Coules" wrote: Thanks to Newshound and Roger for the replies and advice. Toolstation's "Auger Post Hole Drill" is a very reasonable £15.10, so I'll give that a go first I think, in conjunction with the suggested long spike. The tractor-based solution is very attractive but a tad impractical in my particular setting, I'm afraid. Bert Don't discount a basic post hole digger. http://toolstoday.co.uk/product/1014...FUgCwwodIg0AVA Very useful tool and as long as your rocks aren't too big, should cope well. Tim That's my weapon of choice, along with a demolition crowbar http://www.wickes.co.uk/Demolition-C...-1-5m/p/167422 Same here. I got the digger based, IIRC, on your recommendation, then relised that slighly stoney clay was a bit too much for it. Got out the ancient crowbar and jut broke up the soil and scooped it out. The crowbar is double ended: one is a point and the other a slightly angled chisel, so more versatile than a straight one. -- Peter. The gods will stay away whilst religions hold sway |
#28
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:10:39 +0100, Bert Coules wrote:
A rough rule of thumb for post depth is 1/3 in the ground... depends what this fence is for. Is it to keep livestock contained or just "decorative"? Purely decorative (or at least not holding back any animal life) and with posts 30" high. By the one-third rule that seems to suggest just 10" in the ground, which sounds pretty minimal. Aye, I think 10" / 30" is probably about the point where the linear 1/3 rule breaks down. Having said that good firm ground and a hole only just big enough to take the post would probably be OK. -- Cheers Dave. |
#29
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 23/07/2014 09:27, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 08:10:39 +0100, Bert Coules wrote: A rough rule of thumb for post depth is 1/3 in the ground... depends what this fence is for. Is it to keep livestock contained or just "decorative"? Purely decorative (or at least not holding back any animal life) and with posts 30" high. By the one-third rule that seems to suggest just 10" in the ground, which sounds pretty minimal. Aye, I think 10" / 30" is probably about the point where the linear 1/3 rule breaks down. Having said that good firm ground and a hole only just big enough to take the post would probably be OK. I would think you could just hammer them in to that depth. |
#30
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
Thanks for all the new replies. The long-handled digger seems to be
emerging as the favourite, rather than the auger which was my first instinctive choice. I'll look at both. Bert |
#31
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 24/07/2014 10:59, Bert Coules wrote:
Thanks for all the new replies. The long-handled digger seems to be emerging as the favourite, rather than the auger which was my first instinctive choice. I'll look at both. Bert You can never have too many tools. Get them both, and the crowbar (much more useful than you might at first think). |
#32
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
"newshound" wrote:
...and the crowbar (much more useful than you might at first think). Before this conversation, I thought that a crowbar was a shortish affair with a slightly angled chisel-like blade at one end and a curved hook at the other. Obviously not. Thanks for the advice. Bert |
#33
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
In message , Bert
Coules writes "newshound" wrote: ...and the crowbar (much more useful than you might at first think). Before this conversation, I thought that a crowbar was a shortish affair with a slightly angled chisel-like blade at one end and a curved hook at the other. Obviously not. Thanks for the advice. Bert I think that's a jemmy. -- bert |
#34
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On 24/07/2014 11:59, Bert Coules wrote:
"newshound" wrote: ...and the crowbar (much more useful than you might at first think). Before this conversation, I thought that a crowbar was a shortish affair with a slightly angled chisel-like blade at one end and a curved hook at the other. Obviously not. Thanks for the advice. Bert Desmond & I call ours 'the toothpick' :-) -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#35
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On Thu, 24 Jul 2014 23:41:49 +0100, bert wrote:
In message , Bert Coules writes "newshound" wrote: ...and the crowbar (much more useful than you might at first think). Before this conversation, I thought that a crowbar was a shortish affair with a slightly angled chisel-like blade at one end and a curved hook at the other. Obviously not. Thanks for the advice. Bert I think that's a jemmy. or a wrecking bar(?) -- Peter. The gods will stay away whilst religions hold sway |
#36
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
On Friday, July 25, 2014 8:16:42 AM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 24/07/2014 11:59, Bert Coules wrote: "newshound" wrote: ...and the crowbar (much more useful than you might at first think). Before this conversation, I thought that a crowbar was a shortish affair with a slightly angled chisel-like blade at one end and a curved hook at the other. Obviously not. Thanks for the advice. Bert Desmond & I call ours 'the toothpick' :-) -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk We had to do this many years ago.The ground had been backfilled with a mixture of tailings and large rocks. We used a petrol driven auger. Two man job.. It will kick like a mule when its hits an obstruction but if you keep at it it will do the job. You might have to withdraw it occasionally to remove a rock but thats no biggie.Just make sure that there is plenty of room if it kicks back, It could pin you against a wall very easily. Be happy because in the end your posts are going to be firmly held |
#37
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Holes for posts
Well, I'm now back from Wickes/Toolstation armed with a post-hole digger and
a demolition crowbar, the second of which surprised me both by its weight, which is considerable, and by having its non-pointed end bent over at an angle: not only does it not look like that in the website illustration, one of the customer reviews talks about bashing it home with a sledgehammer, which sounds quite tricky. But we'll see. Fred, thanks for the petrol-driven auger suggestion, but as you can see I've decided to try the manual route, at least to begin with. Bert |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dropped posts... Accuracy of opened up holes... | Metalworking | |||
Drilling holes in PT posts | Home Repair | |||
Distance between posts for 5 x 3 posts and 6ft featheredge | UK diy | |||
Multiple holes on Aluminium Posts? | Metalworking | |||
Drilling holes in vinyl fence posts??? | Home Repair |