Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Searching internet for stolen photographs
Andy Burns wrote:
Harry Bloomfield wrote: Now supposing you find a web site, which contains some photographs, photographs which you are fairly certain will have been lifted from another website - is there any way to search the internet, to find where the phograhphs might have been stolen from? Well, TinEye and Google both have reverse image search, they won't necessarily tell you which is the original source, but they'll tell you which sources are similar or identical. That could be a bit of a bugger when looking through the photos on the readers wives section of Fiesta and Razzle. How good is this software? -- Adam |
#42
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Searching internet for stolen photographs
On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 6:55:55 AM UTC+1, Andy Burns wrote:
The Natural Philosopher wrote: If they were in the public domain with zero actual copyrighting or anything then arguable tough ****. They haven't been stolen because no ownership was ever asserted. In the UK you don't have to assert copyright, it's automatic. In the UK, and in all other countries which are signatories to the Berne convention. That has included the USA for more than 20 years now. |
#43
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Searching internet for stolen photographs
On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:27:57 PM UTC+1, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
I uploaded some of my photos to wikipedia for an article. Within a day, they were flagged as stolen, so I investigated, and they had found them on a website (albeit a different size/resolution). I had to explain that was my website, and then they were OK with them. I posted an old picture of an experimental/never-flew British helicopter on another site, in the hope someone could identify it. They did. Shortly afterwards, a Wikipedia contributor had lifted the image and used it without asking, having made up a story that it had been taken by a serviceman (it hadn't) and so was in the public domain (it wasn't and isn't). I complained, Wikipedia deleted it. If the **** had had the courtesy to ask, I'd have probably let him use it. |
#44
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Searching internet for stolen photographs
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:44:29 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote: If they were in the public domain with zero actual copyrighting or anything then arguable tough ****. They haven't been stolen because no ownership was ever asserted. ********. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Off Topic: Clark Little Photographs | Woodworking | |||
Can you tell how this bathroom light switch should be wired based on these photographs? | Home Repair | |||
Can you tell how this bathroom light switch should be wired based on these photographs? | Home Ownership | |||
Photographs of metal items look rusty | Metalworking | |||
"How not to" photographs | UK diy |